Why Leadership Research Is Generally Irrelevant for Leadership Development

2003 ◽  
pp. 207-224
Leadership ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 174271502098322
Author(s):  
Steve Kempster ◽  
Doris Schedlitzki ◽  
Gareth Edwards

In this short article, we explore and problematise the axiomatic assumption of follower in the field of leadership studies notably the leader–follower axiom as the essential foundation of much leadership theorising. We do so, firstly by drawing on our experiences of exploring followership conceptually, and secondly, by reviewing conversations with executive MBA students. From these sources, we argue that the absence of identifications with followership offers a challenge to leadership assumptions around the socio-materiality of followers and their relations with leaders within organisational contexts. This leads us to questions like: what if follower identifications do not typically exist or are rejected in everyday organisational working contexts – despite discursive labelling of individuals as followers or following practices? Would or should leadership research and its examination of leader–follower dynamics fundamentally change and in what ways? We explore these questions and suggest very different orientations that might appear with regards to notions of the leadership relationship, leading and following dynamics, practice-based attention to leadership and perhaps very different approaches to leadership development. Such a (re)appraisal of the leadership lexicon may move notions of follower identification out of social constructions of organisational leadership and towards social media (Facebook, Twitter and Instagram) – where the phenomenon of being a follower is ever present, but is redefined as a phenomenon of vicarious fantasy associated with interest, curiosity and entertainment.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254329
Author(s):  
Joan Manuel Batista-Foguet ◽  
Marc Esteve ◽  
Arjen van Witteloostuijn

Although the most used measure of transformational leadership, the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), has been the subject of intense scrutiny among leadership scholars, little interest has been shown in analyzing the relationship between its underlying constructs and / or their measures. The present study identifies a formative factor structure for most MLQ first-order factors, replacing the usual reflective model. We demonstrate the value of this structure using data from two different samples. First, we applied the MLQ to a sample of 129 police officers from the Catalan Police workforce. Second, we ran an online survey with 300 US citizens. We argue that three second-order factors (transformational, transactional, and laissez faire) should be used as emergent aggregate multidimensional models to describe three different leadership styles, challenging the ubiquitous multidimensional latent models favored in the extant literature. We then propose that transformational/charismatic leadership should be treated as a multidimensional emergent profile model, replacing the leadership development order of precedence, which is dominant in modern leadership research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Smith

Abstract Background There is growing recognition of the importance of leadership in Public Health (PH) practice, and the need to embed it into the education and training of PH professionals. However the theoretical discourse within leadership research has changed significantly and there is recognition that previous conceptualisations of leadership, and our ways of developing it may be flawed, and need to be changed in practice. Objectives This presentation will discuss development of leadership theory, and system leadership. In particular it will highlight how System Leadership differs from previous understandings of leadership and the implications of this for ph practitioners and those charged with developing system leadership capacity within public health. Body of the session Leadership in organisations is mostly focused on current/anticipated internal challenges (strategy, performance management, staff engagement, etc.). Leaders are generally developed via individual leader development rather than a focus developing Leadership capacity across organisations/systems. Within PH it is increasingly realised that single organisations can no longer respond effectively to the “wicked” issues they face. They do not possess sufficient know-how to address the complex and multi-dimensional problems faced, so leadership models based on a single hierarchical organisation are not sustainable. There is a need to work collectively in an ecosystem-based approach (not an ego-based system). System Leadership development requires that participants are actively engaged in real attempts to improve PH System. Development requires that underlying values are made explicit, explored and diversity embraced. The emphasis will be on supporting learners in the doing rather than critiquing or talking about it. Conclusions There is need to appreciate fully the nature of systems leadership, together with implications for PH practice and the development of system leadership capacity throughout the PH workforce.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Thornton

The lack of recognition and support for leadership and leadership development in the New Zealand early years’ sector has long been recognised (Thornton, Wansbrough, Clarkin-Philips, Aitken, & Tamati, 2009). This article reflects on what has changed in the 10 years since the publication of a discussion document by the Teachers Council which signalled a number of issues facing the sector with regard to leadership. Research and guiding documents are drawn on in order to identify the current challenges and opportunities, and recommendations are made for strengthening future leadership practice in the sector.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorunn Møller

