scholarly journals Posterior Commissure Hypertrophy as Diagnostic and Prognostic Indicator for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
Anagha Atul Joshi ◽  
Bhagyashri Ganesh Chiplunkar ◽  
Renuka Anil Bradoo ◽  
Kshitij Dhaval Shah
Keyword(s):  
Lifestyle Modification ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Voice Disorder ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Posterior Commissure ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Female Ratio

ABSTRACT Purpose To establish posterior commissure hypertrophy as tool to diagnose laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to determine whether it can be used as a reliable marker for response to treatment. Materials and methods A prospective study of 100 patients with voice disorder was conducted. Patients were evaluated using reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) by 70° Hopkins’ rigid laryngoscope. Those patients in whom RFS score was 7 or more were diagnosed to have LPR. These patients were then started on antireflux therapy along with lifestyle modification and were evaluated regularly over a period of 6 months. Results The prevalence of LPR in patients with voice disorders was found to be 25%. Mean age was 41.48 years and the male and female ratio was 0.85:1. Posterior commissure hypertrophy was present in 60 out of 100 patients (60%). Among laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD), 23 out of 25 patients (92%) had posterior commissure hypertrophy, out of which only 2 (8.6%) patients showed complete resolution of posterior commissure hypertrophy after 6 months of treatment. A total of 10 patients (43.47%) did not show any change in grading of posterior commissure hypertrophy. And 11 patients (47.82%) showed downgrading of posterior commissure hypertrophy. Sensitivity of posterior commissure hypertrophy for diagnosis of LPR was found to be 92%, whereas specificity was 50.66%. Conclusion Posterior commissure hypertrophy can be used as a screening tool for diagnosis of LPR but cannot be used reliably as a clinical marker for response to therapy. How to cite this article Joshi AA, Chiplunkar BG, Bradoo RA, Shah KD. Posterior Commissure Hypertrophy as Diagnostic and Prognostic Indicator for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. Int J Phonosurg Laryngol 2015;5(2):57-60.

scholarly journals Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Is It the Real Culprit in Patients with Laryngeal Complaints?

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Vishwakarma ◽  
Ruta V Shah
Keyword(s):  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
The Real ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
Male Female Ratio ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Nose And Throat

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with laryngeal complaints and study the correlation between reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS). Materials and methods This is a study of 104 patients, who presented in the ear, nose, and throat outpatient department at the Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India, from April 2015 to April 2016, with complaints like change of voice, chronic cough, foreign body sensation, throat clearing, difficulty swallowing, and regurgitation. All the patients were examined with 90° endoscope by a single examiner, and an RSI ≥13 was considered as indicative of reflux. Observation and discussion The mean age of the 104 patients was 47.2 years. The male-female ratio was 1:1.8. The RSI ranged from 5 to 44, with a mean of 22.99 and standard deviation (SD) of 7.43. The RFS ranged from 4 to 22, with a mean of 11.04 and SD of 3.07. Both the parameters showed high correlation (correlation coefficient 0.98). Conclusion The LPR plays an important contributory role in patients with laryngeal complaints. The RFS and RSI can be used as routine parameters in establishing the diagnosis of reflux. How to cite this article Shah RV, Vishwakarma R. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Is It the Real Culprit in Patients with Laryngeal Complaints? Int J Phonosurg Laryngol 2017; 7(1):6-9.

scholarly journals Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Symptoms, Signs, and Presence of Pepsin in Saliva - A Reliable Diagnostic Triad

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpa Divakaran ◽  
Sivaa Rajendran ◽  
Roshan Marie Thomas ◽  
Jaise Jacob ◽  
Mary Kurien
Keyword(s):  
Positive Response ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Ph Monitoring ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Acid Reflux ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Chi Squared

