scholarly journals Mentoring Qualitative Research Authors Globally: The Qualitative Report Experience

Author(s):  
Ronald Chenail ◽  
Sally St. George ◽  
Dan Wulff ◽  
Maureen Duffy ◽  
Martha Laughlin ◽  
...  

Authoring quality qualitative inquiry is a challenge for most researchers. A lack of local mentors can make writing even more difficult. To meet this need, The Qualitative Report ( TQR ) has helped authors from around the world develop their papers into published articles. TQR editorial team members will discuss the history of the journal, their philosophy of author development; manuscript development strategies; solutions for managing differences; challenges working worldwide; authors’ feedback; and the collective global futures of TQR and qualitative researcher.

Author(s):  
Renée Spencer ◽  
Julia M. Pryce ◽  
Jill Walsh

This chapter reviews some of the major overarching philosophical approaches to qualitative inquiry and includes some historical background for each. Taking a “big picture” view, the chapter discusses post-positivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, and queer theory and offers a brief history of these approaches; considers the ontological, epistemological, and axiological assumptions on which they rest; and details some of their distinguishing features. In the last section, attention is turned to the future, identifying three overarching, interrelated, and contested issues with which the field is being confronted and will be compelled to address as it moves forward: retaining the rich diversity that has defined the field, the articulation of recognizable standards for qualitative research, and the commensurability of differing approaches.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 1122-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Evely Gildersleeve ◽  
Kelly W. Guyotte

Neither inside, nor outside. Between art and non-art. Visual artist, Marcel Duchamp’s readymade art installations of the early 20th century mapped a space of between-ness, of liminality, through previously drawn boundaries in the art world. In this article, we put forth readymade methodology as a liminal approach to (post)qualitative research. Drawing from Duchamp’s readymade art installations, we situate dominant methodological practices as collections of ready-made techniques and technologies for interpreting the world (research as instrumentation); such processes, we argue, are distinct from readymade inquiry (research as immanent and multiplicitous). Readymade methodology disorients knowings and illustrates lines of flight produced from inversions of taken-for-granted technical application of research methods. In this article, we think methodology differently, not limiting ourselves to the constraints/comforts of conventional qualitative methodology. Just as Duchamp interrogated the in-between of art and everyday life, readymade methodology flourishes in/with the potentiality of twisted liminal spaces in (post)qualitative inquiry.


Author(s):  
Alexandra Nowakowski

More than a book about conducting qualitative research, Johnny Saldaña in Thinking Qualitatively: Methods of Mind asks readers to think “highdeeply,” so they organize their thinking about how to live their best lives through the process of qualitative inquiry. To do so, Saldaña transforms the concept of person-centered qualitative inquiry into a concrete entity with structured exercises and practical examples. Saldaña contributions with this work all center on the process of conscious qualitative reflection as a tool for synthetic understanding of the world around us.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-382
Author(s):  
Marisa de Andrade ◽  
Nini Fang ◽  
Fiona Murray ◽  
Edgar Rodríguez-Dorans ◽  
Rosie Stenhouse ◽  
...  

This is the second of two part-issues on qualitative inquiry as activism. The first focused upon activism and/in the academy (academic work, academic cultures, academic practices, etc.), and this second focuses upon activism in the processes of research itself and activism beyond the academy, in the world. Drawing upon Butler’s claim that we are always already, from the outset, ‘given over’ to the human, non-human and more-than-human other, we argue for qualitative research to do what it can to make the future different, better, more ethical.


Author(s):  
Ronald Chenail

The world of commercial qualitative research reflects an emergent and exciting area of contemporary qualitative research which might not be all that familiar to academic qualitative researchers. Traditionally mentored in an oral and experiential fashion, the next generation of market qualitative researchers are benefiting from new books such as Sheila Keegan’s Qualitative Research: Good Decision Making through Understanding People, Cultures and Markets to learn how to address their clients’ needs for gaining insights into their customers’ perspectives. Academic-oriented qualitative researchers can also benefit from Keegan’s insights into this similar but different realm of qualitative inquiry.


