scholarly journals Normatywne ujęcie czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych w aspekcie dowodu nielegalnego

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 333-350
Author(s):  
Norbert Nowicki

Zagadnienia omawiane w niniejszym artykule dotyczą statusu normatywnego czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych w kontekście ustawy o Policji oraz kodeksu postępowania karnego. Podjęto próbę wskazania warunków, które rzutują na legalny charakter inwigilacji, a co za tym idzie – na skuteczne wykorzystanie materiału operacyjnego w procesie karnym. W tym celu scharakteryzowano niejawną aktywność Policji, wyszczególniając dopuszczalne metody operacyjne oraz definiując czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawcze w świetle literatury przedmiotu. Aby w pełni zobrazować problematykę poruszoną w artykule, przeanalizowano relację prawną między dowodem nielegalnym, o którym mowa w art. 168a kpk, a dowodem z czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych, na przykładzie zarządzonej kontroli operacyjnej. Praktyczny wymiar tych rozważań omówiono z punktu widzenia postępowania dowodowego, z uwzględnieniem ról i obowiązków procesowych prokuratora oraz sądu. Normative approach to operational and reconnaissance activities in terms of illegal evidence The issues discussed in this article refer to the normative status of operational and investigative activities in the context of the Police Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure. Namely, an attempt was made to demonstrate the conditions that affect the legal nature of surveillance, and thus the effective use of operational material in a criminal trial. For this purpose, the covert activity of the Police has been characterized by listing acceptable operational methods and defining operational and reconnaissance activities in the light of the literature on the subject. Therefore, in order to fully illustrate the issues discussed, an analysis was conducted of the legal relationship between the illegal evidence referred to in Art. 168a of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the evidence from operational and reconnaissance activities, on the example of an ordered operational control. The practical dimension of these considerations is discussed from the point of view of evidence proceedings, taking into account the procedural roles and responsibilities of the prosecutor and the court.

Author(s):  
Mariia Sirotkina ◽  

The article is turned out to a scientific search for the concept of "a reconciliation agreement between the victim and the suspect or accused" through the study of the essence of reconciliation and role in criminal proceedings thereof. The author notes that criminal procedural law (until 2012) had been proclaimed another approach to reconciliation between victim and suspect, not involved a dispute procedure as a conflict, the result of which can be reached by compromise and understanding through reconciliation. It is stated that one of the ways to resolve the legal conflict in committing a criminal offense was the opportunity to reach a compromise between the victim and the suspect (the accused) by concluding a reconciliation agreement between them, provided by the Code of Сriminal Procedure of Ukraine (2012). The main attention is placed on the shortcoming of the domestic criminal procedure law which is the lack of the concept of "a reconciliation agreement between the victim and the suspect or the accused", which can be eliminated only through examining the essence or legal nature of reconciliation in criminal proceedings. Taking into consideration the current legislation and modern views on the institution of reconciliation in criminal proceedings, the author's definition of the concept of "a reconciliation agreement" is proposed. Thus, “The conciliation agreement is an agreement in criminal proceedings concluded between the victim and the suspect or the accused person on their own initiative in relation to crimes of minor or medium gravity and in criminal proceedings in the form of private prosecution, the subject of which is the compensation of harm caused by wrongdoing or committing other actions not related to compensation for the damage that the suspect or the accused is obliged to commit in favor of the victim, in exchange for an agreed punishment and sentencing thereof or sentencing thereof and relief from serving a sentence with probation, as well as the statutory consequences of conclusion and approval of the agreement".


Author(s):  
E.V. Bolshakov ◽  
◽  
I.D. Nazarov ◽  

The subject of the research within the framework of the article is the criminal procedure institute for the detention of a person on suspicion of committing a crime. The legal nature of this institution is analyzed, and comments are given on the normative legal acts and judicial practice regulating the issues of detention. The theoretical basis of the research is based on the publications of the last two decades on this problem, in particular, reflecting the discussion of the process scientists S. A. Shafer, S. B. Rossinsky and A. A. Tarasov, the subject of which was the issue of the legal nature of a suspect detention in a criminal case. In the paper, the authors ask the following questions: What is the detention of a person on suspicion of committing a crime in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation? From what moment does the detained person acquire the status of a suspect? Is it possible to detain a person before initiating a criminal case? The study concludes that a person acquires the actual status of a suspect from the moment of direct detention, that is, before documenting this status and, as a result, before initiating a criminal case. Amendments to the articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are proposed, and the authors` versions of the definitions of the concepts «detention of a suspect», «the moment of actual detention» and «pre-trial proceedings» are given.


Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 167-175
Author(s):  
Ilya Dikarev ◽  
◽  
Sailaubek Baymanov ◽  

Introduction: the paper discusses the possibility of differentiating the forms of criminal prosecution. The critical analysis is subject to the widespread position in the science of criminal procedure that the forms of criminal prosecution are suspicion and accusation. This point of view is based on the conclusion that the content of criminal prosecution varies depending on the degree of proof of the guilt of the person subject to criminal prosecution. Concerning compliance with the principle of adversarial parties, the theoretical position is also evaluated, according to which one of the forms of criminal prosecution is conviction. The question of the grounds for differentiating the forms of criminal prosecution is studied. Purpose: the confirming the unified nature of the criminal prosecution carried out during the pretrial proceedings, regardless of the procedural position of the person accused of committing the crime. Methods: the paper uses the general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, a systematic approach, as well as specific scientific methods: legal interpretation and logical-legal. The methodological framework was the dialectical method. Results: the study of the common position in the science of criminal procedure, according to which criminal prosecution at different stages of its implementation consistently takes the forms of suspicion and accusation, showed its inconsistency. From the standpoint of philosophy, the content always has a determining value, and the form is always determined. Accordingly, to establish a change in the form of criminal prosecution, it is necessary to make sure that the content of this activity changes. However, the degree of proof of the person’s involvement in the crime is not reflected in the content of the accusatory activity, it remains the same. Therefore, suspicion and accusation do not form the independent forms of criminal prosecution. At the same time, the differentiation of the forms of criminal prosecution is possible, but on different grounds. Conclusions: the differentiation of the forms of criminal prosecution should be made depending on, first, the organization of procedural activities that determine the role and powers of the subject of criminal prosecution in the process of proof; secondly, the procedural status of the participant in the criminal process on the part of the prosecution and, thirdly, the content of the fact in issue.


Author(s):  
І. В. Гловюк

Стаття присвячена дослідженню проблемних питань застосування тимчасового вилу­чення майна та арешту майна як заходів забезпечення кримінального провадження із урахуванням наявної судової практики. Указано та обґрунтовано некоректність норма­тивного визначення тимчасового вилучення майна. Відмічено прогальність нормативного визначення арешту майна в аспекті об'єктів, на які може бути накладено арешт. Сфор­мульовано пропозиції щодо внесення змін та доповнень до ч. 1 ст. 167 КПК щодо ви­значення поняття «тимчасове вилучення майна» та ч. 1 ст. 170 КПК щодо осіб, на майно яких може бути накладено арешт.   The article is dedicated to the research of problematic issues of exercise of temporary seizure of property and arrest of property as means for ensuring criminal proceedings considering relevant judicial practices. Author mentioned and justified his point of view regarding incorrectness of the normative definition of seizure. Author also indicated whitespaces of the regulatory definition of arrest of property in the aspect of objects that may be the subject for the arrest. Proposals for amendments and additions to the part 1 of the Art. 167 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the definition of «temporary seizure of property» and part 1 of the Art. 170 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the scope of persons whose property may be arrested have been made.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 164-172
Author(s):  
Nadezhda V. Plaksina ◽  
Tatiana N. Akulova ◽  
Elena V. Smirnova

The article discusses the peculiarities of studying corruption by students of a technical university from the standpoint of the relevance of its research component. The acquisition of knowledge of a legal nature is substantiated from the point of view of importance not only from the standpoint of the humanitarian discipline «jurisprudence», but also the significant situation of knowledge of legal aspects in any sphere of life. The authors assign a special role in the materials of the article to the dynamic component in the study of the student audience with a view to increasing interest in the humanitarian disciplines, where «jurisprudence» comes to the fore among the disciplines of the humanitarian block. Problematic issues of a social plan, in particular, the negative manifestation of the phenomenal and modern criteria elements of corruption schemes in the current modernity. According to the results of the study, the peculiarities of the procedures of judicial proceedings in relation to criminal acts in general, in particular, in the field of education, arouse keen interest among students. The article presents the effective positions of the research on the subject of active discussion and analysis of situations of corruption in the educational environment. The materials of the study of the disciplines of the humanitarian cycle in higher education are given according to the priority ranking among students.


2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-404
Author(s):  
Michał Sędziński

This article discusses an issue associated with verifi cation proceedings in the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure. It attempts to determine the legal nature of activities related to the “verifi cation of one’s own information”, referred to in § 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Although verifi - cation proceedings have become the subject of numerous publications and studies, the link between the “verifi cation of one’s own information” and “verifi cation roceedings” has not been determined, similar to the nature of § 5 mentioned above has not been established eithe Therefore, this article seeks to determine whether the activities referred to in Article 307(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure form a part of verifi cation proceedings or whether they are distinct from this stage of proceedings and whether they impact such proceedings. Furthermore, the discussion covers also the consequences of a situation in which information about an offence, obtained through a traditional report or from other sources, is not confi rmed. In particular, this article analyses a situation in which a refusal to initiate an investigation is issued.