Abstract Introduction Twenty-four-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance with double probe pH monitoring (MII-pH), though considered the most sensitive tool for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), is invasive, time consuming, not widely available, and unable to detect non-acid reflux. In contrast, the presence of pepsin in the saliva would act as a marker for reflux, considering that pepsin is only produced in the stomach. Objective To evaluate the predictive value of salivary pepsin in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as suggested by the results of reflux symptom index (RSI > 13), reflux finding score (RFS > 7), and positive response to treatment with a 4-week course of proton-pump inhibitors. Methods This prospective study was done at a tertiary care hospital on 120 adult patients attending ENT OPD with clinical diagnosis of LPR. The presence of pepsin in their pharyngeal secretions and saliva using a lateral flow device, the Peptest, was compared with RSI, RFS, and with the response to medical treatment using the Chi-squared test. Results Salivary pepsin was found to be positive in 68% of the patients, with 87.5% of them showing positive response to treatment. Chi-squared analysis showed a significant association between positive salivary pepsin and RFS > 7, RSI >13, a combination of RFS > 7 and RSI > 13 as well as with response to treatment (p < 0.0001). Conclusion When considered along with the clinical indicators of RFS and RSI of more than 7 and 13, respectively, and/or with a response to treatment, a positive salivary pepsin test indicates statistically significant chance of presence of LPR.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Symptomatology of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease in a Medical College Hospital in Kerala

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (27) ◽  
pp. 2467-2471
Author(s):  
Binu Raju George ◽  
Ajayan P.V ◽  
Saify Samad
Keyword(s):  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Reflux Symptom ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Reflux Finding Score ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

BACKGROUND Laryngopharyngeal reflux is a common clinical condition encountered in Otolaryngology practice. It is one of the major causes of laryngeal inflammation. It presents with a constellation of symptoms making the diagnosis difficult. Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score are two tools which aid in diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal reflux. The main objective of this study was to study the agent, host and environment factors of epidemiology of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease using Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score. METHODS A descriptive study was conducted on 100 patients attending the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala. The study period was for one year from December 2017 to December 2018. Demographic data of the patients was recorded, and patients were evaluated for Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease using Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score using 70 degree / flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. The clinical data collected was then tabulated and analysed. RESULTS From the study conducted in 100 patients, 59 % were females and 41 % males. Most common symptom noted was frequent clearing of throat which was present in 88 % cases. Least frequent symptom was choking episode (in 5 %). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease was commonest in the 31 to 40 years age group with mean age was 37.8 ± 2.35 years. The male to female ratio were 1:1.43. The disease was common in labourers and housewives. Risk factors were consumption of tea/coffee, inadequate sleep of less than 6 hrs. Lower socioeconomic group populations were more vulnerable than higher income group. The RSI score was between 13 and 15 in 53 % of the patients. KEYWORDS Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, Reflux Symptom Index, Reflux Finding Score

scholarly journals Smoking Cessation Improves the Symptoms and the Findings of Laryngeal Irritation

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-127
Author(s):  
A. Secil Kayalı Dinc ◽  
Melih Cayonu ◽  
Tijen Sengezer ◽  
M. Melih Sahin
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Vocal Fold ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Endoscopic Examination ◽  
Reflux Finding Score ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Posterior Commissure ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Cigarette Cessation

Smoking is known to increase laryngeal inflammation and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), which cause laryngeal irritation. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in the symptoms and the findings of laryngeal irritation in smokers after a smoking cessation period. The reflux symptom index (RSI) and the reflux finding score (RFS) were used for evaluating the symptoms and findings of laryngeal irritation in smokers. Endoscopic examination of the laryngeal structures for RFS and symptom inquiry for RSI were performed at the beginning of the study and after a 2 months of cigarette cessation period. This study was carried out in 24 volunteers (14 female and 10 male), between the ages of 24 and 62 years. When we compared the results of RSI and RFS that were performed before and after the cigarette cession period, we found that there was a significant improvement both in RSI and in RFS ( P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Also, there was significant correlation between the cigarette smoking period and RFS score that was determined at the beginning of the study ( P = .006, r = .54). A significant improvement was found both in RSI and in RFS after smoking cessation period, which might be the evidence of improvement in laryngeal irritation possibly caused by inflammation due to smoking and LPR. A significant positive correlation was found between smoking period and RFS, especially with vocal fold edema and posterior commissure hypertrophy.

