scholarly journals Modeling Spatial Heterogeneity with Excess Zeroes from School Absenteeism dSata

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Song ◽  
Qi Zhao ◽  
Changming Zhou ◽  
Tao Tao ◽  
Lars Palm ◽  
...  

Absenteeism has great advantages in promoting the early detection of epidemics. The spatial patterns of the data generally are polytropy and heterogeneity. The public health experts pay more attention to whether an outbreak will happen or/and how large the epidemic will be of school absenteeism data in spatial patterns. We construct simultaneously two set of random effects (u1, u2) in RE-ZIP to quantify this two kind spatial heterogeneity for 62 schools.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanum Nurma Azuro ◽  
Moch Yunus ◽  
Rara Warih Gayatri

Based on the Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) 2018, the incidence of periodontitis in Indonesia was reported at 74.1%, which makes it one of the most common oral health problems in the country. Overall, 2,759 patients, aged 19–64 years underwent periodontal examinations at the Public Health Centres in Malang between January and September 2019. The present study aimed to determine the description of periodontitis patients at the Public Health Centres, Malang, by conducting an early detection of periodontitis against the risk of the disease. This study used a cross-sectional design and a proportional random sampling technique. In total, 277 respondents visited the Public Health Centres in Malang during the study period. The early detection result is based on the number of questionnaire scores on signs, symptoms, and exposures to risk factors for periodontitis, which are divided into three categories: high, moderate, and low risks. The instrument used in this study is a modification of the previous research instrument by Renatus. The result showed that 58 respondents had moderate (21%), 4 (1.4%) had high, and 215 (77.6%) had low risks of periodontitis. Respondents who had a lower risk of periodontitis were more than the respondents who had high and moderate risks of periodontitis. Keywords: periodontitis, history of gingivitis, heredity (family history), oral hygiene, history of tobacco use


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiana von Hippel

UNSTRUCTURED In the public health field, the design of interventions has long been considered to be the province of public health experts. In this paper, I explore an important complement to the traditional model: the design, prototyping, and implementation of innovative public health interventions by the public (users) themselves. These user interventions can then be incorporated by public health experts, who in turn design, support, and implement improvements and diffusion strategies as appropriate for the broader community. The context and support for this proposed new public health intervention development model builds upon user innovation theory, which has only recently begun to be applied to research and practice in medicine and provides a completely novel approach in the field of public health. User innovation is an assets-based model in which end users of a product, process, or service are the locus of innovation and often more likely than producers to develop the first prototypes of new approaches to problems facing them. This occurs because users often possess essential context-specific information about their needs paired with the motivation that comes from directly benefiting from any solutions they create. Product producers in a wide range of fields have, in turn, learned to profit from the strengths of these user innovators by supporting their grass-roots, leading-edge designs and field experiments in various ways. I explore the promise of integrating user-designed and prototyped health interventions into a new assets-based public health intervention development model. In this exploration, a wide range of lead user methods and positive deviance studies provide examples for identification of user innovation in populations, community platforms, and healthcare programs. I also propose action-oriented and assets-based next steps for user-centered public health research and practice to implement this new model. This approach will enable us to call upon the strengths of the communities we serve as we develop new methods and approaches to more efficiently and effectively intervene on the varied complex health problems they face.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-117
Author(s):  
Jodi Brookins-Fisher ◽  
Alexis Blavos ◽  
Heidi Hancher-Rauch ◽  
Amy Thompson

As the COVID-19 pandemic rages, there is no end in sight to the stress induced on the public health workforce. It is clear over the last 18+ months that the woeful underfunding of public health efforts across the US impacted the speed and agility with which public health experts have tackled the pandemic. This has led to the emotional decimation of public health workers who have plowed forward, even as they have worked long and stressful hours while also being politically and physically vilified. If this continues, what does the future of our public health workforce look like?


