9. Formula feeding in emergencies

Author(s):  
K. Gribble
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
Kyoung Hwa Yoo ◽  
In Myung Oh ◽  
Ji Eun Park ◽  
Ju Sang Park ◽  
Eun Jeong Jang ◽  
...  

1961 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 639-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis A. Barness

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inga C. Teller ◽  
Nicholas D. Embleton ◽  
Ian J. Griffin ◽  
Ruurd M. van Elburg

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-227
Author(s):  
Gary L. Freed ◽  
J. Kennard Fraley ◽  
Richard J. Schanler

Fathers participate in choosing the feeding method for their newborns. However they traditionally have not been included in most breast-feeding education programs. To examine expectant fathers' attitudes and knowledge regarding breast-feeding, we surveyed 268 men during the first session of their Childbirth education classes at five private hospitals in Houston, Texas. The study population was 81% white, 8% black, and 6% hispanic. Ninety-seven percent (n = 259) of the total were married. Fifty-eight percent (n = 156) reported that their spouses planned to breast-feed exclusively; several signficant differences existed between these men and those who reported plans for exclusive formula feeding. The breast-feeding group was more likely to believe breast-feeding is better for the baby (96% vs 62%; P < .0001), helps with infant bonding (92% vs 53%; P < .0001), and protects the infant from disease (79% vs 47% P < .001). The breast-feeding group was also more likely to want their partner to breast-feed (90% vs 13%; P < .0001) and to have respect for breast-feeding women (57% vs 16%; P < .0001). Conversely, those in the formula feeding group were more likely to think breast-feeding is bad for breasts (52% vs 22%; P < .01), makes breasts ugly (44% vs 23%; P < .05), and interferes with sex (72% vs 24%; P < .0001). The majority of both groups indicated breast-feeding was not acceptable in public (breast-feeding = 71%, formula feeding = 78%, P < .05). These data demonstrate misperceptions and a lack of education regarding breast-feeding in the formula feeding group and a lack of public acceptance in both groups. We conclude that fathers must be included in breast-feeding education programs. Confrontation of myths and misperceptions prenatally may help to overcome obstacles to the initiation of breast-feeding and to provide greater familial support for nursing mothers.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Cheshmeh ◽  
Amir Saber ◽  
Seyed Mostafa Nachvak ◽  
Niloofar Hojati ◽  
Negin Elahi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity are prevalent disorders diagnosed by glucose metabolism problems and excess weight gain. Breastfeeding is the best feeding way for infants until six months and due to its nutritional properties, has desirable effects on diabetes and obesity. This study aimed to investigate the effects of breastfeeding, formula feeding, and formula-plus breastfeeding (mix-feeding) on the anthropometric indices, metabolic factors, and the expression level of obesity and diabetes-predisposing genes of healthy infants. Methods: A total of 150 healthy infants were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All infants (aged 24 months) based on the type of their feeding were divided into three groups, breastfeeding, formula feeding, and mix-feeding. The anthropometric indices, glycemic indexes, lipid profile, and the expression level of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase beta (ACACB), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), liver X receptor α (LXR-α), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) genes were assessed for all infants using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. Results: The anthropometric indices including weight, height, and head circumference, insulin, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were lower in the breastfeeding infants in comparison to other groups. As well, the expression level of the ACACB gene was significantly downregulated in breastfeeding infants, while the PPAR-γ gene was significantly upregulated, but the expression level of LXR- α, PTEN and BDNF didn’t show a significant difference between groups.Conclusions: Breastfeeding in comparison with formula feeding possessed desirable effects on anthropometric indices, metabolic factors, and diabetes-predisposing genes.


Midwifery ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 103093
Author(s):  
Courtney Barnes ◽  
Yvonne Hauck ◽  
Kelly Mabbott ◽  
Kirsty Officer ◽  
Liz Ashton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
MUH Begum

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) emphasize the value of breastfeeding for mothers as well as children. Both recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life. Human breast milk is the healthiest form of milk for babies. Breastfeeding promotes health and helps to prevent diseases including diarrheal diseases. It contains all nutrients including antibodies (IgA),and lactoferrin, that potentially prevent infection and diarrhea in infants and children. Studies conducted in both developed and under developed nations have found that breast feeding is associated with significantly ( upto 64%) less diarrheal disease and the protective effect of breast feeding does not persist beyond two months after breast feeding is stopped. On the other hand, formula fed infants are found an upto 80% increased in the risk of developing diarrhea compared to breast fed infants and there is significantly more diarrheal disease in formula fed infants. Infection may be attributable to contamination of bottles, teats, milk, and food in infants who are not exclusively breastfed. Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and there after complementary feedings while breastfeeding continues for up to two years of age or beyond, enthusiastic support and involvement from clinicians, obstetricians and pediatricians, are essential in “breastfeeding vs formula feeding” issue and to reduce incidence of diarrheal diseases in infants and children. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v32i1.21033 J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2014; 32: 26-30


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-28
Author(s):  
A.I. Aminova ◽  
◽  
P.A. Bobkova ◽  
E.I. Belova ◽  
N.V. Zaytseva ◽  
...  

Study objective. To optimize the recommendations on the strategy of enteral feeding for newborn babies with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Patients and methods. A single-centre, observational, prospective, analytical, cohort study of 186 infants aged from 2 days to 2 months (96 boys, 90 girls) with the verified diagnosis of NEC of varied severity, who were treated at the neonatal pathology department of Moscow G.N.Speransky Children’s City Clinical Hospital No 9 in 2016-2018. The patients were divided into 2 groups, depending on disease staging according to the Walsh and Kliegman classification: group I – 124 (66.7%) newborns with mild NEC (stage 1A, B and 2A) and group II – 62 (33.3%) patients with a severe course (stages 2B and 3A, B). Results. As has been found, maternal risk factors for the development of severe forms of NEC in newborns are: maternal age over 40 years (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.83–2.17), assisted reproductive technologies (OR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.79–3.66), bad obstetrical-gynaecological history (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.03–2.97), infectious diseases during pregnancy (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.69–1.90). The ranking of the risk factors present in babies themselves permitted to find a causative relation with such factors as bacteriological contamination of biological media (OR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.3–4.0), bacteremia, viremia (OR = 5.80, 95% CI 2.99–7.13), gestational age 30–32 wks (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.01–3.94), which were significant only for mild forms of NEC. A minimal number of severe cases was diagnosed for a combination of breastfeeding and parenteral nutrition (16.7%), development of severe NEC was more often noted when feeding was started within 5 days: breastfeeding (26.3%), formula feeding (33.3 %), mixed breast and formula feeding (5%), or in infants who did not receive feeding due to their severe condition after birth (33%) (р < 0.05). The minimal number of severe NEC cases was found among babies who remained on breast (11.1%) and mixed (11.1%) feeding after the 5th day (р < 0.05), the maximal number – in infants who started from enteral feeding and were transferred to formula feeding (50%). Prolonged enteral feeding was three times more often associated with a severe course of NEC (р < 0.001). Conclusion. As has been found, the frequency of developing severe NEC depends on the character of the first feed after birth. A risk of developing severe forms of NEC decreases in newborns on breast- or mixed feeding, in combination of breast feeding and parenteral nutrition, short courses of enteral pauses, alternation of enteral feeding and enteral pauses. The results might be used in the clinical practice of neonatologists and paediatricians for prevention and management of NEC and its possible complications in newborn infants. Key words: necrotising enterocolitis, enteral pause, enteral nutrition, neonatology, birth weight, gestational age, premature infants


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document