scholarly journals Retrospective Analysis of Arthrodesis from Various Options after Anterior Cervical Discectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 014-018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinaysagar Sharma ◽  
Shashwat Kumar Singh
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Socioeconomic Background ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Iii

ABSTRACT Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy is a surgical procedure performed to treat a herniated/degenerated disc in the cervical region. There have been various studies comparing arthrodesis rates among various procedures. Our patients belonged to varied socioeconomic background and underwent anterior cervical microdiscectomy without/with instrumentation. Aim: The present study was performed to study and compare the arthrodesis rates in the patients operated for anterior cervical microdiscectomy with and without fusion/instrumentation procedures at our institution. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study performed at Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru. Pre- and post-operative X-rays were assessed in 96 patients who had undergone anterior cervical discectomy with/without fusion from June 2012 to June 2015. Radiographic arthrodesis was assessed in all patients. An arbitrary grading was designed by us and categorized into Grade I to IV. The criteria considered for adequate arthrodesis in this study were: (a) <2° movement on dynamic X-rays, (b) restored disc space height (±2 mm accepted), and (c) evidence of solid bone mass around disc space. Arthrodesis was categorized as Grade I if all the above 3 criteria on X-rays was fulfilled, Grade II if any 2 of the criteria was fulfilled, Grade III if any 1 of the criteria was fulfilled, and Grade IV when pseudoarthrosis/none of the criteria was fulfilled. Grade I arthrodesis was noted in about 79 patients (82.2%), Grade II in 14 patients, and only 3 patients had Grade III arthrodesis. There were no patients with absent arthrodesis/pseudoarthrosis. Results: Satisfactory arthrodesis was noted in 82% of the total patients, with patients undergoing fusion ± instrumentation procedure having better results. Conclusions: Arthrodesis by an interbody graft/implant with/without plating increases chances of success as compared to anterior cervical discectomy alone. Patients should be motivated for any of the available options for fusion/instrumentation

scholarly journals Comparison between selective caudal fixed screw construct and all variable screw construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Jun Yang ◽  
Sehan Park ◽  
Seongyun Park
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Locking Mechanism ◽  
Adjacent Disc ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Caudal Level

AbstractThis retrospective comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of selective caudal fixed screw constructs with all variable screw constructs in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Thirty-five patients who underwent surgery using selective caudal fixed screw construct (SF group) were compared with 44 patients who underwent surgery using all variable constructs (AV group). The fusion rate, subsidence, adjacent level ossification development (ALOD), adjacent segmental disease (ASD), and plate-adjacent disc space distance were assessed. The one-year fusion rates assessed by computed tomography bone bridging and interspinous motion as well as the significant subsidence rate did not differ significantly between the AV and SF groups. The ALOD and ASD rates and plate-adjacent disc space distances did not significantly differ between the two groups at both the cranial and caudal adjacent levels. The number of operated levels was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis in the logistic regression analysis. The stability provided by the locking mechanism of the fixed screw did not lead to an increased fusion rate at the caudal level. Therefore, the screw type should be selected based on individual patient’s anatomy and surgeon’s experience without concern for increased complications caused by screw type.

scholarly journals Comparison Between Selective Caudal Fixed Screw Construct and All Variable Screw Construct in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Jun Yang ◽  
Sehan Park ◽  
Seongyun Park
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Locking Mechanism ◽  
Adjacent Disc ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Caudal Level

Abstract Objectives: This retrospective comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of selective caudal fixed screw constructs with all variable screw constructs in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: Thirty-five patients who underwent surgery using selective caudal fixed screw construct (SF group) were compared with 44 patients who underwent surgery using all variable constructs (AV group). The fusion rate, subsidence, adjacent level ossification development (ALOD), adjacent segmental disease (ASD), and plate-adjacent disc space distance were assessed.Results: The one-year fusion rates assessed by computed tomography bone bridging and interspinous motion as well as the significant subsidence rate did not differ significantly between the AV and SF groups. The ALOD and ASD rates and plate-adjacent disc space distances did not significantly differ between the two groups at both the cranial and caudal adjacent levels. The number of operated levels was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis in the logistic regression analysis.Conclusion: The stability provided by the locking mechanism of the fixed screw did not lead to an increased fusion rate at the caudal level. Therefore, the screw type should be selected based on individual patient’s anatomy and surgeon’s experience without concern for increased complications caused by screw type.

