The impact of an innovative pharmacist-led inpatient opioid de-escalation intervention in post-operative orthopedic patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-176
Author(s):  
Thuy Bui, BPharm ◽  
Richard Grygiel, MPharm ◽  
Alex Konstantatos, MB BS (Hons), FANZCA, Dip Obs, MRCA ◽  
Nick Christelis ◽  
Susan Liew, MB BS (Hons), FRACS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Prescription Opioid ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Orthopedic Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Objective: Many patients are discharged from hospital after surgery with excessive doses of opioid, and prescription opioid addiction has become a serious public health problem. Inpatient opioid de-escalation performed by clinical pharmacists may assist in reducing opioids before discharge. We aimed to evaluate whether clinical pharmacist-led opioid de-escalation for inpatients after orthopedic surgery led to significant reductions in opioid use at discharge, without resulting in greater pain intensity and side effects.Design: This retrospective pre-/post-intervention study evaluated patients before and after implementation of a pharmacist-led opioid de-escalation service.Setting: A major tertiary institution.Participants: Ninety eight participants underwent de-escalation, and 98 controls received standard care following orthopedic surgery.Intervention: Pharmacist-led opioid de-escalation was initiated after discharge from the institution's Acute Pain Service.Main outcome measure: Primary outcome was total morphine oral equivalence (MOE) required in the 24-hours before discharge between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity scores and opioid-related side effects. Results: The post-intervention group used significantly less opioids in the 24 hours preceding discharge compared with the precohort (total MOE 30 vs 45 mg; p = 0.025).There were no differences in pain intensity at rest (p = 0.19) or with movement (p = 0.19). Cases experienced significantly less constipation (29 vs 49 percent; p = 0.004); no differences were observed for other side effects.Discussion: We observed statistically similar pain intensity ratings, in the setting of significantly lowered opioid doses among the post-intervention group prior to discharge.Conclusion: Pharmacist-led inpatient opioid de-escalation is effective, does not increase pain intensity, and reduces constipation. Hospitals should explore the viability of extending pharmacist-led opioid de-escalation to other surgical patients and following hospital discharge, aiming for opioid cessation.

The Impact of a New Best Practice Advisory on the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diala Alawneh ◽  
Moustafa Younis ◽  
Majdi S. Hamarshi
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Management Algorithm ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Practice Advisory ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Background: According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) hospitalization rates have been steadily increasing. Due to the increasing incidence and the economic impact associated with its morbidity and treatment, effective management is key. We aimed to streamline the management of DKA in our intensive care units (ICU) by implementing a Best-Practice Advisory (BPA) that notifies providers when DKA has resolved. Methods: A BPA was implemented on 9/15/2018. We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to the ICU with DKA a year before and after 9/15/2018. Adults (≥18 age) meeting DKA criteria on admission and treated with continuous insulin infusion (CII) were included. Pre-intervention group included patients admitted before BPA implementation and post-intervention group included patients admitted after. Summary and univariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 282 patients were included; 162 (57%) pre-intervention and 120 (43%) post-intervention. Mean (±SD) age was 44 (±17) years. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics such as age, sex, race, BMI, HbA1c, initial blood glucose, anion gap or bicarbonate concentration between both groups (p>0.05). Mean (±SD) total time on CII in hours was significantly lower in the post-intervention group 14.8 (±7.7) vs 17.5 (±14.3) p=0.041, 95% CI: 0.11-5.3. The incidence of hypoglycemia was lower in the post-intervention group n=4 (3%) vs 17 (10%), p=0.024. There was no significant difference in hypokalemia, mortality, LOS or ICU stay between both groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: The BPA introduced in our DKA management algorithm successfully reduced total time on insulin and the incidence of hypoglycemia.

