The ocean response to changes of the Greenland Ice sheet in a warming climate

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne S. Madsen ◽  
Shuting Yang ◽  
Christian Rodehacke ◽  
Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir ◽  
Synne H. Svendsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Variable Mass ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Model System ◽  
Meridional Overturning Circulation ◽  
The Arctic

<p>During recent decades, increased and highly variable mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has been observed, implying that the ice sheet can respond to changes in ocean and atmospheric conditions on annual to decadal time scales. Changes in ice sheet topography and increased mass loss into the ocean may impact large scale atmosphere and ocean circulation. Therefore, coupling of ice sheet and climate models, to explicitly include the processes and feedbacks of ice sheet changes, is needed to improve the understanding of ice sheet-climate interactions.</p><p>Here, we present results from the coupled ice sheet-climate model system, EC-Earth-PISM. The model consists of the atmosphere, ocean and sea-ice model system EC-Earth, two-way coupled to the Parallel Ice Sheet Model, PISM. The surface mass balance (SMB) is calculated within EC-Earth, from the precipitation, evaporation and surface melt of snow and ice, to ensure conservation of mass and energy. The ice sheet model, PISM, calculates ice dynamical changes in ice discharge and basal melt as well as changes in ice extent and thickness. Idealized climate change experiments have been performed starting from pre-industrial conditions for a) constant forcing (pre-industrial control); b) abruptly quadrupling the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration; and c) gradually increasing the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration by 1% per year until 4xCO<sub>2</sub> is reached.  All three experiments are run for 350 years.</p><p>Our results show a significant impact of the interactive ice sheet component on heat and fresh water fluxes into the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans. The interactive ice sheet causes freshening of the Arctic Ocean and affects deep water formation, resulting in a significant delay of the recovery of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) in the coupled 4xCO<sub>2</sub> experiments, when compared with uncoupled experiments.</p>

scholarly journals Increased variability in Greenland Ice Sheet runoff from satellite observations

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Slater ◽  
Andrew Shepherd ◽  
Malcolm McMillan ◽  
Amber Leeson ◽  
Lin Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
Climate Model Simulations

AbstractRunoff from the Greenland Ice Sheet has increased over recent decades affecting global sea level, regional ocean circulation, and coastal marine ecosystems, and it now accounts for most of the contemporary mass imbalance. Estimates of runoff are typically derived from regional climate models because satellite records have been limited to assessments of melting extent. Here, we use CryoSat-2 satellite altimetry to produce direct measurements of Greenland’s runoff variability, based on seasonal changes in the ice sheet’s surface elevation. Between 2011 and 2020, Greenland’s ablation zone thinned on average by 1.4 ± 0.4 m each summer and thickened by 0.9 ± 0.4 m each winter. By adjusting for the steady-state divergence of ice, we estimate that runoff was 357 ± 58 Gt/yr on average – in close agreement with regional climate model simulations (root mean square difference of 47 to 60 Gt/yr). As well as being 21 % higher between 2011 and 2020 than over the preceding three decades, runoff is now also 60 % more variable from year-to-year as a consequence of large-scale fluctuations in atmospheric circulation. Because this variability is not captured in global climate model simulations, our satellite record of runoff should help to refine them and improve confidence in their projections.

scholarly journals The future sea-level contribution of the Greenland ice sheet: a multi-model ensemble study of ISMIP6

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Goelzer ◽  
Sophie Nowicki ◽  
Anthony Payne ◽  
Eric Larour ◽  
Helene Seroussi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Model Uncertainty ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Climate Forcing ◽  
The Arctic

