scholarly journals Impact of Agricultural Policies on the Egyptian Cotton Sector Using Policy Analysis Matrix

2020 ◽  
pp. 50-59
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. ELsamie ◽  
Tarek Ali ◽  
Moataz Eliw
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Agricultural Policies ◽  
Foreign Markets ◽  
Cotton Crop ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Egyptian Cotton ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix ◽  
Nominal Protection

The Egyptian cotton sector is considered one of the most important export strategic sectors in Egypt, where the Egyptian government takes many agricultural policies that lead to an increase in exports of that crop to foreign markets, as these policies that the government takes have a major impact on the producers of that crop, and this study examined the impact of Agricultural policies on the Egyptian cotton crop, using the policy analysis matrix to know the effect of government policies on the producers of that crop and also the impact of those policies on Egyptian exports of the cotton crop, and the results showed that when comparing the financial and economic performance of the elements of cotton crop production, the financial performance was less than the economic performance on all cost items except workers' wages [1], indicating that the Government is subsidizing cost items, thereby supporting cotton producers. Comparing the average variable costs of cotton during the study period financially and economically shows that the financial valuation exceeds the economic valuation, with the average variable costs of $418.36 at market prices [2] , amounting to $368.84 at world prices, The results also showed that the Nominal Protection Coefficient for the output of the Egyptian cotton in the period under study (2000-2017) was 0.74, indicating the lack of a fair production policy during that period, perhaps due to the fact that the value of the Nominal Protection Coefficient  for the production of the Egyptian cotton crop was lower than the correct one. It also indicated that the value of the Nominal Protection Coefficient for production supplies was 0.92, which indicates a decrease in government support for that crop compared to the value of the effective protection factor of 0.72 during the period under study (2000-2017). This indicates that the factor of the cost of domestic resources for the Egyptian cotton crop is 0.47, and this indicates that the Egyptian cotton has a comparative advantage in foreign markets, the study recommended Maintaining the foreign markets of the Egyptian cotton crop, as it has a global comparative and competitive advantage, and provides the state with foreign exchange, which contributes significantly to the Egyptian national economy.

scholarly journals DAYA SAING USAHA TANI PADI DI KECAMATAN SUSUKAN KABUPATEN SEMARANG MENGGUNAKAN METODE PAM (POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX)

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Yoanes Krisostomos Nargy Justra Septaris ◽  
Tinjung Mary Prihtanti
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Comparative Advantage ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
International Market ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Agricultural Policies ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix

Competitiveness requires a country to excel in competitive and comparative advantage. The commodities that need to be developed are rice. This commodity was chosen because it is a commodity that the government prioritizes and is full of agricultural policies. The purpose of this study is to determine profits, competitive and comparative advantages and the impact of government policies. This research was conducted in March 2018 in Susukan District, Semarang Regency. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique with a total of 30 respondents. Data analysis using Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). The results showed that farming has a competitive and comparative advantage seen from the value of PCR and DRCR less than 1 but the DRCR value of 0.935 means that farming is feared no longer has comparative advantage if there is no interference from government policy. For the government, the policy of subsidizing fertilizers and pesticides is continued so that the farming business remains competitive but the use of fertilizer by farmers should be reduced so that it is in accordance with recommendations from the Agriculture Service or researchers. Marketers should target the domestic market because the price of rice in the international market is lower than in the country.

scholarly journals DINAMIKA DAYA SAING USAHA RUMPUT LAUT

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Mira Mira ◽  
Riesti Triyanti ◽  
Yayan Hikmayani
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Effective Protection ◽  
Private Cost ◽  
Study Sites ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix ◽  
Nominal Protection

