scholarly journals Developing Interactive Mobile Mathematics Inquiry to Enhance Students' Problem-solving Skill

Author(s):  
Moch. Bahak Udin By Arifin ◽  
Makherus Sholeh ◽  
Abdul Hafiz ◽  
Ririn Dwi Agustin ◽  
Mahardika Darmawan Kusuma Wardana

The research aimed to develop interactive multimedia based on scientific inquiry to improve student mathematics problem-solving as a provision for the era of Society 5.0. The research method used is the Agile Method, which is a software development method. This study involved 120 students from the first, second, to third years who were programming mathematics-related subjects at the Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. The results of the development of Interactive Mobile Mathematics Inquiry (IMMI) were valid and proven to improve student problem-solving abilities. In particular, this increase is significant in planning and implementing student plans for a problem. The significance is due to the training in the inquiry aspects during the use of IMMI. The implication of this research in the field of educational technology is that IMMI can be a preliminary study and a pioneer for lecturers, experts, and practitioners to use and further develop IMMI to improve students' mathematical problem-solving skills at the tertiary level more broadly as preparation for media availability following the values of technological advances in the future Society 5.0 era.

Author(s):  
Ni Ummu Kulsum ◽  
Kristayulita Kristayulita

This research aims to describe the student’s mathematical problem solving based on John Dewey’s step viewed by learning style. The subjects are 2 students with a visual learning style, 2 students with auditory learning style, and a student with kinaesthetic learning. The data was collected through a questionnaire of learning style, the test of mathematics problem solving, interview, and documentation. Then it was analyzed used Milles and Huberman model’s data analyzed technique consist of data reduction, data display, and conclusion (verification). This research shows that: (1) the visual subject confronted the problem by reading the question silently in several times, the subject can’t define the problem correctly, can’t found the right solution so that calculating and the answer is not correct, and can’t test consequences (looking back), (2) the auditory subject confronted the problem with reading the question in several times loudly, the subject can define the problem correctly, can found the right solution so that calculating and the answer correctly, and can’t test consequences (looking back), (3) the kinesthetic subject confronted the problem with reading the question in several times, the subject can’t define the problem correctly, can’t found the right solution so that calculating and the answer is not correct, and can’t test consequences (looking back). 


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rina Oktaviyanthi ◽  
Ria Noviana Agus

[Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah ada perbedaan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah antara mahasiswa yang mendapat pembelajaran dengan pendekatan keterampilan fungsional matematis dan pembelajaran konvensional. Pendekatan penelitian kuantitatif dengan desain kuasi eksperimen digunakan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut. Mahasiswa semester dua yang mengambil mata kuliah Kalkulus II pada jurusan pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Serang Raya dijadikan sebagai populasi penelitian. Sebanyak dua kelas ditentukan secara purposive random sampling untuk sampel penelitian, selanjutnya dinamakan kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Kelas eksperimen yaitu kelas yang mendapat pembelajaran dengan pendekatan functional skills mathematics sementara kelas kontrol adalah kelas yang mendapat pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan rata-rata capaian namun terdapat perbedaan peningkatan (N-Gain) kemampuan pemecahan masalah di kedua kelas. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa di kelas eksperimen cenderung meningkat. Kata kunci: Keterampilan Funsional Matematis; Pemecahan Masalah; Quasi Eksperimen [English]: This study aims to examine whether there are differences in improvement of problem-solving ability between students who received learning with the approach of functional skills mathematics and conventional learning. Quantitative research with quasi experiment is used to achieve that goal. The second semester student who enrolled on Calculus II in the Mathematics Education Department, Universitas Serang Raya were the population of research. Two classes were determined by purposive random sampling for the sample of research, called experimental class and control class. The experimental class was taught using functional skills mathematics while the control class was taught by the conventional learning. The results of the statistical tests show that there is no difference in average performance but there is difference in N-Gain problem solving skills in both classes. This research concludes that problem-solving ability of students in the experimental class tends to increase. Keywords: Functional Skills Mathematics; Problem Solving; Quasi Experiment


Author(s):  
Sonny Irawan ◽  
Vina Iasha

This research is aimed to reveal the effects of the core learning model and mathematical disposition model to problem-solving skills in elementary school. This research is experimental research with a 2x2 factorial design. The research sample is fourth-grade students, i.e., 44 persons. The instrument is the mathematical disposition and problem-solving skill instrument. The research result shows that the core learning model is a suitable mathematical learning model to develop mathematical problem-solving skills. The core learning model is more appropriately applied on a group of students with a high mathematical disposition. Meanwhile, the conventional model is more suitable to be applied on a group of students with a low mathematical disposition


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Thalia Thamsir ◽  
Destya Waty Silalahi ◽  
Robert Harry Soesanto

