DAYA SAING USAHA TANI PADI DI KECAMATAN SUSUKAN KABUPATEN SEMARANG MENGGUNAKAN METODE PAM (POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX)

Yoanes Krisostomos Nargy Justra Septaris; Tinjung Mary Prihtanti

doi:10.36728/afp.v19i1.814

DAYA SAING USAHA TANI PADI DI KECAMATAN SUSUKAN KABUPATEN SEMARANG MENGGUNAKAN METODE PAM (POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX)

JURNAL ILMIAH AGRINECA ◽

10.36728/afp.v19i1.814 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

pp. 1-13

Author(s):

Yoanes Krisostomos Nargy Justra Septaris ◽

Tinjung Mary Prihtanti

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Comparative Advantage ◽

Government Policy ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

International Market ◽

Government Policies ◽

Agricultural Policies ◽

The Government ◽

The Impact ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix

Competitiveness requires a country to excel in competitive and comparative advantage. The commodities that need to be developed are rice. This commodity was chosen because it is a commodity that the government prioritizes and is full of agricultural policies. The purpose of this study is to determine profits, competitive and comparative advantages and the impact of government policies. This research was conducted in March 2018 in Susukan District, Semarang Regency. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique with a total of 30 respondents. Data analysis using Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). The results showed that farming has a competitive and comparative advantage seen from the value of PCR and DRCR less than 1 but the DRCR value of 0.935 means that farming is feared no longer has comparative advantage if there is no interference from government policy. For the government, the policy of subsidizing fertilizers and pesticides is continued so that the farming business remains competitive but the use of fertilizer by farmers should be reduced so that it is in accordance with recommendations from the Agriculture Service or researchers. Marketers should target the domestic market because the price of rice in the international market is lower than in the country.

Competitive Advantage Analysis of Soybean Farming in Indonesia

Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan ◽

10.23917/jep.v17i2.1641 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 143

Author(s):

Bernadeta Julia Wijaya Puspita Sari ◽

Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika Prajanti

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Competitive Advantage ◽

Comparative Advantage ◽

Government Policy ◽

Qualitative Method ◽

Government Policies ◽

Farm Income ◽

The Impact ◽

The Village ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix

Soybean is one of the commodities strategy, because the demand for soy in the international and domestic market has always increased. To fill the domestic soybean demand by importing soybeans. This is a serious problem because it will have an impact on the decline in farm income due to import soybeans. The aim of this study was to determine whether soybean farming in the village Banaran, Pracimantoro, Wonogirihas a competitive advantage and comparative advantage, as well as to determine the impact of government policy on soybean farming.The method used is qualitative method by interviews with soybean farmers. Results of interview with farmers processed by Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM), which produced the analysis forms of competitive advantage, comparative advantage, and the impact of government policy.Results from this study are of soybean farming in the village Banaran, Pracimantoro, Wonogiri only has a competitive advantage.Overall government policies protective of soybean farming in the village Banaran.

ANALISA DAYA SAING DAN PELUANG EKSPOR WORTEL DI KELOMPOK TANI KATATA, PANGALENGAN, JAWA BARAT

Agricore: Jurnal Agribisnis dan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Unpad ◽

10.24198/agricore.v2i1.15077 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Arief Budiman ◽

