PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PUNGUTAN LIAR YANG DILAKUKAN DESA ADAT DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-95
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Sri Mahendra Dewi

Since the issuance of Presidential Regulation No. 87 of 2016 concerning the Clean Sweep Task Force (Satgas Saber Pungli), several times law enforcement officers have arrested the officers of the Adat Village who have levied in their territories. These levies are carried out based on the awig-awig and/perarem applicable in the Customary Village, but in the perspective of the Pungli Saber Task Force, these levies are qualified as criminal acts of illegal levies. The law enforcement action creates unrest and raises polemics within the community, so it is important to be investigated. This study aims to identify and analyze two problems, namely (1) regarding the efforts made by law enforcers on acts of illegal fees carried out by Adat Village; and (2) the need for progressive law enforcement against illegal acts of crime committed by Desa Adat. The above problems were examined using normative legal research methods, with a legal approach and conceptual approach. The materials used in this study include legal materials (primary legal materials and secondary legal materials) and non-legal materials, which are collected through literature search techniques in libraries and the internet. The materials that have been found are then read and recorded. After the relevant research materials are collected, they are then processed and analyzed by reasoning techniques and legal arguments, such as legal construction techniques and legal interpretation. The overall results and discussion of this study are presented descriptively. The results of the study show the following conclusions. First, the legal efforts taken by law enforcers against illegal acts of crime committed by Desa Adat are to enforce procedural law with an orientation that emphasizes the provision that anyone who levies outside the statutory provisions qualifies as illegal levies, so that it must be processed law. Second, law enforcers need to implement progressive law enforcement in dealing with illegal acts of crime committed by Desa Adat in order to provide substantive justice to the Desa Adat who carry out levies based on the adat village perarem. Keywords: Customary Village, Illegal Levies, Progressive Law Enforcement.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Edy Suwito ◽  
Mulyadi Aribowo

This study aims to determine the extent to which legal protection and obstacles faced against the victims of rape in criminal justice in Blitar district court. The context of legal protection against victims of crime (criminal act of rape) is by preventive or repressive efforts conducted by both society and law enforcement officers such as providing protection from various threats that can endanger the life of the victim. The research used is juridical normative and juridical empirical research. Research location in Blitar District Court. The materials used in literature study are data collection through literature study, and field research involves interviewing informant. Based on the result of the research, the researcher got the answer that, the legal protection against the victims of criminal act of rape in criminal court in Blitar state court still caused many difficulties in settling either at the investigation stage until the victim was present in the court, because the psychic pressure in victims questioned. This of course affects the mental / psychological development of the victims and also affects the law enforcement process itself to bring about a sense of justice for victims and society.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-103
Author(s):  
Claudia Permata Dinda ◽  
Usman Usman ◽  
Tri Imam Munandar

ABSTRAK Praperadilan yang diatur dalam KUHAP menjamin perlindungan HAM dan aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugas dan kewenangannya secara konsekwen. Lembaga praperadilan telah menciptakan mekanisme kontrol sebagai lembaga yang berwenang melakukan pengawasan terhadap kinerja aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugasnya guna tercipta proses peradilan pidana yang baik. Terkait dengan penegakan hukum dan pemberantasan korupsi, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi merupakan lembaga yang diamanatkan oleh undang-undang dengan wewenangnya untuk menetapkan status tersangka guna proses penyelidikan dan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan atas penetapan status tersangka terhadap KUHAP dan mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan terhadap penetapan status tersangka tindak pidana korupsi oleh KPK. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sebelumnya, sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka oleh KPK bukan merupakan objek praperadilan, namun melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 praperadilan telah berwenang memeriksa sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka. Hal ini menjadi sebuah pembaharuan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. ABSTRACT Pretrial regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code guarantees the protection of human rights and law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties and authorities consistently. The pretrial institution has created a control mechanism as an institution authorized to supervise the performance of law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties in order to create a good criminal justice process.This study aims to determine the effects of the expansion of pretrial objects over the determination of the status of suspects against the Criminal Procedure Code and to determine the consequences of expanding pretrial objects to determine the status of suspected criminal acts of corruption by the KPK. The research method used in writing this thesis is a normative juridical research method through the conceptual approach, the statutory approach and the case approach. Previously, the KPK was not a pretrial object or not, but through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 the pretrial had the authority to examine whether or not the status of the suspect was determined. This has become a renewal in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code.