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyush Kumar

Op-Ed---- Public Health as I see it- India &LMICs1 The concepts of public health, one of the broad and vast scientific streams, is not getting required attention and support in India and other LMICs (low and middle income countries) like the western countries and HICs (high income countries) even in this covid-19 pandemic era. There are several reasons for this difference in public health encouragement between LMICs and HIC, the most significant factors are policies, lack of awareness and resources such as institutes, funds etc. Added to this the policy and decision makers seem to be ignorant about the significance of public health in reducing the burden of disease and health expenses at mass level. The field of public health will be more significant & useful if divided into Medical and Non-Medical branches as it incorporates scholars and experts of different fields and this division will increase significance, utility as well as efficiency of public health scholars. At present it is a mixture of scholars of different backgrounds and the title Master of Public Health seems quite inappropriate title for scholars’ of non-health field backgrounds called Master (of public health) with a simple 2 year course. Moreover the non-medical graduates will find difficulty in getting primary data related to health sciences and vice versa is also true for medical graduates and scholars. For example the non medical scholars doing research on Kala-azar don’t have enough knowledge of kala-azar to interpret the findings like spleen size, life cycle of vector, modes of transmission etc. and vice versa is also true for medical graduates. Since the preparedness and efficiency of these scholars depends on the education they receive and how effectively they use it, the training and work field should be designed as isolated fields to make the scholars’ real master instead of making jack of all trades Master of nothing. This is one of the reasons why the scholars of public health are not getting good jobs, enough attention and reputation. Added to this the credibility and reliability of public health experts can be endangered by practice of using secondary data in research largely derived from medical graduates. Hence it’s better if the public health experts department with proper division is established to reap the maximum benefits from scholars of different fields. Public health consists of experts from different fields and services which can be utilized in cases of emergency and critical support. Their abilities can be utilized while managing existing cases of non-communicable diseases like diabetes, hypertension, heart ailments, routine ante-natal care, accidents, as well as communicable disease like covid-19 if we have a clear role to be played by public health scholars. For example let the management public health expert do the management works while let medical public health experts find out the formula to deal with covid-19 as medical public health experts. Of course everyone will have importance and at the same time expertise in their respective field which can be utilized as team work to deal with various healths related issues. The significance of doctors, nurses, technicians and other hospital-based staff have been noticed and praised during this covid-19 era but still the public health experts are not getting enough attention, why? Taking example of covid-19, Public health experts may not be able to provide sophisticated complex treatments but their role in preventing, identification of cases, contact tracing, quarantine and isolation monitoring, referrals, logistic management etc. would prove helpful and significant to deal with the situation. Their ability would depend on their training about the infection and its identification, transmission, diagnostics and treatment support. India has a three-tier public health system for provision of primary (HSC, APHC, and PHC), secondary (provided by SDH, CHC, and DH specialist on referral from primary care provider) and tertiary (medical college hospitals etc. highly specialized medical care) care. All these centers must have public health experts well qualified and trained to reduce the burden of disease as well as OOPE (out of pocket expenditure) at mass level. India and other LMICs must focus now on preparing the qualified, skilled public health soldiers in order to reduce the burden of disease and health care expenses which are interfering with the nation's development.1. DR PIYUSH KUMAR, M.B.B.S., EMOC (FOGSI), PGDPHM,SENIOR MEDICAL OFFICER, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, [email protected] Mobile-+919955301119/7677833752,GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  

Independent external evaluators are wanted for projects submitted to the Public Health Programme in 2007. In February, the European Commission’s Public Health Executive Agency (PHEA) will publish the 2007 Work Plan and Call for Proposals under the Public Health Programme 2003-2008, and public health experts may now send their curriculum vitae to be considered as evaluators.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Newhagen ◽  
Erik P. Bucy

Health experts worry that a COVID-19 vaccine boycott could inhibit reaching “herd immunity,” and their concerns have only grown as the pandemic has spread. Concern has largely focused on anti-vaccine protestors, who captured headlines as they stood side by side with Tea Party activists and armed militia groups demonstrating against the quarantine in April and May of this year. But anti-vax extremists make up only about a third of respondents in surveys who said they would not vac-cinate. Health officials must also take into account a swelling group who may understand the im-portance of a vaccine but are hesitant and confused because they feel the vaccine’s development is being rushed and may not be safe or effective. The challenge for the public health community is complex; it has to fashion messages to a set of disparate groups, each employing a unique set of biases when processing information about the efficacy of getting a vaccination


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihui Feng ◽  
Liaquat Hossain ◽  
John W. Crawford ◽  
Terry Bossomaier

