scholarly journals HILANGNYA KEADILAN DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM MENURUT TEORI DISKRIMINASI

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Nurindria Naharista Vidyapramatya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Donald Black ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law

<p><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The Indonesian nation is currently experiencing a crisis of justice in law enforcement. This </em> <em>happens because it is only concerned with the aspects of legal certainty and formal-legality rather than justice. The law cannot be enforced if there are no credible, competent and independent law enforcement officers. Legal discrimination is a way for law enforcement officials to differentiate in the imposition of sanctions against someone who is influenced by that person’s ability both in the economic and power fields. This study discusses how discriminatory law enforcement is when viewed from Donald Black’s theory. The author will compare two cases with the same type of crime but different decisions. Then studied through Donald Black’s theory of legal discrimination. The purpose of this study was to determine the existence of discrimination in law enforcement from two similar cases but with different decisions which were reviewed through Donald Black’s theory of legal discrimination. The research method used by the author in this study is a normative juridical research method. The preparation of this research is analytical descriptive with a conceptual approach. The conceptual approach needs to examine legal principles that can be found from the perspective of scholars or legal doctrine. The results of this research are indeed proven that there is legal discrimination that occurs, this can be seen from the study of Donald Black’s theory. The suggestion for law enforcers is to be fair in any case, do not favoritism and discriminate, because all citizens are the same, equally need justice.</em></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Bangsa Indonesia saat ini sedang mengalami krisis keadilan dalam penegakan hukum. Hal ini  terjadi karena semata-mata hanya mementingkan aspek kepastian hukum dan legalitas-formal daripada keadilan. Hukum tidak dapat ditegakkan apabila tidak ada aparat penegak hukum yang berkredibilitas, berkompeten dan independen. Diskriminasi hukum merupakan cara aparat penegak hukum yang membedakan dalam pemberian sanksi terhadap seseorang yang dipengaruhi oleh kemampuan orang tersebut baik dalam bidang ekonomi maupun kekuasaan. Penelitian ini membahas tentang bagaimana diskriminasi penegakan hukum jika ditinjau dari teori milik Donald Black. Penulis akan membandingkan dua kasus dengan jenis tindak pidana yang sama namun putusan yang berbeda. Lalu dikaji melalui teori diskriminasi hukum milik Donald Black. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui adanya diskriminsi dalam penegakan hukum dari dua kasus yang serupa tetapi memiliki putusan yang berbeda yang ditinjau melalui teori diskriminasi hukum milik Donald Black. Metode penelitian yang digunakan penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Penyusunan penelitian ini bersifat diskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan konseptual. Pendekatan konseptual perlu mengkaji prinsip-prinsip hukum yang dapat ditemukan dari pandangan sarjana ataupun doktrin hukum. Hasil dari penelitian ini memang terbukti adanya diskriminsinasi hukum yang terjadi, hal ini dapat dilihat dari kajian teori Donald Black. Saran bagi para penegak hukum adalah bersikap adil terhadap kasus apapun jangan pilih kasih dan membeda-bedakan, karena semua warga negara adalah sama, sama sama butuh keadilan.</p>

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DENGAN KERUGIAN NEGARA YANG KECIL DALAM MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Muchlis
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Small Loss ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Proceedings

The Circulars letter of deputy attorney of general for special crimes number: B-113/F/ Fd.1/05/2010 can be used as a reference by prosecutors in doing law enforcement against corruption with small losses, but in practice law enforcement, this circular letter is making trouble in practice. The results of this research, namely: the law enforcement against corruption with a small loss of state must pay attention to the values of justice, expediency, and legal certainty. In enforcing the law against corruption with small losses only can be stopped during an investigation by utilizing the exchequer and redress demanded. the reason corruption cases with small losses were still continued by the prosecutor to the court proceedings after enactment of circulator letter because circulator letter contrary to corruption constitution and it has no the strength or binding in legal basis. The Suggestions are addressed for law enforcement officials (police, prosecutor, and judge) in order to do the law enforcement against corruption with small losses in order consider the value of a legal basis, namely: fairness, expediency and certainty. The circular letter of deputy attorney general for special crimes number: B-1113/F/Fd.1/05/2010 in order to be taken as government consideration in formulating the new rules (Ius constituendum). Key words: Corruption, Law Enforcement, Justice

scholarly journals The Replacement of Criminal Fine in Criminal Taxation

Yuridika ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Putri Ayu Wulandari ◽  
Mochammad Zaidun
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Reforms ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
Financial Losses

