scholarly journals About Formation of International Ethical Digital Environment with Smart Artificial Intelligence

Author(s):  
Evgeny Bryndin

Intellectual agent ensembles allow you to create digital environment by professional images with language, behavioral and active communications, when images and communications are implemented by agents with smart artificial intelligence. Through language, behavioral and active communications, intellectual agents implement collective activities. The ethical standard through intelligent agents allows you to regulate the safe use of ensembles made of robots and digital doubles with creative communication artificial intelligence in the social sphere, industry and other professional fields. The use of intelligent agents with smart artificial intelligence requires responsibility from the developer and owner for harming others. If harm to others occurred due to the mistakes of the developer, then he bears responsibility and costs. If the damage to others occurred due to the fault of the owner due to non-compliance with the terms of use, then he bears responsibility and costs. Ethical standard and legal regulation help intellectual agents with intelligent artificial intelligence become professional members of society. Ensembles of intelligent agents ith smart artificial intelligence will be able to safely work with society as professional images with skills, knowledge and competencies, implemented in the form of retrained digital twins and cognitive robots that interact through language, behavioral and active ethical communications. Cognitive robots and digital doubles through self-developing ensembles of intelligent agents with synergistic interaction and intelligent artificial intelligence can master various high-tech professions and competencies. Their use in the industry increases labor productivity and economic efficiency of production. Their application in the social sphere improves the quality of life of a person and society. Their widespread application requires compliance with an ethical standard so that their use does not cause harm. The introduction and use of an ethical standard for the use of cognitive robots and digital doubles with smart artificial intelligence increases the safety of their use. Ethical relationships between individuals and intellectual agents will also be governed by an ethical standard.

Legal Concept ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Yana Gaivoronskaya ◽  
Olga Miroshnichenko

Introduction: digitalization is an interdisciplinary problem, but the degree of its mediation by specialists in different fields varies significantly. The modern legal studies of digitalization are often haphazard and superficial. Lawyers are clearly lagging behind modern trends, which can create a number of serious problems in terms of the legal regulation and loss of humanitarian and legal values accumulated by humanity. This situation really creates a number of serious threats to the legal regulation, because technologies are developing, the number of rules associated with their use is increasing, and these rules are written by the experts in the field of digital economy and IT-technologies. The purpose of the study: to summarize the main theoretical and legal problems arising from the widespread introduction of digital technologies in the legal regulation and legal activity. Research objectives: to define the concept of digitalization; to consider the main trends of scientific research on issues related to the largescale spread of digitalization and artificial intelligence technologies; to identify and formulate the main problems of doctrinal and theoretical plan discussed by the legal community in the context of digitalization; to determine the limits of the real impact of new technologies on the social regulation. Methods: the system, structural and functional ones, the methods of analysis and synthesis, expert evaluation. Results: the paper systematizes the main problems of digitalization that concern modern lawyers. The problems of digitalization are divided into general social ones, concerning threats to the development of society as a whole, and special legal ones, concerning the actual change of the legal regulation and law in the era of digitalization. Conclusions: it is not technologies that need the legal regulation, but the relations with the use of technologies do. As for the “horror stories” about AI and total digitalization, most of the problems lie in the sphere of natural intelligence, not artificial one, in the sense that it is necessary to regulate the actions of natural intelligence carriers in the design of artificial intelligence.


2020 ◽  
pp. 79-89
Author(s):  
Marina Ryumina

The article is devoted to the study of the human problem in a digital society. It is a question of changing the very nature of man, of transforming man into a transhuman, and later into a Posthuman. The principle of constructivism in this process is of key importance, forming constructivist thinking and worldview in the social sphere, in science and in culture as a whole. Such properties of radical constructivism as revolutionism, operationalism, efficiency, technicism, pragmatism, reductionism, and utilitarianism are highlighted. The article analyzes such manifestations of Posthuman as artificial intelligence, cyborgization, genetic manipulation, transhumanization, dehumanization of a person.


First Monday ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Etzrodt ◽  
Sven Engesser

Research on the social implications of technological developments is highly relevant. However, a broader comprehension of current innovations and their underlying theoretical frameworks is limited by their rapid evolution, as well as a plethora of different terms and definitions. The terminology used to describe current innovations varies significantly among disciplines, such as social sciences and computer sciences. This article contributes to systematic and cross-disciplinary research on current technological applications in everyday life by identifying the most relevant concepts (i.e., Ubiquitous Computing, Internet of Things, Smart Objects and Environments, Ambient Environments and Artificial Intelligence) and relating them to each other. Key questions, core aspects, similarities and differences are identified. Theoretically disentangling terminology results in four distinct analytical dimensions (connectivity, invisibility, awareness, and agency) that facilitate and address social implications. This article provides a basis for a deeper understanding, precise operationalisations, and an increased anticipation of impending developments.


2021 ◽  
Vol - (3) ◽  
pp. 180-200
Author(s):  
Mykhailo Bogachov

Artificial intelligence is a computer system that thinks or acts like humans. Features of AI systems embody implicit beliefs concerning the human nature that AI developers have. “Strong” AI, which has the general cognitive abilities of an adult, has not yet been created, while “weak” AI is already part of the planetary computation infrastructure. Neural network AI mimics specific types of human behavior, generalizing data about the everyday lives of its users. This AI approach corresponds to the philosophical mainstream of the 20th century, when everyday life was seen as a source of the linguistic and the social pre-given that yields mutual understanding. This approach is also based on the traditional human-machine dichotomy and the corresponding idea that human nature is stable and independent of the technological condition. However, in the post-metaphysical age, when human interaction with technology is communicative rather than instrumental, data on everyday life cannot be an independent paragon of the human nature. AI systems do not only codify the descriptive features of human nature, but also discipline their users, as the digital environment in which everyday data can be collected is already organized by AI. Accordingly, in the digital environment, people are forced to reproduce new norms of behavior, codified by AI, which became one of the forms of human self-mastery, or anthropotechnology. The impact of AI is rarely noted, as the digital environment in which people interact with AI is not organized in a way that is clearly understandable. The anthropotechnological nature of AI is a side effect of the development of platforms, so AI developers rarely take responsibility for the norms embodied in the systems they create.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 339-344
Author(s):  
G. Kachkyn kyzy

