Rates and Predictors of Physician-Recommended and Self-Reported Aspirin Use in 2015

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 556-565
Author(s):  
Taylor Naberhaus ◽  
Nicole K. Early ◽  
Kathleen A. Fairman ◽  
Kelsey Buckley
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Behavioral Risk ◽  
Medication History ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
History Of

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the rate of providerrecommended aspirin use through the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) database versus self-reported aspirin use through the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database and identifies factors that predict initiation of aspirin. This study provides insight into the rate of providerrecommended aspirin use versus self-reported aspirin use prior to the 2016 United States Preventive Service Task Force primary prevention recommendation update.<br/> DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of US population data obtained from medical records (NAMCS) and community-dwelling residents in four states (BRFSS) in 2015.<br/> SETTING: Physician offices (NAMCS) and households or telephone (BRFSS).<br/> PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: NAMCS: visits made by patients 40 years of age or older to physicians who permitted federal employees to abstract officevisit data. BRFSS: household or telephone interview respondents 40 years of age or older.<br/> INTERVENTIONS: Comparisons of persons with (secondary prevention) versus without (primary prevention) cardiovascular disease.<br/> MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: Recommended (NAMCS) or self-reported (BRFSS) use of aspirin.<br/> RESULTS: The sample included 19 170 patients (NAMCS), with 2 205 having a history of cardiovascular disease and 14 872 respondents (BRFSS) with 2 024 having a history of cardiovascular disease. For both primary and secondary prevention, respondents from BRFSS reported higher rates of aspirin use (27.7% primary, 65.6% secondary prevention) compared with prescribed rates from NAMCS (11.7% primary, 45.6% secondary prevention).<br/> CONCLUSIONS: Study results highlight the value of obtaining a complete medication history, including aspirin use, from all patients.

Rates and Predictors of Physician-Recommended and Self-Reported Aspirin Use in 2015

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 556-565
Author(s):  
Taylor Naberhaus ◽  
Nicole K. Early ◽  
Kathleen A. Fairman ◽  
Kelsey Buckley
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Behavioral Risk ◽  
Medication History ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
History Of

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the rate of providerrecommended aspirin use through the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) database versus self-reported aspirin use through the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database and identifies factors that predict initiation of aspirin. This study provides insight into the rate of providerrecommended aspirin use versus self-reported aspirin use prior to the 2016 United States Preventive Service Task Force primary prevention recommendation update.<br/> DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of US population data obtained from medical records (NAMCS) and community-dwelling residents in four states (BRFSS) in 2015.<br/> SETTING: Physician offices (NAMCS) and households or telephone (BRFSS).<br/> PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: NAMCS: visits made by patients 40 years of age or older to physicians who permitted federal employees to abstract officevisit data. BRFSS: household or telephone interview respondents 40 years of age or older.<br/> INTERVENTIONS: Comparisons of persons with (secondary prevention) versus without (primary prevention) cardiovascular disease.<br/> MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: Recommended (NAMCS) or self-reported (BRFSS) use of aspirin.<br/> RESULTS: The sample included 19 170 patients (NAMCS), with 2 205 having a history of cardiovascular disease and 14 872 respondents (BRFSS) with 2 024 having a history of cardiovascular disease. For both primary and secondary prevention, respondents from BRFSS reported higher rates of aspirin use (27.7% primary, 65.6% secondary prevention) compared with prescribed rates from NAMCS (11.7% primary, 45.6% secondary prevention).<br/> CONCLUSIONS: Study results highlight the value of obtaining a complete medication history, including aspirin use, from all patients.

scholarly journals Appropriateness of aspirin prescribing for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes in different care settings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Ying Tan ◽  
Heather Cronin ◽  
Stephen Byrne ◽  
Adrian O’Donovan ◽  
Antoinette Tuthill
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Shared Care ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. Use of aspirin has been shown to be of benefit for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes; benefits in primary prevention have not been clearly proven. Aims This study aims to (a) determine if aspirin is prescribed appropriately in type 2 diabetes for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and (b) evaluate whether there are differences in aspirin prescribing according to where people receive their care. Design Cross-sectional study Methods The medical records of individuals with type 2 diabetes aged over 18 years and attending Elmwood Primary Care Centre and Cork University Hospital Diabetes outpatient clinics (n = 400) between February and August 2017 were reviewed. Results There were 90 individuals exclusively attending primary care and 310 persons attending shared care. Overall, 49.0% (n = 196) of those were prescribed aspirin, of whom 42.3% were using it for secondary prevention. Aspirin was used significantly more in people attending shared care (p < 0.001). About 10.8% of individuals with diabetes and CVD attending shared care met guidelines for, but were not prescribed aspirin. Conclusion A significant number of people with type 2 diabetes who should have been prescribed aspirin for secondary prevention were not receiving it at the time of study assessment. In contrast, a substantial proportion who did not meet criteria for aspirin use was prescribed it for primary prevention.