Denne artikkelen har en dobbel målsetting. For det første er målet å gi et kort historisk tilbakeblikk over hva som har vært gjennomført av skoleleder-opplæring i norsk regi i løpet av de siste 50 årene, da det gir en mulighet til å vise endringer som har skjedd over tid. For det andre er målet å drøfte dagens krav til kvalifisering av skoleledere i et internasjonalt perspektiv. Analysen av det historiske tilbakeblikket i en norsk kontekst bygger på dokumentanalyser og programevalueringer som har vært gjennomført av de ulike programmene siden 1960-tallet. Drøftingen av forholdet mellom utdanningspolitikk og kunnskapsgrunnlag har fokus på hva slags kunnskap som er i bruk og hvorfor, og er inspirert av Gunters kategorisering av skoleledelse som forskningsfelt. I tillegg er internasjonale “handbooks” om utvikling av skoleledere viktige referanser. Den historiske oversikten basert på erfaringer i Norge, gir et bilde av hva slags kompetanse man har hatt som intensjon å utvikle, og hvilke innholds-elementer som har vært vurdert som viktige til ulike tider. Analysen viser at utdanningsprogrammene i hovedsak henter teorigrunnlaget fra generell ledelsesteori og effektstudier, og i økende grad er den nasjonalt baserte utdanningspolitikken blitt påvirket av en internasjonal diskurs om kvalitet i skolen hvor OECD i stor grad setter agendaen og legger premissene for utvikling av skoleledelse og praksis i skolen.Nøkkelord: skolelederutdanning, utdanningspolitiske endringer, internasjonal kvalitetsdiskurs, skoleledelse som forskningsfeltAbstractThis article has a double objective. Firstly, it aims to give a brief historical review of how school leadership development has been enacted in a Norwegian context during the last 50 years. Secondly, it aims to examine and discuss today’s requirements of qualifications for school leadership in an international perspective. Policy documents focusing on school leadership development and external evaluations of the different development programs which have been offered to Norwegian school leaders since the 1960s serve as a departure for the analysis. The discussion of the relationship between educational policy and its knowledge base has a specific focus on what type of knowledge is used and why, and is inspired by Gunter’s conceptual framework of an intellectual history of school leadership research. In addition, international handbooks on the preparation and development of school leaders are key references. By applying a historical lens the analysis provides an image of the kinds of competencies that have been considered important over time. The findings show that the national programs for developing school leaders mainly draw upon general leadership theory and school effectiveness research, and increasingly they have become influenced by the international educational discourse about quality in school in which OECD has become a prominent agent in setting the agenda for improving school leadership and school practices.Keywords: school leadership development, changes in educational policy, international quality discourse, theory traditions within leadership research


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Jackson

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to foreground place as a critical and central concern for public leadership research, development and practice. Design/methodology/approach This invited essay draws on the author’s own research and development work engaging in collaborative place-based interventions with academics, policy makers and practitioners. Findings Place is one of six heuristic lenses in a Leadership Hexad that has been developed to interrogate and better understand leadership in a multi-dimensional manner. Place can provide an important theoretical and practical fulcrum for bridging both collaborative governance and collective leadership and public and political leadership as well as facilitating cross-sectoral leadership. Practical implications This essay argues that more time and effort should be invested into researching and developing place leadership to complement the already extensive efforts to promote collaborative governance and place-based policy initiatives. Place leadership development should be genuinely cross-sectoral in its ambition and should focus on developing emerging and established leaders from the public, private, not-for-profit and indigenous sectors to tackle place-based problems and opportunities. Originality/value This essay draws on experience undertaking academic research and conducting leadership development that draws from and feeds into policy and practice. It utilises research from geography, leadership studies, public management, public policy and political science to gain a more sophisticated understanding of the relationship between place and public leadership and how this can be harnessed to improve economic and social impact.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 11-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Ole Vanebo ◽  
Brita Bjørkelo ◽  
Terje Aaserud

The Norwegian Police Service (NPS) have been heavily criticized after the 22 July 2011 terror attacks at Utøya and in Oslo. One of the evaluation reports stated three shortcomings in the NPS: culture, attitudes and leadership. Management and leadership in the NPS needs to be improved and strengthened, and this shall take place among other things, with the help of a policy document on Civil Service Leadership, elaborated into a manifest called Plattform for medarbeiderskap (Platform of Employeeship for the NPS). The policy document pertains to how the public sector in general ought to be managed, and the document is based on leadership research and is in accordance with mainstream management theory. The idea of formulating a principle of management that would characterize the classical contributions is also evident in this document. This paper addresses two problems: How can value-based police leadership skills be operationalized and measured, and what are the key critical factors in transferring value-based police leadership principles into improved leadership practices?


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Thornton

The lack of recognition and support for leadership and leadership development in the New Zealand early years’ sector has long been recognised (Thornton, Wansbrough, Clarkin-Philips, Aitken, & Tamati, 2009). This article reflects on what has changed in the 10 years since the publication of a discussion document by the Teachers Council which signalled a number of issues facing the sector with regard to leadership. Research and guiding documents are drawn on in order to identify the current challenges and opportunities, and recommendations are made for strengthening future leadership practice in the sector.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Carter

<p>I describe my leadership stance that leans heavily into the intersection of race, class, gender, and ethnicity and its effect on an individual’s life experiences and worldview. The chapter addresses how I need to shift my thinking in applying an intersectional lens to research in a traditionally patriarchal African context. I am excited to visit Africa and embark on much-needed research with faculty women that has the possibility of expanding our knowledge of women’s leadership and gender equity. As I make necessary preparations to begin the research in Uganda, perhaps the most difficult things to attend to are my own thoughts and reflections. In this chapter, I explore the preparatory journey of a Black woman, a Feminist, and American visiting Uganda for transcultural leadership research.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document