The article discusses the prerequisites and conditions for the development of digital technologies in the legal policy of the Kyrgyz Republic, the mechanism of their influence on the acceleration of processes in the social sphere: simplification of the issuance of state benefits, ensuring the protection and registration of children and families in difficult life situations, digitalization of the system for promoting employment of the population, improving the quality of service for pension recipients and what problems, risks and challenges arise in this regard. The most important results of the digitalization of the social security sphere are the creation of prerequisites for the growth of the cultural and legal level of the population due to the rapid development of the digital environment. The author comes to the conclusion that by developing digitalization in the field of socially significant services, the state should be responsible for the reliability and correctness of information translated into electronic format, in turn, the population needs a transition to lifelong learning, to lifelong education and retraining of personnel.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
Ildar R. Begishev ◽  

The development of artificial intelligence and robotics technologies around the world is happening at a fairly rapid pace. The emergence of high-tech solutions and innovations entails the formation of legal terminology for breakthrough technologies. Among the most common terms today, it should be noted such categories as “artificial intelligence” and “robotics”, which are undoubtedly becoming the subject of legal regulation of relations in the field of end-to-end digital technologies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-163
Author(s):  
Henrique Weil Afonso

The aim of this paper is to develop a historical scrutiny of the interplay between legal regulation and social reproduction. The question of marketization of the social sphere has been gaining significant attention over the past decades. While social theorists update Polanyian analysis of the status of embedded and disembedded markets to understand present-day crisis of social reproduction, it is relevant to situate these in light of historical lenses. By focusing on the idea of uberization of labour and care work, it considers, in the first case, how contemporary forms of labour are detrimental to the maintenance of the social fabric and, in the second one, how long-standing forms of violence are reproduced. It develops an argument according to which the disruption of work-related regulation has a direct connection to the inability of legal systems to institutionalize proper social times that are not reducible to market time.


Author(s):  
М.Ю. МАСЛОВ ◽  
Ю.М. СПОДОБАЕВ

Концептуальный кризис в электромагнитной безопасности телекоммуникационных сетей и систем охватил деятельность ряда хозяйствующих субъектов и ведомств и продолжает активно проникать в социальную сферу. В статье рассматриваются серьезные противоречия хозяйствующих субъектов в области правовых, организационных, методических и научных проблем электромагнитной безопасности, которые и являются источником кризиса. Анализируются правовые механизмы, сложившиеся в международной практике. Российская Федерация - одно из немногих государств, которое полностью берет на себя ответственность за электромагнитную безопасность населения. В настоящее время прямое правовое регулирование в области обеспечения электромагнитной безопасности населения РФ отсутствует. Необходима разработка Концепции и Федерального закона «Об электромагнитной безопасности населения», в котором будут прописаны согласованные тонкости и особенности государственного контроля над источниками электромагнитного излучения. А conceptual crisis in the electromagnetic security of telecommunication networks and systems has engulfed the activities of several economic entities and departments and continues to actively penetrate the social sphere. The article considers serious contradictions of economic entities in the field of legal, organizational, methodological, and scientific problems of electromagnetic safety, which are the source of the crisis. The article analyzes the legal mechanisms that have developed in international practice. The Russian Federation is one of the few states that fully assume responsibility for the electromagnetic safety of the population. Currently, there is no direct legal regulation in the field of ensuring the electromagnetic safety of the population of the Russian Federation. It is necessary to develop a Concept and a Federal Law "On Electromagnetic Safety of the Population", which will spell out the agreed subtleties and features of state control over sources of electromagnetic radiation.


Author(s):  
Larisa V. ZAITSEVA ◽  
Olga V. Alieva

The most important political event in 2020 was the nationwide vote on the approval of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Some of the adopted amendments directly concern the social sphere; they are designed to ensure an increase in the well-being of Russian citizens and the level of their social protection. This has actualized scientific research on social justice in all social sciences and humanities. In this regard, legal science is most interested in questions related to at least two aspects. First, to what extent are the amendments to the Russian Federation Constitution relevant from the point of view of the social sphere current state? To what extent are they conditioned by the current agenda and modern social relations content? On the other hand, to what extent does the current legislation designed to serve the implementation of the constitutional foundations meet the requirements of the Basic Law? Do not the provisions of the Constitution become an unattainable bright ideal in the modern system of legal regulation of specific legal relations? This work is devoted to the formulation of precisely these questions. It provides examples from the sphere of regulation of social and labor relations, which make it possible to talk about the difficulties that the law is already facing today, not having sufficient funds in its traditional arsenal to ensure the implementation of fair social standards established in the Constitution. The development of employment non-standart forms, the precarization of the labor market, an objective decrease in the number of hired workers in the total number of employed, creates a significant circle of subjects who today do not have access to the rights and guarantees established by the Constitution, since they are traditionally ensured by the norms of labor law, which does not apply to these citizens. Based on the experience of individual foreign countries, it is concluded that in order to fully implement the constitutional foundations and principles in the world of work, it is necessary to extend certain traditional labor rights and guarantees to the self-employed and workers employed on online platforms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document