scholarly journals The significance of mammography and ultrasound examination in the diagnosis of breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Mirko Petrić ◽  
Adnan Šehić ◽  
Ismira Čatović
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Strong Connection ◽  
Positive Direction ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Ultrasound Diagnostics ◽  
Cystic Changes ◽  
Malignant Changes

Introduction: Mammography represents a very accessible diagnostic method that has been accepted as the initial method of examining women over the age of 40 worldwide. It is a method with a high percentage of accuracy (80-90%) in the detection of breast cancer in patients without symptoms. However, there may be a significant overlap of mammographic presentation of benign and malignant changes in the structural tissue of the breast. The ultrasound method of breast examination is invaluable in breaking down between solid and cystic changes, as well as for clarifying palpable lumps in the breast. In almost 98% of cases, ultrasound examination can distinguish whether it is a benign or malignant change. The aim of this study is to prove the correlation between mammography and ultrasound methods of breast examination.Material and methods: The examination was performed as a retrospective - prospective descriptive study in the Department for radiological and ultrasound diagnostics of the Derventa Health Center. The study included 80 female respondents who consented to the recording. Based on the performed ultrasound and mammography images, a qualitative analysis was made. A comparison of the sensitivity of the breast imaging between mammography and ultrasound imaging was performed.Results: Comparing mammography and ultrasound examination according to BI-RADS classification, based on Pearson's correlation coefficient, we concluded that there is a strong correlation between these two tests (r = 0.743), which is statistically significant (p <0.005). The correlation, in addition to having a strong connection, moves in a positive direction, that is, by increasing the value of BI-RADS of one diagnostic procedure, there is an increase in another.Conclusion: By analyzing the obtained results, we can conclude that mammography and ultrasound methods of breast examination are complementary methods, which complement each other, and which are not perfect. However, these two methods certainly have their place in breast cancer screening.

scholarly journals Digital Analysis in Breast Imaging

Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-150
Author(s):  
Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo ◽  
Michael Ingrisch ◽  
Eva Maria Fallenberg
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Interobserver Variability ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Digital Analysis ◽  
Imaging Analysis ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Malignant Changes

Breast imaging is a multimodal approach that plays an essential role in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Mammography, sonography, magnetic resonance, and image-guided biopsy are imaging techniques used to search for malignant changes in the breast or precursors of malignant changes in, e.g., screening programs or follow-ups after breast cancer treatment. However, these methods still have some disadvantages such as interobserver variability and the mammography sensitivity in women with radiologically dense breasts. In order to overcome these difficulties and decrease the number of false positive findings, improvements in imaging analysis with the help of artificial intelligence are constantly being developed and tested. In addition, the extraction and correlation of imaging features with special tumor characteristics and genetics of the patients in order to get more information about treatment response, prognosis, and also cancer risk are coming more and more in focus. The aim of this review is to address recent developments in digital analysis of images and demonstrate their potential value in multimodal breast imaging.

Opportunities of ultrasound diagnostics of lung injury in SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19): a clinical case

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (11) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
G. V. Neklyudova ◽  
А. V. Chernyak ◽  
N. А. Tsareva ◽  
S. N. Аvdeev
Keyword(s):  
Lung Injury ◽  
Clinical Case ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Acute Period ◽  
Ultrasound Diagnostics ◽  
Early Recovery Period

The article describes a clinical case demonstrating the results of the lungs ultrasound examination in the COVID-19 patient during the acute period of the disease and early recovery period.

scholarly journals The Usefulness of Spectral Mammography in Surgical Planning of Breast Cancer Treatment—Analysis of 999 Patients with Primary Operable Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 2548-2559
Author(s):  
Andrzej Lorek ◽  
Katarzyna Steinhof-Radwańska ◽  
Anna Barczyk-Gutkowska ◽  
Wojciech Zarębski ◽  
Piotr Paleń ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Diagnostic Sensitivity ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Imaging Method ◽  
Treatment Change ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
General Number