Lucyana Trimo ◽

Eti Suminartika ◽

Sri Fatimah

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Competitive Advantage ◽

Comparative Advantage ◽

Government Policy ◽

Export Policy ◽

Long Time ◽

The Government ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix ◽

Actual Price

ABSTRAKKomoditas wortel telah lama menjadi andalan produksi salahsatu kelompok tani Katata yang beradadi Pangalengan, Jawa Barat. Produksinya memiliki kualitas dan kuantitas yang tidak hanya baikdalam pemenuhan lokal saja, namun juga terhadap pemenuhan Ekspor. Tujuan dari penelitian iniadalah untuk mendapatkan pengatahuan daya saing dan peluang ekspor dari dampak kebijakanpemerintah pada usahatani wortel di Kelompok Tani Katata. Penelitian dilakukan di Kelompok TaniKatata, Pangalengan, Kabupaten Bandung. Data dianalisis dengan Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM),untuk menghitung keunggulan komparatif, keunggulan kompetitif dan dampak kebijakan pemerintahdengan menggunakan harga aktual dan harga bayangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwapengusahaan wortel di Kelompok Tani Katata memiliki keunggulan kompetitif karena nilai PCRsebesar 0,062 atau PCR kurang dari satu (PCR < 1). Hal yang sama menunjukkan bahwa wortelmemiliki keunggulan komparatif dengan nilai DRC 0,060 atau DRC kurang dari satu (DRC < 1).Kebijakan pemerintah dinilai menghambat ekspor output dan adanya proteksi terhadap input lokaldibuktikan dengan nilai NPCO dan NPCI yang kurang dari satu. Secara keseluruhan kebijakanpemerintah yang berlaku saat ini masih belum mendukung dalam hal pengembangan danpeningkatan keunggulan komparatif dan keunggulan kompetitif pengusahaan komoditas wortel diKelompok Tani Katata.Kata kunci: daya saing, wortel, ekspor, Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM)ABSTRACTCarrot commodity has been each mainstay production belong to Katata’s farmer group inPangalengan, West Java since long time ago. Their production have good quality and quantitywhich have potential for locally and export. The main of this research is to know the competitivenessand impact of government policy of the commodities carrots (case study Katata, subdistrictPangalengan, county level Bandung).Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) is the method to analyze data ofthis research to measure the comparative advantage, competitive advantage, and impact ofgovernment policy using actual price and estimation price.The result indicate that carrost in Katatahave a competitive advantage because PCR value of 0.062 or PCR of less than one (PCR < 1).Itsalso indicate that carrot has a comparative advantage with the value of the DRC 0.060 or DRC lessthan a (DRC < 1).The government policy is rated to inhibit the outpur export and protection againtslocale input by the value of an NPCO and NPCI is less than one.Overall the policy is still notsupporting development and improvement comparative advantage and competitive advantage forcarrot business in Katata.Keywords: competitiveness, carrots, export, Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM)

ANALISIS DAYASAING JAGUNG DI WILAYAH SENTRA PRODUKSI DI INDONESIA DENGAN PENDEKATAN POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX (PAM)

Forum Agribisnis ◽

10.29244/fagb.8.2.137-154 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 137-154

Author(s):

Ni Wayan Surya Darmayanti ◽

Ratna Winandi ◽

Netti Tinaprilla

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Government Policy ◽

West Java ◽

Maize Production ◽

Central Java ◽

South Sulawesi ◽

The Government ◽

Production Areas ◽

The Impact ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix

The objectives of this research are to analyze competitiveness and the impact of government’s policy of maize farming in several central productions in Indonesia. This research was conducted to analyze maize competitiveness using PAM (Policy Analysis Matrix) method. Data sample was conducted at four maize production centers, including East Java, Central Java, West Java, and South Sulawesi. The results show the forth centre have competitiveness. This showed by PCR values in some production areas less than 1 and for competitive advantage, indicated by DRCR values in production areas also less than 1. Analysis of the Government policy aspect, the government has been able to provide positive incentives for maize farming in North Jawa, Centre of Jawa and West Java. The impact of government policy on inputs and outputs simultaneously can provide a positive incentive to farmers at maize production sites in Java. But the government’s policy hasn’t been able to provide for output in Sulawesi Selatan. The conclusion is the fourth centres of maize production have competitive and comparative advantage. Sulawesi Selatan has high comparative advantages, so Sulawesi Selatan has high potential to improve maize farming.

Impact of Agricultural Policies on the Egyptian Cotton Sector Using Policy Analysis Matrix

Asian Journal of Economics Business and Accounting ◽

10.9734/ajeba/2020/v15i130207 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 50-59

Author(s):

