scholarly journals Analysis of Criminal Law Sanctions' Application Against Statutory Rape from the Positive Law Perspective on Ambon Island and Lease Islands

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 180-191
Author(s):  
Fauzia Rahawarin ◽  
Nursalam Nursalam

The purpose of this study was to analyze the application of criminal law sanctions against statutory rape in Indonesia. The analysis employed a positive law perspective and an empirical legal approach. The research data consisted of verbal utterances and observation results collected from Criminal Investigators at the Ambon Island and Lease Islands’ police stations. Data analysis was carried out through (1) data reduction, (2) data display, and (3) conclusion. The results of this study indicate that criminal sanctions against statutory rape in Indonesia are applied through the process of investigation, visum et repertum, prosecution and summons of suspects and witnesses, statements of criminal penalties for the perpetrators, and prevention of sexual immorality and rape. The criminal sanctions are based on “Law Number 35 of 2014 about Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection Articles 76D and 81.   Keywords: criminal, intercourse, positive law

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Subaidah Ratna Juita

<p>Penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak di Indonesia belum seimbang dengan dampak yang ditimbulkannya. Adapun anak sebagai korban dari kejahatan kesusilaan tentu mengalami trauma yang berkepanjangan hingga dewasa bahkan seumur hidupnya. Salah satu upaya yang dapat ditempuh dalam menghadapi problematika penegakan hukum adalah dengan cara pembenahan sistem hukum. Oleh karna itu perlu adanya pembaharuan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan sebagai bagian dari sistem hukum. Pembaharuan ini perlu dilakukan karena sanksi pidana yang ada saat ini tidak memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku. Upaya pembaruan hukum pidana yang berkaitan dengan sanksi pidana dalam kasus kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak dapat ditelusuri berdasarkan perumusan sanksi pidana berdasarkan KUHP, UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan pertama atas UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu) No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Dengan demikian tulisan ini secara fokus mengkaji urgensi pembaharuan hukum pidana, khususnya hukum pidana materiil tentang sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan seksual dalam rangka untuk memberikan perlindungan pada anak korban kejahatan seksual.</p><p><em>The imposition of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of morality in children in Indonesia has not been balanced by its impact. As for the child as a victim of crime decency certainly traumatized prolonged until adulthood even a lifetime. One effort that can be taken in dealing with the problem of law enforcement is to reform the legal system. By because it is necessary to reform criminal sanctions for the perpetrators of decency as part of the legal system. These reforms need to be done because there is a criminal sanction which does not currently provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators. Efforts to reform the criminal law relating to criminal sanctions in cases of crimes of morality in children can be traced by the formulation of criminal sanctions under the penal law, Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, Law No. 35 of 2014 on the First Amendment of Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, and Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) Number 1 Year 2016 Concerning Second Amendment Act No. 23 of 2002 about Child Protection. So this paper examines the urgency updates operating focus criminal law, especially criminal law substantive about criminal sanctions for dader of sexual crimes in order to provide protection for child victims of sexual crimes.</em></p><p> </p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-51
Author(s):  
Moh. Ansar ◽  
Suhri Hanafi ◽  
Sitti Nurkhaerah ◽  
Wahyuni Wahyuni ◽  
Taufan B.

The problem of how castration sanctions for perpetrators of crimes of sexual violence against children in the perspective of positive law in Indonesia and how Islamic criminal law views castration as a sanction are the focus of the problem in this study. The research method consists of the type of research, data and data sources, data collection techniques and data analysis techniques using a qualitative research approach. Then, as a result of the research, there are differences in Islamic law among scholars regarding the punishment of castration Law Number 17 of 2016 Regarding the stipulation of PERPU Number 1 of 2016 Second Amendment to Law Number 23 Year 2002 Concerning Child Protection Becomes Law against perpetrators of sexual crimes against children, and Islamic law has stipulated penalties for perpetrators of sexual crimes in detail of the facts of their actions, so they cannot (haram) carry out the type of castration punishment in accordance with the argument, namely the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad saw., which prohibits his companions from being castrated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul ◽  
Jamhuri ◽  
Irwansyah