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a promising, digital breast imaging method for planning surgeries. The study aimed at comparing digital mammography (MG) with CESM as predictive factors in visualizing multifocal-multicentric cancers (MFMCC) before determining the surgery extent. We analyzed 999 patients after breast cancer surgery to compare MG and CESM in terms of detecting MFMCC. Moreover, these procedures were assessed for their conformity with postoperative histopathology (HP), calculating their sensitivity and specificity. The question was which histopathological types of breast cancer were more frequently characterized by multifocality–multicentrality in comparable techniques as regards the general number of HP-identified cancers. The analysis involved the frequency of post-CESM changes in the extent of planned surgeries. In the present study, MG revealed 48 (4.80%) while CESM 170 (17.02%) MFMCC lesions, subsequently confirmed in HP. MG had MFMCC detecting sensitivity of 38.51%, specificity 99.01%, PPV (positive predictive value) 85.71%, and NPV (negative predictive value) 84.52%. The respective values for CESM were 87.63%, 94.90%, 80.57% and 96.95%. Moreover, no statistically significant differences were found between lobular and NST cancers (27.78% vs. 21.24%) regarding MFMCC. A treatment change was required by 20.00% of the patients from breast-conserving to mastectomy, upon visualizing MFMCC in CESM. In conclusion, mammography offers insufficient diagnostic sensitivity for detecting additional cancer foci. The high diagnostic sensitivity of CESM effectively assesses breast cancer multifocality/multicentrality and significantly changes the extent of planned surgeries. The multifocality/multicentrality concerned carcinoma, lobular and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) cancers with similar incidence rates, which requires further confirmation.

scholarly journals Correlation of breast imaging and pathological subtype of young breast cancer under 35 years old

The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. S83-S84
Author(s):  
T. Rakchob ◽  
P. Jittawannarat ◽  
P. Moonwiriyakit ◽  
U. Seehawong
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Pathological Subtype ◽  
Young Breast Cancer

Financial Anxiety is Associated With Cancer Screening Adherence in Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salene M W Jones ◽  
Tammy A Schuler ◽  
Tasleem J Padamsee ◽  
M Robyn Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Clinical Breast Examination ◽  
Lower Odds ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Clinical Breast ◽  
Financial Anxiety ◽  
Screening Adherence

Abstract Background Previous studies have examined the impact of material financial hardship on cancer screening but without focusing on the psychological aspects of financial hardship. Purpose This study examined the effects of different types of financial anxiety on adherence to breast cancer screening in women at high risk of breast cancer. Adherence to cervical cancer screening was also examined to determine whether associations between financial anxiety and screening adherence were unique to breast cancer screening or more general. Methods Women (n = 324) aged 30–50 and at high risk for inherited breast cancer completed a survey on general financial anxiety, worry about affording healthcare, financial stigma due to cancer risk, and adherence to cancer screening. Multivariate analyses controlled for poverty, age, and race. Results More financial anxiety was associated with lower odds of mammogram adherence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, confidence interval [CI] = 0.94, 0.99), Pap smear adherence (OR = 0.98, CI = 0.96, 0.996), and clinical breast examination adherence (OR = 0.98, CI = 0.96, 0.995). More worry about affording healthcare was associated with lower odds of clinical breast examination adherence (OR = 0.95, CI = 0.91, 0.9992) but not mammogram or Pap smear adherence (p &gt; .05). Financial stigma due to cancer risk was associated with lower odds of Pap smear adherence (OR = 0.87, CI = 0.77, 0.97) but no other cancer screenings (p &gt; .07). Conclusions Financial anxiety may impede cancer screening, even for high-risk women aware of their risk status. Clinical interventions focused on social determinants of health may also need to address financial anxiety for women at high risk of breast cancer.

