scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI ANAK DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN (PENELITIAN PUTUSAN NOMOR: 17/PID.SUS.ANAK/2014/PN.TJK)

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-56
Author(s):  
Satrio Hadi ◽  
Dina Sukardi
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Intercourse ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Empirical Approach ◽  
Child Witnesses ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Child Witness ◽  
Witness Testimony ◽  
The Public ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Valid Evidence

The focus of research is on the strength of evidence for child witness testimony in criminal acts of sexual intercourse and the basis for judges' consideration in using child witness evidence in Decision Number: 17 / Pid.Sus.Anak / 2014 / PN.TJK. The objectives to be achieved are to analyze the strength of the evidence for child witnesses in the criminal act of sexual intercourse and to analyze the basis for judges' consideration in using evidence for child witnesses in Decision Number: 17 / Pid.Sus.Anak / 2014 / PN.TJK. The research method uses a normative and empirical approach. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the strength of evidence of child witness testimony in the crime of sexual intercourse in accordance with Decision Number: 17 / Pid.Sus.A child / 2014 / PN.TJK only acts as a guide or additional valid evidence and information that can strengthen the judge's conviction. to further prove the guilt of the accused, and can be used to prove the indictment of the Public Prosecutor. The victim witness was not sworn in because he was not yet 15 (fifteen) years old.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN KEJAKSAAN DALAM MENGAJUKAN PERMOHONAN PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN (Suatu Penelitian di Kabupaten Aceh Besar)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Mardiyah Mardiyah ◽  
Azhari Yahya
Keyword(s):  
Field Research ◽  
Empirical Approach ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Common Goal ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Future ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Legal Consequence

This research aims to know the authority of the public prosecutor in applying the cancellation of marriage application at Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho. Article 22 of the Act Number 1, 1974 on Marriage states that a marriage bond might be cancelled if it failed to fulfill the requirement. However, in the practice at the Mahkamah Syariyah Jantho, the prosecutor has never been conducted such authority. This research aims to explore the reasons of the Public Prosecution Office has never been applying for the invalid marriage and legal consequence for the prosecution office when it fails to conduct its duties. This is field research, by using a juridical empirical approach. The research findings are the public prosecution office might apply for r the marriage cancellation towards marriage as ruled in Article 23 point c of the Marriage Act due to reasons for the Prosecution Office that has never been applying is due to the reason that there is no special explanation regarding the matter and there is different perception. The Prosecution Office or the prosecutor but it has implication over the ignorance of not applying the cancellation of marriage. Thus in terms of keeping the law is working, and preventing the offense committed in the future and there is legal certainty amongst people there should be  a common goal and aims in imposing law by law enforcers in responding the authority and the position of the public prosecution office  in applying the application of marriage cancellation.

scholarly journals The Criminal Enforcement Of The Fraud Mode Of Multiple Money (Case study Decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bebas terhadap Kasus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-411
Author(s):  
Ramot Lumbantoruan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Judicial Role

The purpose of this research is to describe the legal arrangements regarding the Free Verdict according to positive legal provisions, the Judicial role of the Judge in deciding a case and Juridical Analysis of a conviction for a murder crime (Study of Judgment Number 423 / Pid / 2008 PN. South Jakarta. This research method is normative juridical research.The nature of this research is descriptive analysis, which is a method used to describe a condition or condition that is happening or ongoing in order to provide as much data as possible about the object of research so as to explore things that are ideal, then analyzed based on legal theory or applicable laws and regulations.Results of this study, first, the legal arrangements regarding the acquittal according to positive legal provisions is to look at Article 191 Paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code specifically also provides an understanding that reinforces its role law about being free from all lawsuits. Second, the role of judges legally in deciding a case in the decision of Case Decision Number 423 / Pid / 2008 / PN. South Jakarta is a judge must pay attention to the interests of various parties, both the interests of the defendant, witnesses, and the interests of the Public Prosecutor.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF PROSECUTOR OFFICE IN THE ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Agus Sunaryo
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Police Agency ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic

In fact, there are still many cases of corruption that have not been revealed; this resulted in the public to be pessimistic with the seriousness of the Prosecutor Office in uncovering variouscases of corruption that are happening today. The purpose of this study is to know the role ofthe Prosecutor Office in the eradication of criminal acts, to obtain an overview of the mechanismof corruption handling by prosecutors in Indonesia and to analyze the obstacles and solutionsin eradicating crime in the Attorney General. The research method was sociological juridical,and data collection were gained by using observation and interview. The existence and role ofthe Public Prosecution Service in eradicating corruption crime begins when the case has notbeen transferred to the Court until the execution of the decision of the Court. However, in thecriminal act of corruption the Prosecutor’s Office has the authority as a public prosecutor aswell as an investigator. The authority of the prosecutor as a special criminal investigator shall beregulated by Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia inArticle 30 paragraph (1) letter d. In addition, in its role against the eradication of corruption, theProsecutor’s Office has always conducted a coordination relationship with the Police Agency andthe Corruption Eradication Commission. The mechanism for handling corruption in the AttorneyGeneral Office, through several procedures already set out in the law includes Investigation,Investigation and Prosecution.

scholarly journals Juridical Analysis of the Acquittal in a Murder Crime

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
Chairul Nopriansyah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court

The judge plays an important role in the judiciary because the judge has the authority to examine, hear and decide on a case so that he is obliged to look for values ​​of justice in the application of progressive and responsive laws, so the judge in issuing decisions must pay attention to various considerations. Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code contains several elements of judges' considerations when making decisions. In the case of an acquittal, the judge needs carefulness and carefulness to consider so that a matter must be truly convincing. This research is a doctrinal research method that is taking the opinions of experts regarding free decisions and through legal products in the form of legislation and judges' decisions. The conclusion of this paper is First, the basic consideration of the judge in passing a free verdict (vrijspraak) is not fulfilling the minimum limit of evidence by the public prosecutor so that the judge will release the defendant because the evidence that can blame the defendant is insufficient and based on the elaboration of the writer above, the Supreme Court allows legal efforts to overturn an acquittal (vrijspraak) namely an appeal on an acquittal, but not all verdicts requested for appeal are always accepted by the Supreme Court.

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN PENANGANAN PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN DAN PENCABULAN TERHADAP ANAK DI POLSEK EMPAT ANGKAT CANDUNG

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 173
Author(s):  
Rahmat Fauzi
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Human Resources ◽  
Sexual Intercourse ◽  
Social Service ◽  
Criminal Investigation ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Police Station ◽  
The Social ◽  
To Come

The purpose of this study was to find out and analyze the implementation of a criminal investigation of sexual intercourse and sexual abuse of children in the Fourth Admission Police Station. The method used in this research is empirical juridical research. The results showed that the research on the crime of intercourse and sexual abuse of children carried out by the investigating authority was in accordance with the provisions of the legislation. Investigation of this case is in accordance with the existing rules of receiving reports, confiscating evidence, arresting, detaining filing and sending files to the Public Prosecutor (P21). Factors inhibiting irregularities in the process of criminal acts of sexual intercourse and sexual abuse of children are: human resources from the investigator, victims are still children, the suspect does not argue, has nothing to do with seeing directly and does not want to come to provide assistance Information and bordering forensic doctors. The way out by investigators in the process of sexual intercourse and sexual abuse of children is to increase existing investigators and those requested by investigating members to the police station, allocate and request assistance to assist these sexual acts of sexual intercourse and coitus with the Social Service Bukittinggi, replace a lot of information and opinions will not come, then called back after it was visited at home to be able to provide information, the suspect did not confess then the investigator made a case at the location, processing evidence and multiply giving reports to provide information and help the doctor Forensics, the investigator is still waiting for the results of the post mortem.

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Dasar Hukum Jaksa Penuntut Umum Melakukan Upaya Hukum Kasasi Terhadap Putusan Bebas (Vrijspraak) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heru Drajat Sulistyo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Data Types ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code

This study discusses theoretically normative about the appeal made by the Public Prosecutor on the verdict free (vrijspraak) in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System intended to find solutions to the juridical problems arising from the acquittal. The problem in this study, namely: What is the legal basis for the Public Prosecutor to conduct an appeal against the verdict (vrijspraak). The research method used is a normative legal research method and uses secondary data types, including primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials collected through library studies, print media, electronic media. The results of the research study, namely: the legal basis of the Public Prosecutor conducting an appeal against the verdict (vrijspraak) is the Decree of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.14-PW.07.03 of 1983 dated December 10, 1983 concerning Supplementary Guidelines for the Implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code (item 19) . Then the Supreme Court Decree Reg. no: 275 K / Pid / 1983 in the Raden Sonson Natalegawa case was the first decision to be born as jurisprudence for a free verdict after the entry into force of the Criminal Procedure Code. Furthermore, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 114 / PUU-X / 2012 dated March 28, 2013. The existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 114 / PUU-X / 2012 dated March 28, 2013, the public must accept the Public Prosecutor is contested with legal action to appeal against the acquittal (vrijspraak).

