Gene Expression Profiling in Kidney Cancer: Combining Differential Expression and Chromosomal and Pathway Analyses

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle A. Furge ◽  
Eric J. Kort ◽  
Ximing J. Yang ◽  
Walter M. Stadler ◽  
Hyung Kim ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14237-e14237 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Henry Aggen ◽  
Ali Ghasemzadeh ◽  
Wendy Mao ◽  
Nivi Chowdhury ◽  
Matthew Chaimowitz ◽  
...  

e14237 Background: Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), key mediators of intrinsic and adaptive immune resistance, remains a significant challenge in kidney cancer immunotherapy. One potential driver of MDSC mediated tumor immunosuppression is the cytokine interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β). Although large cancer prevention studies show that targeting IL1 decreases cancer risk, the exact mechanism of anti-IL-1 mediated anti-tumor efficacy is not yet defined. To understand the immunogenic effects of IL-1β blockade and effects on MDSCs, we used the RENCA model of RCC. Methods: We inoculated BALB/c mice with 1x106 RENCA cells. On Day +10 we treated mice (n = 8/group) with vehicle, αPD1, αIL1β, cabozantinib, combination αPD1/αIL1β, or cabozantinib/αIL1β. We harvested day +18 tumors to quantify tumor size and immune cells by flow cytometry. We then isolated immune cells for differential gene expression profiling by RNAseq. Results: Treatment with αIL1β significantly decreased tumor size compared to vehicle or αPD1 monotherapy. Combining αPD1/αIL1β or cabozantinib/αIL1β potentiated the anti-tumor effects of αPD1 or cabozantinib monotherapy respectively. Anti-IL1β therapy decreased polymorphonuclear (PMN)-MDSC infiltration (αIL1β: 0.76% +/- 0.21 vs. vehicle: 1.89% +/- 0.37, P = 0.014). Relative to PD1 monotherapy, combining αPD1 and αIL1β decreased PMN-MDSCs (αPD1: 2.14% +/- 0.56 vs αPD1/αIL1β: 0.91% +/- 0.15, P = 0.033) and increased M1-like tumor associated macrophages (TAM) (αPD1: 0.798% +/- 0.21 vs. αPD1/αIL1β: 12.04% +/- 2.9, P = 0.0008). Gene expression profiling from sorted immune cells from αIL1β treated tumors revealed multiple differentially regulated cytokines including interleukin-6, IFN-γ, and IL-10. Conclusions: Blockade of IL-1β depletes intratumoral PMN-MDSCs and increases M1-like TAM with minimal effects observed on the T cell compartment. Treatment with cabozantinib or αPD1 in combination with αIL1β led to sustained control of tumor growth. IL-1β represents a promising target for kidney cancer immunotherapy. Based on the preclinical data, a clinical trial of neoadjuvant αPD1 and αIL1β therapy is planned for patients with high risk RCC.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5201-5201
Author(s):  
Chieh Lee Wong ◽  
Baoshan Ma ◽  
Gareth Gerrard ◽  
Martyna Adamowicz-Brice ◽  
Zainul Abidin Norziha ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The past decade has witnessed a significant progress in the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). A large number of genes have now been implicated in the pathogenesis of MPN but their relative importance, the mechanisms by which they cause different cell types to predominate and their implications for prognosis remain unknown. We hypothesized that there are other genes which may contribute to the pathogenesis of the different disease subtypes detectable only by cell-type specific analysis. Aim The aim of this study was to perform gene expression profiling on different cell types from patients with MPN in order to identify novel variants and driver mutations, to elucidate the pathogenesis and to identify predictors of survival in patients with MPN in a multiracial country. Methods We performed gene expression profiling on normal controls (NC) and patients with MPN from 3 different races (Malay, Chinese and Indian) in Malaysia who were diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) according to the 2008 WHO diagnostic criteria for MPN. Two cohorts of patients, the patient and validation cohorts, from 3 tertiary-level hospitals were recruited prospectively over 3 years and informed consents were obtained. Peripheral blood samples were taken and sorted into polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs), mononuclear cells (MNCs) and T cells. RNA was extracted from each cell population. Gene expression profiling was performed using the Illumina HumanHT-12 Expression Beadchip for microarray and the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation Kit for next generation sequencing on the patient and validation cohorts respectively. Results Twenty-eight patients (10 ET, 11 PV and 7 PMF) and 11 NC were recruited into the patient cohort. Twelve patients (4 ET, 4 PV and 4 PMF) and 4 NC were recruited into the validation cohort. Gene expression levels for each cell type in each disease were compared with NC. In the patient cohort, the number of differentially expressed genes in ET, PV and PMF was 0, 141 and 15 respectively for PMNs (p < 0.05 after multiple testing correction) and 5, 170 and 562 respectively for MNCs (p < 0.05). No differentially expressed genes were identified for T cells in any of the three disease groups. RNA-seq analysis of samples from the validation cohort was used to corroborate these findings. After combination, we were able to confirm differential expression of 0, 14 and 7 genes in ET, PV and PMF respectively for PMNs (p < 0.05) and 51 genes in only PMF for MNCs (p < 0.05). The validated differentially expressed genes for PMNs and MNCs were mutually exclusive except for one gene. The differentially expressed genes in PV and PMF for PMNs were involved in cellular processes and metabolic pathways whereas the differentially expressed genes for PMF in MNCs were involved in regulation of cytoskeleton, focal adhesion and cell signaling pathways. Conclusion This is the first study to use microarray and next generation sequencing techniques to compare cell type-specific expression of genes between different subtypes of MPN. The lack of differential expression in T cells validates the techniques used and indicates that they are not part of the neoplastic clone. Differential expression of genes for MNCs was seen only in PMF which may be related to their more severe phenotype. Interestingly, there were fewer differentially expressed genes in PMF compared to PV for PMNs. The lack of differential expression in ET may either reflect the relatively milder phenotype of the disease or that differential expression is limited to megakaryocytes-platelets which were not studied. The lists of mutually exclusive cell type-specific differentially expressed genes for PMNs and MNCs provide further insight into the pathogenesis of MPN and into the differences between its different forms. The identified genes also indicate further routes for investigation of pathogenesis and possible disease-specific targets for therapy. Disclosures Aitman: Illumina: Honoraria.


