scholarly journals Evaluation of Infection Control Measures in a Public Sector Dental Hospital of Peshawar

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdullah ◽  
Saira Afridi ◽  
Syed Imran Gillani

Objective:To evaluate infection control measure in a public sector dental hospital of Peshawar.Methodology:It was a cross sectional study conducted in Khyber college of Dentistry. Study subjects were Dental health care providers who were willing to participate in the study. A structured questionnaire was designed that included various categories of infection control. Data was entered into SPSS version 17. Descriptive statistics were applied and frequencies and percentages were obtained.Results:The results from the data shows that the overall score for the infection control standards were less than 50%. Among the various categories of infection control only personal hygiene standards showed good score (77.3%). Personal protective equipment score was adequate (61%) while hand hygiene score was inadequate (52%). The rest of the categories showed poor scores.Conclusion:The result of the study shows that majority of categories of infection control measures at Khyber college of Dentistry are inadequate or poor.

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foluso John Owotade ◽  
Adebola Fasunioro

Abstract Although identification of risks to dental healthcare workers has been explored in several industrialized nations, very little data is available from developing countries. This paper examines the occupational hazards present in the dental environment and reports survey results concerning attitudes and activities of a group of Nigerian dental care providers. A survey on occupational hazards was conducted among the clinical dental staff at the Dental Hospital of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex, Ile-Ife in Osun State, Nigeria. Thirty eight of the forty staff responded, yielding a response rate of 95%. Subject ages ranged from 26 to 56 years with approximately 25% in the 31-46 year old bracket. All of the staff were aware of the occupational exposure to hazards, and the majority had attended seminars/workshops on the subject. Only five staff members (13.2%) owned a health insurance policy and 26 (68.4%) had been vaccinated against Hepatitis B infection. All dentists (24) had been vaccinated compared with only two non-dentists; this relationship was significant (p= 30.07, x2=0.000). Fourteen members of the clinical staff (36.8%) could recall a sharp injury in the past six months, and the majority (71.1%) had regular contact with dental amalgam. Wearing protective eye goggles was the least employed cross infection control measure, while backache was the most frequently experienced hazard in 47% of the subjects. The need for Hepatitis B vaccinations for all members of the staff was emphasized, and the enforcement of strict cross infection control measures was recommended. The physical activities and body positions that predispose workers to backaches were identified and staff education on the prevention of backaches was provided. Citation Fasunloro A, Owotade FJ. Occupational Hazards Among Clinical Dental Staff. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004 May;(5)2:134-152.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-130
Author(s):  
R Gupta ◽  
NA Ingle ◽  
N Kaur ◽  
HV Dubey ◽  
E Ingle

ABSTRACT Introduction CDC (Center for Disease Control & prevention), who proposed Universal Precautions, states that “Treat each patient as potentially risk”. Therefore, it is our basic responsibility to control the spread of such devastating diseases by following infection control measures. Aims & Objectives To assess the various personal protective measures adapted by dental practitioners in Agra city and to know how many dentists are vaccinated against Hepatitis B for prevention of the spread of this disease. Materials and Methods The study included response using questionnaire from 150 dental practitioners from Agra city, chosen by random sampling. Questions were related to their personal protective measures employed by the dental practitioners and information about their prophylaxis against Hepatitis B was also obtained. Results Among the dental practitioners, 80% were males. Approximately 82% of the dental practitioners were vaccinated against HBV. Only 6% followed the CDC recommendations for hand washing practices, and about 64% dental practitioners gave wrong answers related to droplet infection. Conclusion Lack of awareness regarding universal precautions proposed by CDC is observed among dental practitioners. There is a great need for creating awareness among dental practitioners.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-101
Author(s):  
M Bayoumi ◽  
A Ahmed ◽  
H Hassan

BackgroundPatients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy and health-care providers at unique, complex units such as hemodialysis outpatient clinics are susceptible for health care-associated infection. Nurses' compliance to follow infection control measures reduces transmission of infection.AimThe study aimed to evaluate the nurses' practices toward applying infection control measures at a dialysis unit.Methods and DesignA cross-sectional study was applied to evaluate nurses' performance toward application of infection control measures using National Opportunity to Improve Infection Control in End-stage renal disease (NOTICE) checklists at a dialysis unit in Beni-Suef City, Egypt.ResultsThe overall nurses' performance regarding infection control at enrolled dialysis units were: the percentage of all NOTICE checklists demonstrated that half of nurses had met most steps for checklist #1c Access of AV Fistula or Graft for Initiation of Dialysis (55.87%), ICE Checklist #2: Parenteral Medication Preparation and Administration (48.13%), and ICE Checklist #3b: Access of AV Fistula or Graft for Termination of Dialysis and Post Dialysis Access Care (48.1%); the lowest level of performance found was ICE Checklist #1b: Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Exit Site Care (22.8%). In addition, the first and second observations noticed that nurses ignore hand hygiene, and were not committed to wearing clean gloves as needed.ConclusionBased on the findings of this study, using of NOTICE assessment checklists and highlighting the importance of developing and following strict infection control systems at dialysis units focuses on nursing staff to prevent infection transmission especially, with chronic patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-49
Author(s):  
Aleya Begum ◽  
Rubaba Ahmed ◽  
Akashlynn Badruddoza Dithi ◽  
Md Saiful Islam ◽  
Mushfiq Hassan Shaikh

