Effects of pH, Temperature, and Pre–Pulsed Electric Field Treatment on Pulsed Electric Field and Heat Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7

2003 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 755-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
GULSUN AKDEMIR EVRENDILEK ◽  
Q. HOWARD ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Pulsed Electric Field ◽  
Heat Inactivation ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Effects Of Ph ◽  
Different Temperatures ◽  
Pulsed Electric Field Treatment

This investigation was undertaken to study the inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment and heat treatment after exposure to different stresses. E. coli O157:H7 cells exposed to different pHs (3.6, 5.2, and 7.0 for 6 h), different temperatures (4, 35, and 40°C for 6 h), and different pre-PEF treatments (10, 15, and 20 kV/cm) were treated with PEFs (20, 25, and 30 kV/cm) or heat (60°C for 3 min). The results of these experiments demonstrated that a pH of 3.6 and temperatures of 4 and 40°C caused significant decreases in the inactivation of E. coli O157:H7 by PEF treatment and heat treatment (P < 0.05). Pre-PEF treatments, pHs of 5.2 and 7.0, and a temperature of 35°C, on the other hand, did not result in any resistance of E. coli O157:H7 cells to inactivation by PEF treatment and heat treatment (P > 0.05).

Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Lactobacillus leichmannii by Combinations of Ozone and Pulsed Electric Field

2001 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 777-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAGIP UNAL ◽  
JIN-GAB KIM ◽  
AHMED E. YOUSEF
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Pulsed Electric Field ◽  
Bactericidal Effect ◽  
Treatment Level ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Nonthermal Processing ◽  
Lactobacillus Leichmannii

Pulsed electric field (PEF) and ozone technologies are nonthermal processing methods with potential applications in the food industry. This research was performed to explore the potential synergy between ozone and PEF treatments against selected foodborne bacteria. Cells of Lactobacillus leichmannii ATCC 4797, Escherichia coli O157:H7 ATCC 35150, and Listeria monocytogenes Scott A were suspended in 0.1% NaCl and treated with ozone, PEF, and ozone plus PEF. Cells were treated with 0.25 to 1.00 μg of ozone per ml of cell suspension, PEF at 10 to 30 kV/cm, and selected combinations of ozone and PEF. Synergy between ozone and PEF varied with the treatment level and the bacterium treated. L. leichmannii treated with PEF (20 kV/cm) after exposure to 0.75 and 1.00 μg/ml of ozone was inactivated by 7.1 and 7.2 log10 CFU/ml, respectively; however, ozone at 0.75 and 1.00 μg/ml and PEF at 20 kV/cm inactivated 2.2, 3.6, and 1.3 log10 CFU/ml, respectively. Similarly, ozone at 0.5 and 0.75 μg/ml inactivated 0.5 and 1.8 log10 CFU/ml of E. coli, PEF at 15 kV/cm inactivated 1.8 log10 CFU/ml, and ozone at 0.5 and 0.75 μg/ml followed by PEF (15 kV/cm) inactivated 2.9 and 3.6 log10 CFU/ml, respectively. Populations of L. monocytogenes decreased 0.1, 0.5, 3.0, 3.9, and 0.8 log10 CFU/ml when treated with 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 μg/ml of ozone and PEF (15 kV/cm), respectively; however, when the bacterium was treated with 15 kV/cm, after exposure to 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 μg/ml of ozone, 1.7, 2.0, and 3.9 log10 CFU/ml were killed, respectively. In conclusion, exposure of L. leichmannii, E. coli, and L. monocytogenes to ozone followed by the PEF treatment showed a synergistic bactericidal effect. This synergy was most apparent with mild doses of ozone against L. leichmannii.

Chemical and Irradiation Treatments for Killing Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Alfalfa, Radish, and Mung Bean Seeds

2003 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 767-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. BARI ◽  
E. NAZUKA ◽  
Y. SABINA ◽  
S. TODORIKI ◽  
K. ISSHIKI
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Mung Bean ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Chemical Treatments ◽  
Dry Heat ◽  
Pathogen Populations ◽  
Dry Heat Treatment ◽  
Alfalfa Seeds

In this study, the effectiveness of dry-heat treatment in combination with chemical treatments (electrolyzed oxidizing [EO] water, califresh-S, 200 ppm of active chlorinated water) with and without sonication in eliminating Escherichia coli O157:H7 on laboratory-inoculated alfalfa, radish, and mung bean seeds was compared with that of dry-heat treatment in combination with irradiation treatment. The treatment of mung bean seeds with EO water in combination with sonication followed by a rinse with sterile distilled water resulted in reductions of approximately 4.0 log10 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 per g, whereas reductions of ca. 1.52 and 2.64 log10 CFU/g were obtained for radish and alfalfa seeds. The maximum reduction (3.70 log10 CFU/g) for mung bean seeds was achieved by treatment with califresh-S and chlorinated water (200 ppm) in combination with sonication and a rinse. The combination of dry heat, hot EO water treatment, and sonication was able to eliminate pathogen populations on mung bean seeds but was unable to eliminate the pathogen on radish and alfalfa seeds. Other chemical treatments used were effective in greatly reducing pathogen populations on radish and alfalfa seeds without compromising the quality of the sprouts, but these treatments did not result in the elimination of pathogens from radish and alfalfa seeds. Moreover, a combination of dry-heat and irradiation treatments was effective in eliminating E. coli O157:H7 on laboratory-inoculated alfalfa, radish, and mung bean seeds. An irradiation dose of 2.0 kGy in combination with dry heat eliminated E. coli O157:H7 completely from alfalfa and mung bean seeds, whereas a 2.5-kGy dose of irradiation was required to eliminate the pathogen completely from radish seeds. Dry heat in combination with irradiation doses of up to 2.0 kGy did not unacceptably decrease the germination percentage for alfalfa seeds or the length of alfalfa sprouts but did decrease the lengths of radish and mung bean sprouts.