Imaging Approaches and Findings in the Reconstructed Breast: A Pictorial Essay

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabel M. Scaranelo ◽  
Bridgette Lord ◽  
Riham Eiada ◽  
Stefan O. Hofer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Reconstructive Surgery ◽  
Genetic Screening ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Breast Cancer Detection ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Pictorial Essay ◽  
Reconstructed Breast

Advances in breast imaging over the last 15 years have improved early breast cancer detection and management. After treatment for breast cancer, many women choose to have reconstructive surgery. In addition, with the availability of widespread genetic screening for breast cancer, an increasing number of women are choosing prophylactic mastectomies and subsequent breast reconstruction. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to present the spectrum of imaging findings in the reconstructed breast.

scholarly journals Assessment of Potential Risk Factors and Skin Ultrasound Presentation Associated with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1303
Author(s):  
Khairunnisa’ Md Yusof ◽  
Kelly A. Avery-Kiejda ◽  
Shafinah Ahmad Suhaimi ◽  
Najwa Ahmad Zamri ◽  
Muhammad Ehsan Fitri Rusli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Arm Circumference ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema

Breast cancer has been reported to have the highest survival rate among various cancers. However, breast cancer survivors face several challenges following breast cancer treatment including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), sexual dysfunction, and psychological distress. This study aimed to investigate the potential risk factors of BCRL in long term breast cancer survivors. A total of 160 female breast cancer subjects were recruited on a voluntary basis and arm lymphedema was assessed through self-reporting of diagnosis, arm circumference measurement, and ultrasound examination. A total of 33/160 or 20.5% of the women developed BCRL with significantly higher scores for upper extremity disability (37.14 ± 18.90 vs. 20.08 ± 15.29, p < 0.001) and a lower score for quality of life (103.91 ± 21.80 vs. 115.49 ± 16.80, p = 0.009) as compared to non-lymphedema cases. Univariate analysis revealed that multiple surgeries (OR = 5.70, 95% CI: 1.21–26.8, p < 0.001), axillary lymph nodes excision (>10) (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 0.94–8.11, p = 0.047), being overweight (≥25 kg/m2) (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.04 – 6.38, p = 0.036), received fewer post-surgery rehabilitation treatment (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.05–5.39, p = 0.036) and hypertension (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.01–5.62, p = 0.043) were associated with an increased risk of BCRL. Meanwhile, multivariate analysis showed that multiple surgeries remained significant and elevated the likelihood of BCRL (OR = 5.83, 95% CI: 1.14–29.78, p = 0.034). Arm swelling was more prominent in the forearm area demonstrated by the highest difference of arm circumference measurement when compared to the upper arm (2.07 ± 2.48 vs. 1.34 ± 1.91 cm, p < 0.001). The total of skinfold thickness of the affected forearm was also significantly higher than the unaffected arms (p < 0.05) as evidenced by the ultrasound examination. The continuous search for risk factors in specific populations may facilitate the development of a standardized method to reduce the occurrence of BCRL and provide better management for breast cancer patients.

Molecular Breast Imaging: A Scientific Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie N Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Breast Mri ◽  
Cancer Staging ◽  
Scientific Review ◽  
Molecular Breast Imaging ◽  
Breast Cancer Staging ◽  
Fast Learning ◽  
Technical Advances ◽  
History Of

Abstract Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a nuclear medicine technique that has evolved considerably over the past two decades. Technical advances have allowed reductions in administered doses to the point that they are now acceptable for screening. The most common radiotracer used in MBI, 99mTc-sestamibi, has a long history of safe use. Biopsy capability has become available in recent years, with early clinical experience demonstrating technically successful biopsies of MBI-detected lesions. MBI has been shown to be an effective supplemental screening tool in women with dense breasts and is also utilized for breast cancer staging, assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, problem solving, and as an alternative to breast MRI in women who have a contraindication to MRI. The degree of background parenchymal uptake on MBI shows promise as a tool for breast cancer risk stratification. Radiologist interpretation is guided by a validated MBI lexicon that mirrors the BI-RADS lexicon. With short interpretation times, a fast learning curve for radiologists, and a substantially lower cost than breast MRI, MBI provides many benefits in the practices in which it is utilized. This review will discuss the current state of MBI technology, clinical applications of MBI, MBI interpretation, radiation dose associated with MBI, and the future of MBI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document