Physical abuse is an act causing pain and injury to one's body. Today, there is a customary criminal law regulating the sanctions for the perpetrators of physical abuse, namely in Kampung Taman  Firdaus. However, the customary sanctions are significantly different from the penalties stipulated in Islamic law and positive law. The differences in the type and the rate of sanctions will have consequences on the purpose of a law formation. Therefore, this study examined the regulations of criminal sanctions for the perpetrators of physical abuse in Kampung Taman Firdaus. The results of this study concluded that the customary sanctions of physical abuse in Kampung Taman Firdaus were the fine of one goat for head injuries with blood flowing, and the penalty of one chicken for head injuries without blood flowing. On the other hand, for the physical abuse other than on the head and face, the customary sanction is only to pay medical expenses until the victim is healed,  and this sanction is not in line with Islamic criminal law. Abstrak: Kekerasan fisik adalah suatu tindakan yang  mengakibatkan rasa sakit dan terluka pada tubuh seseorang. Dewasa ini terdapat sebuah hukum pidana Adat  yang mengatur sanksi bagi pelaku kekerasan fisik yaitu di Kampung Taman  Firdaus. Namun pada sanksi Adat tersebut terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan terhadap hukuman yang diatur dalam hukum Islam dan hukum positif, dengan perbedaan dari jenis sanksi serta bobot sanksi tersebut akan berkonsekuensi pada tujuan dibentuknya suatu hukum. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini ingin melihat bagaimana ketentuan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kekerasan fisik dalam Adat Kampung Taman Firdaus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa sanksi adat Kampung Taman Firdaus mengenai kekerasan fisik yaitu denda satu ekor kambing untuk luka di kepala yang darahnya mengalir, dan denda satu ekor ayam untuk luka di kepala yang darahnya keluar tidak mengalir. Sedangkan kekerasan fisik dengan objek selain kepala dan wajah sanksi adatnya ialah hanya membayar biaya pengobatan saja sampai sembuh, dan sanksi adat pada bagian ini tidak sesuai dengan hukum pidana Islam. Kata kunci : Sanksi Adat, kekerasan fisik, dan Hukum  Pidana Islam.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 463
Author(s):  
Muslich Ashari ◽  
Amin Purnawan ◽  
Achmad Sulchan

The formulation of the problem discussed in this study were (1). How settings Criminal Law on Illegal logging?, (2). How Judges consideration in decisions on Illegal logging in State Court of Semarang?. (3). Are the constraints faced by the judge in deciding the case of Illegal logging?.This research used socio-juridical legal research, research data was taken by interview with the respondent judges handling crime of Illegal logging State Court of Semarang. This research use Qualitative analysis techniques.Conclusion of this study is illegal logging is a special crime and therefore their specific legislation governing of illegal logging, in Act No. 18 of 2013 on Combating And Preventing The Destruction Of Forests set of sanctions for Illegal logging in the form of punishment imprisonment for the perpetrators in the form of a sentence of imprisonment and fines, consideration of Judges in deciding the case of Illegal logging legally is appropriate that the elements are there that the perpetrator does not have a valid license from the clerk to do cutting trees in the forest area of Silayur, Judge obstacle in deciding the case of Illegal logging in the form of difficulties in distinguishing between illegal logging carried out by individuals and corporations, lack of special education for judges to handle crime of Illegal LoggingKeywords: Criminal Sanctions; Penalty; Illegal Logging.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 183
Author(s):  
I Wayan Suardana ◽  
I Made Walesa Putra