It is a public demand to expect health care profession to maintain its highest possible standard by preventing the spread of communicable diseases. Dental laboratory, being a potential source for the spread of various infections, is no exception to it and should ensure strict infection control measures. In contrast to the dental clinic and surgical areas, the dental laboratory is often overlooked, especially, when planning effective infection control measure. The aim of this review is to provide the general dental practitioners with the latest information and guidelines to achieve infection control in the dental laboratory. Apparently, it focuses on the technical knowledge and practices that should be followed in prosthetic laboratories. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cdcj.v10i2.16347 City Dent. Coll. J Voume-10, Number-2, July-2013


2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. BANI-YAGHOUB ◽  
R. GAUTAM ◽  
D. DÖPFER ◽  
C. W. KASPAR ◽  
R. IVANEK

SUMMARYThe effectiveness of environmental decontamination (ED) as a measure in the control of infectious diseases is controversial. This work quantifies the effectiveness of ED by analysing the transmission of pathogens from the environment to susceptible hosts in a Susceptible–Infected–Susceptible model. Analysis of the model shows that ED can render a population disease-free only when the duration of infection (D) is within a certain range. As host-to-host transmission rate is increased,Dfalls outside this range and the higher levels of ED have a diminishing return in reducing the number of infected hosts at endemic equilibrium. To avoid this, ED can be combined with other control measures, such as treating infected individuals to push the duration of infection into the specified range. We propose decision criteria and minimum ED efforts required for control policies to be effective.


Author(s):  
Bipin Kumar Yadav ◽  
Ambesh Kumar Rai ◽  
Savita Agarwal ◽  
Bindu Yadav

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the awareness and practice of infection control procedures among dental surgeons in the private dental hospital.Methods: This is an observational study conducted among thirty dental surgeons working in a private dental hospital in Gwalior, (M.P.) to evaluate the management policies and procedures associated with infection control and instrument decontamination. The doctors were indirectly interviewed by self-administered questionnaire consisted of twenty-one questions regarding the availability of infection control materials, use of personal protective devices, techniques of hand washing, sterilization methods, control of aerosols, status of immunization, asking about medical history, routine documentation of needle-prick injuries, methods of waste segregation etc. The study group was selected regardless of sex, age and field of expertise. This study was done in two weeks and in this time frame self-administered, pre-structured questionnaire was offered to professionals.Results: In this study it was found that although 95% of doctor’s wear gloves but only 6.6% doctors use protective eyewear and 3.3% use gowns for protection. The most of the doctor’s use soap bars for hand washing which is also not a good infection control practice method. There are only 10% doctors who use high-volume-evacuator but most of the time available evacuator is not in working state. Not a single doctor used rubber dam. Out of thirty 74% use gluteraldehyde, 67% use sodium hypochlorite, 54% use phenolic compounds as a surface disinfectant. Most of the doctors use non-sterilized hand pieces, burs, impression trays etc.Conclusions: The infection control actions implemented by dental surgeons were far from ideal. Efforts are needed to improve attitudes, encourage implementation, raise awareness, promote regular updating courses and motivate dental professionals in the correct and routine use of infection control measures. Apart from this, it is also important to improve the hospital management system.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Saira Afzal

