scholarly journals Pembatalan Perkawinan dan Akibat Hukumnya: Studi Putusan Nomor 1384/Pdt.G/2013/PA Mks

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-161
Author(s):  
Husaima Husaima ◽  
Ma’ruf Hafidz ◽  
Hasbuddin Khalid

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen terhadap perusahaan leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Serta menganalisis faktor-faktor efektivitas yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum bagi perlindungan konsumen terhadap perusahaan leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Hasil yang diperoleh penulis dalam melakukan penelitian ini adalah Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap perusahaan Leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum terbagi menjadi dua yakni bentuk preventif dan represif. Penegakan hukum sengketa konsumen tidak lepas dari tiga faktor yaitu Substansi Hukum, Struktur Hukum dan Kultur Hukumnya yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan prosesnya. Adapun diantaranya ialah ketentuan yang kontradiktif dan rumusannya tidak jelas serta tegas, terlalu banyak peranan lemabaga yang terlibat dalam penegakan hukum UUPK,  tidak adanya pedoman operasioanl, dan pelaku usaha tidak melaksanakan putusan BPSK dengan sukarela. This study aims to determine and analyze the form of legal protection for consumers against companies leasing that commit acts against the law. As well as analyzing the factors that influence law enforcement for consumer protection agains tcompanies leasing that commit acts against the law. The results obtained by the author in conducting this research are consumer protection against companies leasing that commit acts against the law is divided into two, namely preventive and repressive forms. Law enforcement of consumer disputes cannot be separated from three factors, namely Legal Substance, Legal Structure and Legal Culture which affect the success of the process. Among them are contradictory provisions and the formulation is not clear and firm, there are too many roles of institutions involved in UUPK law enforcement, there are no operational guidelines, and business actors do not voluntarily implement BPSK decisions.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-144
Author(s):  
Sarifa Nabila ◽  
Said Sampara ◽  
Ilham Abbas

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen terhadap perusahaan leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Serta menganalisis faktor-faktor efektivitas yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum bagi perlindungan konsumen terhadap perusahaan leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Hasil yang diperoleh penulis dalam melakukan penelitian ini adalah Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap perusahaan Leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum terbagi menjadi dua yakni bentuk preventif dan represif. Penegakan hukum sengketa konsumen tidak lepas dari tiga faktor yaitu Substansi Hukum, Struktur Hukum dan Kultur Hukumnya yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan prosesnya. Adapun diantaranya ialah ketentuan yang kontradiktif dan rumusannya tidak jelas serta tegas, terlalu banyak peranan lemabaga yang terlibat dalam penegakan hukum UUPK,  tidak adanya pedoman operasioanl, dan pelaku usaha tidak melaksanakan putusan BPSK dengan sukarela. This study aims to determine and analyze the form of legal protection for consumers against companies leasing that commit acts against the law. As well as analyzing the factors that influence law enforcement for consumer protection agains tcompanies leasing that commit acts against the law. The results obtained by the author in conducting this research are consumer protection against companies leasing that commit acts against the law is divided into two, namely preventive and repressive forms. Law enforcement of consumer disputes cannot be separated from three factors, namely Legal Substance, Legal Structure and Legal Culture which affect the success of the process. Among them are contradictory provisions and the formulation is not clear and firm, there are too many roles of institutions involved in UUPK law enforcement, there are no operational guidelines, and business actors do not voluntarily implement BPSK decisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1908
Author(s):  
Yusi Permatasi ◽  
Yuwono Prianto

In Society, Paranormal practices is considered as common things. Paranormal Practices is used for any good and also for crime, so to cope with the activities, government had regulated the act to control the crime by using paranormal background. The paranormal practices have been included as criminal acts. It has regulated in article 545 and article 546 of the criminal law act and set on as supernatural powers activity. As time passes, there are constraint in the alleviation law it’s law enforcement. This research was done with empirical or law sociological point of view, where Lawrence M. Friedman state that the elements of the legal system consist of Legal Structure, Legal Substance, and Legal Culture. The result of this research is the paranormal practices are differentiate by it used which is good or bad. The bad paranormal practices cause loss for society. This gave rise to uncertainty of law enforcement on the paranormal practices, therefore it need a deep research which is not only from the law enforcement point of view, but also the religious and cultural represented by figure.


FENOMENA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abnan Pancasilawati ◽  
Muhamad Noor

The implementation of legislation either nationally or internationally linked to the implementation of restorative justice as one of the alterntif in the process of implementation of conviction against children in conflict with the law had been applied, but the case has not yet been thoroughly and still limited at the law enforcement officers and observers who are committed and integrity as well as having the attention to this problems. The implementation of restorative justice which is applied at each level of the process of criminal justice in the form of taking back the children to their parents, versioned by handing the children to Panti Sosial Marsudi Putra (PSMP), and the implementation of social integration through giving CB, CMB, and PB for children who are already serving imprisonment. Some obstacle factors the implementation of restorative justice as one of the alternatives in the implementation of conviction against children in conflict with the law, including physical building facilities and non-physical facilities and legal substance. It is because restorative justice has not been expressly regulated, even though in the law nomer 11, 2012 concerning about the Child Criminal System has been regulated but until now it has not been declared valid. The other factors are legal structure and legal culture.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (II) ◽  
pp. 181-204
Author(s):  
Amrunsyah