<p>Program revitalisasi pada sektor perikanan telah berjalan sejak 8 tahun yang lalu dan telah berdampak pada usaha budidaya dan daya saing rumput laut di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dinamika daya saing rumput laut yang banyak dibudidayakan di daerah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survey dan wawancara dengan pembudidaya rumput laut di Nusa Penida dan Lombok Timur. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) dengan membandingkan daya saing rumput laut tahun 2005 dan 2013. Hasil analisis mengindikasikan bahwa di dua lokasi penelitian dengan adanya intervensi pemerintah dari tahun ke tahun menyebabkan keuntungan yang diterima pembudidaya pada tahun 2013 rumput laut lebih besar (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) &gt; 1)) jika dibandingkan tanpa kebijakan (PC &lt; 1) (tahun 2005). Keefektifan perhatian pemerintah tersebut bisa dilihat dari nilai SRP <em>(Subsidy Ratio to Producers)</em> dan EPC <em>(Effective Protection Coofficient)</em> yang berubah dari tahun 2005 dan 2013, bila pada tahun 2005 nilai SRP bertanda negatif dan EPC &lt; 1, yang artinya subsidi dan kebijakan pemerintah belum efektif melindungi usaha rumput laut. Tahun 2013, nilai SRP bertanda positif dan EPC ) &gt; 1 di masing-masing lokasi penelitian, yang artinya kebijakan pemerintah dan subsidi efektif mengembangkan usaha rumput laut. Dalam kurun waktu 8 tahun usaha rumput laut memiliki keunggulan kompetitif dan keunggulan komparatif yang bisa dilihat dari nilai DRC dan PCR (Private Cost Ratio), meskipun ada tren penurun keungulan kompetitif, karena pada tahun 2013 di Nusa Penida menggunakan BBM yang memiliki komponen impor yang lebih besar. Implikasi kebijakan pemerintah (kebijakan input) di dua lokasi penelitian yang diindikasikan dengan nilai NPCI <em>(Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input)</em> yang semakin meningkat maka keberpihakan pemerintah Nusa Penida lebih tinggi dibandingkan keberpihakan pemerintah Lombok Timur terhadap input usaha rumput laut baik itu tahun 2005 maupun pada tahun 2013.</p><p> </p><p><em>(Competitive and Comparative Dinamics of the Seaweed Busineses)</em></p><p>Revitalization policy programs in the fisheries sector which has been creating since 8 years ago have the impact on the competitiveness seaweed at Small Islands. The purpose of this study examines competitive and comparative of seaweed. Survey and interview with seaweed cultivators were conducted at The Eastern Nusa Penida and The Eastern Lombok. Data analysis method uses a Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Results of the analysis indicate that in the two study sites government intervention have a positive impact. Benefits received by farmers in 2013 (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) &gt; 1) greater than without a policy of revitalization in 2005 ( PC &lt;1). The effectiveness of government policies showed by SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) and EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) values were changed from 2005 and 2013. The value of the SRP in 2005 is negative and EPC &lt;1, it means subsidies and government policies have not been effective in protecting the seaweed business. SRP value is positive and EPC)&gt; 1 in each of the research sites after 8 years of revitalization was launched (2013), it means government policies and subsidies effectively develop seaweed business. Seaweed business has also a competitive advantage and comparative advantages, it shown the DRC (Dosmetic Cost Ratio) and PCR (Private Cost Ratio) value. There is trend-lowering competitive advantage in Nusa Penida, because farmers in 2013 using a fuel that has a greater import components. Intervention of government (in terms of policy input) at two study sites increases the value of NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input). The concern of Nusa Penida government on input seaweed business is higher than in the Eastern Lombok government.</p><p><em><br /></em></p>

scholarly journals Keunggulan Komparatif dan Kompetitif Komoditi Kopi Arabika (Coffea arabica) di Desa Ulian, Kecamatan Kintamani, Kabupaten Bangli

2018 ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
NI MADE METRI WIDHYAPURI ◽  
MADE ANTARA ◽  
IDA AYU LISTIA DEWI
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Coffea Arabica ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Arabica Coffee ◽  
Input And Output ◽  
Coffee Farmers ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix ◽  
Inputs And Outputs