<p>“In times of stress and danger such as come about as the result of an epidemic, many tragic and cruel phases of human nature are brought out, as well as many brave and unselfish ones.”</p><p><strong>William Crawford Gorgas</strong></p><p>      Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever is endemic in certain parts of world. It is a <em><a title="Zoonotic" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoonotic">zoonotic</a></em> disease and reservoirs are domestic and wild animals. It spreads by vector <em><a title="Hyalomma" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyalomma">Hyalomma</a></em> tick or contact with infected animals or people or infected secretions. The clinical disease spectrum includes fever with flu like symptoms, hemorrhages and mortality rate of 10 – 40%. The incubation period is 1 – 3 days after a tick bite or 5 – 6 days following exposure to infected blood or tissues. The <em><a title="Influenza" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza">flu</a></em> – like symptoms may resolve after one week. In up to 75% of cases, however, signs of <em><a title="Hemorrhage" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemorrhage">hemorrhage</a></em> appear within 3–5 days of the onset of illness in the form of skin bruises, nose bleeds, vomiting, and black stools. The <em><a title="Liver" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liver">liver</a></em> becomes swollen and tender. Patients usually begin to show signs of recovery after 9 – 10 days from when symptoms presented.<sup>1</sup> 10 – 40% of the cases result in mortality by the end of the second week of illness and may be attributed by hemorrhagic shock, hypovolemia, septacaemia, acute kidney failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.<sup>2</sup></p><p>      Pakistan has witnessed severe outbreaks in 2009 and 2010. In 2009, epidemic of Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever was reported from Baluchistan. In September 2010, an outbreak was reported in Pakistan’s <em><a title="Khyber Pakhtunkhwa" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khyber_Pakhtunkhwa">Khyber Pakhtunkhwa</a></em> province. Poor diagnosis and record keeping has caused the extent of the epidemic to be uncertain, though some reports indicate over 100 cases, with a case – fatality rate above 10%. Crimean – Congo haemorrhagic fever is declared endemic in Pakistan. Human infections caused by the Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic virus have been occurring throughout the year and in wide geographic areas of the country. The seasonal spike has been reported this year and guidelines for prevention in public and health care providers are formulated. However, clear and rational policies from law enforcement agencies to avoid spread from endemic foci to other non-endemic areas through transportation of animals or contact with infected cases especially during Eid festivals are still needed. The transportation of animals is greatly increased during Eid festival in Pakistan and risk of epidemic is also increased. Law enforcement and Agricultural regulations require de-ticking farm animals before transportation or delivery for slaughter. Protocols for safety during slaughter and disposal of infected wastes should be formulated and implemented. In the case when feverish patients with evidence of bleeding are reported, emergency preparations for resuscitation or intensive care are required urgently. Moreover guidelines regarding suspected cases quarantine, body secretions and wastes isolation and disposal in health care facilities and standard precautions for laboratory workers, nursing staff and doctors should be adopted.</p><p>      Surveillance and laboratory diagnosis for early detection of cases, infection control measures in health care facilities and risk communication should be strengthened especially in high risk areas in the country. Seroprevalence of antibodies against Crimean Congo hemorrhagic virus in our community is still unknown.</p><p>      Preventive steps are simple but awareness in masses about Crimean congo hemorrhagic fever is the most important step. Some of the important steps for prevention are:</p><ul><li>Use a repellent containing 20% – 30% DEET or 20% Picaridin. Re-apply according to manufacturer’s directions.</li><li>Wear neutral – coloured and light – weight clothes, long – sleeved shirts and full pants. Tuck pants into socks for further protection.</li><li>Apply a permethrin spray or solution to clothing and gear.</li><li>When walking through grass lands avoid tall grasses and shrubs.</li><li>Carefully examine body, clothing, gear, and animals for ticks.</li><li>Apply sunscreen first followed by the repellent and preferably 20 minutes later.</li><li>Avoid coming into contact with the blood or tissues of animals. Healthcare practitioners should take appropriate infection control measures to prevent infection. Standard operating procedures to handle infectious materials and suspected cases should be displayed in clinical settings.</li><li>Laboratory staff should wear protective gear and waste disposal should be according to the protocols.</li></ul><p>      There is no effective commercially available vaccine or chemoprophylaxis against Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever. Thus efforts should be directed to prevent this disease by awareness in masses. Moreover, seroprevalence in general public as well as in specific groups including health care providers, laboratory workers, butchers, veterans and surgeons should be detected by screening and later on confirmed by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay (ELISA). Early case detection, quarantine of susceptible cases and adoption of standard protocols during management of patients can decrease the spread of this deadly virus.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 348-354
Author(s):  
Salwa A. Aldahlawi ◽  
Ibtesam K. Afifi

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has become a worldwide, significant public health challenge. Dental care providers are at high risk due to the nature of their profession, which necessitates close proximity to the patient's oropharyngeal region and the use of droplet and aerosol-generating procedures. Methods: A review of the evolving literature on the COVID-19 pandemic was conducted. Published articles addressing SARS-CoV2 transmission modes and risks, and infection control procedures required in the dental office to protect dental patients and health care providers were assessed. Also, clinical guidelines on the management of dental patients during the pandemic were reviewed. Results: The established modes of transmission of SARS-CoV2 appear to be through respiratory droplets and through close contact with either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients. In addition to standard precautions of infection control widely followed in dental practices, extra precautionary measures are needed to control the spread of this highly infectious disease. Dental treatment during the pandemic is limited to emergent and urgent cases after a meticulous patient risk assessment and dental needs are triaged to minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission and avoid cross-contamination. Conclusion: Dentists should be aware of the recently updated knowledge about COVID-19 modes of transmission and the recommended infection control measures in dental settings. Effective management protocols to regulate droplet and aerosol contamination in the dental clinic should be implemented to deliver dental care in a safe environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document