2021 ◽  
Vol 244 ◽  
pp. 12006
Author(s):  
Yulia Golovastova ◽  
Ludmila Prikhozhaya

The article examines existing approaches and different opinions of scholars-penitentiaries regarding the legal nature of separation of prisoners sentenced to imprisonment. The legal analysis of positions of scholars in the field of criminal executive law, who investigated the essence of separation of prisoners sentenced to imprisonment in various aspects, made it possible to highlight following approaches: 1) principle of institution of execution of punishment in the form of imprisonment; 2) means of ensuring the regime; 3) condition for implementation of principle of differentiation; 4) special classification issue; 5) type of classification; 6) intrageneric institution; 7) criminal-executive means of preventing crimes in correctional institutions. The authors come to the conclusion that separation of convicts is an inter-sectoral institution (in a broad sense), and also belongs to the category of internal penal means (in a narrow sense). Arguing this point of view, the general constant and special features of legal institutions and legal means and their application to the subject of research are considered. The authors identify and substantiate the main tasks of separation of prisoners and its functions, which are an external manifestation of its essence and determine the social and legal purpose, functional connection with other phenomena. As a result of study of the legal nature, the author’s definition of separate maintenance of those sentenced to imprisonment is proposed, its goals are highlighted and argued.


2019 ◽  
pp. 163-177
Author(s):  
Leila Shoraka

This study aims to present the role of employability culture in shaping employees’ employability as an adaptive reaction to the effects of flexible human resource management in modern organizations. In addition, we check whether these phenomena are described in scientific studies, regardless of the conditions in which the business environment operates in a given country. Therefore, this article presents a review of the literature on this subject, in Iran. This study is a systematic literature review (SLR) that investigated this subject from 1997 to 2018 published in databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Iranian databases such as SID, MAGIRAN, CIVILICA, and NOORMAG. The result showed the important role of employability culture in shaping employees’ employability as an adaptive reaction to the effects of flexible human resource management. In addition, it has been shown that there are very few items describing this issue in Iranian publications. This is due to the relatively low competitive conditions of the business environment in which the companies of this country operate. It can be assumed that depending on the advancement of the economy, scholars, to varying degrees, concentrate on the phenomena that are the subject of analysis of their publications. They most clearly respond to current problems and even with a certain delay in relation to their issues. This approach of the employer is very beneficial from the point of view of the effective use of employee competencies in the labor market and avoiding the unfavorable phenomenon of unemployment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (XXI) ◽  
pp. 279-291
Author(s):  
Jędrzej Kubica

In this article, the author focuses on the issue of making an in-kind contribution to a limited liability company – both at the time of the company establishment and in the procedure of increasing the share capital. For this purpose, the author reviews the doctrine and judicature positions relating to the concept of contribution capacity and looks for answers to the question whether the limited liability company agreement and the declaration of taking up shares have the binding and disposing effect referred to in art. 155 and art. 510 of the Civil Code, and therefore whether it is necessary to conclude a separate agreement for the transfer of the subject of the contribution to the company for the effective transfer of the in-kind contribution. In his considerations, the author draws attention to the practical dimension of applying the provisions from the point of view of the work of a notary


Author(s):  
Ya. Babych ◽  

The article addresses the understanding of the legal categories "legal protection" and "protection of rights". The legal nature and content of these definitions are analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the characteristics of these definitions in scientific international and domestic doctrines. The positions of five different scientific schools on the understanding of these concepts are considered. The first cohort of scientists adheres to the views according to which such definitions are analyzed as interaction of whole and part. The second group of scholars identifies the concepts of "legal protection" and "protection of rights". The third point of view on the specified theoretical problems, consists of the delimitation of the outlined definitions. The fourth constellation of scholars reveals the analyzed categories through the prism of individual branches of law, taking into account the subject and method of legal regulation of each area. The universal approach distinguishes between the concepts of "legal protection" and "protection of rights" and considers them as different, but at the same time absolutely full-fledged legal categories. It is substantiated that the latter has normative and applied significance and is effectively used by the international community both at the doctrinal and legislative levels. On the basis of the conducted theoretical research the independent scientific conclusions and judgments on the analyzed subjects are offered, in particular the author's definition of definition "legal protection" is given. In addition, the main features inherent in the above categories are highlighted. Particular attention is paid to the need of highlighting the preventive component of the concept of "legal protection", which is particularly important within this category.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document