scholarly journals Ser sí mismo auténtico. Existencia, facticidad e instante

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 91-109
Author(s):  
María Cielo Aucar
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard

Desde una perspectiva ontológico-existencial, el artículo pretende poner en evidencia algunos de los rasgos constitutivos del ser sí mismo auténtico en el pensamiento de Søren Kierkegaard y su respectiva recepción en la obra temprana de Martin Heidegger, específicamente Sein und Zeit. Para ello se propone, en primer lugar, llevar a cabo el análisis fenomenológico-hermenéutico de la noción kierkegaardiana de sí mismo como espíritu, así como de la noción heideggeriana de Dasein, para concluir en un diálogo crítico-hermenéutico entre ambos pensadores en torno a tal cuestión.

scholarly journals Martin Heidegger, profeta de la comunicación indirecta

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Roggero
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Indirect Communication ◽  
Karl Jaspers ◽  
Formal Indication

RESUMENLa idea de la filosofía sostenida por Heidegger en sus primeros cursos puede ser caracterizada por las notas que Karl Jaspers utiliza para describir a los profetas de la comunicación indirecta. El objetivo de este artículo es mostrar la influencia de la labor metodológica de Søren Kierkegaard en el joven Heidegger.PALABRAS CLAVEHEIDEGGER, KIERKEGAARD, COMUNICACIÓN INDIRECTA,INDICACIÓN FORMAL, ÉTICA DEL MÉTODOABSTRACTThe idea of philosophy held by Heidegger in his early courses can be characterized by the features that Karl Jaspers uses to describe the prophets of indirect communication. The aim of this article is to show the influence of Søren Kierkegaard’s methodological work on the young Heidegger.KEY WORDSHEIDEGGER, KIERKEGAARD, INDIRECT COMMUNICATION,FORMAL INDICATION, ETHICS OF METHOD

scholarly journals A angústia tratada como um afeto

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 359
Author(s):  
Claudia Murta
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Sigmund Freud ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Jean Paul

No ano universitário de 1962-63, Lacan, em seu Seminário, propõe a angústia como um afeto. Para ele, o afeto não é uma emoção, pois a cada vez que se referencia aos afetos na psicanálise, procura afastá-los das propostas de análise psicofisiológica e procura se aproximar da filosofia. Para tanto, ele cita filósofos tais como Jean-Paul Sartre, Martin Heidegger e Sören Kierkegaard, além de Sigmund Freud. O objetivo deste artigo é percorrer as referências lacanianas às concepções dos filósofos citados, incluindo as concepções freudianas, sobre o tema da angústia e articulá-las às proposições lacanianas sobre o mesmo tema. A partir dessa comparação poder-se-á acompanhar o motivo pelo qual Lacan prefere se referir à filosofia para abordar o tema da angústia em vez de abordá-la a partir das referências psicofisiológicas.

Martin Heidegger Reads Søren Kierkegaard – or What Did He Actually Read?

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Thonhauser
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Initial Period ◽  
Intellectual Life ◽  
History Of ◽  
Productive Engagement

AbstractThis paper presents an overview of the sources that Heidegger’s Gesamtausgabe provides for a discussion of the Heidegger-Kierkegaard relationship. I identify the translations Heidegger used and the writings that had the most impact on him. Moreover, I show that Heidegger’s relation to Kierkegaard was not consistent over his intellectual life, distinguishing five periods: an initial period of productive engagement (1919-1923); a complex period during the years in Marburg (1923-1928); an affirmative period back in Freiburg (1929-1934); a period of historical classification in the history of being (1935-1945); and an absence in the late writings (1946-1976).

scholarly journals Pragmatism and Existential Philosophy

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-118
Author(s):  
Hans Lipps ◽  
Jason Hills
Keyword(s):  
Lived Experience ◽  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
John Dewey ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
William James ◽  
Existential Philosophy

Hans Lipps compares pragmatism (William James and John Dewey) existentialism (Friedrich Nietzsche, Soren Kierkegaard, and Martin Heidegger) in this 1936 article translated from French.  He claims that they aim at the same goals, e.g., a return to lived experience and a rejection of the Cartesian legacy in philosophy.  While summarizing the commonalities of each, he engages in a polemic against philosophy then that remains relevant now into the next century.

scholarly journals Reading Heidegger through the Cross

1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-114
Author(s):  
Deborah Casewell
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Martin Luther ◽  
Direct Influence ◽  
Augustine Of Hippo ◽  
Rudolf Bultmann ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Christian Thought ◽  
The Relationship

This article is concerned with how a particular concept of ontology switched from theistic to atheistic to theistic again due to the influences and disciples of Martin Heidegger. It is agreed that Heidegger took aspects of Christian thought, namely from Augustine of Hippo, Martin Luther, and Søren Kierkegaard, stripping them of their relation to God and instead orientating them to nothingness. Despite Heidegger’s methodological atheism, his ontology was taken up by a number of theologians such as Ernst Fuchs and Rudolf Bultmann, who in their turn influenced Eberhard Jüngel, who in turn mentioned the direct influence that Heidegger has on his thought. Whilst Jüngel acknowledges his debts to Heidegger in the area of ontology, Jüngel also seeks to incorporate the history of God into ontology, where the history of God as Trinity is defined by the passivity of Christ on the cross, and how that event redefines evil’s work in nothingness. This article initially explores how Heidegger formulated his account of ontology, then explores how Jüngel re-Christianized Heidegger’s ontology; evaluating what can be drawn from these shifts about the relationship between ontology and history.