scholarly journals Cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence and predictors of statin utilisation in Ireland with a focus on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e018524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Byrne ◽  
John Cullinan ◽  
Catríona Murphy ◽  
Susan M Smith
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
History Of ◽  
Base Category ◽  
Sectional Analysis ◽  
Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease

ObjectiveTo describe the prevalence of statin utilisation by people aged over 50 years in Ireland and the factors associated with the likelihood of using a statin, focusing particularly on those using statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).MethodsThis is a cross-sectional analysis of cardiovascular risk and sociodemographic factors associated with statin utilisation from wave 1 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing. A hierarchy of indications for statin utilisation, consisting of eight mutually exclusive levels of CVD-related diagnoses, was created. Participants were assigned one level of indication. The prevalence of statin utilisation was calculated. The likelihood that an individual was using a statin was estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model, controlling for cardiovascular risk and sociodemographic factors.ResultsIn this nationally representative sample (n=5618) of community-dwelling participants aged 50 years and over, 1715 (30.5%) were taking statins. Of these, 65.0% (57.3% of men and 72.7% of women) were doing so for the primary prevention of CVD. Thus, almost two-thirds of those taking statins did so for primary prevention and there was a notable difference between women and men in this regard. We also found that statin utilisation was highest among those with a prior history of CVD and was significantly associated with age (compared with the base category 50–64 years; 65–74 years OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.65); 75+ OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.69)), living with a spouse or partner (compared with the base category living alone; OR 1.35 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.65)), polypharmacy (OR 1.74 (95% CI 1.39 to 2.19)) and frequency of general practitioner visits (compared with the base category 0 visits per year; 1–2 visits OR 2.46 (95% CI 1.80 to 3.35); 3–4 visits OR 3.24 (95% CI 2.34 to 4.47); 5–6 visits OR 2.98 (95% CI 2.08 to 4.26); 7+ visits OR 2.51 (95% CI 1.73 to 3.63)), even after controlling for clinical need. There was no association between using statins and gender, education, income, social class, health insurance status, location or Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk in the multivariable analysis.ConclusionStatin utilisation among those with no history of CVD accounted for almost two-thirds of all statin use, in part reflecting the high proportion of the population with no history of CVD, although utilisation rates were highest among those with a history of CVD.

scholarly journals Multimorbidity, polypharmacy and primary prevention in community-dwelling adults in Quebec: a cross-sectional study

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 706-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tu N Nguyen ◽  
Patrice Ngangue ◽  
Jeannie Haggerty ◽  
Tarek Bouhali ◽  
Martin Fortin
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Chronic Diseases ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Concurrent Use ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Polypharmacy carries the risk of adverse events, especially in people with multimorbidity. Objective To investigate the prevalence of polypharmacy in community-dwelling adults, the association of multimorbidity with polypharmacy and the use of medications for primary prevention. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of the follow-up data from the Program of Research on the Evolution of a Cohort Investigating Health System Effects (PRECISE) in Quebec, Canada. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of three or more chronic diseases and polypharmacy as self-reported concurrent use of five or more medications. Primary prevention was conceptualized as the use of statin or low-dose antiplatelets without a reported diagnostic of cardiovascular disease. Results Mean age 56.7 ± 11.6, 62.5% female, 30.3% had multimorbidity, 31.9% had polypharmacy (n = 971). The most common drugs used were statins, renin–angiotensin system inhibitors and psychotropics. Compared to participants without any chronic disease, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for having polypharmacy were 2.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23–6.28] in those with one chronic disease, 8.88 (95% CI: 4.06–19.20) in those with two chronic diseases and 25.31 (95% CI: 11.77–54.41) in those with three or more chronic diseases, P < 0.001. In participants without history of cardiovascular diseases, 16.2% were using antiplatelets and 28.5% were using statins. Multimorbidity was associated with increased likelihood of using antiplatelets (adjusted OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.98–4.48, P < 0.001) and statins (adjusted OR: 3.76, 95% CI: 2.63–5.37, P < 0.001) for primary prevention. Conclusion There was a high prevalence of polypharmacy in community-dwelling adults in Quebec and a strong association with multimorbidity. The use of medications for primary prevention may contribute to polypharmacy and raise questions about safety.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Aspirin Prescriptions among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Songklanagarind Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Rattanaporn Chootong ◽  
Silom Jamulitrat
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Aspirin Therapy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease

