MAKING AN IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION TO A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (XXI) ◽  
pp. 279-291
Author(s):  
Jędrzej Kubica

In this article, the author focuses on the issue of making an in-kind contribution to a limited liability company – both at the time of the company establishment and in the procedure of increasing the share capital. For this purpose, the author reviews the doctrine and judicature positions relating to the concept of contribution capacity and looks for answers to the question whether the limited liability company agreement and the declaration of taking up shares have the binding and disposing effect referred to in art. 155 and art. 510 of the Civil Code, and therefore whether it is necessary to conclude a separate agreement for the transfer of the subject of the contribution to the company for the effective transfer of the in-kind contribution. In his considerations, the author draws attention to the practical dimension of applying the provisions from the point of view of the work of a notary

Author(s):  
Yulia Fanilevna Aitova ◽  

The article analyzes the issue of determining the legal status of the individual management body of a limited liability company. The author begins his research with the concept of legal status existing in the general theory of law, and then proceeds to consider the issue from the point of view of philosophical categories. In addition, the work explores the diversity of points of view existing in the doctrine regarding the legal status of the individual management body of economic societies.


Author(s):  
R.S. Lukashov

The article is devoted to the theoretical and legal analyses of the place of a corporate agreement in the system of civil contracts. The article identifies the key factors that justify a separate place of the corporate agreement among existing contractual structures of civil law. The article deals with scientific views on the concept and legal nature of the corporate agreement, outlines the subject of the corporate agreement, which is concluded between the participants of the legal entity of corporate type, as well as analyzed the latest legislation on the definition of the concept, subject and content of the corporate agreement, which is concluded between the members of the limited liability company.  


2020 ◽  
pp. 96-123
Author(s):  
Lucas Salles Moreira Rocha ◽  
Tereza Cristina Monteiro Mafra

RESUMOO presente artigo objetiva examinar o direito patrimonial do ex-cônjuge ou ex-companheiro de sócio sobre quotas de sociedade limitada, nos casos de rompimento da relação familiar em que haja litígio quanto à divisão dos bens. A matéria atualmente gera controvérsias, pois o art. 600, parágrafo único, do Código de Processo Civil, e o art. 1.027 do Código Civil, que regulam os direitos do ex-cônjuge ou ex-companheiro de sócio nos casos de término da relação conjugal, aparentam conflitar entre si. Diante das controvérsias que permeiam o tema, buscar-se-á, pelo método exploratório, realizar interpretação sistemática e teleológica, para sugerir a aplicação da teoria do diálogo das fontes na compatibilização das normas aparentemente conflitantes.PALAVRAS-CHAVEDivórcio. Partilha de quotas. Diálogo das fontes. ABSTRACTThe purpose of this article is to examine the property rights of a member’s former spouse or partner towards the ownership interests of a limited liability company, in the event of a break in the family relationship, in which there is a dispute over de division of goods owned by the couple. The matter is currently controversial, since Articles 600, sole paragraph, of the Code of Civil Procedure, and Article 1,027 of the Civil Code, which regulate the rights of the former spouse or partner of partners in cases of termination of the conjugal relationship, appear to conflict with each other. Given the controversies that permeate this field, this paper will seek to perform systematic and teleological interpretation, though the exploratory method, in order to suggest the application of the theory of the dialogue of the sources in the compatibilization of the apparently conflicting rules.KEYWORDSDivorce. Division of ownership Interests. Dialogue of the sources.