scholarly journals 87. Utilization of Methicillin-Sensitive/Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screen to Decrease Vancomycin and Linezolid Use in Hospitalized Patients with Respiratory Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S60-S60
Author(s):  
Noor F Zaidan ◽  
Rachel S Britt ◽  
David Reynoso ◽  
R Scott Ferren
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Screening Protocol ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Pharmacist-driven protocols for utilization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares screenings have shown to decrease duration of empiric gram-positive therapy and rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with respiratory infections. This study evaluated the impact of a pharmacist-driven MRSA nares screening protocol on duration of vancomycin or linezolid therapy (DT) in respiratory infections. Methods Patients aged 18 years and older with a medication order of vancomycin or linezolid for respiratory indication(s) were included. The MRSA nares screening protocol went into effect in October 2019. The protocol allowed pharmacists to order an MRSA nares polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for included patients, while the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) made therapeutic recommendations for de-escalation of empiric gram-positive coverage based on negative MRSA nares screenings, if clinically appropriate. Data for the pre-intervention group was collected retrospectively for the months of October 2018 to March 2019. The post-intervention group data was collected prospectively for the months of October 2019 to March 2020. Results Ninety-seven patients were evaluated within both the pre-intervention group (n = 50) and post-intervention group (n = 57). Outcomes for DT (38.2 hours vs. 30.9 hours, P = 0.601) and AKI (20% vs. 14%, P = 0.4105) were not different before and after protocol implementation. A subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in DT within the pre- and post-MRSA PCR groups (38.2 hours vs. 24.8 hours, P = 0.0065) when pharmacist recommendations for de-escalation were accepted. Conclusion A pharmacist-driven MRSA nares screening protocol did not affect the duration of gram-positive therapy for respiratory indications. However, there was a reduction in DT when pharmacist-driven recommendations were accepted. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 600. Decreased Hospital Readmission After Programmatic Strengthening of an Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Program

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S362-S363
Author(s):  
Gaurav Agnihotri ◽  
Alan E Gross ◽  
Minji Seok ◽  
Cheng Yu Yen ◽  
Farah Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Although it is recommended that an OPAT program should be managed by a formal OPAT team that supports the treating physician, many OPAT programs face challenges in obtaining necessary program staff (i.e nurses or pharmacists) due to limited data examining the impact of a dedicated OPAT team on patient outcomes. Our objective was to compare OPAT-related readmission rates among patients receiving OPAT before and after the implementation of a strengthened OPAT program. Methods This retrospective quasi-experiment compared adult patients discharged on intravenous (IV) antibiotics from the University of Illinois Hospital before and after implementation of programmatic changes to strengthen the OPAT program. Data from our previous study were used as the pre-intervention group (1/1/2012 to 8/1/2013), where only individual infectious disease (ID) physicians coordinated OPAT. Post-intervention (10/1/2017 to 1/1/2019), a dedicated OPAT nurse provided full time support to the treating ID physicians through care coordination, utilization of protocols for lab monitoring and management, and enhanced documentation. Factors associated with readmission for OPAT-related problems at a significance level of p< 0.1 in univariate analysis were eligible for testing in a forward stepwise multinomial logistic regression to identify independent predictors of readmission. Results Demographics, antimicrobial indications, and OPAT administration location of the 428 patients pre- and post-intervention are listed in Table 1. After implementation of the strengthened OPAT program, the readmission rate due to OPAT-related complications decreased from 17.8% (13/73) to 6.5% (23/355) (p=0.001). OPAT-related readmission reasons included: infection recurrence/progression (56%), adverse drug reaction (28%), or line-associated issues (17%). Independent predictors of hospital readmission due to OPAT-related problems are listed in Table 2. Table 1. OPAT Patient Demographics and Factors Pre- and Post-intervention Table 2. Factors independently associated with hospital readmission in OPAT patients Conclusion An OPAT program with dedicated staff at a large academic tertiary care hospital was independently associated with decreased risk for readmission, which provides critical evidence to substantiate additional resources being dedicated to OPAT by health systems in the future. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Assessment of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing and Monitoring Pre- and Post-Implementation of a Pharmacy Protocol at a Community Teaching Hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Miele ◽  
Mary Taylor ◽  
Aditi Shah
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Appropriate Prescribing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group ◽  
Community Teaching