Abstract. The Greenland ice sheet is one of the largest contributors to global-mean sea-level rise today and is expected to continue to lose mass as the Arctic continues to warm. The two predominant mass loss mechanisms are increased surface meltwater runoff and mass loss associated with the retreat of marine-terminating outlet glaciers. In this paper we use a large ensemble of Greenland ice sheet models forced by output from a representative subset of CMIP5 global climate models to project ice sheet changes and sea-level rise contributions over the 21st century. The simulations are part of the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). We estimate the sea-level contribution together with uncertainties due to future climate forcing, ice sheet model formulations and ocean forcing for the two greenhouse gas concentration scenarios RCP8.5 and RCP2.6. The results indicate that the Greenland ice sheet will continue to lose mass in both scenarios until 2100 with contributions of 89 ± 51 mm and 31 ± 16 mm to sea-level rise for RCP8.5 and RCP2.6, respectively. The largest mass loss is expected from the southwest of Greenland, which is governed by surface mass balance changes, continuing what is already observed today. Because the contributions are calculated against a unforced control experiment, these numbers do not include any committed mass loss, i.e. mass loss that would occur over the coming century if the climate forcing remained constant. Under RCP8.5 forcing, ice sheet model uncertainty explains an ensemble spread of 40 mm, while climate model uncertainty and ocean forcing uncertainty account for a spread of 36 mm and 19 mm, respectively. Apart from those formally derived uncertainty ranges, the largest gap in our knowledge is about the physical understanding and implementation of the calving process, i.e. the interaction of the ice sheet with the ocean.

scholarly journals Annual Greenland accumulation rates (2009–2012) from airborne Snow Radar

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 6697-6731 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. Koenig ◽  
A. Ivanoff ◽  
P. M. Alexander ◽  
J. A. MacGregor ◽  
X. Fettweis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Ice Cores ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Accumulation Rates ◽  
Surface Mass ◽  
Automated Method

Abstract. Contemporary climate warming over the Arctic is accelerating mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) through increasing surface melt, emphasizing the need to closely monitor surface mass balance (SMB) in order to improve sea-level rise predictions. Here, we quantify accumulation rates, the largest component of GrIS SMB, at a higher spatial resolution than currently available, using Snow Radar stratigraphy. We use a semi-automated method to derive annual-net accumulation rates from airborne Snow Radar data collected by NASA's Operation IceBridge from 2009 to 2012. An initial comparison of the accumulation rates from the Snow Radar and the outputs of a regional climate model (MAR) shows that, in general, the radar-derived accumulation matches closely with MAR in the interior of the ice sheet but MAR estimates are high over the southeast GrIS. Comparing the radar-derived accumulation with contemporaneous ice cores reveals that the radar captures the annual and long-term mean. The radar-derived accumulation rates resolve large-scale patterns across the GrIS with uncertainties of up to 11 %, attributed mostly to uncertainty in the snow/firn density profile.

scholarly journals The future sea-level contribution of the Greenland ice sheet: a multi-model ensemble study of ISMIP6

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Goelzer ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Model Uncertainty ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Climate Forcing ◽  
The Arctic

<p>The Greenland ice sheet is one of the largest contributors to global-mean sea-level rise today and is expected to continue to lose mass as the Arctic continues to warm. The two predominant mass loss mechanisms are increased surface meltwater runoff and mass loss associated with the retreat of marine-terminating outlet glaciers. In this paper we use a large ensemble of Greenland ice sheet models forced by output from a representative subset of CMIP5 global climate models to project ice sheet changes and sea-level rise contributions over the 21st century. The simulations are part of the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). We estimate the sea-level contribution together with uncertainties due to future climate forcing, ice sheet model formulations and ocean forcing for the two greenhouse gas concentration scenarios RCP8.5 and RCP2.6. The results indicate that the Greenland ice sheet will continue to lose mass in both scenarios until 2100 with contributions of 89 ± 51 mm and 31 ± 16 mm to sea-level rise for RCP8.5 and RCP2.6, respectively. The largest mass loss is expected from the southwest of Greenland, which is governed by surface mass balance changes, continuing what is already observed today. Because the contributions are calculated against a unforced control experiment, these numbers do not include any committed mass loss, i.e. mass loss that would occur over the coming century if the climate forcing remained constant. Under RCP8.5 forcing, ice sheet model uncertainty explains an ensemble spread of 40 mm, while climate model uncertainty and ocean forcing uncertainty account for a spread of 36 mm and 19 mm, respectively. Apart from those formally derived uncertainty ranges, the largest gap in our knowledge is about the physical understanding and implementation of the calving process, i.e. the interaction of the ice sheet with the ocean.</p>

scholarly journals A continuous pathway for fresh water along the East Greenland shelf

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (43) ◽  
pp. eabc4254
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. Foukal ◽  
Renske Gelderloos ◽  
Robert S. Pickart
Keyword(s):  
Fresh Water ◽  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Coastal Current ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
In Situ Data