Objective: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the American Heart Association (AHA) recommend aspirin use for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. There are, however, some doubts regarding the prescription of aspirin therapy to prevent cardiovascular events in diabetic patients, aspects of its safety, and contraindications of the drug administration. This study was conducted in order to evaluate the amount of prescribed aspirin for diabetic patients who received the treatment at Songklanagarind Hospital.Material and Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted to review the medical records of diabetic patients who received the treatment at outpatient departments from 1st-31st December 2013.Results: A total of 1,342 diabetic patients are included in this study: 80.3% from the primary prevention group and 19.7% from the secondary prevention group. Mean age was 64.3 years old. Of the patients, 44.7% were male. The study revealed that prescribed aspirin accounted for one-third of total prescriptions (31.7%). The primary prevention group was 19.0% (95% confidence interval (CI)=12.0-21.3) and the secondary prevention group was 83.7% (95% CI=78.6-87.9). The departments that frequently prescribed aspirin for the primary prevention group was endocrinology (21.2%) and for the secondary prevention group it was the Primary Care Unit (87.5%). Aspirin side effects were gastrointestinal 1.0% and tinnitus 0.1%. Aspirin contraindications were active peptic ulcer (0.1%), history of gastrointestinal bleeding (0.4%), bleeding disorders (0.2%), history of recent intracranial bleeding (0.2%) and severe liver disease (0.9%). There was a positive correlation between age, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and the dose of prescribed aspirin (p-value<0.001, 0.003 respectively). These patients were more likely to have the dose of aspirin increased as age and HbA1c increased.Conclusion: Despite aspirin being a safe, inexpensive and readily available therapy that is effective in preventing cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients and likely to provide benefits rather than side effects and contraindications. The author found significant underuse of aspirin therapy, especially in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients. 

Abstract P168: Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with Aspirin: Self-Reported and Validated Aspirin use in a Minnesota Community

Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (suppl_12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole D Zantek ◽  
Russell V Luepker ◽  
Sue Duval ◽  
Heather LaMarre ◽  
John R Finnegan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Current Smoking ◽  
Actual Use ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Aspirin (ASA) is recommended for the primary prevention (PP) of cardiovascular disease (CVD, defined as a first myocardial infarction or stroke) by the American Heart Association, Centers for Disease Control, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rates of current ASA use for primary prevention of CVD are not well established. Furthermore, self-reported ASA use may be higher than actual use. We thus investigated self-reported and validated ASA use in a Minnesota population. Hypotheses: Current ASA use for primary prevention is low and self-report overestimates actual use. Methods: A population-based telephone survey was conducted of males 45-79 and females 55-79 years of age in a Minnesota community in 2012. Subjects were classified as PP or secondary prevention (SP) based on a history of CVD or previous cardiovascular procedures. Self-reported aspirin use was validated by measurement of serum thromboxane B 2 (sTXB 2 ), a stable metabolite of thromboxane A 2 , measured in a subset (n=54) using the Thromboxane B 2 EIA Kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) and reported as median (IQR). Results: A sample of 103 subjects (response rate 56%, age 64±9, 67% male) included both PP (n=74) and SP (n=29) cohorts. Risk factors were prevalent in both PP and SP groups: hypertension (41 vs 62%); diabetes (12 vs. 38%); hyperlipidemia (46 vs 76%); and current smoking (20 vs 23%). Daily aspirin use was reported by 37% of the PP vs. 76% of the SP groups. Within the PP group, most (96%) took aspirin to reduce the risk of CVD events. sTXB 2 levels were 165.6 (18.5, 250.1) ng/mL in aspirin non-users and were 2.8 (0.5, 12.0) ng/mL in self-reported aspirin users. A sTXB 2 cutpoint of 25 ng/mL to validate ASA exposure was associated with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 73%. Conclusions: Self-report of ASA use is a valid measure. Use is relatively low in a contemporary primary prevention population.

scholarly journals Aspirin Use among Adults with Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: Implications for an Intervention Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Ansa ◽  
Zachary Hoffman ◽  
Nicollette Lewis ◽  
Cassandra Savoy ◽  
Angela Hickson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Behavioral Risk ◽  
Lifestyle Modifications ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance ◽  
Underlying Cause Of Death