Mohamed A. ELsamie ◽

Tarek Ali ◽

Moataz Eliw

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Economic Performance ◽

Agricultural Policies ◽

Foreign Markets ◽

Cotton Crop ◽

The Government ◽

The Impact ◽

Egyptian Cotton ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix ◽

Nominal Protection

The Egyptian cotton sector is considered one of the most important export strategic sectors in Egypt, where the Egyptian government takes many agricultural policies that lead to an increase in exports of that crop to foreign markets, as these policies that the government takes have a major impact on the producers of that crop, and this study examined the impact of Agricultural policies on the Egyptian cotton crop, using the policy analysis matrix to know the effect of government policies on the producers of that crop and also the impact of those policies on Egyptian exports of the cotton crop, and the results showed that when comparing the financial and economic performance of the elements of cotton crop production, the financial performance was less than the economic performance on all cost items except workers' wages [1], indicating that the Government is subsidizing cost items, thereby supporting cotton producers. Comparing the average variable costs of cotton during the study period financially and economically shows that the financial valuation exceeds the economic valuation, with the average variable costs of $418.36 at market prices [2] , amounting to $368.84 at world prices, The results also showed that the Nominal Protection Coefficient for the output of the Egyptian cotton in the period under study (2000-2017) was 0.74, indicating the lack of a fair production policy during that period, perhaps due to the fact that the value of the Nominal Protection Coefficient for the production of the Egyptian cotton crop was lower than the correct one. It also indicated that the value of the Nominal Protection Coefficient for production supplies was 0.92, which indicates a decrease in government support for that crop compared to the value of the effective protection factor of 0.72 during the period under study (2000-2017). This indicates that the factor of the cost of domestic resources for the Egyptian cotton crop is 0.47, and this indicates that the Egyptian cotton has a comparative advantage in foreign markets, the study recommended Maintaining the foreign markets of the Egyptian cotton crop, as it has a global comparative and competitive advantage, and provides the state with foreign exchange, which contributes significantly to the Egyptian national economy.

Effectiveness of the Management of Pajale Food Security Program (Rice, Corn, and Soybean) In West Aceh Regency

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding ◽

10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1778 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (6) ◽

pp. 517

Author(s):

Amiruddin Amiruddin ◽

Fajri Fajri ◽

Muhammad Rusdi

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Analytical Method ◽

Total Population ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Sustainable Food ◽

Self Sufficiency ◽

The Matrix ◽

The Government ◽

The Impact ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and impact of the Pajale (Rice, Corn, and Soybean) of the UPSUS (Special Effort) Program on the production of rice, corn, and soybean in West Aceh regency. This study conducted in West Aceh Regency. The method used to collect the data is the random sampling technique. The number of samples determined using Solvin formula. However, due to the limited time, energy, and cost, the researcher only took 188 samples from the total population of 584 respondents. The analytical method used to answer the first hypothesis is using the effectiveness formula, as follows: The Effectiveness of Program = (R/T) x 100%. The analytical method used to answer the second hypothesis is using the PAM (Policy Analysis Matrix) approach. This method used to determine the impact of the UPSUS Pajale Program. The matrix of PAM consists of two identities that are the profit identity and the deviation identity.Based on references from Litbang Depdagri (Research and Development Agency, Indonesian Ministry of Home Affairs) year 1991, the effectiveness of the UPSUS Pajale Program in West Aceh for Rice and Soybean categorized as effective, which is within the range of ≥80 – 100. Meanwhile for the commodity of corn categorized as quite effective, which is within the range of ≥60 – 80. This shows that the UPSUS Pajale Program implemented in West Aceh can support sustainable food self-sufficiency targeted by the government for rice and soybean commodities. This can be done by increasing the harvested area and production of both commodities.The impact of the program determined using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). If the profit coefficient (PC) > 0, then the government policies can increase profits obtained by producers, and vice versa. Based on the PAM calculation result on the impact of the program, it shows that the UPSUS Pajale Program implemented in West Aceh can increase profits achieve by producers for all three commodities, rice, corn, and soybean where is the PC > 0.

The Competitiveness of Stevia rebaudiana as a Sweetener Alternative in Tawangmangu Subdistrict of Karanganyar Regency

Agro Ekonomi ◽

10.22146/ae.46979 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 30 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Trisna Wahyu Putri ◽

Any Suryantini ◽

Arini Wahyu Utami

Keyword(s):

Comparative Advantage ◽

Government Policy ◽

Descriptive Analysis ◽

Stevia Rebaudiana ◽

Agricultural Product ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government ◽