Export from the Arctic and meltwater from the Greenland Ice Sheet together form a southward-flowing coastal current along the East Greenland shelf. This current transports enough fresh water to substantially alter the large-scale circulation of the North Atlantic, yet the coastal current’s origin and fate are poorly known due to our lack of knowledge concerning its north-south connectivity. Here, we demonstrate how the current negotiates the complex topography of Denmark Strait using in situ data and output from an ocean circulation model. We determine that the coastal current north of the strait supplies half of the transport to the coastal current south of the strait, while the other half is sourced from offshore via the shelfbreak jet, with little input from the Greenland Ice Sheet. These results indicate that there is a continuous pathway for Arctic-sourced fresh water along the entire East Greenland shelf from Fram Strait to Cape Farewell.

scholarly journals Dependence of Eemian Greenland temperature reconstructions on the ice sheet topography

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 6683-6732
Author(s):  
N. Merz ◽  
A. Born ◽  
C. C. Raible ◽  
H. Fischer ◽  
T. F. Stocker
Keyword(s):  
Energy Balance ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Surface Energy Balance ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Surface Wind ◽  
Sensible Heat Flux ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Lapse Rate

Abstract. The influence of a reduced Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) on Greenland's surface climate during the Eemian interglacial is studied using a comprehensive climate model. We find a distinct impact of changes in the GrIS topography on Greenland's surface air temperatures (SAT) even when correcting for changes in surface elevation which influences SAT through the lapse rate effect. The resulting lapse rate corrected SAT anomalies are thermodynamically driven by changes in the local surface energy balance rather than dynamically caused through anomalous advection of warm/cold air masses. The large-scale circulation is indeed very stable among all sensitivity experiments and the NH flow pattern does not depend on Greenland's topography in the Eemian. In contrast, Greenland's surface energy balance is clearly influenced by changes in the GrIS topography and this impact is seasonally diverse. In winter, the variable reacting strongest to changes in the topography is the sensible heat flux (SHFLX). The reason is its dependence on surface winds, which themselves are controlled to a large extent by the shape of the GrIS. Hence, regions where a receding GrIS causes higher surface wind velocities also experience anomalous warming through SHFLX. Vice-versa, regions that become flat and ice-free are characterized by low wind speeds, low SHFLX and anomalous cold winter temperatures. In summer, we find surface warming induced by a decrease in surface albedo in deglaciated areas and regions which experience surface melting. The Eemian temperature records derived from Greenland proxies, thus, likely include a temperature signal arising from changes in the GrIS topography. For the NEEM ice core site, our model suggests that up to 3.2 °C of the annual mean Eemian warming can be attributed to these topography-related processes and hence is not necessarily linked to large-scale climate variations.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the updated regional climate model RACMO2.3: summer snowfall impact on the Greenland Ice Sheet

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1831-1844 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Noël ◽  
W. J. van de Berg ◽  
E. van Meijgaard ◽  
P. Kuipers Munneke ◽  
R. S. W. van de Wal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Elevation Gradient ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Ice Cores ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Ablation Zone ◽  
Surface Mass

Abstract. We discuss Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) surface mass balance (SMB) differences between the updated polar version of the RACMO climate model (RACMO2.3) and the previous version (RACMO2.1). Among other revisions, the updated model includes an adjusted rainfall-to-snowfall conversion that produces exclusively snowfall under freezing conditions; this especially favours snowfall in summer. Summer snowfall in the ablation zone of the GrIS has a pronounced effect on melt rates, affecting modelled GrIS SMB in two ways. By covering relatively dark ice with highly reflective fresh snow, these summer snowfalls have the potential to locally reduce melt rates in the ablation zone of the GrIS through the snow-albedo-melt feedback. At larger scales, SMB changes are driven by differences in orographic precipitation following a shift in large-scale circulation, in combination with enhanced moisture to precipitation conversion for warm to moderately cold conditions. A detailed comparison of model output with observations from automatic weather stations, ice cores and ablation stakes shows that the model update generally improves the simulated SMB-elevation gradient as well as the representation of the surface energy balance, although significant biases remain.

scholarly journals Time-evolving mass loss of the Greenland ice sheet from satellite altimetry

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1057-1093
Author(s):  
R. T. W. L. Hurkmans ◽  
J. L. Bamber ◽  
C. H. Davis ◽  
I. R. Joughin ◽  
K. S. Khvorostovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Laser Altimetry ◽  
Radar Altimetry ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Satellite Radar