<strong></strong><p>The purpose of learning mathematics is to obtain life skills through problem solving. Problem solving skills are one of mathematics skills that must be possessed by students. The result of the pre-cycle in this research showed that 83.33% of students had not achieved the minimum predicate “B-” in solving non-routine problems. It proved that students’ abilities in mathematics problem solving in non-routine problems were still low. During the pre-cycle, the researcher also observed some students who were not brave enough yet to ask questions of the teacher directly during the learning process. Besides that, almost all the students still had high individualistic and low awareness. Based on the problems that happened in the class, the researcher offered the peer tutoring method as a solution to improve students’ mathematical problem-solving skills in non-routine problems. The research method used in this research was Classroom Action Research using the Kemmis and McTaggart model. The instruments used in this research were tests, observation sheets, students’ questionnaires, and journal reflections. Based on the data analysis, students’ mathematical problem-solving skills in non-routine problems improved to 29.17% by implementing the peer tutoring<em> </em>method with the steps (1) choosing the tutors, (2) guiding the tutors, (3) students doing the tutoring activity, and (9) evaluating the learning process</p><p class="abstrak"><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK: </strong>Tujuan dari mempelajari matematika ialah untuk memperoleh kecakapan hidup salah satunya melalui pemecahan masalah. Kemampuan pemecahan masalah merupakan salah satu standar kemampuan matematika yang harus dimiliki oleh siswa. Hasil tes pra siklus pada penelitian ini menunjukkan sebanyak 83.33% siswa belum mampu mencapai predikat minimal ‘B-’ dalam menyelesaikan soal non-rutin. Ini membuktikan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada soal non-rutin masih kurang. Selama pra siklus berlangsung, peneliti juga mengamati beberapa siswa belum berani untuk bertanya langsung kepada guru selama proses pembelajaran berlangsung. Selain itu, sebagian besar siswa masih memiliki sikap individualis yang tinggi dan juga rasa kepedulian antar siswa masih rendah. Berdasarkan masalah yang terjadi di dalam kelas tersebut maka peneliti menawarkan metode <em>peer tutoring </em>sebagai solusi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada soal non-rutin. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dengan model Kemmis dan Mc. Taggart. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah tes, lembar observasi, angket siswa dan jurnal refleksi. Berdasarkan analisis data, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada soal non-rutin mengalami peningkatan hingga 29,17% menggunakan metode <em>peer tutoring </em>dengan langkah-langkah penerapan yaitu (1) memilih tutor, (2) membimbing tutor, (3) siswa melakukan kegiatan tutorial, dan (4) mengevaluasi pembelajaran</p><strong></strong>


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-115
Author(s):  
Nindy Ivalyn ◽  
Andi Pujo Rahadi

The mathematics problem-solving ability of students in Indonesia is not high yet. The students found it difficult to do the mathematics problems that lead to solving a problem. This study aims to improve students' mathematical problem-solving skills using the Edmodo platform. The study used a quasi-experimental design to find out whether the enhancement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities that obtain using the Edmodo Platform with a scientific approach is significantly higher than the students who obtain scientific approach learning models. The sample of the research was students in two classes X grade student Negeri 1 Parongpong, West Bandung 2019/2020. The first-class students obtained an using the Edmodo Platform with a scientific approach, while the students in the second class obtained a scientific approach learning with a scientific approach. The results showed that the enhancement of the students' mathematical problem-solving abilities in both classes was included in the moderate category. Based on the statistical tests, the students in the first class have a significant enhancement in mathematical problem-solving abilities compared with the students in the second class. Furthermore, student responses to use the Edmodo Platform with a scientific approach are categorized as "very like" and student responses to a scientific approach are categorized as "very like".


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Septya Giartianti ◽  
E Elvis Napitupulu

This study aims to determine whether are differences in problem solving skills of mathematics students using cooperative learning type TAI and NHT in class VII SMP Negeri 3 Pulau Rakyat. This type of research is quasi experiment. The population in this study is all students of grade VII semester 2 SMP Negeri 3 Pulau Rakyat consisting of 5 classes with total 160 students and the sample of this study are VII-1 and VII-3 as many as 64 students. The required dara is obtained by using the students’ math problem solving test in the form of a description of 4 question. From the results of data analysis obtained the average test results of students mathematics problem solving abilities through cooperative learning type TAI is 27,28 with varians 2,65 and the average test result of students’ mathematics problem solving abilities through cooperative leraning type NHT is 22,25 with varians 3,28. To test hypothesis used t test, from the calculation results obtained tcount with the test reject Ho and accept Ha if tcount  1,6697 so it looks  that tcount is not reside in the Ho accetance area which means Ho rejected and Haaccepted or in other  words there are differences problem solving ability of mathematics students using cooperative learning type TAI and NHT in class VII SMP Negeri 3 Pulau Rakyat. Keywords: Mathematical Problem Solving Abilities, TAI, NHT


10.35580/imed ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Erni Apriani ◽  
D Djadir ◽  
A Asdar