The Cost ◽

The Impact ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix

The purpose of this research is to analyze the competitiveness of Stevia agriculture in Tawangmangu Subdistrict, Karanganyar Regency based on its competitive and comparative advantage, as well as to know the effect of government policies on this agricultural product. The basic method used is a descriptive analysis with a quantitative approach. The study involved 14 stevia cultivators as respondents. Sampling was carried out by way of census. The data of the study were collected during one stevia planting season in the course of 2015-2018, with an average planting period of 4 years. The data were collected using Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) method. The results reveal that stevia farming in Tawangmangu Subdistrict is proven to have a competitive advantage as seen from the value of PP and PCR. It also has a comparative advantage as indicated by its SP and DRCR values. The impact of government policy is apparent from (a) the value of EPC and NPCO pinpointing that there is protection from government policy for domestic farmers who cultivate stevia intensively, especially for output (stevia dried leaves) prices. It is also indicated by (b) the value of NPCI highlighting that the tradable input costs paid by farmers are lower than the cost of tradable inputs that should be paid. This is in accordance with the rule of the Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia No.47/Permentan/SR.310/11/2018. It is pivotal that the government provide the stevia farmers with stevia superior seeds to boost the production of high-quality stevia product.

DAYA SAING DAN PERAN PEMERINTAH DALAM MENINGKATKAN DAYA SAING KOMODITI KAKAO DI SULAWESI TENGAH

Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan ◽

10.30908/bilp.v11i1.79 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 69-96

Author(s):

Siti Yuliaty Chansa Arfah ◽

Harianto . ◽

Suharno .

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Government Policy ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Research Area ◽

Primary Data ◽

Cocoa Beans ◽

Output Analysis ◽

The Government ◽

Central Sulawesi ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji daya saing komoditi kakao di Sulawesi Tengah dan melihat peran pemerintah dalam meningkatkan daya saing komoditi kakao. Data primer berasal dari observasi, wawancara dan kuesioner, sementara data sekunder berasal dari instansi terkait. Metode analisis menggunakan Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) dan analisis sensitivitas. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa nilai PCR Kabupaten Parigi Moutong 0,589 dan Kabupaten Sigi 0,396. Sedangkan nilai DRC Kabupaten Parigi Moutong 0,387 dan Kabupaten Sigi 0,319. Hal tersebut mengindikasikan bahwa usahatani komoditi kakao di Sulawesi Tengah memiliki daya saing, namun tidak menguntungkan secara ekonomi karena Sulawesi Tengah menghasilkan biji kakao yang tidak difermentasi akibatnya petani menerima harga rendah. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, pemerintah belum memberikan proteksi terhadap harga biji kakao dalam negeri melalui harga referensi biji kakao sehingga harga biji kakao didaerah penelitian masih tergolong rendah jika dibandingkan dengan harga di pasar internasional. Sementara terhadap input, pemerintah telah memberikan kebijakan subsidi kepada petani, namun implementasinya masih perlu perbaikan terutama terkait penyaluran dan pengelolaan bantuan agar merata. Kajian ini merekomendasikan masih diperlukan kebijakan pemerintah baik terhadap input maupun output untuk meningkatkan produktivitas, menurunkan biaya produksi dan menaikkan harga jual biji kakao, sehingga dapat meningkatkan daya saing biji kakao. The purpose of this study is to assess the competitiveness of cocoa in Central Sulawesi and to investigate the role of government in improving the competitiveness of cocoa. The primary data were generated through observation, interviews and some questionnaires. The secondary data were obtained from the agency or the institution related to the research. This study uses the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) and sensitivity analysis. The study found that the PCR value for Parigi Moutong district was 0.589 and Sigi district was 0.396. While, the DRC value for Parigi Moutong district was 0.387 and Sigi district was 0.319. This indicates that cocoa beans farming in Central Sulawesi has competitiveness, but not economically beneficial because Central Sulawesi produces unfermented cocoa beans consequently farmers receive low prices. Based on the results of the government's impact on output analysis, the government did not provide protection for domestic cocoa seed prices through the reference price of cocoa beans, consequently the price of domestic cocoa beans, particularly in the research area, was relatively low compared to the price of cocoa beans at the international market. Seen from the government policy on inputs, the government have provided subsidies to farmers but they need to improve the distribution and management of aid to be evenly distributed. It is necessary to set up good government policy on inputs and outputs in order to increase cocoa seed productivity, decrease production cost and increase the price which simultaneously can improve its competitiveness in the research location.

POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX FOR THE ESSENTIAL CEREAL CROPS VARIETIES (RICE BUHOOTH 1, AND CORN SYNTHETIC GENOTYPE BAGHDAD 3) (STUDY CASE) IN IRAQ FOR THE YEAR 2012

IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES ◽

10.36103/ijas.v48i3.395 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (3) ◽

Author(s):

Lateef & et al.

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Comparative Advantage ◽

Government Intervention ◽

Cereal Crops ◽

Cost Coefficient ◽

Governmental Support ◽

Resource Cost ◽

The Government ◽

Domestic Producer ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix

The objective of this research was to analyze the economic impact of government intervention in the essential cereal crops for (Rice Buhooth1, and Synthetic genotype Baghdad3) by comparing the social price and private prices through adopting policy analysis matrix approach PAM and the derived parameters from it .The research was divided into two chapters; the first chapter was about field counting for the policy analysis matrix PAM and measuring the implications of the government intervention on the Rice Buhooth1. The second chapter was about explaining the field counting for policy analysis matrix PAM and measuring the implications of the government intervention impact on the second synthetic genotype Baghdad3.The research found a set of results, the most important result showed that the value of profitability coefficient was about 3.69, this indicates that the rice crop production system for the Rice Buhooth 1 takes advantage of the adopted government policy in that year, which means that there is governmental support for the product. In addition, domestic resource cost coefficient value which was about 0.72 indicates that there is comparative advantage for the Rice Buhooth 1 for the year 2012. The values of the nominal and effective protection coefficient were about 1.74 and 1.59 respectively; the value of the first factor indicates that there is governmental support for the domestic producer for the above, while the second factor indicates that the domestic producer will obtain greater returns in the investment of its resources in the existence of the government intervention from its absence. Regarding the Synthetic genotype Baghdad3, the value of profitability coefficient was about 1.75 which means that there is governmental support for the product. The domestic resource cost coefficient value was about 0.24 which indicates that there was comparative advantage for the mentioned above for the year 2012. The values of the nominal and effective protection coefficient were about 1.48 and 1.56 respectively; the value of the first factor indicates that there is governmental support for the domestic producer for the above, while the second factor indicates that the domestic producer will obtain greater returns in the investment of its resources in the existence of the government intervention from its absence. Finally, it is highly recommended that support should be increased for the varieties that the country has greater comparative advantage in order to improve the utilization of available resources and reduce wasted resources. Moreover, similar studies should be done in the future by other researchers to major cereal crops varieties at the country level in order to do comparison between them to set a mechanism for the government intervention policy in the main crop prices in the country which help both the local producer and agricultural investor in directing its resources properly.

The competitiveness analysis of shallot in Indonesia: A Policy Analysis Matrix

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0256832 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (9) ◽

pp. e0256832

Author(s):

Saptana ◽

Endro Gunawan ◽

Atika Dyah Perwita ◽

Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya ◽

Valeriana Darwis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Competitive Advantage ◽

Comparative Advantage ◽

Dry Season ◽

Advanced Technology ◽

Cost Ratio ◽

Comparative Advantages ◽

Incentive Policies ◽

The Impact ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix

Shallot is a national strategic commodity in Indonesia, but it is development has a fundamental technical, socioeconomic, and policy support problems. Therefore, it is essential to know the competitiveness of shallot in Indonesia and the incentive policy to implement the comparative advantage to become a sustainable competitive advantage. The purposes of this study are to (1) analyze the profitability of shallot farming privately and socially, (2) analyze the competitiveness of shallot farming from a competitive and comparative advantage perspective, (3) review the impact of government policy on shallot farming, and (4) formulate incentive policies in the development of shallot commodities. The empirical results of the Policy Analysis Matrix revealed that shallot farming in production centers in Indonesia has both competitive and comparative advantages. The highest competitive and comparative advantages were found in the dry season in the upland of Malang district with the coefficient values of PCR (Private Cost Ratio) of 0.268–0.508 and DRCR (Domestic Resource Cost Ratio) of 0.208–0.323. The lowest competitive advantage was found in the lowland of East Lombok district in the dry season with a coefficient value of PCR 0.728–0.844. The lowest comparative advantage in the dry season was found in East Lombok district with a DRCR of 0.448, while in the rainy season, it was found in Wonosobo district with a DRCR of 0.522. These results mean that it is more profitable for Indonesia to increase domestic shallot production than to import. Improving shallot competitiveness can be carried out by implementing advanced technology, agricultural infrastructure, capacity building of farmers’ resources, and government incentive policies to increase productivity and competitiveness sustainability.