scholarly journals Gugatan Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Eksekusi Barang Sitaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Tedhy Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Republic

The criminal act of corruption is a financial and humanitarian crime that harms the state and reduces the people's right to better access to welfare. The settlement of corruption cases often involves many parties, including good third parties related to the evidence seized by the Prosecutor. Judgments in judicial practice still cause new problems. The Panel of Judges imposed a crime in the form of appropriation of property in the control of a well-intentioned third party. The purpose of this paper is to examine the legal status of a third party who has good faith in the execution of confiscated goods in the case of corruption and the role of the prosecutor in a third-party lawsuit related to the execution of confiscated goods in the case of corruption. The research method used is normative legal research with statutes approach and case approach. The study indicates that the legal measures that can be done by a good third party against the confiscated objects in the case of corruption must be in accordance with Article 19 of the Anti-Corruption Eradication Act. The role of the public prosecutor in a civil case is not a public prosecutor or executor but in a lawsuit as a State Attorney Attorney under Article 30 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia. Tindak pidana korupsi adalah kejahatan keuangan dan kemanusiaan yang merugikan negara dan mengurangi hak rakyat untuk mendapat akses kesejahteraan yang lebih baik. Penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi seringkali melibatkan banyak pihak, termasuk pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik terkait dengan barang bukti yang disita oleh Penuntut Umum. Putusan-putusan dalam praktek peradilan masih menimbulkan masalah baru. Majelis Hakim menjatuhkan pidana berupa perampasan harta dalam penguasaan pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengkaji kedudukan hukum pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik dalam eksekusi barang sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan peranan jaksa dalam gugatan pihak ketiga terkait eksekusi barang sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Upaya Hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik terhadap benda sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi harus sesuai dengan Pasal 19 Undang-undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Peran jaksa dalam perkara perdata bukan sebagai penuntut umum atau eksekutor akan tetapi dalam perkara gugatan sebagai Jaksa Pengacara Negara berdasarkan Pasal 30 Ayat (2) Undang-undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

scholarly journals LIMITATIF KEWENANGAN JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1324
Author(s):  
Novi Mardihana Sari ◽  
I Nyoman Budiana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan kewenangan jaksa penuntut umum dalam tindak pidana korupsi, serta mengkaji dan menganalisis limitative kewenangan jaksa dalam tindak pidana korupsi, sudahkah mencerminkan adanya kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan sesuai dengan tujuan hukum di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (Statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi, Jaksa berwenang melakukan penyelidikan, penyidikan dan penuntutan. Hal-hal yang menjadi limitatif kewenangan jaksa penuntut umum dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, serta Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. This paper aims to determine the regulation of the authority of the public prosecutor in criminal acts of corruption, and to study and analyze the limitative authority of prosecoturs in criminal acts of corruption, has it reflected the existence of legal certainty, justice and usefulness in accordance with the legal objectives in Indonesia. The method used in this paper uses the normative legal research method with the statute approach and conceptual approach. The results showed that in handling corruption, the prosecutor has the authority to conduct investigations, investigations and prosecutions. Matters which become the limitative authority of public prosecutors in handling corruption are regulated inKitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 tahun 2004 concerning the attorney general of the republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 concerning eradication of criminal acts.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Alat Bukti Keterangan Saksi yang Memiliki Hubungan Darah dengan Terdakwa dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Keluarga

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-490
Author(s):  
I Gede Agus Sudiantara ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Family Relationships ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Minimum Principle ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Witness Testimony ◽  
Family Ties ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
The Family ◽  
Witness Statements

The strength of evidence from witnesses who have family ties to the defendant in the crime of theft in the family, the process of examining witnesses is the main evidence in a crime. The purpose of this study is to reveal the strength of the evidence of witnesses who have blood relations with the defendant in the evidentiary process and barriers to proof by using evidence of witnesses who have blood relations with the defendant in the crime of theft in the family. The research method used is normative legal research. Sources of primary and secondary legal materials. Legal materials that have been obtained from the literature study and the approach to legislation were analyzed using a systematic interpretation technique. The results of the study reveal that witness testimony is very necessary in the trial in order to provide appropriate sanctions for the defendant. The barrier to proof from witness statements who have family relationships and ties is if the minimum principle of proof cannot be proven. It can be concluded that the strength of the testimony of a witness who does not take an oath, cannot be considered as evidence, but only information that is considered by the judge.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document