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become popular alternatives to vitamin K antagonists for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases; however, there are limited data regarding the appropriate use of DOACs in clinical practice. To ensure safety and efficacy of these medications, it is important that decisions regarding their use in patients rely on the available evidence. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of DOAC prescribing in adult patients before and after the implementation of a pharmacist-driven DOAC protocol. Methods Data were collected on adult patients admitted to a community teaching hospital who received DOAC therapy for at least 2 days between January and March 2015 (pre-intervention group) and between January and March 2016 (post-intervention group). These data were analyzed to measure inappropriately prescribed DOACs, defined based on DOAC indication, renal function, drug interactions, and other pertinent patient-specific factors. Prior to the start of data collection for the post-intervention group, a pharmacist-driven protocol was developed and implemented. DOAC education was provided to pharmacists, including an evidence-based prescribing table to guide appropriate DOAC therapy. Comparisons were made between the pre-intervention and post-intervention groups to determine the impact of the pharmacist-driven service on appropriate DOAC prescribing. Results Fifty patients were analyzed in the pre-intervention group compared with 85 patients in the post-intervention group, with a total of 333 and 816 doses administered, respectively. Of the total doses administered, 32.4% were considered inappropriate in the pre-intervention group compared with 13.8% in the post-intervention group (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.42, 95% CI, 0.19-0.96; p = 0.039). Conclusions Implementing a pharmacist-driven DOAC service significantly improved appropriate prescribing of these agents. Provider education regarding DOAC use is essential to further increase appropriate prescribing of DOACs, optimize patients' therapy, and prevent adverse drug events.

scholarly journals An Electronic Alert for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department Increases Screening but not the Diagnosis of HIV

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 299-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Liu ◽  
J. Sperling ◽  
R. Green ◽  
S. Clark ◽  
D. Vawdrey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
New York ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

SummaryObjective: Based on US. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, New York State enacted legislation in 2010 requiring healthcare providers to offer non-targeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing to all patients aged 13–64. Three New York City adult emergency departments implemented an electronic alert that required clinicians to document whether an HIV test was offered before discharging a patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the electronic alert on HIV testing rates and diagnosis of HIV positive individuals.Methods: During the pre-intervention period (2.5–4 months), an electronic “HIV Testing” order set was available for clinicians to order a test or document a reason for not offering the test (e.g., patient is not conscious). An electronic alert was then added to enforce completion of the order set, effectively preventing ED discharge until an HIV test was offered to the patient. We analyzed data from 79,786 visits, measuring HIV testing and detection rates during the pre-intervention period and during the six months following the implementation of the alert.Results: The percentage of visits where an HIV test was performed increased from 5.4% in the pre-intervention period to 8.7% (p<0.001) after the electronic alert. After the implementation of the electronic alert, there was a 61% increase in HIV tests performed per visit. However, the percentage of patients testing positive per total patients-tested was slightly lower in the post-intervention group than the pre-intervention group (0.48% vs. 0.55%), but this was not significant. The number of patients-testing positive per total-patient visit was higher in the post-intervention group (0.04% vs. 0.03%).Conclusions: An electronic alert which enforced non-targeted screening was effective at increasing HIV testing rates but did not significantly increase the detection of persons living with HIV. The impact of this electronic alert on healthcare costs and quality of care merits further examination.Citation: Schnall R, Liu N, Sperling J, Green R, Clark S, Vawdrey D. An electronic alert for HIV screening in the emergency department increases screening but not the diagnosis of HIV. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 299–312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-09-RA-0075

scholarly journals 98. Antibiotic Stewardship Interventions Significantly Improve Preferred Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S179-S179
Author(s):  
Katelyn Quartuccio ◽  
Raquel Roberts ◽  
Kelly E Pillinger ◽  
Eric Heintz ◽  
Jessica Stern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Risks Factors ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Orthopedic Patients ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Most patients reporting a penicillin (PCN) allergy can tolerate cefazolin, the preferred prophylaxis in a total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical prophylaxis in patients with a reported PCN allergy undergoing a TJA following a stewardship intervention that included updates to institutional guidelines, reclassification of severe PCN allergy, standardization of ordering processes, and participation of a physician champion. Methods This was a single center, retrospective study of adult orthopedic patients greater than 18 years old who underwent a primary elective TJA at a 261-bed community hospital from March 1, 2017 to August 30, 2017 (pre-intervention) and from March 1, 2019 to August 30, 2019 (post-intervention). The primary outcome was the difference in the composite rate of the following: 1) Patients with a reported non-severe PCN allergy without MRSA risk factors who received cefazolin; 2) Patients with a non-severe PCN allergy with MRSA risks factors who received cefazolin plus vancomycin; and 3) Patients with a severe PCN allergy who received vancomycin prior to a primary elective TJA. Results A total of 180 patients with a documented PCN allergy were evaluated (90 patients in the pre-intervention group and 90 patients in the post-intervention group). Rash and hives were the most commonly reported allergies in both groups (71% vs 61%, P=0.2076). Post-intervention revealed a significant increase in the primary outcome of appropriate perioperative antibiotic (55% vs 91%, P&lt; 0.001), largely driven by patients with non-severe allergy [47% (36/76) vs 96% (73/76), P&lt; 0.001]. No patients had signs of an allergic reaction thought to be due to cefazolin, including 8 patients with severe PCN allergy. No patients in either group developed a surgical site infection or C. difficile infection within 90 days post-procedure. Conclusion A multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention increased preferred prophylaxis in elective primary TJA. Patients with non-severe PCN allergies, even those reporting hives or local swelling, can tolerate cefazolin without issue. Patients with severe PCN allergy should undergo further evaluation as cefazolin may be a safe option. Disclosures Katelyn Quartuccio, PharmD, BCPS, AstraZeneca (Consultant) Kelly E. Pillinger, PharmD, BCIDP, Pharmacy Times (Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker)