The absence of provisions regulating the substitution of criminal fines in the KUP Law, raises legal uncertainty for law enforcement officials, especially prosecutors in executing court decisions. Considering the recovery of state financial losses that can be resolved by the consistency of court decisions, so the provisions in the KUP Law must meet the legal principles in criminal fines in criminal taxation acts. By not clearly stipulated the substitution of criminal fines in the KUP Law raises legal uncertainty. While substituting criminal fines in the KUP Law is only in the form of imprisonment. In practice, there are several forms of court rulings, there are substituting criminal fines with imprisonment, substituting criminal fines with confiscation of assets then auctioned to pay underpayment taxes, substituting criminal fines with confiscation of assets then auctioned to pay underpayment taxes if the convicted person does not have property that is adequate then replaced with imprisonment. The formulation of the legal issues in this study are: (1) the philosophy of substituting criminal fines in criminal acts in the taxation field, (2) Characteristics of substitution of criminal fines in criminal acts in the taxation field. The results of this study are expected to have a conceptual and legal reforms related to substituting criminal fines in criminal acts in the taxation field, so as to ensure legal certainty, justice and benefit, then the replacement of criminal substitute fines in criminal acts in the taxation field must be included in court decisions and followed up with execution of court decision by the Prosecutor as the executor.

scholarly journals Visum et Repertum as Evidence for Criminal Acts in Domestic Violence

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Jatmiko Raharjo ◽  
Syamsuddin Muchtar ◽  
Audyna Mayasari Muin
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Law

The aim of the study is to determine the application of Visum et Repertum as evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence. This study was empirical legal research. The location of this study was conducted in Kejaksaan Negeri Klaten. The result of the research showed that as proof of domestic violence with evidence Visum et Repertum was one of the law enforcements oriented to realize for legal certainty and protection of victims in proving the occurrence of criminal acts in domestic violence. The lack of evidence bothers the process of law enforcement, regarding requirements to determine the victim provided at least two evidence and for the judges to decide on criminal cases with valid evidence at least can be avoided by using Visum et Repertum. The obstacles to prove the evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence with Visum et Repertum includes the differences of understanding among law enforcement officials about the use of Visum et Repertum for criminal acts in domestic violence.

scholarly journals Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-103
Author(s):  
Claudia Permata Dinda ◽  
Usman Usman ◽  
Tri Imam Munandar
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Status ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

ABSTRAK Praperadilan yang diatur dalam KUHAP menjamin perlindungan HAM dan aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugas dan kewenangannya secara konsekwen. Lembaga praperadilan telah menciptakan mekanisme kontrol sebagai lembaga yang berwenang melakukan pengawasan terhadap kinerja aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugasnya guna tercipta proses peradilan pidana yang baik. Terkait dengan penegakan hukum dan pemberantasan korupsi, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi merupakan lembaga yang diamanatkan oleh undang-undang dengan wewenangnya untuk menetapkan status tersangka guna proses penyelidikan dan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan atas penetapan status tersangka terhadap KUHAP dan mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan terhadap penetapan status tersangka tindak pidana korupsi oleh KPK. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sebelumnya, sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka oleh KPK bukan merupakan objek praperadilan, namun melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 praperadilan telah berwenang memeriksa sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka. Hal ini menjadi sebuah pembaharuan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. ABSTRACT Pretrial regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code guarantees the protection of human rights and law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties and authorities consistently. The pretrial institution has created a control mechanism as an institution authorized to supervise the performance of law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties in order to create a good criminal justice process.This study aims to determine the effects of the expansion of pretrial objects over the determination of the status of suspects against the Criminal Procedure Code and to determine the consequences of expanding pretrial objects to determine the status of suspected criminal acts of corruption by the KPK. The research method used in writing this thesis is a normative juridical research method through the conceptual approach, the statutory approach and the case approach. Previously, the KPK was not a pretrial object or not, but through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 the pretrial had the authority to examine whether or not the status of the suspect was determined. This has become a renewal in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum Diwilayah Laut Maluku oleh Lantamal IX Ambon

