scholarly journals Kekuatan Alat Bukti Keterangan Saksi yang Memiliki Hubungan Darah dengan Terdakwa dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Keluarga

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-490
Author(s):  
I Gede Agus Sudiantara ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

The strength of evidence from witnesses who have family ties to the defendant in the crime of theft in the family, the process of examining witnesses is the main evidence in a crime. The purpose of this study is to reveal the strength of the evidence of witnesses who have blood relations with the defendant in the evidentiary process and barriers to proof by using evidence of witnesses who have blood relations with the defendant in the crime of theft in the family. The research method used is normative legal research. Sources of primary and secondary legal materials. Legal materials that have been obtained from the literature study and the approach to legislation were analyzed using a systematic interpretation technique. The results of the study reveal that witness testimony is very necessary in the trial in order to provide appropriate sanctions for the defendant. The barrier to proof from witness statements who have family relationships and ties is if the minimum principle of proof cannot be proven. It can be concluded that the strength of the testimony of a witness who does not take an oath, cannot be considered as evidence, but only information that is considered by the judge.

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Hasan Basri ◽  
Muhammad Azani

<p><em>This article analyzes the inheritance practices carried out by the community in Bantan District, Bengkalis Regency Based on Islamic Law. The research method used is a sociological legal research that discusses the application of positive law regarding the practice of community inheritance in Bantan District, Bengkalis Regency. The results showed: a. The community in Bantan Subdistrict turned out to be wrong in understanding the principle of balanced justice which was considered to be contrary to the sense of justice for the heirs. They understand the principle of balanced justice must be in the same sense. Whereas the meaning of the principle is that each heir, both male and female, has the same rights in obtaining inheritance rights. Men get more rights which do not mean unfair, but in Islamic law it stipulates that men are responsible for the burden of the family; b. The community in Bantan District in understanding radd in Islamic law does not fully refer to the KHI which is a reference in determining the law. They divide radd based only on habits that can be shared with the heirs who want it or the mosque; c. The community in Bantan Subdistrict considers that the heirs who passed away first from the heir, cannot be replaced by the heir's child. Whereas based on Article 185 paragraph (1) the KHI position of the heir can be replaced by the offspring of both male and female.</em></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ummu Salamah

Abstrak: Proses mediasi merupakan  upaya alternatiif dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan pada aspek hukum keluarga terutama pada hak dan kepentingan anak-anak. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk dapat memastikan adanya perlindungan pada anak-anak akibat perceraian orang tuanya melalui jalur mediasi. Target khusus  yang ingin dicapai dalam penelitian ini agar anak-anak korban perceraian tidak dirugikan akan hak-haknya. Metode dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normative, setelah mengkaji sumber data yang didapatkan melalui kepustakaan juga menelaah hasil  mediasi di Pengadilan Agama yang terdapat dalam Akta Perdamaian.Kata Kunci: mediasi, peradilan, Akta PerdamaianAbstract: The mediation process is an alternative effort in the family law, particularly in solving problems on the rights and interests of the child. The purpose of this research is to ensure the protection of children of divorced parents through mediation. The specific targets to be achieved in this study is that children as victims of divorce are not deprived of their rights. Normative legal research method is applied in examining the data obtained through  literature review and also by examining the results of mediation in the Settlement Agreement at the Religious Courts.Keywords: Mediation, Judicial, Settlement Agreement


Author(s):  
Erfina Fuadatul Khilmi ◽  
Arvina Hafidzah ◽  
Praptika Septi Femilia

Differences in understanding the distribution pattern of inheritance rights potentially cause disputes which fade the family relationships and merge endless conflicts among the family members. The aim of the research is to comprehend the implementation of inheritance dispute arrangement based on local wisdom as an alternative method in achieving the community’s balance and harmony that they still consider the arrangement through a court action as a taboo of settlement. The research shows several findings; factors that influence the differences in the distribution of inheritance in Gayasan A, Jenggawah, Jember Regency are the absence of communication between the heirs (the giver) and heirs, which is known as debik kek lopaen; and the community’s view of the heirs also influence the distribution of inheritance rights, so that local wisdom is needed as a strategic tool in arranging the disputes by implementing internal discussions among the family members mediated by a customary head and a sanction of exclusion (not diajepi). Data collection was conducted through a combination of literature study and field study by triangulating the results of observations, interviews and questionnaires. The research design applied was the sociology of law with an approach of problem on the unwritten customary law implemented in the community of Gayasan A as a social fact developed from the value system of the community and supported by a theoretical approach


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Riska Andista Indriyani ◽  
Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni

<p>Abstract</p><p>This article explains the problem, firstly about the causal factors cause of the child sues the parent. Secondly, regarding law enforcement efforts against Article 46 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Mariage to prevent children from suing parents. This research is normative legal research is descriptive. The type of data used is secondary data, data collection techniques used is literature study, further technical analysis used is the nature of descriptive data analysis. The results of the research indicate that the factors causing the child to sue the parent is the existence of problems in the family and the provisions of the Article related to the obligation of the child to the parents has not provided assertiveness that the child who sues the parent is a violation of these provisions. The law enforcement effort against Article 46 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 regarding Marriage to prevent children from suing parents is done by settling family problems through deliberation  or through mediation and formulation of continued legal policy as the elaboration of such provisions.</p><p>Keywords: Sues Paren; Child Obligation; Law Enforcement.</p><p> </p><p>Abstrak</p><p>Artikel ini menjelaskan permasalahan, pertama tentang faktor penyebab anak menggugat orangtua. Kedua, tentang upaya penegakan hukum terhadap Pasal 46 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan untuk mencegah anak menggugat orangtua. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat deskriptif. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder, teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan, selanjutnya teknis analisis yang digunakan adalah sifat analisis data deskriptif. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor penyebab anak menggugat orangtua adalah adanya permasalahan dalam keluarga dan ketentuan pasal terkait kewajiban anak  kepada orangtua belum memberikan ketegasan bahwa anak yang menggugat orangtua merupakan pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan tersebut. Upaya penegakan hukum terhadap Pasal 46 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan untuk mencegah anak menggugat orangtua dilakukan dengan penyelesaian permasalahan keluarga melalui musyawarah atau melalui mediasi dan perumusan kebijakan hukum lanjutan sebagai penjabaran ketentuan tersebut.</p><p>Kata kunci: Menggugat Orangtua; Kewajiban Anak; Penegakan Hukum.</p>


Esensi Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-63
Author(s):  
Arman Tjoneng ◽  
Christin Septina Basani ◽  
Novalita Sidabutar

Abstract The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has become a super institution with extraordinary restraint. With the new Corruption Eradication Commission Law, some people think that the KPK has been weakened, which has been an institution loved by the public, even though the government denies that the new KPK Law has not weakened the KPK at all. One of the new things is the formation of the KPK Supervisory Body, one of which has the authority to grant permission to the KPK to conduct searches, which in fact has an impact on the problems at hand. The method used is a normative legal research method. The approach used is a statutory approach. The data used are secondary data obtained by literature study and primary data obtained by conducting interviews with related party respondents. There has been a shift in the meaning of Barriers to Justice as stated in Article 221 of the Criminal Code with Article 221 of the Corruption Eradication Law where Article 221 of the Criminal Code views Obstruction of Justice as a material offense while for Article 21 of the Corruption Eradication Law, Judicial Obstruction is seen as a formal offense. On the other hand, the actions of the Supervisory Board in granting licenses for searches, confiscation, etc. are not automatically considered a disturbance of justice unless it can be proven that the elements of wrongdoing committed by the Supervisory Board can be proven.   Keywords : Corruption, Authority, Obstruction Of Justice.   ABSTRAK Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) telah menjadi lembaga super dengan pengekangan yang luar biasa. Dengan adanya Undang-Undang KPK yang baru, sebagian orang menilai telah terjadi pelemahan KPK yang selama ini menjadi institusi yang dicintai masyarakat, padahal pemerintah membantah bahwa Undang-Undang KPK yang baru sama sekali tidak melemahkan KPK. Salah satu hal baru yaitu adalah pembentukan Badan Pengawas KPK yang salah satunya memiliki kewenangan untuk memberikan izin kepada KPK untuk melakukan penggeledahan, yang ternyata berdampak pada permasalahan yang sedang dihadapi. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan statutori. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh dengan studi pustaka dan data primer diperoleh dengan melakukan wawancara dengan responden pihak terkait. Telah terjadi pergeseran makna Hambatan Keadilan sebagaimana tertuang dalam Pasal 221 KUHP dengan Pasal 221 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Korupsi dimana Pasal 221 KUHP memandang Obstruksi Keadilan sebagai delik material sedangkan untuk Pasal 21 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Korupsi, Obstruksi Peradilan dipandang sebagai delik formal. Di sisi lain, tindakan Dewan Pengawas dalam pemberian izin penggeledahan, penyitaan, dan lain-lain tidak serta merta dianggap sebagai gangguan keadilan kecuali dapat dibuktikan bahwa unsur-unsur perbuatan salah yang dilakukan Dewan Pengawas dapat dibuktikan. Kata Kunci: Korupsi, Otoritas, Obstruksi Keadilan.