Albert Dereymaeker and Joseph Cyriel Mulier’s description of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in 1955

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald H. M. A. Bartels ◽  
Jan Goffin
Keyword(s):  
French Literature ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Subsequent Paper ◽  
Intervertebral Disc Space ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Iliac Crest Graft ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Time Period

Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) is a very well-known and often-performed procedure in the practice of spine surgeons. The earliest descriptions of the technique have always been attributed to Cloward, Smith, and Robinson. However, in the French literature, this procedure was also described by others during the exact same time period (in the 1950s).At a meeting in Paris in 1955, Belgians Albert Dereymaeker and Joseph Cyriel Mulier, a neurosurgeon and an orthopedic surgeon, respectively, described the technique that involved an anterior cervical discectomy and the placement of an iliac crest graft in the intervertebral disc space. In 1956, a summary of their oral presentation was published, and a subsequent paper—an illustrated description of the technique and the details of a larger case series with a 3.5-year follow-up period—followed in 1958.The list of authors who first described ACDF should be completed by adding Dereymaeker’s and Mulier’s names. They made an important contribution to the practice of spinal surgery that was not generally known because they published in French.

scholarly journals Risk factor analysis of axial symptoms after single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective study of 113 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 6100-6108
Author(s):  
Lin-Feng Wang ◽  
Zhen Dong ◽  
De-Chao Miao ◽  
Yong Shen ◽  
Feng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Axial Symptoms

Objective This retrospective study was performed to investigate the risk factors for axial symptoms (AS) after single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods One hundred thirteen patients with cervical spondylosis who had undergone single-segment ACDF from January 2012 to December 2015 were divided into those with and without AS (n = 34 and n = 79, respectively). Clinical data and radiological evaluation results were recorded. Results The occurrence rate of AS was 30.1% (34/113), and the average visual analog scale score was 4.5 points. Bony fusion was achieved in all cases during follow-up. There were no differences in age, sex, disease duration, diagnostic categories, operative segment, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, or adjacent segment degeneration. However, cervical range of motion (CROM), cervical curvature, and disc space enlargement significantly differed between the groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that CROM, cervical curvature, and disc space enlargement were independently associated with AS. Conclusions AS after single-segment ACDF is not rare. Disc space enlargement is a risk factor for AS, while higher CROM and lordotic cervical curvature are protective factors. Excessive or insufficient disc space enlargement could increase the incidence of AS. Maintaining CROM within the normal range and restoring cervical lordosis might help to prevent AS.

scholarly journals Fivefold higher rate of pseudarthrosis with polyetheretherketone interbody device than with structural allograft used for 1-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie L. Krause ◽  
James T. Obayashi ◽  
Kelly J. Bridges ◽  
Ahmed M. Raslan ◽  
Khoi D. Than
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Bone Growth ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Structural Allograft ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVECommon interbody graft options for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) include structural allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). PEEK has gained popularity due to its radiolucency and its elastic modulus, which is similar to that of bone. The authors sought to compare the rates of pseudarthrosis, a lack of solid bone growth across the disc space, and the need for revision surgery with the use of grafts made of allogenic bone versus PEEK.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed 127 cases in which patients had undergone a 1-level ACDF followed by at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up. Data on age, sex, body mass index, tobacco use, pseudarthrosis, and the reoperation rate for pseudarthrosis were collected. These data were analyzed by performing a Pearson’s chi-square test.RESULTSOf 127 patients, 56 had received PEEK implants and 71 had received allografts. Forty-six of the PEEK implants (82%) were stand-alone devices. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups with respect to patient age, sex, or body mass index. Twenty-nine (52%) of 56 patients with PEEK implants demonstrated radiographic evidence of pseudarthrosis, compared to 7 (10%) of 71 patients with structural allografts (p < 0.001, OR 9.82; 95% CI 3.836–25.139). Seven patients with PEEK implants required reoperation for pseudarthrosis, compared to 1 patient with an allograft (p = 0.01, OR 10.00; 95% CI 1.192–83.884). There was no significant difference in tobacco use between the PEEK and allograft groups (p = 0.586).CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study demonstrate that the use of PEEK devices in 1-level ACDF is associated with a significantly higher rate of radiographically demonstrated pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery compared with the use of allografts. Surgeons should be aware of this when deciding on interbody graft options, and reimbursement policies should reflect these discrepancies.

A unique device, the disc space–fitted distraction device, for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: early clinical and radiological evaluation

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Tani ◽  
Hiroyasu Nagashima ◽  
Akira Isoshima ◽  
Masahiko Akiyama ◽  
Hiroki Ohashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Spinal Curvature ◽  
Radiological Evaluation ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Distraction Device ◽  
Adjacent Disc ◽  
Curvature Index

Object To perform interbody distraction and to obtain spinal curvature correction during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the authors recently adopted a new stand-alone device, a disc space–fitted distraction device (DFDD). In this preliminary report the authors introduce this unique device and discuss some advantages in terms of short-term clinical and radiological evaluations. Methods The most unique aspect of the DFDD is the function of gentle distraction at anterior disc space with maximum lordotic correction of up to 8° while rotating a screw at the front of the device. Additional advantages are related to its configuration such as disc space–matched shape in all dimensions, tapering contour for easy insertion into the disc space, multiple spikes to avoid dislodgment, wider contact area to the vertebral endplate for diminishing sinking process, and sufficient space for accommodation of bone-conductive materials. Twenty-four patients who have been observed more than 12 months after ACDF were involved in this evaluation. Results The objective clinical outcome, measured by the Neurological Cervical Spine Scale, was significantly improved. In radiological evaluation, statistically significant improvement compared with preoperative values was noted on the curvature index, C2–7 curvature, and disc angle (p < 0.01) throughout the entire postoperative period, up to 12 months. A high fusion rate and remodeling process around the implants were also observed. Conclusions The DFDD may have some advantages over other devices—its distraction action, diminished sinking, and early solid bone union resulted in maintaining sufficient correction of the spinal curvature. This corrected spinal curvature may play an important role in preventing progressive adjacent-disc degeneration subsequent to ACDF in the long term.