<p><em>Reform of the National Criminal Law is absolutely necessary with political, practical and sociological considerations. The amend of Criminal Code also include adjustments of the punishment aims, which leads to restorative justice. Likewise the sanctions for criminal offense in adat law, the punishment is less than optimal if only imposed the freedom deprivation to the perpetrator's, it is necessary to make efforts in restoring the situation (balance).</em></p><p><em>This type of research is normative research, by analyzing norms and legislation related to the aim of punishment in customary offenses.</em><em> </em><em>The results of the research that is the aim of customary sentencing is not specifically regulated in positive law, but customary criminal law have the power to apply, based: Article 18 B paragraph (2) of The 1945 State Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Emergency Law No. 1 of 1951 on Temporary Measure in Organizing the Unity of the powers and procedure of Civil Courts, Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power, Law No.39 of 1999 on Human Rights, and the Supreme Court Decisions, among others: (1) Decision No. 1644K / Pid / 1988 dated May 15, 1991; (2) Decision No. 984 K / Pid / 1996 dated January 30, 1996. </em></p><p><em>In the positive law, there is a reflection of restorative justice as a concept that developed in modern criminal law in line with the purpose of sentencing the customary offenses. The aim of sentencing as ius constituendum is formulated in Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 2017 Criminal Code Concept which includes resolving conflicts that arise, restoring balance, and bringing sense of peace and secure in the community, which is in line with customary criminal sanctions because of the visible values of customary law; resolve conflicts, restore balance, and bring a sense of peace in society.</em></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Analysis, Purpose of Sentencing, Criminal Law Reform, Customary Criminal Act</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-364
Author(s):  
Nadila Purnama Sari ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Children with disabilities are often the main targets to be victims of criminals, discrimination and sexual violence. The following can be seen from the increase in criminal cases against women and children with disabilities which from year to year tends to increase. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal protection of children with disabilities as victims of sexual violence and criminal sanctions against perpetrators of sexual violence against children with disabilities. The method used is a normative method along with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study show that legal protection for children as victims of sexual violence is contained in article 1 paragraph (2) of Law no. 35 of 2014 concerning child protection, namely so that the child gets protection and his rights as a child. Criminal sanctions for perpetrators of sexual violence against persons with disabilities exist in positive law in Indonesia. The criminal act of rape is contained in Articles 285 to 288 of the Criminal Code. Violence against children with disabilities there is no law that specifically regulates it but in VU No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection in Article 290 paragraph (1) is threatened with approximately 7 years of imprisonment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-243
Author(s):  
I Gede Susila Putra ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

Child sexual immorality is a social   problem that is very disturbing   to society. This sexual abuse of children needs very serious attention   from all circles.    imposing criminal   sanctions  on perpetrators  of criminal  acts  of sexual  immorality   certainly cannot  be  separated   from  the  role  of judges,   prosecutors,   and  the  police  as  law enforcement   officers  in order  to achieve  peace  in people's   lives.   There  are  also problem  formulations   (I)   How  is the legal  protection  for child  victims   of  sexual immorality?   (2) What are the  sanctions   for perpetrators of sexual   abuse  against children?  This study uses the normative method because there are still vague norms, based on the opinions  of law  and law scholars.  According  to Decision   Number 978 I Pid.Sus  I 2016  I PN  Ops,   punishment   for  perpetrators   of  child  molestation    is regulated  in  Article 760  in conjunction   with  Article 81  Paragraph  3 of Law Number 35 Year 2014   concerning   Amendments   to Law Number 23 Year 2002 Concerning Child  Protection  which  reads  "Having   committed   violence   or threats  of violence, forcing the child  to have intercourse  with  him or with  other people,  which  is carried out  by  parents,  guardians,   child   caregivers,  educators,   or educational    personnel, namely   with  the  threat  of  imprisonment    of   10   (ten)  years   and  a  fine  of  Rp.100,000,000   (one hundred  million  rupiah).


QAWWAM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-84
Author(s):  
Wardah Nuroniyah

Abstract One of the acts of domestic violence against people in the household sphere is neglect. Parental neglect is negligence of the child towards the biological mother's father who has a dependency in physical needs (negligence to provide adequate food, clothing, or hygiene), and emotional (negligence to provide care or affection). neglect of parents is included in the form of lawlessness to parents because parents have rights to their children. So that for each perpetrator of neglect parents must be subject to sanctions. This study aims to answer the questions that formulate the problem: "What is the view of Islamic law and positive law in Indonesia on neglect of parents" and "What are the sanctions for perpetrators of neglect of parents according to Islamic law and positive law in Indonesia". This study uses qualitative research, data collected by means of literature (library research) are then analyzed. As for the results of this study: 1) Neglect of parents in Islamic law and in positive law in Indonesia is prohibited, because in Islamic law people who do neglect are sinful, while in positive law in Indonesia neglect is included in violence. 2) Sanctions for perpetrators of neglect of parents in the perspective of Islamic law and positive law in Indonesia are criminal sanctions, but in Islamic law it is called jarimah ta'zir and the sanctions are not only that but there are other sanctions, namely big sins, all deeds are not accepted by Allah SWT, will not enter heaven, hated by Allah SWT.   Keywords: Neglect, Parents, Sanctions, Islamic Law, Positive Law in Indonesia.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-212
Author(s):  
Noercholis Cholis Noercholis Rapid A