Author(s):  
A.A. Istri Ari Atu Dewi ◽  
Putri Triari Dwijayanthi ◽  
Cokorde Istri Dian Laksmi Dewi

This paper aims to identify, analyze and elaborate on the role of the family in fulfilling the right to education during the Covid-19 pandemic as well as a model for family participation in fulfilling the right to education during the Covid-19 pandemic. This is a socio-legal research method or socio-legal research which examines the text and context with a statutory approach combined with the conditions in the community. The results show that online school is the best solution to guarantee the right to education as stipulated in Surat Edaran Nomor 15 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for Organizing Learning from Home in an Emergency for the Spread of Covid-19 and family role models in an effort to fulfill the right to education during the Covid-19 pandemic, which is in the form of awareness from parents or guardians to provide assistance during learning from home activities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-149
Author(s):  
Islamiyatur Rokhmah

In this research will be studied about reproductive health in the perspective of the Qur’an, the verses that will be discussed thistime include reproduction health verses both biologically and sociologically, which is related to the relationship of family relationships in the family process of reproductive health. The research method used in this study is a literary research that examines the verses of Alqur’an on reproductive health, by looking at various views of contemporary and classical mufassir. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-137
Author(s):  
Sri Dewi Rahayu Dewi ◽  
Yulia Monita

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan pidana terhadap pelaku penyalahguna narkotika golongan I bagi diri sendiri. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum Yuridis Normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penyebab hakim menjatuhkan putusan berbeda terhadap kedua kasus ini karena terdapat keadaan yang meringankan terhadap kedua terdakwa. Pada studi kasus keadaan yang meringankan yang dipertimbangkan oleh hakim yaitu: karena terdakwa merupakan korban penyalahguna narkotika yang sudah kecanduan serta didukung dengan keterangan saksi di persidangan. Oleh karena itu hakim harus mempertimbangkan fakta yuridis, fakta persidangan dan fakta sosiologis dari terdakwa. Hal ini dilakukan agar terdakwa merasa bahwa hakim menjatuhkan putusan pidana sesuai dengan perbuatan terdakwa. ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the basic considerations of judges in convicting criminals against class I narcotics abusers themselves. This research method is a normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that the cause of the judge handed down a different verdict in these two cases because there were circumstances that alleviated the two defendants. In the case study the mitigating circumstances considered by the judge are: because the defendant is a victim of narcotics who are addicted and supported by witness testimony at the trial. Therefore the judge must consider the juridical facts, the facts of the trial and the sociological facts of the defendant. This was done so that the defendant felt that the judge handed down the criminal verdict according to the defendant's actions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-228
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Ayu Agung Cleo Bayu Pertiwi ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini

The financial sector in Indonesia is a sector that is most important than advancing and developing the level of the economy. This of course needs to be maintained both by banks and other financial institutions so that the process of economic development in Indonesia is not delayed. Moreover to maintain this thing, it is necessary to make improvements which in particular do it with financial institutions and of course not banks. The purpose of this study is to reveal the factors that cause overmacht due to Covid-19 at PT. Federal International Finance (FIF) Karangasem Regency and efforts to resolve the overmacht due to Covid-19 at PT. Federal International Finance (FIF) Karangasem Regency. This research method using empirical legal research with a literature study approach. The sources of data used are primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques by observing, interviewing and documentation methods. After primary legal data and secondary legal data are collected, the data will then be processed and analyzed using systematic legal data processing methods. The research results reveal that some of the problems identified lie in internal and external factors where these problems cannot be borne by the consumer and beyond the control of the consumer himself. The overmatch settlement is carried out by using non-litigation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-150
Author(s):  
Abraham Amanda

The number of arrests carried out by the KPK lately, known as the Capture Operations or OTT, led to a polemic whether the action was legal or invalid. There are parties who consider that the OTT carried out by the KPK is illegal or illegal. The research used is a normative legal research method (normative juridical) by conducting a literature study to collect secondary data. Normative legal research is done by examining library materials (literature) which are secondary data. From the analysis that can be understood, the OTT Corruption Eradication Commission against suspects in corruption cases in relation to the term caught in the Criminal Procedure Code Article 111 paragraph (1) KUHAP and Article 1 point 19 KUHAP above the legal basis for the Corruption Eradication Commission in conducting Hand Arrest Operations (OTT ) which is considered illegal and considers that the Hand Arrest Operations are different from the Hand Caught contained in these articles. Then OTT in relation to the special investigation technique known as Controlled Delivery is often used by BNN investigators, assessing that the practice of KPK in OTT has used two such actions (interdiction and entrapment) which means KPK investigators have adopted without the authority that BNN investigators have, so that the KPK has committed three types of actions that violate the law (interdiction, entrapment and in the process of investigation).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document