The Comparative and Competitive Advantages of Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica) Commodity in Ulian Village, Kintamani Sub-District of Bangli Regency The study aimed to analyze the comparative and competitive advantages and the divergence of input and output of arabica coffee commodity, to find out the government protection policy against inputs and outputs; and to investigate the impact of changes in input and output prices on profits, comparative advantages, competitive advantages, divergence, and government protection against inputs and outputs. Methods of data collection was interview and observation. The respondents were 38 farmers in Ulian Village, Kintamani, Bangli and selected by random sampling. Data analysis used Policy Analysis Matrix and sensitivity analysis. The result of analysis by using Policy Analysis Matrix showed that the social profit was Rp 47.953.373 and private profit of Rp 33.202.446. The superiority of arabica coffee commodity in Ulian Village consists of comparative and competitive advantages expressed in DRC ratio of 0.23 and PCR ratio of 0.29. The divergence of input and output consists of divergence of revenue of Rp15,734,996, tradable input divergence was Rp 0, domestic factor divergence was Rp. 994,070, and divergence of net profit of Rp 14,750,927. Government protection was expressed in NPCO ratio of 0.75, EPC ratio of 0.75, PC ratio of 0.69, and SRP ratio of -0.24. These ratios indicate that arabica coffee farmers in Ulian Village, Kintamani, Bangli have no protection from the government. Changes in input and output prices during inflation were at 3.02 percent, an increase in input prices by 10 percent and a fall in the price of output by 50 percent resulted in arabica coffee commodities in Ulian Village, Kintamani, Bangli to have comparative and competitive advantages. There is no government protection on arabica coffee farmers in Ulian Village, Kintamani Sub-District of Bangli Regency when input and output prices changed.

scholarly journals DAMPAK KEBIJAKAN PEMBATASAN IMPOR BAWANG MERAH TERHADAP USAHATANI BAWANG MERAH DI KABUPATEN PROBOLINGGO Policy Impact of Import Restriction of Shalloton Farm in Probolinggo District

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (03) ◽  
pp. 347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Wahyudin ◽  
Mochmammad Maksum ◽  
Henry Yuliando
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Matrix Method ◽  
Policy Impact ◽  
Restriction Policy ◽  
The Government ◽  
Import Restrictions ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix

On January - August 2013, the government implemented a quota-based import restriction policy for the shallot. While on September 2013, the government then changed it into a price-based import restriction. This research aims to determine how the impact of the quota-based and price-based import restrictions to the level of protection, profitability, andefficiency of farm. The method of analysis used in this research is PAM (Policy Analysis Matrix) method. The results showed that the quota-based import restriction policy has increased 141%, 270%, and 32% of protection, profitability, and efficiency of shallot farming, respectively. The price-based import restriction policyhas decreased 46% and 233% of protection and profitability of shallot farming, however it has increased 1% of the efficiency.Keywords: Policy impact, import restriction, shallot, PAM, Probolinggo ABSTRAKPada Januari - Agustus 2013, pemerintah menerapkan kebijakan pembatasan impor berbasis kuota terhadap komoditas bawang merah. Selanjutnya, pada September 2013 pemerintah mengubah kebijakan tersebut menjadi pembatasan impor berbasis harga. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana dampak kebijakan pembatasan impor berbasis kuota dan berbasis harga terhadap proteksi, profitabilitas, dan efisiensi usahatani bawang merah. Metode analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan pembatasan impor berbasis kuota telah meyebabkan proteksi, profitabilitas, dan efisiensi usahatani bawang merah meningkat 141%, 270%, dan 32%. Sedangkan kebijakan pembatasan impor berbasis harga menyebabkan proteksi dan profitabilitas usahatani turun 46% dan 233%, dan efisiensi usahatani meningkat 1%.Kata kunci: Dampak kebijakan, pembatasan impor, bawang merah, PAM, Probolinggo   

scholarly journals Impact of Agricultural Price Policy on Major Crops in Egypt

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Moataz Eliw ◽  
Osman A. Ismail ◽  
Harb A. El-Bardisy
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
Price Policy ◽  
Relative Advantage ◽  
Economic Policies ◽  
Agricultural Policies ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix

Agricultural production, like other economic activities, is affected by the success of agricultural economic policies pursued by government from leaving the farmer free to cultivate his land with the desired crops and to take his production and marketing decisions in light of the mechanisms of supply and demand and the movement of prices in the markets without any intervention by the government. Therefore, the government's intervention influences the farmers' desire to grow any of the crops through its agricultural policies by imposing taxes or subsidizing inputs. To achieve the research objectives, we applied the Policy analysis matrix, where is one of the essential modern methods used in policy analysis. Besides, it helps to examine the impacts of government intervention policies across different stages of the flow of goods. In addition, it helps to assess and measure such policies' efficiency in achieving the hoped-for objectives and examine their impacts on producers, consumers, and the macro-level economic conditions. The Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) can be calculated by calculating nominal and effective protection coefficients and then identifying the policy adopted by the government, whether it is a protectionist policy or a policy of direct or indirect taxes on the producers of those crops. Also, the calculation of the cost of domestic resources to determine the relative advantage. Where wheat, maize, rice, and potatoes are among the most crucial strategic food and industrial crops in Egypt.

scholarly journals ANALISIS DAYASAING JAGUNG DI WILAYAH SENTRA PRODUKSI DI INDONESIA DENGAN PENDEKATAN POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX (PAM)

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-154
Author(s):  
Ni Wayan Surya Darmayanti ◽  
Ratna Winandi ◽  
Netti Tinaprilla
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
West Java ◽  
Maize Production ◽  
Central Java ◽  
South Sulawesi ◽  
The Government ◽  
Production Areas ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix

The objectives of this research are to analyze competitiveness and the impact of government’s policy of maize farming in several central productions in Indonesia. This research was conducted to analyze maize competitiveness using PAM (Policy Analysis Matrix) method. Data sample was conducted at four maize production centers, including East Java, Central Java, West Java, and South Sulawesi. The results show the forth centre have competitiveness. This showed by PCR values in some production areas less than 1 and for competitive advantage, indicated by DRCR values in production areas also less than 1. Analysis of the Government policy aspect, the government has been able to provide positive incentives for maize farming in North Jawa, Centre of Jawa and West Java. The impact of government policy on inputs and outputs simultaneously can provide a positive incentive to farmers at maize production sites in Java. But the government’s policy hasn’t been able to provide for output in Sulawesi Selatan.  The conclusion is the fourth centres of maize production have competitive and comparative advantage. Sulawesi Selatan has high comparative advantages, so Sulawesi Selatan has high  potential to improve maize farming.

scholarly journals An analytical of the agricultural policy analysis matrix for Egyptian cotton crop

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-156
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdallah ◽  
SH.A. Abd-elmomen ◽  
M.T. Elbana Elbana ◽  
A.M. A.M. Faraj
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Agricultural Policy ◽  
Cotton Crop ◽  
Egyptian Cotton ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix

scholarly journals Effectiveness of the Management of Pajale Food Security Program (Rice, Corn, and Soybean) In West Aceh Regency