Author(s):  
Alesya V. Demkina ◽  

The article deals with the relatively new rules of Art. 434.1 the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the conduct of negotiations. Taking into account the current wording of the said rule and the experience of foreign legislation on pre-contractual liability, the article argues for different theories justifying the nature of pre-contractual legal relations and liability and gives different positions of the authors on this issue. Proceeding from the doctrinal concept of obligation and characteristics of pre-contractual relations themselves the conclusion is made that these relations, firstly, are regulated by law and, secondly, they are not simply a legal relation but an obligation. It is based on certain actions of the negotiating partners that give rise to such an obliga-tion. As such, any action that is sufficiently certain (in some cases it may be required by law) and expresses the intention of the person to regard himself as negotiating with the addressee, who will in return perform the same sufficiently certain action, can be regarded as such. The specified characteristics of an action allow us to conclude that, from the point of view of classification of legal facts, this action is an act (because it is performed with a certain in-tention evident to other participants of civil turnover) and, moreover, it is also a transaction. Special rules of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation stipulate that the actions performed to enter into negotiations (for example, if the conclusion of a contract is binding on one party) or the actions of both partners entail legal consequences - the obligation to negotiate in good faith. The analysis of these legal relationships identifies three stages in their development, charac-terises them and attempts to answer more precisely the question of who can be a participant in the negotiation process depending on the stage of the negotiation process. The subject matter of an obligation arising during pre-contractual contacts will be actions aimed at negotiating and concluding a contract. The content of the obligation arising in the course of pre-contractual contacts, based on Art. 434.1 of the Civil Code will be the obligation to negotiate in good faith (paragraph 2 of the above rule). Assuming that the legislator provides an indicative list of actions that should fall within the scope of bad faith conduct, an indicative list of the "standard" of good faith conduct at the negotiation stage is given. This includes the obligation to provide full and truthful information to a party, including the reporting of circumstances that, due to the nature of the contract, must be brought to the attention of the other party (e.g. in a sale, all encumbrances on the subject of the contract must be reported). In addition, persons are obliged to negotiate only if they intend to conclude a contract, not to terminate negotiations suddenly and unjustifiably, and to take into account the rights and legitimate interests of the other party to the negotiation. The obligation under this obligation may also include a requirement not to disclose infor-mation obtained during the negotiation of the contract.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 333-350
Author(s):  
Norbert Nowicki

Zagadnienia omawiane w niniejszym artykule dotyczą statusu normatywnego czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych w kontekście ustawy o Policji oraz kodeksu postępowania karnego. Podjęto próbę wskazania warunków, które rzutują na legalny charakter inwigilacji, a co za tym idzie – na skuteczne wykorzystanie materiału operacyjnego w procesie karnym. W tym celu scharakteryzowano niejawną aktywność Policji, wyszczególniając dopuszczalne metody operacyjne oraz definiując czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawcze w świetle literatury przedmiotu. Aby w pełni zobrazować problematykę poruszoną w artykule, przeanalizowano relację prawną między dowodem nielegalnym, o którym mowa w art. 168a kpk, a dowodem z czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych, na przykładzie zarządzonej kontroli operacyjnej. Praktyczny wymiar tych rozważań omówiono z punktu widzenia postępowania dowodowego, z uwzględnieniem ról i obowiązków procesowych prokuratora oraz sądu. Normative approach to operational and reconnaissance activities in terms of illegal evidence The issues discussed in this article refer to the normative status of operational and investigative activities in the context of the Police Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure. Namely, an attempt was made to demonstrate the conditions that affect the legal nature of surveillance, and thus the effective use of operational material in a criminal trial. For this purpose, the covert activity of the Police has been characterized by listing acceptable operational methods and defining operational and reconnaissance activities in the light of the literature on the subject. Therefore, in order to fully illustrate the issues discussed, an analysis was conducted of the legal relationship between the illegal evidence referred to in Art. 168a of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the evidence from operational and reconnaissance activities, on the example of an ordered operational control. The practical dimension of these considerations is discussed from the point of view of evidence proceedings, taking into account the procedural roles and responsibilities of the prosecutor and the court.


