scholarly journals Antimicrobial stewardship programs in emergency departments: how do we measure antimicrobial use? A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesus Ruiz-Ramos ◽  
◽  
Emili Vallvé Alcón ◽  
Francisco Moreno Ramos ◽  
Rosario Santolaya-Perrín ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Usual Practice ◽  
The Impact

Objectives. The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become a usual practice in hospital settings. However, the method for monitoring antimicrobial use in accident and emergency departments (ED) is not yet adequately defined. Thus, the objective of this review is to describe antimicrobial use indicators used by ASPs implemented in ED. Material and methods. A systematic review was performed based on studies found in the following academic research databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus (Period: January 2000 to December 2019). Controlled clinical trials, before-and-after studies, interrupted time series, and repeated measures studies assessing the impact of ASPs on antimicrobial use in ED were included; studies published in languages other than English or Spanish were excluded from this review. Results. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. In total, 15 (62.5%) studies described the ASP team members who collaborated with the ED staff. Most (21; 80.8%) studies used the percentage of patients with an antibiotic prescription as an indicator. Four (15.4%) studies included defined daily dose data. The antibiotic treatment duration was reported in four (15.4%) studies. Only two studies assessed the impact of the ASP using microbiological indicators, both of which used the incidence of infection with Clostridioides difficile as the indicator. Conclusions. The reports of experiences in implementing ASPs in ED show heterogeneous antimicrobial use indicators, which makes it difficult to compare results. Therefore, antimicrobial use indicators for ASPs must be standardised between hospital units.

scholarly journals 39. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in a Community Hospital setting: An Interrupted Times Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S141-S142
Author(s):  
Jason Li ◽  
Ken Chan ◽  
Hina Parvez ◽  
Margaret Gorlin ◽  
Miriam A Smith
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Community hospitals have fewer resources for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) compared to larger tertiary hospitals. At our 312-bed community hospital, Long Island Jewish Forest Hills/Northwell, a combination of modified preauthorization, prospective audit feedback, and ASP education was implemented starting in August 2019 (Monday through Friday 9 am to 5 pm). Methods This retrospective study evaluated the impact of ASP interventions on the rate of targeted antimicrobial use over a 7 month pre- vs 7 month post- intervention period (Aug 2018 to Feb 2019 vs Aug 2019 to Feb 2020). Targeted antimicrobials included piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin, daptomycin, and carbapenems. The primary outcome was the monthly mean for overall targeted antimicrobial use measured by the rate of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present. Secondary outcomes were the individual rates of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present for each of the targeted antimicrobials, and the hospital’s overall standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR). Data were analyzed as a segmented regression of interrupted time series. Results Pre-intervention, there was an increasing trend (positive slope, p< 0.05) in the monthly mean, hospital SAAR, vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam use. Post-intervention, there was a significant change in slope for these same metrics, indicating a decrease in the mean use. Immediate impact of ASP interventions, measured by the difference in antibiotic use between the end of each intervention period, was visually evident in all cases except carbapenems (Fig. 1 through 4). The immediate impact on the overall monthly mean represented a significant reduction in the rate of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present, -12.72 (CI -21.02 to -4.42, P < 0.0066). The pre- vs post- ASP gap for all measures was negative and consistent with fewer days of antibiotic use immediately following intervention. Conclusion A targeted, multifaceted ASP intervention utilizing modified preauthorization, prospective audit feedback, and education significantly reduced antibiotic use in a community hospital. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals The impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs on the appropriateness of prophylaxis and antimicrobial therapy: the experience of the “F. Miulli” Hospital of Bari

ABOUTOPEN ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-13
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Picerno ◽  
Gisella Caracciolo ◽  
Martina Cortelletti ◽  
Maurizio Formoso ◽  
Vincenzo Longobardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Pharmaceutical Expenditure ◽  
Economic Resources ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Professional Interactions

Introduction: The continuous increase of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) to optimize antimicrobial use, including selection, dose, duration, and way of administration. Methods and Results: An “Antimicrobial Stewardship Team” (AST) was established at “F. Miulli” Hospital of Bari. The AST is a multidisciplinary group formed by a pharmacist, an infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist, an anesthetist and a hygienist. The AST has started a clinical path of professional interactions and optimization of antimicrobial use. The AST was focused on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, planning events/meetings with 13 wards of “F. Miulli” hospital and writing 13 operating guidelines. The AST was focused on antimicrobial therapies too. On this occasion, the AST did not organize events or meetings but was focused on professional interactions with clinicians to optimize the antimicrobial use in the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens. A reduction of antimicrobial use (defined daily dose, DDD) and pharmaceutical expenditure was reached in surgical wards during 2017-2018, while, in the same period, an increase of antimicrobial use (DDD) and pharmaceutical expenditure was observed in non-surgical wards. Conclusions: The “Antimicrobial Stewardship Team” programs are essential to monitor the hospital economic resources and to support the purchase of the innovative antimicrobial therapies to treat multi-drug resistant pathogens.