scholarly journals A low-cost intervention to promote immediate skin-to-skin contact and improve temperature regulation in Northern Uganda

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Nissen ◽  
Kristin Svensson ◽  
Scovia Mbalinda ◽  
Kajsa Brimdyr ◽  
Peter Waiswa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Cost ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Skin Contact ◽  
Group Data ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Skin To Skin ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Background Uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact between mothers and newborns during the first hour after birth has been reported to be 2% in Uganda. Aims To investigate if a low-cost intervention targeting the behaviors of hospital staff would increase skin-to-skin contact and to investigate whether skin-to-skin contact stabilised temperature in the newborn. Methods The study had a quasi-experimental, before and after design. The sample included 110 in the pre-intervention group, and 93 in the post-intervention group. Data collection included observations of skin-to-skin contact and temperature measurements. Data were also collected from medical records and interviews. Findings No infants had skin-to-skin contact before the intervention, whereas the proportion was 54.8% after the intervention. Infants who received skin-to-skin contact (n=51) and infants who did not receive skin-to-skin contact (n=146) increased in temperature; however, infants who received skin-to-skin contact were significantly warmer after 5 minutes and remained so at 60 minutes. Conclusions The intervention increased the practice of skin-to-skin contact, which was found to be safe in regard to temperature stabilisation.

scholarly journals 143. Modification of Linezolid Restriction Criteria Reduces ICU Gram-positive Antibiotic Consumption

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S201-S202
Author(s):  
John M Boulos ◽  
Kathryn DeSear ◽  
Bethany Shoulders ◽  
Veena Venugopalan ◽  
Stacy A Voils ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Antibiotic time out (ATO) policies have been proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to limit unnecessary use of antibiotics. Critically ill patients are often treated empirically with MRSA-active agents for a prolonged duration. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an ATO policy by targeting empiric gram-positive coverage. Methods Before this intervention, linezolid required pre-approval by the antimicrobial stewardship program or infectious diseases (ID) consult service before dispensing, and no automatic ATO policy was in place for any agent. In 2018, restriction of linezolid was modified to allow 72 hours of empiric use in the intensive care unit (ICU). This retrospective, single-center, pre- post-intervention study looked at eight ICUs at our institution from two equal periods. Adults (age ≥ 18 years) were included who received an IV gram-positive antibiotic (IVGP-AB), specifically linezolid or vancomycin, used for empiric therapy and were admitted to the ICU. The primary outcome was antimicrobial consumption of IVGP-AB defined as days of therapy (DOT) per patient. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Figure 1. Flowchart of patient inclusion into the study Results 2718 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study. 1091 patients were included in the pre-intervention group and 1627 patients were included in the post-intervention group. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar, with ID consults being higher in the pre-intervention group. Total mean DOT of IVGP-AB in pre- and- post-intervention groups was 4.97 days vs. 4.36 days, p&lt; 0.01. Secondary outcomes of in-hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and in-hospital mortality did not vary significantly between groups. Thirty-day readmission was lower in the post-intervention group (12.9% vs. 3.9%, p&lt; 0.01). AKI did not differ significantly between groups, however the need for renal replacement therapy was higher in the pre-intervention group (1.2% vs. 0.2%, p&lt; 0.01). Conclusion This study assessed the impact of an ATO policy allowing 72 hours of empiric linezolid in the ICU. We found a statistically significant reduction in days of therapy of IVGP-AB without increases in LOS, mortality, readmission, and AKI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Impact of a Systematic Pharmacist-Initiated Antibiotic Time-Out Intervention for Hospitalized Adults

