scholarly journals Recent Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

2015 ◽  
Vol 9s1 ◽  
pp. CCRPM.S23313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidenaga Kawasumi ◽  
Takahisa Gono ◽  
Yasushi Kawaguchi ◽  
Hisashi Yamanaka
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Disease Subtype

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a prognostic factor for poor outcome in polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM). The appropriate management of ILD is very important to improve the prognosis of patients with PM/DM. ILD activity and severity depend on the disease subtype. Therefore, clinicians should determine therapeutic strategies according to the disease subtype in each patient with PM/DM. Anti–melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody and hyperferritinemia predict the development and severity of rapidly progressive (RP) ILD, particularly in East Asian patients. Combination therapy with corticosteroids, intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse, and calcineurin inhibitors should be administered in RP-ILD. In contrast, patients with anti–aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) show better responses to corticosteroids alone. However, ILDs with anti-ARS often display disease recurrence or become refractory to corticosteroid monotherapy. Recent studies have demonstrated that the administration of tacrolimus or rituximab in addition to corticosteroids may be considered in ILD patients with anti-ARS. Large-scale, multicenter randomized clinical trials should be conducted in the future to confirm that the aforementioned agents exhibit efficacy in ILD patients with PM/DM. The pathophysiology of ILD with PM/DM should also be elucidated in greater detail to develop effective therapeutic strategies for patients with ILD in PM/DM.

scholarly journals Management of Myositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 347
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Fujisawa
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Pulmonary Involvement ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
Substantial Heterogeneity

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, including polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), and clinically amyopathic DM (CADM), are a diverse group of autoimmune diseases characterized by muscular involvement and extramuscular manifestations. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has major pulmonary involvement and is associated with increased mortality in PM/DM/CADM. The management of PM-/DM-/CADM-associated ILD (PM/DM/CADM-ILD) requires careful evaluation of the disease severity and clinical subtype, including the ILD forms (acute/subacute or chronic), because of the substantial heterogeneity of their clinical courses. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of myositis-specific autoantibodies’ status, especially anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) and anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies, in order to evaluate the clinical phenotypes and treatment of choice for PM/DM/CADM-ILD. Because the presence of the anti-MDA5 antibody is a strong predictor of a worse prognosis, combination treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporin A (CsA)) is recommended for patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM/CADM-ILD. Rapidly progressive DM/CADM-ILD with the anti-MDA5 antibody is the most intractable condition, which requires immediate combined immunosuppressive therapy with GCs, CNIs, and intravenous cyclophosphamide. Additional salvage therapies (rituximab, tofacitinib, and plasma exchange) should be considered for patients with refractory ILD. Patients with anti-ARS antibody-positive ILD respond better to GC treatment, but with frequent recurrence; thus, GCs plus immunosuppressants (TAC, CsA, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil) are often needed in order to achieve favorable long-term disease control. PM/DM/CADM-ILD management is still a therapeutic challenge for clinicians, as evidence-based guidelines do not exist to help with management decisions. A few prospective clinical trials have been recently reported regarding the treatment of PM/DM/CADM-ILD. Here, the current knowledge on the pharmacologic managements of PM/DM/CADM-ILD was mainly reviewed.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Glucocorticoids and Calcineurin Inhibitors for Anti-aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Antibody–positive Polymyositis/dermatomyositis–associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Propensity Score–matched Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironao Hozumi ◽  
Tomoyuki Fujisawa ◽  
Ran Nakashima ◽  
Hideki Yasui ◽  
Yuzo Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Aminoacyl Trna Synthetase ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Objective.The optimal treatment strategy for anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody–positive polymyositis/dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease (anti-ARS-PM/DM-ILD) is yet to be established. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in patients with ARS-PM/DM-ILD.Methods.Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were retrospectively evaluated in 32 consecutive patients with ARS-PM/DM-ILD. Disease progression was defined as deterioration in PM/DM-ILD (including recurrence). Predictive factors associated with PFS were analyzed by Cox hazards analysis. The efficacy of first-line prednisolone (PSL) plus CNI therapy was compared with that of PSL monotherapy using propensity score–matched analysis.Results.Overall, 20 (62.5%) and 12 (37.5%) patients received first-line therapy with PSL + CNI and PSL, respectively. The 2-year PFS and 5-year survival rates in the overall cohort were 68.8% and 96.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, arterial oxygen pressure (HR 0.86) and PSL monotherapy (vs PSL + CNI; HR 7.29) showed an independent association with PFS. Baseline characteristics of propensity score-matched PSL + CNI and PSL groups were similar. The 2-year PFS rate was significantly higher in the matched PSL + CNI group than in the matched PSL group. All patients who experienced disease progression during first-line therapy were subsequently treated with second-line therapies. The 5-year survival rates of both the matched PSL + CNI and PSL groups were favorable.Conclusion.Propensity score–matched analysis demonstrated that first-line PSL + CNI therapy for patients with ARS-PM/DM-ILD significantly improved the PFS compared with PSL monotherapy, although there was no significant difference regarding longterm survival.