scholarly journals Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Environments of Culture-Positive Cattle

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 6816-6822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Davis ◽  
Karen A. Cloud-Hansen ◽  
John Carpenter ◽  
Carolyn J. Hovde
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Different Temperatures ◽  
Farm Structures ◽  
On Farm ◽  
Culture Positive ◽  
Culture Negative ◽  
Over Time

ABSTRACT Outbreaks of Escherichia coli O157:H7 disease associated with animal exhibits have been reported with increasing frequency. Transmission can occur through contact with contaminated haircoats, bedding, farm structures, or water. We investigated the distribution and survival of E. coli O157:H7 in the immediate environments of individually housed, experimentally inoculated cattle by systematically culturing feed, bedding, water, haircoat, and feed bunk walls for E. coli O157:H7 for 3 months. Cedar chip bedding was the most frequently culture-positive environmental sample tested (27/96 or 28.15%). Among these, 12 (44.0%) of positive bedding samples were collected when the penned animal was fecal culture negative. Survival of E. coli O157:H7 in experimentally inoculated cedar chip bedding and in grass hay feed was determined at different temperatures. Survival was longest in feed at room temperature (60 days), but bacterial counts decreased over time. The possibility that urine plays a role in the environmental survival of E. coli O157:H7 was investigated. Cedar chip bedding moistened with sterile water or bovine urine was inoculated with E. coli O157:H7. Bedding moistened with urine supported growth of E. coli O157:H7, whereas inoculated bedding moistened with only water yielded decreasing numbers of bacteria over time. The findings that environmental samples were frequently positive for E. coli O157:H7 at times when animals were culture negative and that urine provided a substrate for E. coli O157:H7 growth have implications for understanding the on-farm ecology of this pathogen and for the safety of ruminant animal exhibits, particularly petting zoos and farms where children may enter animal pens.

Effect of Heat Shock and Incubation Atmosphere on Injury and Recovery of Escherichia coli O157:H7

1993 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 568-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELSA A. MURANO ◽  
MERLE D. PIERSON
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Toxic Substances ◽  
Anaerobic Conditions ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Heat Treated ◽  
Shock Response ◽  
Cell Components

Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 cells were grown at 30°C for 6 h and subjected to a heat stress, or heat shock, at 42°C for 5 min. Heat-shocked and nonheat-shocked controls were heat treated at 55°C for up to 60 min. The number of injured cells was significantly higher in heat-shocked cells than in controls, and the rate of release of cell components was higher in heat-shocked cells. Anaerobic plating resulted in higher recovery of injured cells, when compared with aerobic plating, regardless of whether the cells were heat shocked or not. In addition, heat shocking resulted in lower catalase and superoxide dismutase activities when compared with controls. It also resulted in greater survivability after exposure to hydrogen peroxide, suggesting that heat shocking somehow enables the cells to survive exposure to toxic substances in addition to heat. The heat-shock response, coupled with anaerobic conditions, increased the ability of E. coli O157:H7 cells to recover after a heat treatment. Thus, heat shock did not afford protection to the cells against injury, but rather enhanced their ability to recover during storage.

Survival and Growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Roast Beef and Salami after Exposure to an Alkaline Cleaner

2004 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 2107-2116 ◽  
Author(s):  
MANAN SHARMA ◽  
GLENNER M. RICHARDS ◽  
LARRY R. BEUCHAT
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Storage Period ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Mold Growth ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Macconkey Agar ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Different Temperatures ◽  
Survival And Growth ◽  
Roast Beef

Survival and growth of wild-type (EDL 933) and rpoS-deficient (FRIK 816-3) strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 after exposure to an alkaline cleaner for 2 min and inoculating into roast beef (pH 6.3) and hard salami (pH 4.9) at low (0.003 to 0.52 CFU/g) and high (0.69 to 31.5 CFU/g) populations were determined. Roast beef was stored at 4 and 12°C; salami was stored at 4, 12, and 20°C. At 4°C, untreated cells of both strains showed greater reductions in populations in salami than in roast beef during a 21-day storage period. Populations of treated and untreated cells recovered from roast beef and salami stored at 4°C on tryptic soy agar were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher than on sorbitol MacConkey agar, indicating that a portion of the cells was injured. Treated and untreated cells grew in roast beef at 12°C. Growth of treated cells of the FRIK 816-3 strain in roast beef at 12°C was significantly slower than that of the EDL 933 strain. Populations of both strains decreased at different rates in salami stored at different temperatures (20°C > 12°C > 4°C). E. coli O157:H7 strain EDL 933 grew more rapidly at 20°C in a slurry (pH 5.97) prepared from stored salami (17 days at 20°C) on which Penicillium chrysogenum had grown than in a slurry (5.23) prepared from salami showing no mold growth. Within 2 to 3 days, populations were ca. 3 log CFU/ml higher in slurry made from infected salami than in control salami. Results indicate that treatment of E. coli O157: H7 with an alkaline cleaner for 2 min does not impair resuscitation and growth of surviving cells in roast beef at 12°C. Cross protection of cells exposed to an alkaline cleaner against subsequent stress conditions imposed by roast beef and salami stored at 4°C was not evident in either of the test strains.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document