Drought Propagation as Illustrated by the 2018 Nordic Drought Event

Author(s):  
Sigrid Jørgensen Bakke ◽  
Monica Ionita ◽  
Lena Merete Tallaksen

<p>An extreme meteorological and hydrological drought occurred in Northern Europe in 2018, with widespread impacts including vast amounts of forests destroyed by wildfires, major crop losses, hydropower shortage, freshwater ecosystem stress, and water usage restrictions. Drought impacts are commonly felt on the ground and many are related to freshwater rather than solely to the atmosphere. A better understanding of the hydrological aspect of drought propagation is therefore vital in order to mitigate drought impacts. This study aims at assessing the drought propagation in 2018 in the (continental) Nordic countries at a monthly resolution, with a special emphasis on the streamflow and groundwater aspect. We used the E-OBS gridded observational datasets for temperature and precipitation, as well as high quality near-natural streamflow and groundwater data from the Nordic countries provided by national agencies. The extremeness for each variable was assessed by ranking each month of 2018 relative to that month in a 60-year record of data (30-year for groundwater due to data limitations). Whereas record-breaking high temperatures and precipitation deficits emerged over the Nordic region in May (Bakke et al., in prep.), streamflow stations did not experience extreme conditions before June in Norway, Sweden and Finland. This delay reflects the effect of various catchment properties and in particular the contribution of catchment water storages (mainly snowmelt) that dampens and delays streamflow response to meteorological conditions. The extent of record low streamflow maximized in July. In mid-August, high precipitation replenished the rivers in western and northern parts of the Nordic region. In the southeastern region, however, extremely low streamflow persisted throughout 2018 despite the return to more normal temperature and precipitation conditions after July. Catchments in western Denmark did not experience extremely low streamflow conditions during the summer of 2018, likely due to large groundwater reservoirs feeding the rivers. The response in groundwater levels was also delayed, with unusually low levels emerging in June and expanding in July. However, there was no clear spatial pattern of extremely low groundwater levels, even wells located very close together showed different results, reflecting the various hydrogeological properties and depths of the wells. Nevertheless, extremeness in groundwater are seen in about half of the wells throughout 2018. The response delay (estimated by the precipitation moving average window best correlated with the groundwater time series), depth and soil type help explain part of the variability in the results amongst the wells. In addition to assessing the uniqueness of the 2018 northern European drought, this study emphasises the added complexity of drought propagation, and the need of incorporating more variables than weather alone to understand hydrological drought development.</p><p>Reference: Bakke, S.J., Ionita, M., Tallaksen, L.M. (in prep.). The 2018 Northern Europe Hydrological Drought and its Drivers in a Historical Perspective.</p>

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein H.J. van Huijgevoort ◽  
Janine A. de Wit ◽  
Ruud P. Bartholomeus

<p>Extreme dry conditions occurred over the summer of 2018 in the Netherlands. This severe drought event led to very low groundwater  and surface water levels. These impacted several sectors like navigation, agriculture, nature and drinking water supply. Especially in the Pleistocene uplands of the Netherlands, the low groundwater levels had a large impact on crop yields and biodiversity in nature areas. Projections show that droughts with this severity will occur more often in the future due to changes in climate. To mitigate the impact of these drought events, water management needs to be altered.</p><p>In this study, we evaluated the 2018 drought event in the sandy regions of the Netherlands and studied which measures could be most effective to mitigate drought impact. We have included meteorological, soil moisture and hydrological drought and the propagation of the drought through these types. Droughts were determined with standardized indices (e.g. Standardized Precipitation Index) and the variable threshold level method. Investigated measures were, for example, higher water levels in ditches, reduced irrigation from groundwater, and increased water conservation in winter. We also studied the timing of these measures to determine the potential for mitigating effects during a drought versus the effectiveness of long term adaptation. The measures were simulated with the agro-hydrological Soil–Water–Atmosphere–Plant (SWAP) model for several areas across the Netherlands for both agricultural fields and nature sites.</p><p>As expected, decreasing irrigation from groundwater reduced the severity of the hydrological drought in the region. Severity of the soil moisture drought also decreased in fields that were never irrigated due to the effects of capillary rise from the groundwater, but, as expected, increased in currently irrigated fields. Increasing the level of a weir in ditches had a relatively small effect on the hydrological drought, provided water was available to sustain higher water levels. This measure is, therefore, better suited as a long term change than as ad hoc measure during a drought. The effectiveness of the measures depended on the characteristics of the regions; for some regions small changes led to increases in groundwater levels for several months, whereas in other regions effects were lost after a few weeks. This study gives insight into the most effective measures to mitigate drought impacts in low-lying sandy regions like the Netherlands.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2679-2694 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gil ◽  
A. Garrido ◽  
N. Hernández-Mora