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 517
Author(s):  
Amiruddin Amiruddin ◽  
Fajri Fajri ◽  
Muhammad Rusdi
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Sustainable Food ◽  
Self Sufficiency ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and impact of the Pajale (Rice, Corn, and Soybean) of the UPSUS (Special Effort) Program on the production of rice, corn, and soybean in West Aceh regency. This study conducted in West Aceh Regency. The method used to collect the data is the random sampling technique. The number of samples determined using Solvin formula. However, due to the limited time, energy, and cost, the researcher only took 188 samples from the total population of 584 respondents. The analytical method used to answer the first hypothesis is using the effectiveness formula, as follows: The Effectiveness of Program = (R/T) x 100%. The analytical method used to answer the second hypothesis is using the PAM (Policy Analysis Matrix) approach. This method used to determine the impact of the UPSUS Pajale Program. The matrix of PAM consists of two identities that are the profit identity and the deviation identity.Based on references from Litbang Depdagri (Research and Development Agency, Indonesian Ministry of Home Affairs) year 1991, the effectiveness of the UPSUS Pajale Program in West Aceh for Rice and Soybean categorized as effective, which is within the range of ≥80 – 100. Meanwhile for the commodity of corn categorized as quite effective, which is within the range of ≥60 – 80. This shows that the UPSUS Pajale Program implemented in West Aceh can support sustainable food self-sufficiency targeted by the government for rice and soybean commodities. This can be done by increasing the harvested area and production of both commodities.The impact of the program determined using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). If the profit coefficient (PC) > 0, then the government policies can increase profits obtained by producers, and vice versa. Based on the PAM calculation result on the impact of the program, it shows that the UPSUS Pajale Program implemented in West Aceh can increase profits achieve by producers for all three commodities, rice, corn, and soybean where is the PC > 0.

scholarly journals DINAMIKA DAYA SAING USAHA RUMPUT LAUT

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Mira Mira ◽  
Riesti Triyanti ◽  
Yayan Hikmayani
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Effective Protection ◽  
Private Cost ◽  
Study Sites ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix ◽  
Nominal Protection

Program revitalisasi pada sektor perikanan telah berjalan sejak 8 tahun yang lalu dan telah berdampak pada usaha budidaya dan daya saing rumput laut di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dinamika daya saing rumput laut yang banyak dibudidayakan di daerah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survey dan wawancara dengan pembudidaya rumput laut di Nusa Penida dan Lombok Timur. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) dengan membandingkan daya saing rumput laut tahun 2005 dan 2013. Hasil analisis mengindikasikan bahwa di dua lokasi penelitian dengan adanya intervensi pemerintah dari tahun ke tahun menyebabkan keuntungan yang diterima pembudidaya pada tahun 2013 rumput laut lebih besar (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) > 1)) jika dibandingkan tanpa kebijakan (PC < 1) (tahun 2005). Keefektifan perhatian pemerintah tersebut bisa dilihat dari nilai SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) dan EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) yang berubah dari tahun 2005 dan 2013, bila pada tahun 2005 nilai SRP bertanda negatif dan EPC < 1, yang artinya subsidi dan kebijakan pemerintah belum efektif melindungi usaha rumput laut. Tahun 2013, nilai SRP bertanda positif dan EPC ) > 1 di masing-masing lokasi penelitian, yang artinya kebijakan pemerintah dan subsidi efektif mengembangkan usaha rumput laut. Dalam kurun waktu 8 tahun usaha rumput laut memiliki keunggulan kompetitif dan keunggulan komparatif yang bisa dilihat dari nilai DRC dan PCR (Private Cost Ratio), meskipun ada tren penurun keungulan kompetitif, karena pada tahun 2013 di Nusa Penida menggunakan BBM yang memiliki komponen impor yang lebih besar. Implikasi kebijakan pemerintah (kebijakan input) di dua lokasi penelitian yang diindikasikan dengan nilai NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input) yang semakin meningkat maka keberpihakan pemerintah Nusa Penida lebih tinggi dibandingkan keberpihakan pemerintah Lombok Timur terhadap input usaha rumput laut baik itu tahun 2005 maupun pada tahun 2013. (Competitive and Comparative Dinamics of the Seaweed Busineses)Revitalization policy programs in the fisheries sector which has been creating since 8 years ago have the impact on the competitiveness seaweed at Small Islands. The purpose of this study examines competitive and comparative of seaweed. Survey and interview with seaweed cultivators were conducted at The Eastern Nusa Penida and The Eastern Lombok. Data analysis method uses a Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Results of the analysis indicate that in the two study sites government intervention have a positive impact. Benefits received by farmers in 2013 (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) > 1) greater than without a policy of revitalization in 2005 ( PC <1). The effectiveness of government policies showed by SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) and EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) values were changed from 2005 and 2013. The value of the SRP in 2005 is negative and EPC <1, it means subsidies and government policies have not been effective in protecting the seaweed business. SRP value is positive and EPC)> 1 in each of the research sites after 8 years of revitalization was launched (2013), it means government policies and subsidies effectively develop seaweed business. Seaweed business has also a competitive advantage and comparative advantages, it shown the DRC (Dosmetic Cost Ratio) and PCR (Private Cost Ratio) value. There is trend-lowering competitive advantage in Nusa Penida, because farmers in 2013 using a fuel that has a greater import components. Intervention of government (in terms of policy input) at two study sites increases the value of NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input). The concern of Nusa Penida government on input seaweed business is higher than in the Eastern Lombok government.