scholarly journals 152. Applying A Difference-in-Difference Analysis to Assess Effect of Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies on Changes in Antimicrobial Use

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S86-S86
Author(s):  
Ann F Chou ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Makoto M Jones ◽  
Christopher J Graber ◽  
Matthew B Goetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Pharmacist ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Time Points ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background About 30–50% of inpatient antimicrobial therapy is sub-optimal. Health care facilities have utilized various antimicrobial stewardship (AS) strategies to optimize appropriate antimicrobial use, improve health outcomes, and promote patient safety. However, little evidence exists to assess relationships between AS strategies and antimicrobial use. This study examined the impact of changes in AS strategies on antimicrobial use over time. Methods This study used data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare Analysis & Informatics Group (HAIG) AS survey, administered at 130 VA facilities in 2012 and 2015, and antimicrobial utilization from VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Four AS strategies were examined: having an AS team, feedback mechanism on antimicrobial use, infectious diseases (ID) attending physicians, and clinical pharmacist on wards. Change in AS strategies were computed by taking the difference in the presence of a given strategy in a facility between 2012–2015. The outcome was the difference between antimicrobial use per 1000 patient days in 2012–2013 and 2015–2016. Employing multiple regression analysis, changes in antimicrobial use was estimated as a function of changes in AS strategies, controlling for ID human resources in and organizational complexity. Results Of the 4 strategies, only change in availability of AS teams had an impact on antimicrobial use. Compared to facilities with no AS teams at both time points, antibiotic use decreased by 63.9 uses per 1000 patient days in facilities that did not have a AS team in 2012 but implemented one in 2015 (p=0.0183). Facilities that had an AS team at both time points decreased use by 62.2 per 1000 patient days (p=0.0324). Conclusion The findings showed that AS teams reduced inpatient antibiotic use over time. While changes in having feedback on antimicrobial use and clinical pharmacist on wards showed reduced antimicrobial use between 2012–2015, the differences were not statistically significant. These strategies may already be a part of a comprehensive AS program and employed by AS teams. In further development of stewardship programs within healthcare organizations, the association between AS teams and antibiotic use should inform program design and implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Promoting Antimicrobial Stewardship Education Among Pediatricians Through a Maintenance of Certification Part 4 Quality Impro

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s29-s29
Author(s):  
Prachi Singh ◽  
Brian Lee ◽  
Jenna Holmen
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Transition Period ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Maintenance Of Certification ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Baseline Knowledge ◽  
Initial Survey ◽  
The Impact

Background: The rise of antimicrobial resistance has made it critical for clinicians to understand antimicrobial stewardship principles. We sought to determine whether the opportunity to participate in an American Board of Pediatrics Maintenance of Certification Part 4 (MOC4) quality improvement (QI) project would engage pediatricians and improve their knowledge about antimicrobial stewardship. Methods: In August 2019, a new clinical algorithm for acute appendicitis, spearheaded by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), was implemented at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland to standardize care and optimize antimicrobial use. Medical staff were invited to participate in a QI project evaluating the impact of this algorithm. Data were collected for the 2 quarters preceding implementation (baseline), for the quarter of implementation (transition period), and for the quarter after implementation. Participants were offered MOC4 credit for reviewing these 3 cycles of data and associated materials highlighting information about antimicrobial stewardship. An initial survey was given to participants to assess their baseline knowledge via 4 questions about antimicrobial use in surgical patients (Table 1). At the conclusion of the QI project, another survey was conducted to reassess participant knowledge and to evaluate overall satisfaction with the project. Results: In total, 150 clinicians completed the initial survey. Of these, 44% were general pediatricians and 56% were pediatric subspecialists. Based on years out of training, their levels of experience varied: >20 years in 24%, 11–20 years in 32.7%, 0–10 years in 34.7%, and currently in training in 8.7%. Of the 150 initial participants, 133 (89%) completed the QI project and the second survey. Between surveys, there was significant improvement in knowledge about the appropriate timing and duration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (Table 1). Moreover, 88% of participants responded that the QI project was extremely effective in helping them learn about antimicrobial stewardship principles and about ASP interventions. Conclusions: Participation in this MOC4 QI project resulted in significant improvement in knowledge about antimicrobial use in surgical patients, and the activity was perceived as a highly effective way to learn about antimicrobial stewardship. QI projects that leverage MOC4 credit can be a powerful tool for engaging pediatricians and disseminating education about antimicrobial stewardship.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