Clinical characteristics of cancer-associated myositis complicated by interstitial lung disease: a large-scale multicentre cohort study

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Kaneko ◽  
Takahiro Nunokawa ◽  
Yoshinori Taniguchi ◽  
Yukie Yamaguchi ◽  
Takahisa Gono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Aminoacyl Trna Synthetase ◽  
Multicentre Cohort Study ◽  
Incidence Risk ◽  
Incident Cases ◽  
Multicentre Cohort

Abstract Objective To clarify the incidence, risk factors, and impact of malignancy in patients with PM/DM-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods This study used data from 497 patients with PM/DM-associated ILD enrolled in a multicentre, retrospective and prospective cohort of incident cases. Cancer-associated myositis (CAM) was defined as malignancy diagnosed within 3 years before or after PM/DM diagnosis. Demographic and clinical information was recorded at the time of diagnosis, and data about the occurrence of mortality and malignancy was collected. Results CAM was identified in 32 patients with PM/DM-associated ILD (6.4%). Patients with CAM were older (64 vs 55 years, P < 0.001), presented with arthritis less frequently (24% vs 49%, P = 0.01), and showed a lower level of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (687 vs 820 IU/l, P = 0.03) than those without CAM. The distribution of myositis-specific autoantibodies, including anti-melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5, anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase, and anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1-γ antibodies, did not differ between the groups. Survival analysis demonstrated that CAM patients had a poorer survival than non-CAM patients (P = 0.006), primarily due to excess deaths by concomitant malignancy, while mortality due to ILD-related respiratory failure was similar between the groups (P = 0.51). Conclusion Concomitant malignancy can occur in patients with PM/DM-associated ILD, and has significant impact on mortality. Older age, lack of arthritis, and a lower level of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 at diagnosis are predictors of concomitant malignancy.

Is Immune Response Relevant in Interstitial Lung Disease?

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-27
Author(s):  
Manzoor M. Khan
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Fibrosis ◽  
Lymphocytic Infiltration ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Mediators Of Inflammation ◽  
Acquired Immune Responses ◽  
Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Interstitial lung disease, a term for a group of disorders, causes lung fibrosis, is mostly refractory to treatments and has a high death rate. After diagnosis the survival is up to 3 years but in some cases the patients live much longer. It involves a heterogenous group of lung diseases that exhibit progressive and irreversible destruction of the lung due to the formation of scars. This results in lung malfunction, disruption of gas exchange, and eventual death because of respiratory failure. The etiology of lung fibrosis is mostly unknown with a few exceptions. The major characteristics of the disease are comprised of injury of epithelial type II cells, increased apoptosis, chronic inflammation, monocytic and lymphocytic infiltration, accumulation of myofibroblasts, and inability to repair damaged tissue properly. These events result in abnormal collagen deposition and scarring. The inflammation process is mild, and the disease is primarily fibrotic driven. Immunosuppressants do not treat the disease but the evidence is evolving that both innate and acquired immune responses a well as the cytokines contribute to at least early progression of the disease. Furthermore, mediators of inflammation including cytokines are involved throughout the process of lung fibrosis. The diverse clinical outcome of the disease is due to different pattern of inflammatory markers. Nonetheless, the development of novel therapeutic strategies requires better understanding of the role of the immune response. This review highlights the role of the immune response in interstitial lung disease and considers the therapeutic strategies based on these observations. For this review several literature data sources were used to assess the role of the immune response in interstitial lung disease and to evaluate the possible therapeutic strategies for the disease.

scholarly journals Clinicoserological features of antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS)-associated interstitial lung disease presenting to respiratory services: comparison with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and ASyS diagnosed in rheumatology services

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000829
Author(s):  
Shaney L Barratt ◽  
Havra H Adamali ◽  
Caroline Cotton ◽  
Ben Mulhearn ◽  
Hina Iftikhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Musculoskeletal Symptoms ◽  
Antisynthetase Syndrome ◽  
Cytoplasmic Staining ◽  
Phenotypic Differences ◽  
Lung Physiology

IntroductionAntisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease (CTD), associated with autoantibodies targeting tRNA synthetase enzymes, that can present to respiratory (interstitial lung disease (ILD)) or rheumatology (myositis, inflammatory arthritis and systemic features) services. The therapeutic management of CTD-associated ILD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) differs widely, thus accurate diagnosis is essential.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective, multicentre observational cohort study designed to (1) evaluate differences between ASyS-associated ILD with IPF, (2) phenotypic differences in patients with ASyS-ILD presenting to respiratory versus rheumatology services, (3) differences in outcomes between ASySassociated with Jo-1 versus non-Jo-1 autoantibodies and (4) compare long-term outcomes between these groups.ResultsWe identified 76 patients with ASyS-ILD and 78 with IPF. Patients with ASyS were younger at presentation (57 vs 77 years, p<0.001) with a female predominance (57% vs 33%, p=0.006) compared with IPF. Cytoplasmic staining on indirect immunofluorescence was a differentiating factor between ASyS and IPF (71% vs 0%, p<0.0001). Patients with ASyS presenting initially to respiratory services (n=52) had a higher prevalence of ASyS non-Jo-1 antibodies and significantly fewer musculoskeletal symptoms/biochemical evidence of myositis, compared with those presenting to rheumatology services (p<0.05), although lung physiology was similar in both groups. There were no differences in high-resolution CT appearances or outcomes in those with Jo-1 versus non-Jo-1 ASyS-ILD.ConclusionsExtended autoimmune serology is needed to evaluate for ASyS autoantibodies in patients presenting with ILD, particularly in younger female patients. Musculoskeletal involvement is common in ASyS (typically Jo-1 autoantibodies) presenting to rheumatology but the burden of ILD is similar to those presenting to respiratory medicine.

scholarly journals The myositis clinical phenotype associated with anti-Zo autoantibodies: a case series of nine UK patients

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 1626-1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L Tansley ◽  
Zoe Betteridge ◽  
Hui Lu ◽  
Emma Davies ◽  
Simon Rothwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Clinical Phenotype ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Muscle Disease ◽  
Ancestral Haplotype ◽  
Common Finding

Abstract Objectives It has been over 10 years since the first report of autoantibodies directed against phenylalanyl tRNA synthetase (anti-Zo) in a patient with features of the anti-synthetase syndrome. In that time no further cases have been published. Here we aim to characterize more fully the clinical phenotype of anti-Zo–associated myositis by describing the clinical features of nine patients. Methods Anti-Zo was identified by protein-immunoprecipitation in patients referred for extended spectrum myositis autoantibody testing at our laboratory. Results were confirmed by immunodepletion using a reference serum. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to provide detailed information of the associated clinical phenotype for all identified patients. Where possible, HLA genotype was imputed using Illumina protocols. Results Nine patients with anti-Zo were identified. The median age at disease onset was 51 years, and six patients were female. Seven patients had evidence of inflammatory muscle disease, seven of interstitial lung disease and six of arthritis. The reported pattern of interstitial lung disease varied with usual interstitial pneumonia, non-specific interstitial pneumonia and organizing pneumonia all described. Other features of the anti-synthetase syndrome such as RP and mechanics hands were common. HLA data was available for three patients, all of whom had at least one copy of the HLA 8.1 ancestral haplotype. Conclusion Patients with anti-Zo presenting with features of the anti-synthetase syndrome and interstitial lung disease is a common finding. Like other myositis autoantibodies, there is likely to be a genetic association with the HLA 8.1 ancestral haplotype.

scholarly journals Predictive Factors for the Long-Term Deterioration of Pulmonary Function in Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Anti-Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Antibodies

Respiration ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Yamakawa ◽  
Eri Hagiwara ◽  
Hideya Kitamura ◽  
Tae Iwasawa ◽  
Ryota Otoshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Function ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Aminoacyl Trna Synthetase

Prognosis of adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective study of 679 adult cases

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan Li ◽  
Yuxin Sun ◽  
Chi Shao ◽  
Hui Huang ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Inflammatory Myopathy ◽  
Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Objectives Few studies have investigated the prognostic factors for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy-associated interstitial lung disease (IIM-ILD) across different clinical/serological phenotypes. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with IIM between January 2012 and December 2017. Results Of the 760 IIM cases registered, 679 adult cases were included in this study. ILD was present in 508 cases, and the presence of ILD in the clinically amyopathic DM, DM and PM groups was 92.7, 73.6 and 55.1%, respectively (P &lt; 0.01). The prevalence of ILD in the anti-synthetase antibody (ASA)+-IIM group was higher than that in ASA–-IIM group (95.2 vs 72.4%, P &lt; 0.01); no such difference was found between the anti-histidyl-tRNA synthetase (Jo-1)+-IIM and Jo-1–ASA+-IIM groups (93.0 vs 98.5%, P &gt; 0.05). The prevalence of ILD in the melanoma differentiation-associated protein-5 (MDA-5)+-IIM group was higher than that in MDA-5–-IIM group (97.8 vs 72.1%, P &lt; 0.01). Among adults with IIM, men with concurrent ILD, who were older than 50 years, were most likely to die. No significant difference was found in the all-cause mortality rates between DM-ILD and clinically amyopathic DM-ILD groups (33.3 vs 23%, P &gt; 0.05), although both were higher than that in PM group (13.2%, P = 0.01 and P &lt; 0.05, respectively). No difference was found in the all-cause mortality rates between MDA5–ASA–-IM-ILD and MDA5–ASA+-IM-ILD groups (17.2 vs 12.8%, P &gt; 0.05), and both were lower than that in MDA5+ASA–-IM-ILD group (33.7%, P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion The prevalence of ILD in IIM and the prognosis of IIM-ILD patients may vary depending on the statuses of the ASA and MDA-5 antibodies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document