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Analytical Approach ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Institutional Aspects ◽  
Study Techniques ◽  
Sea Area

Introduction: Law enforcement in the sea area by Lantamal IX Ambon, is faced with, supporting factors and inhibiting factors. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine and analyze how Lantamal IX Ambon conducts law enforcement in the Maluku sea area.Methods of the Research: The research method used is a normative research method using a statute approach approach conceptual approach and analytical approach. Document study techniques and study analysis use qualitative analysis. Results of the Research: The results showed that in order to achieve efficiency and effectiveness in deploying the force of the Navy, it is faced with budget constraints, technical conditions of defense equipment and the expected level of capability and escalation of threats, it is necessary to reform policies regarding law enforcement facilities and infrastructure towards improvements in accordance with science. and modernization today due to the reality of the geographical configuration of the country's territory in the form of an archipelago with 2/3 of its territory being water, of course logically Indonesia needs a strong and reliable Navy. There is an overlap in legal and institutional arrangements at sea, so it is necessary to synergize with the institutional aspects of law enforcement officials who have the authority.

scholarly journals MENYOAL PENGATURAN PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK PASCA REFORMASI

Yurispruden ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Future ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
The Ideal

ABSTRACTThe regulation regarding legal assistance for children has basically been stated in Law Number 11 of 2012, however in the formulation of regulation it appears that there is a contradiction between the meaning of legal assistance as legal rights and assistance as an obligation, especially in the context of legal assistance as an obligation attached to law enforcement officers. The purpose is to analyze whether the regulation of providing legal assistance to children in Law Number 11 of 2012 is in accordance with the principle of the best interest of the child, and provides ideas for formulating arrangements for providing legal assistance to children in the future. This paper using normative legal research methods with a legal approach and conceptual approach. The ideal arrangement in the future can be done by reformulating arrangements regarding existing legal assistance for children, namely eliminating legal aid as children's rights in the criminal justice system and formulating legal consequences in the form of illegal actions taken by law enforcement officials at every level of examination.Key words: Regulation, Legal assistance, Children ABSTRAKPengaturan bantuan hukum terhadap anak telah dituangkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, namun dalam formulasi pengaturan tersebut tampak adanya pertentangan makna antara bantuan hukum sebagai hak dan bantuan hukum sebagai kewajiban, terlebih dalam konteks bantuan hukum sebagai kewajiban yang melekat pada aparat penegak hukum. Tujuan penulisan ini yaitu untuk menganalisis apakah pengaturan pemberian bantuan hukum terhadap anak dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 telah sesuai dengan prinsip the best interest of the child dan memberikan gagasan formulasi pengaturan pemberian bantuan hukum terhadap anak di masa yang akan datang. Dalam penulisan makalah ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Pengaturan ideal di masa mendatang dapat dilakukan dengan mereformulasi kembali pengaturan mengenai bantuan hukum terhadap anak yang ada yaitu menghapuskan bantuan hukum sebagai hak anak dalam sistem peradilan pidana dan memformulasikan akibat hukum berupa tidak sahnya tindakan yang dilakukan aparat penegak hukum dalam setiap tingkat pemeriksaan.Kata Kunci: Pengaturan, Bantuan Hukum, Anak

scholarly journals Fiduciary Security Arrangements and Issues in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Jamil
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Colonial Era ◽  
Loading Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
Dutch Colonial

In this paper, the author explores the law of fiduciary security. Fiduciary guarantees have been used in Indonesia since the Dutch colonial era as a form of guarantee born of jurisprudence. This form of guarantee is widely used in lending and borrowing transactions because the loading process is considered simple, easy, and fast, but it does not guarantee legal certainty. Before the Fiduciary Guarantee Act, in general, Fiduciary guarantees were regulated in Oogstverband (Staatsblad 1886 Number 57) and jurisprudence based on the Hooggerechtsh of (HGH) decision dated August 18, 1932. In 1999 the Fiduciary Guarantee Law was born (UU No. 42/ 1999). The research method used in this paper is a juridical-normative research method with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach.Keywords: Fiduciary; Security; Guarantee.

scholarly journals KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN BUDAYA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boni Suparto Wuarlela
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Early Age ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Unitary State ◽  
The Future ◽  
Learning Programs ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