Abstract. The economic evaluation of drought impacts is essential in order to define efficient and sustainable management and mitigation strategies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the economic impacts of a drought event on the agricultural sector and measure how they are transmitted from primary production to industrial output and related employment. We fit econometric models to determine the magnitude of the economic loss attributable to water storage. The direct impacts of drought on agricultural productivity are measured through a direct attribution model. Indirect impacts on agricultural employment and the agri-food industry are evaluated through a nested indirect attribution model. The transmission of water scarcity effects from agricultural production to macroeconomic variables is measured through chained elasticities. The models allow for differentiating the impacts deriving from water scarcity from other sources of economic losses. Results show that the importance of drought impacts are less relevant at the macroeconomic level, but are more significant for those activities directly dependent on water abstractions and precipitation. From a management perspective, implications of these findings are important to develop effective mitigation strategies to reduce drought risk exposure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-91
Author(s):  
L. S. Voronkov

The paper is dedicated to the differences between the classical instruments for regulating interstate political and trade-economic relations from those used in the development of regional integration processes. Traditionally, the Eurasian Economic Union is compared with the European Union, considering the EU as a close example to follow in the development of integration processes. At the same time, there exist the other models of integration. The author proposes to pay attention to the other models of integration and based on the analysis of documents, reveals the experience of Northern Europe, which demonstrates effective cooperation without infringing on the sovereignty of the participants. The author examines the features of the integration experience of the Nordic countries in relation to the possibility of using its elements in the modern integration practice of the Eurasian Economic Union.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1489-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Korhonen ◽  
A. Venäläinen ◽  
H. Seppä ◽  
H. Järvinen

Abstract. Earth system models of intermediate complexity (EMICs) have proven to be able to simulate the large-scale features of glacial–interglacial climate evolution. For many climatic applications the spatial resolution of the EMICs' output is, however, too coarse, and downscaling methods are needed. In this study we introduce a way to use generalized additive models (GAMs) for downscaling the large-scale output of an EMIC in very different climatological conditions ranging from glacial periods to current relatively warm climates. GAMs are regression models in which a combination of explanatory variables is related to the response through a sum of spline functions. We calibrated the GAMs using observations of the recent past climate and the results of short time-slice simulations of glacial climate performed by the relatively high-resolution general circulation model CCSM (Community Climate System Model) and the regional climate model RCA3 (Rossby Centre regional Atmospheric climate model). As explanatory variables we used the output of a simulation by the CLIMBER-2 (CLIMate and BiosphERe model 2) EMIC of the last glacial cycle, coupled with the SICOPOLIS (SImulation COde for POLythermal Ice Sheets) ice sheet model, i.e. the large-scale temperature and precipitation data of CLIMBER-2, and the elevation, distance to ice sheet, slope direction and slope angle from SICOPOLIS. The fitted GAMs were able to explain more than 96% of the temperature response with a correlation of >0.98 and more than 59% of the precipitation response with a correlation of >0.72. The first comparison with two pollen-based reconstructions of temperature for Northern Europe showed that CLIMBER-2 data downscaled by GAMs corresponded better with the reconstructions than did the bilinearly interpolated CLIMBER-2 surface temperature.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 2954
Author(s):  
Diego A. Guzmán ◽  
Guilherme S. Mohor ◽  
Eduardo M. Mendiondo

The sustainability of water utility companies is threatened by non-stationary drivers, such as climate and anthropogenic changes. To cope with potential economic losses, instruments such as insurance are useful for planning scenarios and mitigating impacts, but data limitations and risk uncertainties affect premium estimation and, consequently, business sustainability. This research estimated the possible economic impacts of business interruption to the Sao Paulo Water Utility Company derived from hydrological drought and how this could be mitigated with an insurance scheme. Multi-year insurance (MYI) was proposed through a set of “change” drivers: the climate driver, through forcing the water evaluation and planning system (WEAP) hydrological tool; the anthropogenic driver, through water demand projections; and the economic driver, associated with recent water price policies adopted by the utility company during water scarcity periods. In our study case, the evaluated indices showed that MYI contracts that cover only longer droughts, regardless of the magnitude, offer better financial performance than contracts that cover all events (in terms of drought duration). Moreover, through MYI contracts, we demonstrate solvency for the insurance fund in the long term and an annual average actuarially fair premium close to the total expected revenue reduction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-256
Author(s):  
E. V. Korunova