Author(s):  
Iwo Jarosz

In recent years we have witnessed an almost unprecedented effort of legislators and legal academics in Europe to make limited liability companies in various jurisdictions more modern, simpler and more accessible. These endeavors are usually related to the liberalization of statutory requirements regarding the minimum share capital amounts. Lively debates among academics and practitioners, as well as regulatory competition, seem to be the factors making the legislative changes dynamic and evolutionary. The issue of limited liability companies’ regulatory reform were also the subject of proposed European legislation, including the now abandoned proposal of a harmonised single-member limited liability company model known as Societas Unius Personae SUP. In Poland there has also been, for  almost a decade, a discussion on whether and how to follow the example of Germany and its Unternehmergesellschaft and other European countries and liberalize the capital requirements for the Polish limited liability company. Lately the Polish legislator has introduced the so-called simple joint-stock company prosta spółka akcyjna, which had been drafted to be an attractive offer for start-ups, aiming, in the perception of its proponents, to achieve the modernization and simplification desired by contemporary legislators and supposedly accomplished in other jurisdictions, all the while maintaining serious levels of creditor protection. The author employs formal-dogmatic and comparative methods to describe the capital structure of the new company type and to confront it with certain other statutory developments, especially the Societas Unius Personae as a serious and well-thought-out, nonetheless failed venture, to try to assess the solutions set forth by the Polish legislator.Kapitał zakładowy prostej spółki akcyjnej w świetle dotychczasowych przepisów i projektów prawodawstwa europejskiegoW ostatnich latach europejscy ustawodawcy i przedstawiciele nauki prawa podejmowali nieomalże bezprecedensowe wysiłki w kierunku modernizacji, uproszczenia i zwiększenia dostępności spółek z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością. Działania te zazwyczaj zmierzały do liberalizacji ustawowych wymogów dotyczących minimalnych kwot kapitału zakładowego. Czynnikami dynamizującymi zmiany legislacyjne wydają się żywe dyskusje w środowisku akademickim oraz na łonie praktyki, a także konkurencja regulacyjna. Kwestie reformy spółek z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością były również przedmiotem projektów prawodawstwa europejskiego, w tym projektu dyrektywy w sprawie zharmonizowanego modelu spółki z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością jednoosobowej znanego jako Societas Unius Personae SUP. Także w Polsce od prawie dekady toczy się dyskusja w przedmiocie zmian dotyczących spółek z o.o., w szczególności tego, czy polskie ustawodawstwo powinno podążyć za przykładem Niemiec i znanej z niemieckiego porządku prawnego Unternehmergesellschaft oraz innych krajów europejskich i zliberalizować wymogi kapitałowe dla tego typu spółek. Sejm przegłosował niedawno ustawę wprowadzającą tak zwaną prostą spółkę akcyjną. Ten nowy typ spółki ma w założeniu stanowić atrakcyjną propozycję dla start-upów, prowadząc — zdaniem jej zwolenników — do modernizacji i uproszczenia pożądanego przez współczesnych prawodawców przy jednoczesnym utrzymaniu stosownego poziomu ochrony wierzycieli. Autor próbuje ocenić rozwiązania zaproponowane przez polskiego ustawodawcę w zakresie struktury kapitałowej nowego typu spółki, konfrontując je z innymi rozwiązaniami, w tym w szczególności z projektem Societas Unius Personae — przedsięwzięciem ostatecznie nieudanym, choć przemyślanym i zasługującym na uwagę.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-149
Author(s):  
Henrique Avelino Lana Lana

Resumo: Pretende-se desenvolver uma reflexão acerca da possibilidade jurídica de se incluir o aviamento nos haveres do sócio que se desliga da sociedade empresária limitada. Buscar-se-á demonstrar quais os divergentes posicionamentos doutrinários e jurisprudenciais sobre o assunto, bem como os fundamentos que os esteiam. Ao final, tentar-se-á demonstrar que não se trata o tema como sendo de fácil deslinde, merecendo, portanto, especial atenção de todos os operadores do direito, haja vista estar, inclusive, presente no dia-a-dia de todos aqueles que exercem atividade empresária em nosso país. Procurar-se-á demonstrar sua relevância econômica, bem como a necessidade de que, diante do caso concreto, se utilize das ferramentas metodológicas proporcionadas pela Análise Econômica do Direito. Palavras-chave: Análise Econômica do Direito. Dissolução Parcial. Inclusão. Aviamento. Abstract: The aim is to develop a reflection on the legal possibility of including the goodwill to assets of the partner that turns off the limited liability company. Search will show what the different positions and doctrinal jurisprudence on the subject, and the pleas that esteem. In the end, it will try to demonstrate that this is not the issue as an easy demarcation, deserving, therefore, special attention of all law enforcement officers, have seen to be, even in the day-to-day life of all those businesswoman engaged in activity in our country. It will seek to demonstrate their economic importance and the necessity that, before the concrete case, if use of methodological tools provided by the Economic Analysis of Law. Keywords: Economic Analysis of Law. Partial dissolution. Inclusion. Goodwill.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Adriána Palajová

Abstract This article deals with the transfer of stake in a general commercial company and the transfer of business share in a limited liability company especially according to Slovak legislation and also according to older and current Czech legislation. The attention is focused on the regulation of these transfers and the relations that are generated on the basis of author´s point of view and case law. The question of the admissibility and prohibition of the transfer of stake is presented in general commercial company. Analysis of the issue focuses mainly on the formal and material conditions of transfer of business share in limited liability company with differentiation on another member and on third party. Special attention is paid to the consent to that transfer granted by the general meeting or by other body of limited liability company and also is paid to the legal consequences that arise in the case of withholding of consent. The authoress seeks to point at the shortcomings of assessed legal arrangement and provides possible legislative solutions of transfer of stake or business share within the dispositive provisions of the Slovak Commercial Code.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document