Yurispruden ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya

ABSTRACTThe regulation regarding legal assistance for children has basically been stated in Law Number 11 of 2012, however in the formulation of regulation it appears that there is a contradiction between the meaning of legal assistance as legal rights and assistance as an obligation, especially in the context of legal assistance as an obligation attached to law enforcement officers. The purpose is to analyze whether the regulation of providing legal assistance to children in Law Number 11 of 2012 is in accordance with the principle of the best interest of the child, and provides ideas for formulating arrangements for providing legal assistance to children in the future. This paper using normative legal research methods with a legal approach and conceptual approach. The ideal arrangement in the future can be done by reformulating arrangements regarding existing legal assistance for children, namely eliminating legal aid as children's rights in the criminal justice system and formulating legal consequences in the form of illegal actions taken by law enforcement officials at every level of examination.Key words: Regulation, Legal assistance, Children ABSTRAKPengaturan bantuan hukum terhadap anak telah dituangkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, namun dalam formulasi pengaturan tersebut tampak adanya pertentangan makna antara bantuan hukum sebagai hak dan bantuan hukum sebagai kewajiban, terlebih dalam konteks bantuan hukum sebagai kewajiban yang melekat pada aparat penegak hukum. Tujuan penulisan ini yaitu untuk menganalisis apakah pengaturan pemberian bantuan hukum terhadap anak dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 telah sesuai dengan prinsip the best interest of the child dan memberikan gagasan formulasi pengaturan pemberian bantuan hukum terhadap anak di masa yang akan datang. Dalam penulisan makalah ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Pengaturan ideal di masa mendatang dapat dilakukan dengan mereformulasi kembali pengaturan mengenai bantuan hukum terhadap anak yang ada yaitu menghapuskan bantuan hukum sebagai hak anak dalam sistem peradilan pidana dan memformulasikan akibat hukum berupa tidak sahnya tindakan yang dilakukan aparat penegak hukum dalam setiap tingkat pemeriksaan.Kata Kunci: Pengaturan, Bantuan Hukum, Anak


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 607-610
Author(s):  
Ketut Danu Yudistira ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

The environmental condition in Klungkung Regency has shown some signs of increasing environmental damage and pollution every year. To maintain and preserve the environment by the surrounding community, the Klungkung Regency Government issued Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2010 concerning Control of Environmental Damage and Pollution. The purposes of this study are to examine the effectiveness of Perda No. 2 of 2010 and to examine the obstacles in enforcing Perda No. 2 of 2010. This study was designed with empirical legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. Data were collected through field interview techniques. The data used are primary and secondary data. After the research data was collected, the researchers then analyzed using descriptive qualitative methods. The results showed that the effectiveness of the Regional Regulation in an effort to stop the level of pollution on the Watu Klotok beach with preventive and repressive efforts through. Administrative sanctions in the form of verbal warnings, written warnings, criminal sanctions or civil fines for environmental damage or pollution. The obstacles in implementing this regional regulation are law enforcement officers, community culture, economy and public awareness. So that the effectiveness of the regulation has not been implemented effectively by law enforcers in terms of imposing sanctions. Therefore, the Klungkung Regency Government must be more firm and wise in implementing the existing legal regulations.


GANEC SWARA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 464
Author(s):  
ARI RAHMAD HAKIM BF ◽  
I GUSTI AGUNG WISUDAWAN ◽  
YUDI SETIAWAN

Online credit lending or referred to as “Fintech” is now developing in Indonesian society and is considered as a solution to get loans without collateral for consumptive purposes. The development of Fintech certainly requires supervision by the Financial Services Authority (OJK). This research is a normative research with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. This study also uses primary, secondary , and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used in this research is the study of legal documentation, then analyzed in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results show that: 1). Online credit loan or fintech business arrangements according to positive law in Indonesia are regulated by Bank Indonesia Regulation, No 18/40 / PBI / 2016 and No 19/12 / PBI / 2017, Member of the Board of Governors Regulation No. 19/14 / PADG / 2017 and No 19/15 / PADG / 2017. 2), the form of supervision carried out by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) of the online credit business is an integrated and coordinated supervision system between legal structures such as the Police, BI. OJK, and Investment Alert Task Force


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-110
Author(s):  
La Ode Bunga Ali ◽  
Muh Sutri Mansyah