One of the biggest problems faced by the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is the handling of the problem of corruption which seems to never end, both in terms of eradicating or implementing laws regarding corruption. In Indonesia, an independent institution specifically dealing with corruption issues has been established, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) since 2002. However, the fact is that until 2020 it has not really been able to effectively address the problem of corruption in Indonesia with various arrests made by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). proves that the problem of corruption that occurs inthis country and the government in Indonesia needs serious attention from various parties who play an important role in dealing with the problem. This writing aims to determine the extent to which legal certainty applies in the process of eradicating corruption in Indonesia, the researchmethod used is the normative research method. Based on the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded that the laws governing and law enforcement officials inovercoming the problem of corruption in Indonesia have not been fully effective in providing legal certainty to corrupt actors and the application of existing laws has not been able to fully guarantee the disappearance or no more corruption. will happen in the future, and there is a need for prevention that can give birth to new corruptors in the future by further increasing anti-corruption learning programs and carrying out various socialization or prevention of acts of corruption from an early age which is felt to help overcome the problem of corruptors in this country.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Buruh yang Mengalami Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja dengan Alasan Berserikat

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1615
Author(s):  
Rizky Akhmad Harhary
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Law

AbstractThe writing of this article refers to a normative juridical research method using the Law approach, Conceptual Approach, and Court Decisions which are linked to several National Laws such as Law Number 13 of 2013, Law Number 21 of 2000, and Law Number 2 of 2004. This study aims to determine the legal protections for workers who have been terminated on the basis of association as well as legal remedies that can be taken by workers who have terminated their employment on the grounds of association. Termination of employment on the grounds of association is an industrial relations dispute which cannot be carried out automatically according to Law No. 13 of 2003. This research shows that termination of employment to labor for reasons of association (union busting) is a crime by fulfilling the elements of general criminal regulations and specific crimes related to the qualifications of the criminal act. Based on this research, it can be seen in detail the rules regarding union busting in order to guarantee law enforcement regarding the sanction. Keywords: Workers; Union Busting; Industrial.AbstrakPenulisan artikel penelitian ini mengacu pada metode penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normative dengan menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang, Pendekatan Konseptual, dan Putusan Pengadilan yang dikaitkan dengan beberapa Undang-Undang Nasional seperti, Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2013, Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2000, serta Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perindungan hukum terhadap buruh yang mengalami pemutusan hubungan kerja dengan alasan berserikat serta upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh oleh buruh yang mengalami pemutusan hubungan kerja dengan alasan berserikat. Pemutusan hubungan kerja dengan alasan berserikat merupakan perselsihan hubungan industrial yang tidak serta merta dapat dilaksanakan begitu saja menurut Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pemutusan hubungan kerja kepada buruh dengan alasan berserikat (union busting) merupakan suatu tindak pidana dengan memenuhi unsur-unsur peraturan pidana umum dan pidana khusus terkait kualifikasi tindak pidananya. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, dapat diketahui secara rinci aturan mengenai union busting agar dapat menjamin penegakan hukum terkait sanksinya.Kata Kunci: Buruh; Union Busting; Industrial.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Whistleblower dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 332-336
Author(s):  
Gusti Nyoman Adung Setiawan ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Legal Security ◽  
Statutory Regulation

A wistleblower is someone who is aware of a criminal act and notifies it to law enforcement officials. The role of whistleblowers is very important to help expose acts of narcotics abuse. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal protection arrangements for whistleblowers in narcotics abuse and to find out legal protection for whistleblowers in narcotics crime. The research method used in this research is normative legal research method normative legal research method which is carried out by examining a statutory regulation related to the problem being discussed and through a conceptual approach or conceptual approach which shows a concept, and uses a conceptual approach. doctrine, namely the views or thoughts of experts related to the science of law. A person who is a whistleblower or notifier in narcotics abuse always bears a reply from those who feel aggrieved or aggrieved as a result of a notification or report from a whistleblower, legal security for a person who is a pioneer or whistleblower in investigating criminal acts of narcotics abuse is important given to the authorities so that all people are willing to become reporters in order to support legal institutions to reveal and arrest narcotics abuse. Security for whistleblowers must be made strictly in law so that security for whistleblowers can be upheld.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document