scholarly journals Allergic rhinitis, asthma and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a cross-sectional study on their reciprocal relations

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer Kakaje ◽  
Mohammad Marwan Alhalabi ◽  
Ayham Alyousbashi ◽  
Ayham Ghareeb
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Wide Range

AbstractAllergic rhinitis (AR) is a common medical condition worldwide. It is an inflammation in the nasal mucosa due to allergen exposure throughout the year. Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is another medical condition that can overlap with AR. LPR can be considered an extra oesophageal manifestation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or a different entity. Its diagnosis imposes a real challenge as it has a wide range of unspecific symptoms. Although AR and LPR are not life-threatening, they can severely affect the quality of life for years and cause substantial distress. Moreover, having AR is associated with having asthma which is also in turn associated with GORD. This is a cross-sectional study which used surveys distributed online on Social Media and targeted people across Syria. All participants who responded to the key questions were included. Reflux symptom index (RSI) was used for LPR, and score for allergic rhinitis (SFAR) was used for AR. Demographic questions and whether the participant had asthma were also included in the survey. We found that there was an association between the symptoms of LPR and AR p < 0.0001 (OR, 2.592; 95% CI 1.846–3.639), and their scores were significantly correlated (r = 0.334). Having asthma was associated with LPR symptoms p = 0.0002 (OR 3.096; 95% CI 1.665–5.759) and AR p < 0.0001 (OR 6.772; 95% CI 2.823–16.248). We concluded that there was a significant association between having LPR, AR, and asthma. We need more studies to distinguish between their common symptoms and aetiologies.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Proton Pump Inhibitors Combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Pei ◽  
Wei Jia Hu ◽  
Yi Nan Mao ◽  
Yu Liang Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Proton Pump ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background:To explore whether combined with TCM based on classical proton pumpinhibitors PPIs therapy can achieve better efficacy for patients withlaryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Methods: There were 150 laryngopharyngeal refluxpatients enrolled and divided into three groups randomly, with 50 cases in each group.Patients in group A were treated with the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) lansoprazole.Patients in group B were treated with lansoprazole combined with Banxia Houpudecoction, and patients in group C were treated with acupuncture treatments and acombination of Chinese and Western medicine. The reflux symptom index (RSI), refluxfinding score (RFS), and quality of life (36 item short form health survey questionnaire)were assessed before and 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. Results: The RSI and RFSscores of the three groups were significantly reduced after treatment (P < 0.001). Ingroup B and C, they were lower than in group A at 8 weeks (P < 0.01). The SF 36 scoreof 3 groups increased after treatment. At both 4 and 8 weeks (P < 0.001), and patientsin groups B and C scored higher than patients in group A (P < 0.001). The total effectiverate of group B and group C was higher than that of group A (P < 0.05). Conclusion:All three treatments have therapeutic effects on the disease, but the efficacy of a PPIalone is not as good as the combined treatments’ efficacies. Moreover, PPI combinedwith Banxia Houpu decoction and/or acupuncture treatment substantially affects lifeimprovement.

Usefulness of Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 in Saliva as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nu-Ri Im ◽  
Byoungjae Kim ◽  
Kwang-Yoon Jung ◽  
Seung-Kuk Baek
Keyword(s):  
Matrix Metalloproteinase ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Enzyme Activity Assay ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 7

Abstract Introduction Several diagnostic methods are currently being used to diagnose LPRD (laryngopharyngeal reflux disease), but have the disadvantage of being invasive, subjective, or expensive. Objectives Our purpose in this study was to investigate the correlation between pepsin and MMP-7 (Matrix Metalloproteinase-7) in pharyngeal secretions of subjects according to RSI (Reflux Symptom Index) score to find out the diagnostic value of MMP-7. Method We recruited 173 subjects aged between 19 and 85 years who completed the RSI scale. All samples were taken after waking up, and the amount of the pepsin and MMP-7 in saliva were measured by means of an enzyme activity assay. Results There was a significant increase of pepsin and MMP-7 activity in the study group with an RSI score of 13 or higher. The sensitivity and specificity of MMP-7 for predicting the possibility of an RSI of 13 or more was higher than that of pepsin. When MMP-7 and pepsin were combined, this sensitivity and specificity increased. Conclusion An enzyme assay of MMP-7 in saliva may be a noninvasive and easy technique for diagnosing LPRD.