DINAMIKA DAYA SAING USAHA RUMPUT LAUT

Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan ◽

10.15578/jsekp.10.2.2015.117-189 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 117

Author(s):

Mira Mira ◽

Riesti Triyanti ◽

Yayan Hikmayani

Keyword(s):

Policy Analysis ◽

Competitive Advantage ◽

Government Policies ◽

Cost Ratio ◽

Effective Protection ◽

Private Cost ◽

Study Sites ◽

The Impact ◽

Policy Analysis Matrix ◽

Nominal Protection

Program revitalisasi pada sektor perikanan telah berjalan sejak 8 tahun yang lalu dan telah berdampak pada usaha budidaya dan daya saing rumput laut di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dinamika daya saing rumput laut yang banyak dibudidayakan di daerah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survey dan wawancara dengan pembudidaya rumput laut di Nusa Penida dan Lombok Timur. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) dengan membandingkan daya saing rumput laut tahun 2005 dan 2013. Hasil analisis mengindikasikan bahwa di dua lokasi penelitian dengan adanya intervensi pemerintah dari tahun ke tahun menyebabkan keuntungan yang diterima pembudidaya pada tahun 2013 rumput laut lebih besar (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) > 1)) jika dibandingkan tanpa kebijakan (PC < 1) (tahun 2005). Keefektifan perhatian pemerintah tersebut bisa dilihat dari nilai SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) dan EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) yang berubah dari tahun 2005 dan 2013, bila pada tahun 2005 nilai SRP bertanda negatif dan EPC < 1, yang artinya subsidi dan kebijakan pemerintah belum efektif melindungi usaha rumput laut. Tahun 2013, nilai SRP bertanda positif dan EPC ) > 1 di masing-masing lokasi penelitian, yang artinya kebijakan pemerintah dan subsidi efektif mengembangkan usaha rumput laut. Dalam kurun waktu 8 tahun usaha rumput laut memiliki keunggulan kompetitif dan keunggulan komparatif yang bisa dilihat dari nilai DRC dan PCR (Private Cost Ratio), meskipun ada tren penurun keungulan kompetitif, karena pada tahun 2013 di Nusa Penida menggunakan BBM yang memiliki komponen impor yang lebih besar. Implikasi kebijakan pemerintah (kebijakan input) di dua lokasi penelitian yang diindikasikan dengan nilai NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input) yang semakin meningkat maka keberpihakan pemerintah Nusa Penida lebih tinggi dibandingkan keberpihakan pemerintah Lombok Timur terhadap input usaha rumput laut baik itu tahun 2005 maupun pada tahun 2013. (Competitive and Comparative Dinamics of the Seaweed Busineses)Revitalization policy programs in the fisheries sector which has been creating since 8 years ago have the impact on the competitiveness seaweed at Small Islands. The purpose of this study examines competitive and comparative of seaweed. Survey and interview with seaweed cultivators were conducted at The Eastern Nusa Penida and The Eastern Lombok. Data analysis method uses a Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Results of the analysis indicate that in the two study sites government intervention have a positive impact. Benefits received by farmers in 2013 (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) > 1) greater than without a policy of revitalization in 2005 ( PC <1). The effectiveness of government policies showed by SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) and EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) values were changed from 2005 and 2013. The value of the SRP in 2005 is negative and EPC <1, it means subsidies and government policies have not been effective in protecting the seaweed business. SRP value is positive and EPC)> 1 in each of the research sites after 8 years of revitalization was launched (2013), it means government policies and subsidies effectively develop seaweed business. Seaweed business has also a competitive advantage and comparative advantages, it shown the DRC (Dosmetic Cost Ratio) and PCR (Private Cost Ratio) value. There is trend-lowering competitive advantage in Nusa Penida, because farmers in 2013 using a fuel that has a greater import components. Intervention of government (in terms of policy input) at two study sites increases the value of NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input). The concern of Nusa Penida government on input seaweed business is higher than in the Eastern Lombok government.