DAYA SAING DAN PERAN PEMERINTAH DALAM MENINGKATKAN DAYA SAING KOMODITI KAKAO DI SULAWESI TENGAH

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-96
Author(s):  
Siti Yuliaty Chansa Arfah ◽  
Harianto . ◽  
Suharno .
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Cocoa Beans ◽  
Output Analysis ◽  
The Government ◽  
Central Sulawesi ◽  
Policy Analysis Matrix

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji daya saing komoditi kakao di Sulawesi Tengah dan melihat peran pemerintah dalam meningkatkan daya saing komoditi kakao. Data primer berasal dari observasi, wawancara dan kuesioner, sementara data sekunder berasal dari instansi terkait. Metode analisis menggunakan Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) dan analisis sensitivitas. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa nilai PCR Kabupaten Parigi Moutong 0,589 dan Kabupaten Sigi 0,396. Sedangkan nilai DRC Kabupaten Parigi Moutong 0,387 dan Kabupaten Sigi 0,319. Hal tersebut mengindikasikan bahwa usahatani komoditi kakao di Sulawesi Tengah memiliki daya saing, namun tidak menguntungkan secara ekonomi karena Sulawesi Tengah menghasilkan biji kakao yang tidak difermentasi akibatnya petani menerima harga rendah. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, pemerintah belum memberikan proteksi terhadap harga biji kakao dalam negeri melalui harga referensi biji kakao sehingga harga biji kakao didaerah penelitian masih tergolong rendah jika dibandingkan dengan harga di pasar internasional. Sementara terhadap input, pemerintah telah memberikan kebijakan subsidi kepada petani, namun implementasinya masih perlu perbaikan terutama terkait penyaluran dan pengelolaan bantuan agar merata. Kajian ini merekomendasikan masih diperlukan kebijakan pemerintah baik terhadap input maupun output untuk meningkatkan produktivitas, menurunkan biaya produksi dan menaikkan harga jual biji kakao, sehingga dapat meningkatkan daya saing biji kakao. The purpose of this study is to assess the competitiveness of cocoa in Central Sulawesi and to investigate the role of government in improving the competitiveness of cocoa. The primary data were generated through observation, interviews and some questionnaires. The secondary data were obtained from the agency or the institution related to the research. This study uses the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) and sensitivity analysis. The study found that the PCR value for Parigi Moutong district was 0.589 and Sigi district was 0.396. While, the DRC value for Parigi Moutong district was 0.387 and Sigi district was 0.319. This indicates that cocoa beans farming in Central Sulawesi has competitiveness, but not economically beneficial because Central Sulawesi produces unfermented cocoa beans consequently farmers receive low prices. Based on the results of the government's impact on output analysis, the government did not provide protection for domestic cocoa seed prices through the reference price of cocoa beans, consequently the price of domestic cocoa beans, particularly in the research area, was relatively low compared to the price of cocoa beans at the international market. Seen from the government policy on inputs, the government have provided subsidies to farmers but they need to improve the distribution and management of aid to be evenly distributed. It is necessary to set up good government policy on inputs and outputs in order to increase cocoa seed productivity, decrease production cost and increase the price which simultaneously can improve its competitiveness in the research location.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document