2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 849-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Lane ◽  
Jianbo Li ◽  
Ming Zhou ◽  
Denise Babineau ◽  
Pieter Faber ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e4502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zhao ◽  
Shuxuan Li ◽  
Wenjing Yao ◽  
Boru Zhou ◽  
Renhua Li ◽  
...  

The basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor gene family is one of the largest gene families and extensively involved in plant growth, development, and stress responses. However, limited studies are available on the gene family in poplar. In this study, we focused on 202 bHLH genes, exploring their DNA and protein sequences and physicochemical properties. According to their protein sequence similarities, we classified the genes into 25 groups with specific motif structures. In order to explore their expressions, we performed gene expression profiling using RNA-Seq and identified 19 genes that display tissue-differential expression patterns without treatment. Furthermore, we also performed gene expression profiling under salt stress. We found 74 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which are responsive to the treatment. A total of 18 of the 19 genes correspond well to the DEGs. We validated the results using reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. This study lays the foundation for future studies on gene cloning, transgenes, and biological mechanisms.


2003 ◽  
Vol 100 (12) ◽  
pp. 6958-6963 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Vasselli ◽  
J. H. Shih ◽  
S. R. Iyengar ◽  
J. Maranchie ◽  
J. Riss ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena M. Comelli ◽  
Margarida Amado ◽  
Steven R. Head ◽  
James C. Paulson

The development of microarray technology offers the unprecedented possibility of studying the expression of thousands of genes in one experiment. Its exploitation in the glycobiology field will eventually allow the parallel investigation of the expression of many glycosyltransferases, which will ultimately lead to an understanding of the regulation of glycoconjugate synthesis. While numerous gene arrays are available on the market, e.g. the Affymetrix GeneChip® arrays, glycosyltransferases are not adequately represented, which makes comprehensive surveys of their gene expression difficult. This chapter describes the main issues related to the establishment of a custom glycogenes array.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Tsunoda ◽  
Junichi Inocuchi ◽  
Darren Tyson ◽  
Seiji Naito ◽  
David K. Ornstein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document