The Lauge-Hansen Classification for Ankle Fractures: Is it Relevant in 2017?
ABSTRACT Despite being one of the commonest fractures, classifications of ankle injuries are still debated, with modern surgeons decrying the use of the so-called antiquated system based on injury mechanisms. Despite glaring lacunae, especially with lack of reproducibility using modern methods, and an understanding that many fractures which we now see routinely may not fit into this classification, the Lauge-Hansen classification is still worth preserving. It clarifies some, if not most deforming forces, allows us to understand the ankle injury in a three-dimensional concept, both on the medial and lateral sides, and allows an understanding of reduction methods. The limitations in its use are the lack of prognostication ability, the fact that most reductions are now done open, and the recognition of some transitional and posterior malleolar injuries unclassifiable by it. Not being alphanumeric is another disadvantage in the computer age. Nevertheless, it is an important landmark in the history of orthopedics, and in the development of our understanding of ankle fractures. Even in 2017, it is too important a piece of work to be discarded, and modern orthopedic students are encouraged to gain an understanding of this classification system, and to combine it with the newer ones to get an overall picture of the ankle injury. How to cite this article Dhillon MS, Kumar L, Sharma S, Mehta N. The Lauge-Hansen Classification for Ankle Fractures: Is it Relevant in 2017? J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia-Pacific) 2017;4(2):53-56.