Author(s):  
Renée Spencer ◽  
Julia M. Pryce ◽  
Jill Walsh

This chapter reviews some of the major overarching philosophical approaches to qualitative inquiry and includes some historical background for each approach. Taking a “big picture” view, the chapter discusses postpositivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, and queer theory and offers a brief history of these approaches; considers the ontological, epistemological, and axiological assumptions on which they rest; and details some of their distinguishing features. In the last section, attention is turned to the future, identifying three overarching, interrelated, and contested issues with which the field is being confronted and will be compelled to address as it moves forward: retaining the rich diversity that has defined the field, the articulation of recognizable standards for qualitative research, and the commensurability of differing approaches.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 465
Author(s):  
Ni Made Indrayani

<p><em>The Sarasamuccaya text is the essence of Asta Dasa Parwa abstracted by Bhagawan Wararuci. In the text of Sarasamuccaya there is one of the teachings of Purwakarma, Purwakarma is a deed in the past lifetime. The former act will inevitably be felt by the one who made or did the karma. Karmaphala that determines where and where the human must be lived which is certainly adjusted by the good old deeds in the life of the world. Through the description above, then the formulation of the problems discussed in this study include: 1) Sarasamuccaya text structure, 2) the concept of Purwakarma in Sarasamuccaya text, 3) The philosophical value contained in the concept of Purwakarma in Sarasamuccaya text.</em></p><p><em>The theory used in this research is the theory of hermeneutics and value terori. The hermeneutic theory refers to Ricoeur's opinion that hermeneutical understanding is based on text and utilizes the dichotomy of langue and parole and seeks to position explanations and understanding in an interpretation. Value theory refers to the opinion of Notonagoro that everything that comes from reason (ratio, mind, cipta) is the value of truth, everything that comes from the element of human feeling is the value of good that comes from the element of human will itself, something that comes from trust Or human belief in the creator is a religious value (religion). This type of research is qualitative research using batat technique (reading and recording) and literature study. This research is descriptive that emphasizes the ground of meaning or philosophy.</em></p><form><p><em>The discussion of the overview discusses the history of the Sarasamuccan text, the summary and the importance of studying the Sarasamuccan text. Discussion of the structure of the text discusses the form, structure, and teachings of Purwakarma in the Sarasamuccaya text. Discussion of the concept discusses about the concept of Purwakarma in the review of natural law, the concept of Purwakarma in the influence of Tri Guna, Purwakarma concept in the sense of previous deeds. Discussion of philosophical value discusses the value of truth, goodness value and religious value.</em></p></form>


1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
HA Qazi

This article explores the issue of "evaluating goodness in qualitative research", from a perspective of novice qualitative researchers. Despite the recent upsurge in publications of qualitative studies especially in health sciences, the issue of goodness in qualitative research is still debatable. Qualitative researches in contrast to traditional research not only differ in research methodology and methods but also in data analysis.Although approaches for evaluating goodness in qualitative research are available but consensus on universality is still lacking. The development of extrinsic criteria although provide the guidelines for post positivist studies, however, it is not acceptable to interpretivist /constructivist who believe on multiple realities and knowledge as co construct. The authenticity criteria although fits well to constructivism/interpretivism, however, researchers argue that because it provide a post hoc strategy for evaluation of a study and avoid focusing during its conduct, thus causing serious threats to the credibility. Primary criteria forwarded by Whitemoore et al., although seems essential for all qualitative inquiry but because based on validity has been rejected by authors on the grounds that qualitative epistemological and ontological assumptions are entirely different to the traditional qualitative research. The criteria by Ballinger in 2006 although seems practical in application to all paradigms, however, as it also questions reflexivity which seems irrelevant in realist tradition. Further other general criteria such as seems popular because of its simplistic approach but do not address the terms of ontology, epistemology and paradigm that seem very important in qualitative research.It is important for the novice qualitative researchers to be aware of the debate on the issue of evaluating goodness of qualitative research. However, they should adopt a cautious stand while favouring or rejecting one criteria. Finally the development of a universal and uniform criteria is although important but not necessary requirement for the qualitative research progress. DOI: 10.3329/bjms.v10i1.7314Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.10 No.1 Jan 2010 pp.11-20


1970 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asilia Franklin-Phipps

Inspired by Toni Morrison’s Sula (2004), this paper thinks through the use (broadly imagined) of literary texts that are experimentally read beside and through theoretical texts in order to prompt unexpected thinking. This approach places literature beside traditional research texts, rather than subordinate to such texts. The thinking and doing that occurs in relation to the tangle of texts, literary and otherwise, is already happening, even though often unrecognized. Differently attending to the jumble created by the multitude of texts that make up our reading lives might snag us in ways that open paths to new ways of thinking, resulting in novel approaches, or tangles of approaches, to post qualitative research. While literary texts are what is of interest here, the argument might extend to film, art, and other cultural texts not usually imagined as directly related to post qualitative inquiry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document