scholarly journals Comparative study of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by anterior cervical plate and stand-alone cervical cage

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 888
Author(s):  
Ansari Muqtadeer Abdul Aziz ◽  
Venktesh Dattatray Sonkawade ◽  
Ansari Ishtyaque Abdul Aziz ◽  
Nair Pradeepkumar Sasidharan
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Incision Size ◽  
Cervical Plate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Plate

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) was used for management of degenerative cervical disc disorders (DCDD) in previous days. Further research and developments in management of DCDD led to evolution of standard and widely used operative technique as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by either anterior cervical plate (ACDF-ACP) with bone grafting or stand-alone cage (ACDF-SAC). There is less data available in literature regarding when and where to use ACDF-ACP and ACDF-SAC.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The study was conducted on 20 patients operated in Government Medical College and Hospital and Pacific Hospital and Research Centre, Aurangabad from June 2018 to March 2020. These patients divided into group A - 10 patients, operated by ACDF-SAC which are further divided as group Aa - 6 patients - operated for single level ACDF-SAC and group Ab - 4 patients - operated for two level ACDF-SAC, group B - 10 patients, operated by ACDF-ACP which are further divided as group Ba - 5 patients - operated for single level ACDF-ACP and group Bb - 5 patients - operated for two level ACDF-ACP. Patients evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using X-ray cervical spine anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views, MRI cervical spine, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Robinson’s criteria and Cobb’s angle.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> In our study we found, ACDF-SAC has small incision size, less intraoperative time, easy to carry out for surgeons, less intraoperative complications and better clinical outcome as compared to ACDF-ACP. Whereas only radiological results were better in ACDF-ACP than ACDF-SAC.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> ACDF-SAC is superior to ACDF-ACP for appropriately selected patients and in well experienced hands.</p>

Vertebral Artery Injury During Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in a Patient With Bilateral Anomalous Arteries in the Disc Space

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. E874-E875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Gantwerker ◽  
Ali A. Baaj ◽  
Peter H. Maughan ◽  
Cameron G. McDougall ◽  
William L. White
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Images ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Neurological Sequelae ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Risk Of Injury ◽  
The Face

Abstract OBJECTIVE Our goal was to increase the safety of anterior cervical discectomy, a routine surgery performed by neurosurgeons worldwide, in the face of vertebral artery (VA) anomalies. CLINICAL PRESENTATION A 59-year-old woman had an intraoperative injury of the left VA during elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion from C3 to 7. Retrospective analysis of her magnetic resonance images showed bilateral anomalous VAs. Intervention postoperatively, a pseudoaneurysm developed that was subsequently coiled. The patient underwent embolization of the pseudoaneurysm and sacrifice of the parent vessel by endovascular neurosurgical techniques. She had no neurological sequelae but did have some difficulty swallowing. CONCLUSION Radiologists, neuroradiologists, and surgeons should note the location and course of the VA in their routine evaluation of cervical magnetic resonance images. Neuroradiologists should alert surgeons to the possibility of anomalous VAs that are at risk of injury during surgery. Ultimately, it remains the responsibility of the surgeon to carefully review the images, assess for vascular anomalies, and plan the surgery accordingly.

scholarly journals Gestational age estimation using transcerebellar diameter with grading of fetal cerebellar growth

2012 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Anirban Das Gupta ◽  
Arindom Banerjee ◽  
N Rammurthy ◽  
P Revati ◽  
Josna Jose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Good Marker ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Gestational Age Estimation ◽  
Grade Iii ◽  
I 32

Abstract Background : The transverse cerebellar diameter (TCD) serves as a reliable predictor of gestational age (GA) of the fetus and is a standard against which aberrations in other fetal parameters can be compared, especially when the GA cannot be determined by the date of the last menstrual period or an early pregnancy scan. Aim : The aim of this study was to derive a regression equation and evaluate the relationship between transverse cerebellar diameter and gestational age, which will be helpful in assessing the fetal gestational age and also to evaluate the grades of cerebellum and to see its growth. Materials & methods : The prospective study was carried out in 292 pregnant women between 14-40 weeks of pregnancy attending the Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Foundation, Amalapuram for routine ultrasound examination. Transverse cerebellar diameter was measured and cerebellum was graded using ultrasonography. Results : Fetal cerebella were found to be in 29%, 10% and 61 % cases as grade I, II and III respectively. The grade changed from I to III progressively with advancing gestation. The median GA and TCD were 20 wks and 22 mm for grade I, 32 wks and 30 mm for grade II and 36 wks and 38 mm for grade III. Conclusion : Regression analysis indicated a strong relationship between TCD and gestational age indicating TCD is a good marker for estimation of gestational age.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document