Currently, the country of Indonesia is experiencing unresolved narcotics problems. various efforts to eradicate and prevent narcotics have been done, but have not caused a deterrent effect in law enforcement. There is a difficulty in eradicating it to its roots, it becomes one of the obstacles experienced by our law enforcement officers, in this study using normative juridical research method with historical approach, conceptual approach which has been studied the customary criminal sanction which is applicable during the reign of the buton sultanate and obstacles in the application of gogoli punishment. The results of this study indicate that the renewal of national criminal law in relation to criminal sanctions may originate from customary law prevailing in the sultanate of buton as intended is gogoli punishment, while the concept of gogoli punishment is a rope encircled on the body of a person convicted and withdrawn by in opposite direction until the loss of endurance or death, the punishment is included in the type of death penalty, this is relevant to immigrants who commit a narcotics criminal act in Indonesia which has been sentenced to death several times but apparently until now still not cause effects, the authors has the hope that the punishment can be applied nationally considering narcotic criminal acts that occur almost throughout the region and will damage the morale of the nation today.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Nurindria Naharista Vidyapramatya

<p><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The Indonesian nation is currently experiencing a crisis of justice in law enforcement. This </em> <em>happens because it is only concerned with the aspects of legal certainty and formal-legality rather than justice. The law cannot be enforced if there are no credible, competent and independent law enforcement officers. Legal discrimination is a way for law enforcement officials to differentiate in the imposition of sanctions against someone who is influenced by that person’s ability both in the economic and power fields. This study discusses how discriminatory law enforcement is when viewed from Donald Black’s theory. The author will compare two cases with the same type of crime but different decisions. Then studied through Donald Black’s theory of legal discrimination. The purpose of this study was to determine the existence of discrimination in law enforcement from two similar cases but with different decisions which were reviewed through Donald Black’s theory of legal discrimination. The research method used by the author in this study is a normative juridical research method. The preparation of this research is analytical descriptive with a conceptual approach. The conceptual approach needs to examine legal principles that can be found from the perspective of scholars or legal doctrine. The results of this research are indeed proven that there is legal discrimination that occurs, this can be seen from the study of Donald Black’s theory. The suggestion for law enforcers is to be fair in any case, do not favoritism and discriminate, because all citizens are the same, equally need justice.</em></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Bangsa Indonesia saat ini sedang mengalami krisis keadilan dalam penegakan hukum. Hal ini  terjadi karena semata-mata hanya mementingkan aspek kepastian hukum dan legalitas-formal daripada keadilan. Hukum tidak dapat ditegakkan apabila tidak ada aparat penegak hukum yang berkredibilitas, berkompeten dan independen. Diskriminasi hukum merupakan cara aparat penegak hukum yang membedakan dalam pemberian sanksi terhadap seseorang yang dipengaruhi oleh kemampuan orang tersebut baik dalam bidang ekonomi maupun kekuasaan. Penelitian ini membahas tentang bagaimana diskriminasi penegakan hukum jika ditinjau dari teori milik Donald Black. Penulis akan membandingkan dua kasus dengan jenis tindak pidana yang sama namun putusan yang berbeda. Lalu dikaji melalui teori diskriminasi hukum milik Donald Black. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui adanya diskriminsi dalam penegakan hukum dari dua kasus yang serupa tetapi memiliki putusan yang berbeda yang ditinjau melalui teori diskriminasi hukum milik Donald Black. Metode penelitian yang digunakan penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Penyusunan penelitian ini bersifat diskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan konseptual. Pendekatan konseptual perlu mengkaji prinsip-prinsip hukum yang dapat ditemukan dari pandangan sarjana ataupun doktrin hukum. Hasil dari penelitian ini memang terbukti adanya diskriminsinasi hukum yang terjadi, hal ini dapat dilihat dari kajian teori Donald Black. Saran bagi para penegak hukum adalah bersikap adil terhadap kasus apapun jangan pilih kasih dan membeda-bedakan, karena semua warga negara adalah sama, sama sama butuh keadilan.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra

Civil procedure has important role in enforcing civil rights. Therefore codification and unification of civil procedure may guarantee the legal certainty which necessary and urgent in law enforcement. Philosophically, codification and unification is an idea in the development of national legal system. The regulation of civil procedure until nowadays is distributed into many parts of law and regulation, which mostly inherited from the Dutch Colonial Administration or substantive statutory laws enacted by the Indonesian legislative body and government. Since 1967, the bill of civil procedure had been ratifi  ed in 13th plenary session of National Legal Reform Task Force (BPLPHN), which expected to be the new Indonesian civil procedure. However, until today, the bill is not ratifi  ed yet to be a law by the parliament. There is an idea of codification and unification of civil procedure, on the other side there is integration principle, which adopted in Law of Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment. The integration principle means that all civil procedural laws should be into one system of civil law. The main issue is that whether integration principle align with the idea of codification and unification. This article will answer the issue as a result of doctrinal research with statutory approach and conceptual approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document