AbstractThis study discusses diyat‎ comparison of criminal sanctions in criminal law. This study aims to determine the essence of criminal sanctions for murder in positive law and Islamic criminal law.This type of research is library research using data that are qualitative (non-statistical). This research is a review of the written works of legal experts, both Islamic law and national law. Normative theological approach, which is the approach used by referring to laws that originate from the Quran and Hadith and the juridical approach, that is, the approach used by referring to the applicable laws.This research implies that criminal sanctions for murder in national criminal law contain two principles, namely the principle of certainty and the principle of justice does not contain the principle of benefit, in this case, the benefit for the victim's family. Whereas Islamic criminal law contains all three principles because it provides maslahah for the victims' families.Keywords: Benefits; Criminal; The killing.AbstrakPenelitian ini membahas tentang diyat perbandingan sanksi pidana dalam hukum pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui esensi dari sanksi pidana pembunuhan dalam hukum positif dan hukum pidana Islam.            Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan (Library research) dengan menggunakan data-data yang bersifat kualitatif (non statistic). Penelitian ini merupakan penelaahan terhadap karya-karya tertulis dari para ahli hukum, baik hukum Islam maupun hukum nasional. Pendekaatan teologis normatif, yaitu pendekatan yang digunakan dengan merujuk pada hukum-hukum yang bersumber pada al-Qur’an dan Hadis dan pendekatan yuridis, yakni pendekatan yang digunakan dengan merujuk pada kitab perundang-undangan yang berlaku.            Implikasi penelitian ini bahwa sanksi pidana bagi pembunuhan dalam hukum pidana nasioan mengandung dua asas yaitu asas kepastian dan asas keadilan tidak mengandung asas manfaat dalam hal ini manfaat bagi keluarga korban. Sedangkan dalam hukum pidana Islam mengandung ketiga asas tersebut karena memberikan maslahah kepada keluarga korban.Kata Kunci: Manfaat, Pidana, Pembunuhan


Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1592
Author(s):  
Hanafi Amrani

AbstrakArtikel ini membahas dua permasalahan pokok: pertama, kriteria yang digunakan oleh pembentuk undang-undang di bidang politik dalam menetapkan suatu perbuatan sebagai perbuatan pidana (kriminalisasi); dan kedua, fungsi sanksi pidana dalam undang-undang di bidang politik. Terkait dengan kriminalisasi, undang-undang di bidang politik yang termasuk ke dalam hukum administrasi, maka pertimbangan dari pembuat undang-undang tentu saja tidak sekedar kriminalisasi sebagaimana diatur dalam ketentuan hukum pidana dalam arti sebenarnya. Hal tersebut disebabkan adanya pertimbangan-pertimbangan tertentu. Pertama, perbuatan yang dilarang dalam hukum pidana administrasi lebih berorientasi pada perbuatan yang bersifat mala prohibita, sedangkan dalam ketentuan hukum pidana yang sesungguhnya berorientasi pada perbuatan yang bersifat mala in se. Kedua, sebagai konsekuensi dari adanya penggolongan dua kategori kejahatan tersebut, maka pertimbangan yang dijadikan acuan juga akan berbeda. Untuk yang pertama (mala prohibita), sanksi pidana itu dibutuhkan untuk menjamin ditegakkannya hukum administrasi tersebut. Dalam hal ini sanksi pidana berfungsi sebagai pengendali dan pengontrol tingkah laku individu untuk mencapai suatu keadaan yang diinginkan. Sedangkan untuk yang kedua (mala in se), fungsi hukum pidana dan sanksi pidana lebih berorientasi pada melindungi dan mempertahankan nilai-nilai moral yang tertanam di masyarakat tempat di mana hukum itu diberlakukan atau ditegakkan. Kata Kunci: Kebijakan, Kriminalisasi, Undang-Undang PolitikThis article discusses two main problems: firstly, the criteria used by the legislators in the field of politics in determining an act as a criminal act (criminalization); secondly, the function of criminal sanctions in legislation in the field of politics. Associated with criminalization, legislation in the field of politics that is included in administrative law, the consideration of the legislators of course not just criminalization as stipulated in the provisions of criminal law in the true sense. This is due to certain considerations. Firstly, the act which is forbidden in the administration of criminal law is more oriented to act is malum prohibitum offences, whereas in actual criminal law provisions in the act are mala in se offences. Secondly, as a consequence of the existence of two categories of classification of the crime, then consideration will also vary as a reference. For the first (mala prohibita), criminal sanctions are needed to ensure the enforcement of the administrative law. In this case the criminal sanction serves as controller and controlling the behavior of individuals to achieve a desired state. As for the second (mala in se), the function of criminal law and criminal sanctions is more oriented to protect and maintain the moral values that are embedded in a society where the law was enacted or enforced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document