In the middle of the 20th century a unique subsystem of international relations emerged in the Northern Europe, which has turned it into one of the stablest and most peaceful regions during the Cold War period. Nowadays, rising international tensions bring new relevance to the history lessons of World War II, its origins and aftermaths. The paper examines the evolution of the Nordic countries’ views on the issue of neutrality from mid-1930s to the end of 1940s. The first section considers the approaches of the Scandinavian countries to the establishment of a collective security system in the region in the interwar period. In that regard, the paper focuses on the Swedish project of the Northern defense alliance, which was aimed at deepening military cooperation between the states of the region and strengthening their ability to jointly deter any aggression as the best way to guarantee their neutrality. However, this project had not been implemented, because it faced both cool reactions from the leaders of Norway and Denmark and suspicion from the leading powers. According to the author, the fundamental reason for the failure of that project was that Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland sought support and protection from different, opposing great powers. The latter circumstance had also to a large extent predetermined the fate of the Scandinavian countries during the war years, when almost all of them were in one form or another involved in the conflict. The victory of the anti-Hitler coalition both opened new opportunities and posed new challenges for the states of the region: in the emerging bipolar world they rapidly turned into the subject matter of dispute of the superpowers. In these conditions, Sweden once again put forward the idea that in order to preserve peace in the region, the Nordic countries should be able to defend their neutrality and proposed the establishment of a Scandinavian Defense Union. In the final section, the paper examines the reaction to this project of the Scandinavian countries, the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain. The author shows that although this reaction was more than restrained, and the project was not implemented, Sweden’s initiatives contributed to the creation of a unique security architecture in Northern Europe, where each state of the region had its own role with the neutral Sweden serving as a balancing force.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Stephan ◽  
Mathilde Erfurt ◽  
Stefano Terzi ◽  
Maja Žun ◽  
Boštjan Kristan ◽  
...  

Abstract. Drought affects even mountain regions, despite a humid climate. Droughts' damaging character in the past and an increasing probability in future projections call for an understanding of drought impacts in the European Alpine region. The European Drought Impact Report Inventory (EDII) collects text reports on negative drought impacts. This study presents a considerably updated EDII focusing on the study region of the greater Alpine Space. This first version release of an Alpine Drought Impact Inventory (EDIIALPS) classifies impact reports into categories covering various affected sectors and enables comparisons of the drought impact characteristics. We analyzed the distribution of reported impacts on the spatial, temporal and seasonal scale, and by drought type for soil-moisture and hydrological drought. For the spatial analysis, we compared the impact data located in the Alpine Space' to entire Europe. Further, we compared impact data between different climatic and altitudinal domains (Northern vs. Southern region, pre-Alpine vs. high-altitude region), and between the Alpine countries. Compared to entire Europe, in the Alpine Space agriculture and livestock farming impacts are even more frequently reported, especially in the Southern region. Public water supply is second most relevant sector, but overall less prominent compared to Europe, especially in spring when snowmelt mitigates water shortages. Impacts occurred mostly in summer and early autumn with a delay between those impacts initiated by soil-moisture and those by hydrological drought. The high-altitude region showed this effect the strongest. From 1975 to 2020, the number of archived reports increased, with substantially more impacts noted during the drought events of 1976, 2003, 2015 and 2018. Moreover, reported impacts diversified from agricultural dominance to multi-facetted impact types covering forestry, water quality, industry and so forth. Though EDIIALPS is biased by reporting behaviour, the amount of more than 3200 compiled reports on negative drought impacts demonstrates the need to move from emergency actions to better preparedness. These may be guided by EDIIALPS' insights to regional patterns, seasons and drought types.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Stephan ◽  
Mathilde Erfurt ◽  
Kerstin Stahl

<p>Droughts are among the most damaging natural hazards leading to a wide range of impacts also in the water-rich mountain regions. In recent years, drought conditions and impacts have been reported frequently in the European Alpine region, possibly because climate change affects mountain environments more rapidly than others. However, in mountain regions the propagation of drought signals through the hydrological cycle and into different environmental and societal impact occurrence are poorly understood, especially regarding the impacts’ seasonal patterns and delayed effects. This study aims to improve the understanding of the droughts’ characteristics and their impacts from the high elevation headwater regions down to plateau and foothill areas. Specific climate conditions in high elevation regions determine an alpine environment, economy and society that differs from the pre-Alpine regions. Subsequently, impacts are expected to vary as well and indices for drought monitoring may have to be selected specifically for such a region. The European Drought Impact Report Inventory (EDII) compiles text-reports on negative drought impacts across Europe and classifies them into 15 categories with 108 subtypes. An updated version focusing on the ‘Alpine Space’ released as EDII<sub>ALPS</sub> V1.0 contains more than 3,200 reports about drought impacts. The most relevant categories are Agriculture and livestock farming and Public water supply. This data allowed an analysis of the seasonal patterns of drought impacts in several categories for four sub-regions in the Alpine Space: pre-Alpine vs. high-elevated region, Northern vs. Southern region. Assigning the impacts subtypes to drought type, soil-moisture drought (SMD impacts) and hydrological drought (HD impacts) allowed the derivation of smoothed seasonal “impact regimes”. The peak of HD impacts occurred later in the year than the SMD impact peak, most clearly in the high-elevation region, with the latest increase of HD impacts in May and strongest decrease between November-December. This pattern is less clear for the Southern region. SMD indices and HD indices that may be used for monitoring and early warning need to be targeted to and tested for capturing these delays.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document