Abstrak. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif yang bersifat kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematika dan perbedaan gender. Subjek penelitian ini adalah enam orang siswa Keenam siswa dipilih berdasarkan nilai Tes Kemampuan Matematika yang terbagi dalam kategori tinggi, sedang, dan rendah dengan dua orang masing-masing satu laki-laki dan satu perempuan yang mewakili tiap tingkatan kemampuan matematika pada materi SPLDV dengan mengambil nilai tertiggi dari tiap kategori kemampuan. Keenam subjek diberikan TesKemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika I dan TesKemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika II dalam waktu yang berbeda. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis kualitatif.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Indikator menyebutkan hal-hal yang diketahui dan ditanyakan dimiliki oleh semua subjek, (2) Indikatormembuat rencanapenyelesaian masalah dari hal-halyang diketahui untukpemecahan masalahdimiliki oleh semua subjek, (3) Indikator melaksanakanpemecahan masalah melaluirencana yang telah dibuat dimiliki oleh semua subjek, (4) Indikator melakukan pemeriksaan kembali terhadapjawaban yang sudah adadimiliki oleh semua subjek.Kata kunci: penelitian kualitatif, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, kemampuan awal matematika, perbedaan gender, sistem persamaan linear dua variabelAbstact. This research is a qualitative descriptive research that aims to describe the ability of problem solving mathematically viewed from the early ability of mathematics and gender differences. The subjects of this study were six students. The six students were selected based on the Mathematics Ability test scores divided into high, medium, and low categories with two men each and one woman representing each level of math skills on SPLDV material by taking the highest grades from each capability category. The six subjects were given the Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Test I and the Mathematics Problem Solving Ability Test II at different times. Data analysis techniques using qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that: (1) Indicators mention things that are known and questioned by all subjects, (2) Indicators to make problem-solving plans from things known for problem solving are shared by all subjects, (3) Indicators carry out problem solving through a plan that has been made owned by all subjects, (4) Indicators of re-examination of existing answers owned by all subjects.Keywords: Qualitative research, mathematical problem solving skills, early math ability, gender differences, two-variable linear equations system


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
Sri Ayu Harani Tanjung ◽  
Yuli Amalia

Bahan ajar dikembangkan berdasarkan karakteristik siswa, sehingga kompetensi yang ditetapkan dapat dicapai. Secara umum kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa masih sangat rendah, siswa belum bisa memahami soal, sehingga terkendala dalam menentukan model penyelesaian soal matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kevalidan, keefektifan, dan respon siswa terhadap bahan ajar berbasis Problem Based Learning berkemampuan pemecahan masalah yang dikembangkan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan dengan menggunakan model ADDIE yaitu Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, dan Evaluation. Subjek Penelitan dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMA Negeri 1 Meureubo kelas X Mia2 sebanyak 23 siswa. Instrumen penelitian berupa lembar validasi, angket respon siswa, dan tes. Dari hasil uji coba, pada uji coba I dan II diperoleh bahan ajar berbasis Problem Based Learning yang dikembangkan efektif ditinjau dari 70% siswa yang mengikuti tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah memperoleh nilai minimal 75 dan tercapainya ketuntasan belajar tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah  75% dan respon positif siswa terhadap bahan ajar berbasis Problem Based Learning untuk kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang dikembangkan. Teaching materials are developed based on the characteristics of students, so that the specified competencies can be achieved. In general, students' problem solving abilities are still very low, students have not been able to understand the problem, so it is constrained in determining the mathematical problem solving model. This study aims to describe the validity, effectiveness, and response of students to Problem Based Learning-based teaching materials that are problem-solving skills developed. This research is a development research using ADDIE models namely Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The research subjects in this study were 23 students of Meureubo High School 1 in class Mia2 as many as 23 students. The research instruments were validation sheets, student response questionnaires, and tests. From the results of the trials, in the first and second trials obtained teaching materials based on Problem Based Learning that were developed effectively in terms of 70% of students taking the test of problem solving skills obtained a minimum score of 75 and achievement of learning completeness 75% problem solving ability tests and positive responses for Problem Based Learning based teaching materials for problem solving abilities developed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-210
Author(s):  
Rivdya Eliza ◽  
Fitri Aulia

The purpose of this research are: 1) to know the learning activity of learners mathematics which is taught by Search, Solve, Create, and Share (SSCS), and 2) model to know the ability of problem solving of mathematics learners who taught by SSCS learning model in the class XI MIA MAN 1 Muara Labuh academic year 2016/2017. This research belongs to a kind of quasi-experimental research with randomized control group only design. In this study design, a group of subjects taken from a particular population were randomly assigned into two groups, the experimental group and the control group. After analyzing the data, it is known that the learning activity of the students after applying the SSCS learning model has improved towards the better from the first meeting to the fifth meeting, ie 35%, 45%, 55%, 68%, 77%. Based on the hypothesis test obtained ttable = 1.645 and tcount = 2.598 so obtained (2.598> 1.645) at 95% confidence interval. Because tcount > ttable then hypothesis in this research accepted. Thus, students 'math-problem-solving skills taught by SSCS learning models are higher than the students' uneducated mathematical problem-solving skills with SSCS learning modelsKeywords: Problem solving abilities, search, solve, sreate and share (SSCS) learning models


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document