Supplementation of Conjugated Linoleic Acid with γ-Oryzanol for 12 Weeks Effectively Reduces Body Fat in Healthy Overweight Korean Women

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Hee Kim ◽  
Ok-Hyun Kim ◽  
Yeong-Lae Ha ◽  
Jeong-Ok Kim
2010 ◽  
Vol 140 (11) ◽  
pp. 1949-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam A. Sinclair ◽  
Weerasinghe M. P. B. Weerasinghe ◽  
Robert G. Wilkinson ◽  
Michael J. de Veth ◽  
Dale E. Bauman

2005 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 2409-2415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asuka AKAHOSHI ◽  
Kazunori KOBA ◽  
Rie ENMOTO ◽  
Kazuko NISHIMURA ◽  
Yukiko HONDA ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 276 (4) ◽  
pp. R1172-R1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. DeLany ◽  
Fawn Blohm ◽  
Alycia A. Truett ◽  
Joseph A. Scimeca ◽  
David B. West

Recent reports have demonstrated that conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) has effects on body fat accumulation. In our previous work, CLA reduced body fat accumulation in mice fed either a high-fat or low-fat diet. Although CLA feeding reduced energy intake, the results suggested that some of the metabolic effects were not a consequence of the reduced food intake. We therefore undertook a study to determine a dose of CLA that would have effects on body composition without affecting energy intake. Five doses of CLA (0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0% by weight) were studied in AKR/J male mice ( n = 12/group; age, 39 days) maintained on a high-fat diet (%fat 45 kcal). Energy intake was not suppressed by any CLA dose. Body fat was significantly lower in the 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0% CLA groups compared with controls. The retroperitoneal depot was most sensitive to the effects of CLA, whereas the epididymal depot was relatively resistant. Higher doses of CLA also significantly increased carcass protein content. A time-course study of the effects of 1% CLA on body composition showed reductions in fat pad weights within 2 wk and continued throughout 12 wk of CLA feeding. In conclusion, CLA feeding produces a rapid, marked decrease in fat accumulation, and an increase in protein accumulation, at relatively low doses without any major effects on food intake.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 676-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Purushotham ◽  
Gayle E. Shrode ◽  
Angela A. Wendel ◽  
Li-Fen Liu ◽  
Martha A. Belury

2006 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Navarro ◽  
J. Miranda ◽  
I. Churruca ◽  
A. Fernández-Quintela ◽  
V. M. Rodríguez ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy A. McCrorie ◽  
Edel M. Keaveney ◽  
Julie M. W. Wallace ◽  
Nino Binns ◽  
M. Barbara E. Livingstone

The primary purpose of the present review was to determine if the scientific evidence available for potential human health benefits of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is sufficient to support health claims on foods based on milk naturally enriched with cis-9, trans-11-CLA (c9, t11-CLA). A search of the scientific literature was conducted and showed that almost all the promising research results that have emerged in relation to cancer, heart health, obesity, diabetes and bone health have been in animal models or in vitro. Most human intervention studies have utilised synthetic CLA supplements, usually a 50:50 blend of c9, t11-CLA and trans-10, cis-12-CLA (t10, c12-CLA). Of these studies, the only evidence that is broadly consistent is an effect on body fat and weight reduction. A previous review of the relevant studies found that 3.2 g CLA/d resulted in a modest body fat loss in human subjects of about 0.09 kg/week, but this effect was attributed to the t10, c12-CLA isomer. There is no evidence of a consistent benefit of c9, t11-CLA on any health conditions; and in fact both synthetic isomers, particularly t10, c12-CLA, have been suspected of having pro-diabetic effects in individuals who are already at risk of developing diabetes. Four published intervention studies using naturally enriched CLA products were identified; however, the results were inconclusive. This may be partly due to the differences in the concentration of CLA administered in animal and human studies. In conclusion, further substantiation of the scientific evidence relating to CLA and human health benefits are required before health claims can be confirmed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex S. Ribeiro ◽  
Fábio Luiz C. Pina ◽  
Soraya R. Dodero ◽  
Danilo R. P. Silva ◽  
Brad J. Schoenfeld ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of 8 weeks of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation associated with aerobic exercise on body fat and lipid profile on obese women. We performed a randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled trial with 28 obese women who received 3.2 g/day of CLA or 4 g/day of olive oil (placebo group) while performing an 8-week protocol of aerobic exercise. Dietary intake (food record), body fat (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and biochemical analysis (blood sample) were assessed before and after the intervention period. Independent of CLA supplementation, both groups improved (p < .05) oxygen uptake (CLA group, 13.2%; PLC group, 14.8%), trunk fat (CLA group, −1.0%; PLC group, −0.5%), leg fat (CLA group, −1.0%; PLC group, −1.6%), and total body fat (CLA group, −1.7%; PLC group, −1.3%) after the 8-week intervention. No main effect or Group × Time interaction was found for total cholesterol, triglycerides, and plasma lipoproteins (p > .05). We conclude that CLA supplementation associated with aerobic exercise has no effect on body fat reduction and lipid profile improvements over placebo in young adult obese women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document