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002098061
Author(s):  
Calley M. Paulson ◽  
Jillian F. Handley ◽  
Thomas J. Dilworth ◽  
Dan Persells ◽  
Rachael Y. Prusi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Intra Abdominal Infection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Introduction: Antibiotic time-outs (ATO) are a recommended antimicrobial stewardship action, but data assessing their impact are lacking. This study investigated the impact of a systematic, pharmacist initiated ATO intervention. Methods: This pre-post study included inpatients on hospitalist and intensivist services receiving empiric antibiotics for ≥48 hours. The ATO was initiated by pharmacists after 48 hours of empiric therapy and the outcome was documented including antibiotic indication, plan, and duration. An electronic medical record (EMR) alert facilitated ATO completion and pharmacists and prescribers received education prior to implementation. The primary outcome was EMR documentation of an antibiotic plan by 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic utilization and antibiotic therapy modifications by 2 hours. Results: 399 patients were included, 199 pre- and 200 post-intervention. The most common indications were pneumonia (32%), intra-abdominal infection (20%) and urinary tract infection (19%), with no between-group differences. EMR documentation of an antibiotic plan significantly improved in the post-intervention group (19% vs. 79%, p<0.0001) as did modifications to antibiotic therapy. The median duration of in-hospital antibiotic therapy was similar between groups (4.0 vs. 4.0 days, p = 0.2499). Approximately 45% of patients in each group received discharge antibiotics and median duration of discharge antibiotic therapy prescribed was reduced (7 vs. 5 days in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively; p = 0.0140). Discussion: Implementation of pharmacist initiated ATO was associated with improvements in supporting EMR documentation and antibiotic therapy modifications. These findings highlight an important role in which pharmacists can serve as part of a collaborative antibiotic stewardship team.

scholarly journals 46. Antimicrobial Stewardship’s Selective Antibiotic Suppression Does Not Lead to Adverse Outcomes in Neutropenic Patients with Gram-Negative Bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S46-S46
Author(s):  
Anna Witt ◽  
Mason G Harper ◽  
Juan Carlos Rico Crescencio ◽  
Ryan K Dare ◽  
Mary Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Group ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Narrow Spectrum ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background An antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) strategy to minimize the use of overly broad antimicrobials is to suppress specific antimicrobial susceptibility results when isolates are sensitive to narrow antibiotics. There is limited data on possible adverse outcomes of this method. Patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) and gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) whose culture is sensitive to non-pseudomonal antibiotics still require broader pseudomonal coverage to treat the syndrome of FN. We evaluated if ASP suppression of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics adversely affects patients with FN and GNB. Methods In February 2018, our institution’s ASP began suppressing cefepime and meropenem susceptibility results from E. coli, Klebsiella spp, and Proteus spp when sensitive to cefepime (MIC ≤ 2), ceftriaxone and ceftazidime. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with FN and GNB from 2016 – 2020 to evaluate the appropriateness of antibiotic regimens before and after the ASP intervention. Antibiotic regimens were deemed inappropriate if the patient was de-escalated to a narrow-spectrum, non-pseudomonal agent while neutropenic. Of 338 inpatient encounters identified with any bacteremia and FN, 49 were due to non-Pseudomonas, non-ESBL GNB, 20 before and 29 after the intervention. Sixteen of the 29 post-intervention patients were excluded, as their isolates did not meet suppression criteria. This resulted in a total of 13 patients in the post-intervention group. Results After culture susceptibility reports were released, 3 out of 20 patients in the pre-intervention group (15%) and 4 out of 13 patients in the post-intervention group (30.8%) were inappropriately tailored to narrow-spectrum antibiotics (p=0.39). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality, 10.0% pre- and 0% post-intervention (p=0.50), or amount of meropenem prescribed, 45% pre- and 38.5% post-intervention (p=0.74). Conclusion These data show no significant difference in inappropriate antibiotic regimens prescribed for patients with FN and GNB after ASP antibiotic suppression was implemented. 30-day mortality was also not affected. The ASP intervention did not decrease meropenem prescriptions in this patient group, which may be appropriate. Larger studies are needed to verify these findings. Disclosures Ryan K. Dare, MD, MS, Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc (Research Grant or Support) Mary Burgess, MD, Pfizer Inc (Grant/Research Support)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document