The impact of digital interventions on antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals: A qualitative synthesis of systematic reviews (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany A Van Dort ◽  
Jonathan Penm ◽  
Angus Ritchie ◽  
Melissa T Baysari
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽  
Digital Interventions ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs aim to optimize antimicrobial use by utilizing a suite of coordinated strategies. With the increased use of health information technology in hospitals, AMS processes that were traditionally paper-based are becoming computerized and streamlined. A number of reviews on digital interventions supporting AMS have been performed, so we performed a review of reviews to consolidate findings OBJECTIVE To provide a systematic overview and synthesis of evidence on the effectiveness of digital interventions to improve antimicrobial prescribing and monitoring in hospitals. METHODS Databases: Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from 2010 onwards. Papers were eligible if they included studies that examined the effectiveness of digital health interventions related to antimicrobial prescribing and monitoring, in an inpatient hospital setting. Papers were excluded if they did not include a clearly defined search strategy, if they were limited to a pediatric setting, or they were not in English. RESULTS Seven systematic reviews were included for data extraction. Five reviews were of moderate quality and two of low quality. A large number of digital interventions were evaluated, with a strong focus on clinical decision support. There was a large variability in outcome measures used. Six reviews reported that digital interventions reduced antimicrobial use and improved antimicrobial appropriateness. The impact of digital interventions on clinical outcomes was inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review indicate digital interventions, regardless of type, reduce antimicrobial use and improve antimicrobial appropriateness in hospitals. We recommend hospitals consider implementing one or more digital interventions to facilitate AMS programs.

scholarly journals Application of an antibiotic spectrum index in the neonatal intensive care unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1181-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra C. Lahart ◽  
Christopher C. McPherson ◽  
Jeffrey S. Gerber ◽  
Barbara B. Warner ◽  
Brian R. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Antimicrobial Spectrum ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

AbstractAntimicrobial stewardship programs typically use days of therapy to assess antimicrobial use. However, this metric does not account for the antimicrobial spectrum of activity. We applied an antibiotic spectrum index to a population of very-low-birth-weight infants to assess its utility to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

Development of an antimicrobial stewardship program in an integrated healthcare system

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Lane ◽  
Amanda J Hays ◽  
Helen Newland ◽  
Jeanne E Zack ◽  
Rebecca M Guth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare System ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
System Level ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Integrated Healthcare ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Regulatory Mandates ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose The development of an inpatient antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in an integrated healthcare system is described. Summary With increasing national focus on reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use, state and national regulatory mandates require hospitals to develop ASPs. In 2015, BJC HealthCare, a multihospital health system, developed a system-level, multidisciplinary ASP team to assist member hospitals with ASP implementation. A comprehensive gap analysis was performed to assess current stewardship resources, activities and compliance with CDC core elements at each facility. BJC system clinical leads facilitated the development of hospital-specific leadership support statements, identification of hospital pharmacy and medical leaders, and led development of staff and patient educational components. An antimicrobial-use data dashboard was created for reporting and tracking the impact of improvement activities. Hospital-level interventions were individualized based on the needs and resources at each facility. Hospital learnings were shared at bimonthly system ASP meetings to disseminate best practices. The initial gap analysis revealed that BJC hospitals were compliant in a median of 6 ASP elements (range, 4–8) required by regulatory mandates. By leveraging system resources, all hospitals were fully compliant with regulatory requirements by January 2017. Conclusion BJC’s ASP model facilitated the development of broad-based stewardship activities, including education modules for patients and providers and clinical decision support, while allowing hospitals to implement activities based on local needs and resource availability.