Shar Pei Larynx: Supraglottic and Postcricoid Mucosal Redundancy and Its Association With Medical Comorbidities

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Yiu ◽  
Kathleen M. Tibbetts ◽  
C. Blake Simpson ◽  
Laura A. Matrka
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe a clinical entity the authors term “Shar Pei larynx,” characterized by redundant supraglottic and postcricoid mucosa that the authors hypothesize coexists in patients with obstructive sleep apnea, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and obesity. By exploring this hypothesis, the authors hope to set the foundation for future research with the goal of identifying whether Shar Pei larynx is a marker for untreated sleep apnea or other diseases. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Two tertiary care academic institutions. Methods: Data were collected from a 5-year period by querying for patients described to have “Shar Pei larynx” or “posterior supraglottic and/or postcricoid mucosal redundancy” on laryngoscopic findings. Relevant demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed, with a focus on associations with obesity, sleep apnea, and laryngopharyngeal reflux. Results: Thirty-two patients were identified with physical findings consistent with Shar Pei larynx. Twenty-six patients (81.3%) were obese; 16 (50%) were morbidly obese. Twenty-two patients (68.8%) either had an existing diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea or were diagnosed on polysomnography performed after initial evaluation. Sixteen patients (50%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 87.5% of these patients were obese. Twenty-eight patients (87.5%) noted histories of reflux, with a median reflux symptom index of 27 of 45. Five patients underwent procedures to reduce mucosal redundancy related to Shar Pei larynx. Conclusions: This pilot study confirms that the majority of patients diagnosed with Shar Pei larynx also had diagnoses of obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, and reflux disease. The demonstrated association is strong enough to warrant further study.

scholarly journals Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Dysphonics—Understanding the Significance and the Efficacy of Clinical Diagnosis: A Case-based Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
John Mathew ◽  
Swapna Sebastian ◽  
Arif Ali Kolethekkat ◽  
Mahasampath Gowri
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Voice Disorders ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Vocal Nodule ◽  
Case Based

ABSTRACT Objective To determine the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with voice disorders and to find out the efficacy of reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) in the diagnosis. Methods This prospective analytical study was conducted on 554 patients who presented with dysphonia and symptoms suspicious of LPR. They were then subjected to clinical work up based on symptomatic history based RSI and video stroboscopic RFS scoring criteria. The results were analyzed statistically. The differences between RSI and RFS were calculated by Fisher's two sided test and the comparison between the two is calculated using kappa statistics to check the strength of agreement. Results Among 554 patients, 457 (82.4%) patients were diagnosed to have LPR based on RSI score of more than 13. Among 448 (80.8%) patients RFS score was positive. Vocal nodule (23.64%), laryngitis (22.38%) and the vocal polyp (20.03%) constitute the majority, with a female preponderance in vocal nodule. Both RSI and RFS were poor or almost absent in conditions such as spasmodic dysphonia, tremors, vocal cord palsy, hemorrhage, functional aphonia and traumatic conditions. The Pearson correlation coefficient showed a good correlation and agreement between RSI and RFS was statistically significant. Conclusion The association of LPR in patients with voice disorders is significantly high. The RSI and RFS based clinical diagnosis is reliable and valid in the diagnosis of LPR as revealed in our study. How to cite this article Sebastian S, Kolethekkat AA, Mathew J, Gowri M. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Dysphonics— Understanding the Significance and the Efficacy of Clinical Diagnosis: A Case-based Study. Int J Phonosurg Laryngol 2014;4(1):5-9.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document