ABSTRACTObjectiveSocial media provides us with a new platform on which to explore how the public responds to disasters and, of particular importance, how they respond to the emergence of infectious diseases such as Ebola. Provided it is appropriately informed, social media offers a potentially powerful means of supporting both early detection and effective containment of communicable diseases, which is essential for improving disaster medicine and public health preparedness.MethodsThe 2014 West African Ebola outbreak is a particularly relevant contemporary case study on account of the large number of annual arrivals from Africa, including Chinese employees engaged in projects in Africa. Weibo (Weibo Corp, Beijing, China) is China’s most popular social media platform, with more than 2 billion users and over 300 million daily posts, and offers great opportunity to monitor early detection and promotion of public health awareness.ResultsWe present a proof-of-concept study of a subset of Weibo posts during the outbreak demonstrating potential and identifying priorities for improving the efficacy and accuracy of information dissemination. We quantify the evolution of the social network topology within Weibo relating to the efficacy of information sharing.ConclusionsWe show how relatively few nodes in the network can have a dominant influence over both the quality and quantity of the information shared. These findings make an important contribution to disaster medicine and public health preparedness from theoretical and methodological perspectives for dealing with epidemics. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:26–37)


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin S Olivari ◽  
Molly E French ◽  
Lisa C McGuire

Abstract As the proportion of older adults in the United States is projected to increase dramatically in the coming decades, it is imperative that public health address and maintain the cognitive health of this growing population. More than 5 million Americans live with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) today, and this number is projected to more than double by 2050. The public health community must be proactive in outlining the response to this growing crisis. Promoting cognitive decline risk reduction, early detection and diagnosis, and increasing the use and availability of timely data are critical components of this response. To prepare state, local, and tribal organizations, CDC and the Alzheimer’s Association have developed a series of Road Maps that chart the public health response to dementia. Since the initial Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI) Road Map release in 2007, the Road Map has undergone two new iterations, with the most recent version, The HBI’s State and Local Public Health Partnerships to Address Dementia: The 2018–2023 Road Map, released in late 2018. Over the past several years, significant advances were made in the science of risk reduction and early detection of ADRD. As a result, the public health response requires a life-course approach that focuses on reducing risk and identifying memory issues earlier to improve health outcomes. The most recent Road Map was revised to accommodate these strides in the science and to effect change at the policy, systems, and environment levels. The 2018–2023 Road Map identifies 25 actions that state and local public health agencies and their partners can implement to promote cognitive health and address cognitive impairment and the needs of caregivers. The actions are categorized into four traditional domains of public health, and the Road Map can help public health and its partners chart a course for a dementia-prepared future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-581
Author(s):  
Brie Sherwin

With COVID-19, we are facing the most serious public health threat of our lifetime. Now, more than ever, we need experts and sound scientific advice to guide critical decision-making during the pandemic. With conspiracy theories and other similar rhetorical weapons being used to discredit our scientific experts, we face a myriad of misinformation, mistruths, and all-out attacks on our experts, breeding distrust between the public and the policymakers leading the fight against the pandemic. As President Trump took office, scientists were routinely denigrated and isolated. Furthermore, science denialism has permeated its way up to the highest levels of government, resulting in disastrous public policy decisions that have been detrimental to environmental and public health. Funding was cut for much-needed research on zoonotic-borne diseases, the U.S. government pulled its support from the Paris Climate Agreement in 2017, and well-respected scientists were removed from various advisory roles in agencies. Until the COVID-19 pandemic, many of these decisions went unnoticed by the general public. But, in courtrooms over the past thirty years, judges have recognized the danger of fake experts and acted as gatekeepers to ensure that experts are credible and that science is reliable. The use of Daubert in the courtroom has provided judges with a tool for allowing expert testimony that has met certain indicia of reliability, so jurors can focus on making factual determinations instead of judging whether the sources of the expertise should be trusted. Without a similar gatekeeping function in society, citizens must make those determinations on their own. Scientists and advocates of science should employ their own rhetorical methods to restore the credibility and importance of science in protecting our environment and now our health. Change can only truly come from the ground up. Citizens must actually believe that the climate is changing; they must believe that the health advice they are receiving from public health experts is accurate and trustworthy enough to follow. It is time to put science first—we can only do that if we stop science denialism in its tracks and restore resources and trust in our scientific community.


BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m3917
Author(s):  
Stewart Forsyth

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document