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major underlying cause of death, with high economic burden in most countries, including the United States. Lifestyle modifications and the use of antiplatelet therapy, such as aspirin, can contribute significantly to secondary prevention of CVD in adults. This study examined the prevalence and associated factors of aspirin use for the secondary prevention of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular disease (stroke) in a sample of American adults. The 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) dataset was analyzed for this cross-sectional study. Almost 16% of the study population (N = 441,456) had angina, MI, or stroke. Weighted percentages of respondents with angina, MI, and stroke were 4%, 4.3%, and 3%, respectively. Overall, weighted prevalence of daily (or every other day) aspirin use was about 65%, 71%, and 57% among respondents with angina, MI, and stroke, respectively. Factors that were significantly associated with aspirin use included male sex, more than high school education, high blood pressure, diabetes, and less than excellent general health. There were existing differences among individuals with CVD based on diagnosis, demographic and socioeconomic status in the use of aspirin for secondary prevention. Resources for promoting aspirin use should be directed toward groups with lower utilization.

The burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Middle East: A systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on primary prevention

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula ◽  
Abdullah Shehab ◽  
Anhar Ullah ◽  
Jamal Rahmani
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Family History ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Middle Eastern ◽  
History Of

Background: The increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) threatens the Middle Eastern population. Several epidemiological studies have assessed CVD and its risk factors in terms of the primary prevention of CVD in the Middle East. Therefore, summarizing the information from these studies is essential. Aim: We conducted a systematic review to assess the prevalence of CVD and its major risk factors among Middle Eastern adults based on the literature published between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 and carried out a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Embase and Google Scholar to identify literature published from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. All the original articles that investigated the prevalence of CVD and reported at least one of the following factors were included: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, smoking and family history of CVD. To summarize CVD prevalence, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: A total of 41 potentially relevant articles were included, and 32 were included in the meta-analysis (n=191,979). The overall prevalence of CVD was 10.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.1-14.3%, p<0.001) in the Middle East. A high prevalence of CVD risk factors, such as dyslipidaemia (43.3%; 95% CI: 21.5-68%), hypertension (26.2%; 95% CI: 19.6-34%) and diabetes (16%; 95% CI: 9.9-24.8%), was observed. The prevalence rates of other risk factors, such as smoking (12.4%; 95% CI: 7.7-19.4%) and family history of CVD (18.7%; 95% CI: 15.4-22.5%), were also high. Conclusion: The prevalence of CVD is high (10.1%) in the Middle East. The burden of dyslipidaemia (43.3%) in this region is twice as high as that of hypertension (26.2%) and diabetes mellitus (16%). Multifaceted interventions are urgently needed for the primary prevention of CVD in this region.

Factors Associated with Lower Cognitive Performance Scores Among Older Japanese Men in Hawaii and Japan

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Naoko Miyagawa ◽  
Takayoshi Ohkubo ◽  
Akira Fujiyoshi ◽  
Akihiko Shiino ◽  
Randi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Educational Attainment ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Subclinical Atherosclerosis ◽  
Lifestyle Factors ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Japanese Men ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cardiometabolic Factors

Background: Few studies have compared factors related to cognitive function among people with similar genetic backgrounds but different lifestyles. Objective: We aimed to identify factors related to lower cognitive scores among older Japanese men in two genetically similar cohorts exposed to different lifestyle factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study of community-dwelling Japanese men aged 71–81 years included 2,628 men enrolled in the Kuakini Honolulu-Asia Aging Study based in Hawaii and 349 men in the Shiga Epidemiological Study of Subclinical Atherosclerosis based in Japan. We compared participant performance through Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) assessment in Hawaii (1991–1993) and Japan (2009–2014). Factors related to low cognitive scores (history of cardiovascular disease, cardiometabolic factors, and lifestyle factors) were identified with questionnaires and measurements. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of a low (<  82) CASI score based on different factors. Results: CASI scores were lower in Hawaii than in Japan [21.2%(n = 556) versus 12.3%(n = 43), p <  0.001], though this was not significant when adjusted for age and educational attainment (Hawaii 20.3%versus Japan 17.9%, p = 0.328). History of stroke (OR = 1.65, 95%confidence interval = 1.19–2.29) was positively associated with low cognitive scores in Hawaii. Body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 tended to be associated with low cognitive scores in Japan; there was a significant interaction between the cohorts. Conclusion: Cognitive scores differences between cohorts were mostly explained by differences in educational attainment. Conversely, cardiovascular diseases and cardiometabolic factors differentially impacted cognitive scores among genetically similar older men exposed to different lifestyle factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document