scholarly journals PENSAR A/NA EXISTÊNCIA: PARADOXO E ONTOLOGIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (148) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Carlos Roberto Drawin
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Karl Jaspers

O meu texto toma como referência central o pensamento de Sören Kierkegaard, mas não tem a pretensão de oferecer um estudo erudito ou espe­cializado do filósofo. Possui antes um perfil ensaístico, embora procure evitar tanto a mera digressão, quanto a abordagem de uma sucessão arbitrária de te­mas. A leitura de Kierkegaard não é em si mesma o meu objetivo, embora ela ocupe uma boa parte da exposição. Na verdade, ela parte de um determinado horizonte conceptual que poderia ser resumido na ideia do esquecimento das raízes existenciais do pensar. Assim, o texto está dividido em quatro partes. Na primeira é delineada a problemática filosófica tomada como ponto de partida. Na segunda e na terceira partes focalizei alguns aspectos dos escritos de Kierkegaard, sobretudo do período de 1843 a 1846, com a intenção de mostrar a fecundidade de seu modo paradoxal de fazer filosofia. A ênfase recaiu na leitura do primeiro capítulo de “O conceito de angústia”. Na última parte tratei de alguns aspectos da ressonância kierkegaardiana em Karl Jaspers e Martin Heidegger. No entanto, este último autor esteve presente desde o início na demarcação deste estudo.

scholarly journals Sobre la importancia del método en la formación filosófica.

Protrepsis ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 19-42
Author(s):  
José Alfonso Villa Sánchez
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Ludwig Wittgenstein ◽  
David Hume ◽  
Karl Marx ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Max Horkheimer ◽  
Hans Georg Gadamer

La formación profesional en filosofía debe poner la misma atención al contenido de los filósofos estudiados que al método del que dichos filósofos se valen, pues unas ideas se dejan expresar de unos modos mejor que de otros, y unos problemas filosóficos reclaman ser tratados más con un género literario que con otro. De manera que el método en filosofía no es un asunto menor en la formación del profesional de la filosofía. El presente estudio profundiza en el método utilizado por algunos pensadores consagrados en la historia de la filosofía, tomando como ejemplo algún fragmento significativo de su producción. Se trata de autores de la talla de Platón, Santo Tomás de Aquino y Søren Kierkegaard, David Hume, Friedrich Nietzsche y Ludwig Wittgenstein, Karl Marx y el trabajo conjunto de Max Horkheimer y Theodor W. Adorno, Martin Heidegger y Hans-Georg Gadamer.

Kierkegaard and Heidegger on ‘Life in the Crowd’

2020 ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
K. E. Løgstrup
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Human Existence

This chapter considers a fundamental problem which is central to Søren Kierkegaard and Martin Heidegger, namely how to avoid living a life that is governed by others and so is inauthentic, trapped within the hum-drum and the mundane—a life in the crowd. Focusing first on Kierkegaard, and his critique of ‘busyness’, it then turns to Heidegger, and his account of ‘idle talk’. However, it is argued that Kierkegaard’s approach differs from Heidegger’s in being fuelled by an ethical passion, which is partly driven by his hostility to Hegelianism, and also to contemporary Danish Christendom. Moreover, while on Heidegger’s account, life in the crowd is made an inevitable and therefore neutral feature of human existence, for Kierkegaard it can be avoided. How this might be possible for Kierkegaard is considered in subsequent chapters.

Kierkegaard's and Heidegger's Analysis of Existence and its Relation to Proclamation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Løgstrup ◽  
Robert Stern
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Social Rules ◽  
Authentic Existence ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
The One ◽  
Authentic Life ◽  
Ethical Demand

In its first five chapters, this book offers a comparative assessment of Søren Kierkegaard and Martin Heidegger, drawing out both similarities and differences. In the remaining three chapters, their views are subject to critique. The interpretation focuses on certain key ideas that are central to both thinkers, such as ‘life in the crowd’ or ‘das Man’; how this uniformity can be avoided; and what an authentic life requires instead. The critique argues that Kierkegaard holds that the only way to escape life in the crowd is through a relation to an infinite demand which is left empty, and Heidegger avoids offering any kind of ethics. In contrast to both, it is argued that it is instead possible to have an ethic which is not just a set of social rules on the one hand, but is more contentful than Kierkegaard’s infinite demand on the other: namely, the requirement or ethical demand to take on responsibility for the other person whose life is placed in your hands. This responsibility for the other, which sets the responsible individual apart, frees them from the crowd and thus offers an ethical route to an authentic existence, which both Kierkegaard and Heidegger overlook.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document