scholarly journals Clostridium DifficileInfection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene K. Louh ◽  
William G. Greendyke ◽  
Emilia A. Hermann ◽  
Karina W. Davidson ◽  
Louise Falzon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Chlorhexidine Bathing ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVEPrevention ofClostridium difficileinfection (CDI) in acute-care hospitals is a priority for hospitals and clinicians. We performed a qualitative systematic review to update the evidence on interventions to prevent CDI published since 2009.DESIGNWe searched Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and grey literature databases from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2015.SETTINGWe included studies performed in acute-care hospitals.PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTSWe included studies conducted on hospitalized patients that investigated the impact of specific interventions on CDI rates.INTERVENTIONSWe used the QI-Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) to assess the quality of included studies. Interventions were grouped thematically: environmental disinfection, antimicrobial stewardship, hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing, probiotics, bundled approaches, and others. A meta-analysis was performed when possible.RESULTSOf 3,236 articles screened, 261 met the criteria for full-text review and 46 studies were ultimately included. The average quality rating was 82% according to the QI-MQCS. The most effective interventions, resulting in a 45% to 85% reduction in CDI, included daily to twice daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces (including bed rails) and terminal cleaning of patient rooms with chlorine-based products. Bundled interventions and antimicrobial stewardship showed promise for reducing CDI rates. Chlorhexidine bathing and intensified hand-hygiene practices were not effective for reducing CDI rates.CONCLUSIONSDaily and terminal cleaning of patient rooms using chlorine-based products were most effective in reducing CDI rates in hospitals. Further studies are needed to identify the components of bundled interventions that reduce CDI rates.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2017;38:476–482

scholarly journals Effectiveness of counselling and psychotherapeutic interventions for people with dementia and their families: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Shoesmith ◽  
Alys Wyn Griffiths ◽  
Cara Sass ◽  
Divine Charura
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Repeated Measures Design ◽  
Care Givers ◽  
Psychotherapeutic Interventions ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
The Impact

Abstract As there is currently no cure for dementia, providing psycho-social support is imperative. Counselling and psychotherapeutic interventions offer a way to provide individualised support for people with dementia and their families. However, to date, there has not been a systematic review examining the research evidence for these interventions. This review aimed to examine the following research questions: (1) Are counselling/psychotherapeutic interventions effective for people with dementia?, (2) Are counselling/psychotherapeutic interventions effective for care-givers of people with dementia? and (3) Which modes of delivery are most effective for people with dementia and care-givers of people with dementia? A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO and CINAHL in March 2019. Keyword searches were employed with the terms ‘dement*’, ‘counsel*’, ‘psychotherapy’, ‘therap*’, ‘care’ and ‘outcome’, for the years 2000–2019. Thirty-one papers were included in the review, from seven countries. Twenty studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or adopted a quasi-experimental design. The remaining studies were qualitative or single-group repeated-measures design. The review identified variation in the counselling/psychotherapeutic approaches and mode of delivery. Most interventions adopted either a problem-solving or cognitive behavioural therapy approach. Mixed effectiveness was found on various outcomes. The importance of customised modifications for people with dementia was highlighted consistently. Understanding the dyadic relationships between people with dementia and their care-givers is essential to offering effective interventions and guidance for practitioners is needed. Information about the cognitive impairment experienced by participants with dementia was poorly reported and is essential in the development of this research area. Future studies should consider the impact of cognitive impairment in developing guidance for counselling/psychotherapeutic intervention delivery for people with dementia.

A Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in the Emergency Department

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 774-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Losier ◽  
Tasha D. Ramsey ◽  
Kyle John Wilby ◽  
Emily K. Black
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Process Of Care ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
Antimicrobial Utilization ◽  
Improve Patient

Background/Objective: To improve antimicrobial utilization, development and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in the emergency department (ED) has been recommended. The primary objective of this review was to characterize antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the ED and to identify interventions that improve patient outcomes or process of care and/or reduce consequences of antimicrobial use. Methods: This study was completed as a systematic review. The following databases were searched from inception through November, 2016: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after studies, interrupted time series studies, and repeated-measures studies evaluating AMS interventions in the ED were included in the review. Studies published in languages other than English were excluded. Results: A total of 43 studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified from our search. Patient or provider education and guideline or clinical pathway implementation were the most commonly reported interventions. Few studies reported on audit and feedback, and no study evaluated preauthorization. Impact of interventions showed variable results. Where identified, benefits of AMS interventions primarily included improvement in delivery of care or a decrease in antimicrobial utilization; however, most studies were rated as having unclear or high risk of bias. Conclusion: AMS interventions in the ED may improve patient care. However, the optimal combination of interventions is unclear. Additional studies with more rigorous design evaluating core components of AMS programs, including prospective audit and feedback are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document