Abstract. Mass changes of the Greenland ice sheet may be estimated by the Input Output Method (IOM), satellite gravimetry, or via surface elevation change rates (dH / dt). Whereas the first two have been shown to agree well in reconstructing mass changes over the last decade, there are few decadal estimates from satellite altimetry and none that provide a time evolving trend that can be readily compared with the other methods. Here, we interpolate radar and laser altimetry data between 1995 and 2009 in both space and time to reconstruct the evolving volume changes. A firn densification model forced by the output of a regional climate model is used to convert volume to mass. We consider and investigate the potential sources of error in our reconstruction of mass trends, including geophysical biases in the altimetry, and the resulting mass change rates are compared to other published estimates. We find that mass changes are dominated by SMB until about 2001, when mass loss rapidly accelerates. The onset of this acceleration is somewhat later, and less gradual, compared to the IOM. Our time averaged mass changes agree well with recently published estimates based on gravimetry, IOM, laser altimetry, and with radar altimetry when merged with airborne data over outlet glaciers. We demonstrate, that with appropriate treatment, satellite radar altimetry can provide reliable estimates of mass trends for the Greenland ice sheet. With the inclusion of data from CryoSat II, this provides the possibility of producing a continuous time series of regional mass trends from 1992 onward.

scholarly journals Contrasting regional variability of buried meltwater extent over two years across the Greenland Ice Sheet

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon Dunmire ◽  
Alison F. Banwell ◽  
Jan T. M. Lenaerts ◽  
Rajashree Tri Datta
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Regional Variability ◽  
Meltwater Runoff ◽  
Lake Formation

Abstract. The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) rapid mass loss is primarily driven by an increase in meltwater runoff, which highlights the importance of understanding the formation, evolution and impact of meltwater features on the ice sheet. Buried lakes are meltwater features that contain liquid water and exist under layers of snow, firn, and/or ice. These lakes are invisible in optical imagery, challenging the analysis of their evolution and implication for larger GrIS dynamics and mass change. Here, we present a method that uses a convolutional neural network, a deep learning method, to automatically detect buried lakes across the GrIS. For the years 2018 and 2019, we compare total areal extent of both buried and surface lakes across six regions, and use a regional climate model to explain the spatial and temporal differences. We find that the total buried lake extent after the 2019 melt season is 56 % larger than after the 2018 melt season across the entire ice sheet. Northern Greenland observes the largest increase in buried lake extent after the 2019 melt season, which we attribute to late-summer surface melt and high autumn temperatures. We also provide evidence that different processes are responsible for buried lake formation in different regions of the ice sheet. For example, in western Greenland, buried lakes often appear on the surface during the previous melt season, indicating that these features form when surface lakes partially freeze and become insulated as snowfall buries them. In contrast, in southeast Greenland, most buried lakes never appear on the surface, signifying that these features may form due to subsurface penetration of shortwave radiation and/or downward percolation of meltwater. This study helps to provide additional perspective on the potential role of meltwater on GrIS dynamics and mass loss.

scholarly journals A new programme for monitoring the mass loss of the Greenland ice sheet

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 61-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas P. Ahlstrøm ◽  
* PROMICE project team
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Arctic Region ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
National Space ◽  
Ice Caps ◽  
Political Concern ◽  
Global Sea Level

The Greenland ice sheet has been losing mass at a dramatic rate in recent years, raising political concern worldwide due to the possible impact on global sea level rise and climate dynamics (Luthcke et al. 2006; Rignot & Kanagaratnam 2006; Velicogna & Wahr 2006; IPCC 2007; Shepherd & Wingham 2007). The Arctic region as a whole is warming up much more rapidly than the globe at large (ACIA 2005) and it is desirable to quantify these changes in order to provide the decision-makers with a firm knowledge base. To cover this need, the Danish Ministry of Climate and Energy has now launched a new Programme for Monitoring of the Green- land Ice Sheet (PROMICE), designed and operated by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) in collaboration with the National Space Institute at the Tech nical University of Denmark and Asiaq (Greenland Survey). The aim of the programme is to quantify the annual mass loss of the Greenland ice sheet, track changes in the extent of local glaciers and ice caps, and track changes in the position of the ice-sheet margin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document