This paper is entitled "The Neglected Dream" (Implementation of the Purpose of Law and Criminal Law in Indonesia). Law and the purpose of law have interrelated and inseparable links. The law always plays an important role in a country even the law has a multifunction with the aim of the public good in order to achieve justice, legal certainty, order, expediency, and others. However, this is far from the fire. That is, the public is only given the wind of heaven and dreams that wash away while the state authorities use the law as a tool to suppress society, so that society can be positioned in accordance with the desires of the state authorities. The implementation of the law and the purpose of the law in force in Indonesia is clearly visible, so through a number of legal theories set forth in this paper will be a little stomping for anyone who understands it when compensating for the facts that occur in the midst of society. In fact, for people who want to get legal justice but in reality are entangled in the law. The government should be serious in responding to this because the people have given full mandate to manage this country, including in dealing with legal issues, both in terms of legal structure, legal substance and legal culture played by law enforcement.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Jawade Hafidz

“Nawacita” and Constitutional Law needs to be a legal approach to make improvements to the legal system, in order to encourage enforcement of the law with justice, then at least have to involve three pillars consisting of: (1) the substantive law (legal substance), which include legislative reform; (2) legal structure (law structure), including human resources law-enforcement officers (human resource), entered in it anyway coordination among law enforcement officers; and (3) the legal culture (legal culture), both culture and public law enforcement officers or citizens in general.Then, constitutional law and can be answered correctly, can be practiced within their Constitutional Act and may be unenforceable government in running the government. The key factor to keep in mind is eliminating ego-sectoral government agencies. Do not stop until the Act, a similar effort was also made to the laws which are in the executive area, such as government regulations, a presidential decree and ministerial regulation


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-270
Author(s):  
Luthvi Febryka Nola

Bankruptcy and suspension of obligation for debt repayment is one of dispute resolution mechanisms that can be chosen by parties with an aim of solving the problem in an economical and transparent manner. This mechanism is regulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 of Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Debt Repayment (Insolvency Law). However, the Law has faced many problems in its implementation mainly related to consumer protection. This paper will discuss consumer position related to bankruptcy and its implementation. The author finds that consumer position in bankruptcy is not only govern by Insolvency Law but also by the Civil Code, Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, and Law No. 40 of 2014 on Insurance. The guidelines on those regulations have several problems, namely the lack of clarity and provision as well as violations of the principles of legislation. As a result consumer has a very weak position. Consumer is often categorized as concurrent creditor who will receive compensation only after separatist and preferential creditor. In contrast, the positions of the curator, the administrator, the supervisory judge are too strong that it allows for irregularities such as mafia practices in bankruptcy cases that harm the consumer. With regard to legal culture, law enforcement has acknowledged the position of consumer as a creditor in bankruptcy, but conversely judge’s verdict has not favored the consumer. This makes people prefer to resolve the dispute through ways other than bankruptcy. Therefore, the Insolvency Law needs to regulate the consumer position clearly; while regulation on its supervision also needs to be strengthened; and heavy sanctions should also be ordered against any misconduct by law enforcement authorities. Concurrently other laws need to adjust their rules with Insolvency Law for effective implementation. AbstrakKepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang merupakan salah satu mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat dipilih oleh para pihak dengan tujuan menyelesaikan masalah secara singkat murah dan transparan. Mekanisme kepailitan diatur dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (UU Kepailitan). Namun dalam praktiknya UU Kepailitan memiliki banyak permasalahan terutama berkaitan dengan perlindungan konsumen. Tulisan ini akan membahas pengaturan kedudukan konsumen terkait kepailitan dan implementasinya. Penulis menemukan bahwa yang mengatur kedudukan konsumen dalam kepailitan tidak hanya UU Kepailitan akan tetapi juga KUHPerdata, UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, dan UU No. 40 Tahun 2014 tentang Perasuransian. Pengaturan tersebut memiliki beberapa permasalah yaitu adanya ketidakjelasan dan ketidaksingkronan pengaturan serta pelanggaran asas peraturan perundang-undangan. Akibatnya dalam pelaksanaanya kedudukan konsumen menjadi sangat lemah. Konsumen kerap dikategorikan sebagai kreditor konkuren yang akan menerima ganti kerugian setelah kreditor separatis dan preferen. Sebaliknya, kedudukan kurator, pengurus, hakim pengawas sangat kuat sehingga memungkinkan terjadi penyimpangan seperti praktik mafia kepailitan yang merugikan konsumen. Berkaitan dengan budaya hukum, penegak hukum telah mengakui kedudukan konsumen sebagai kreditor dalam kepailitan hanya saja putusan hakim belum berpihak terhadap konsumen. Hal ini membuat masyarakat lebih memilih menyelesaikan sengketa melalui cara di luar kepailitan. Oleh sebab itu UU Kepailitan perlu mengatur kedudukan konsumen secara jelas; aturan tentang pengawasan juga perlu diperketat; dan sanksi yang tegas terhadap penegak hukum yang melanggar juga perlu diatur. Sedangkan UU lain perlu menyesuaikan aturan dengan UU Kepailitan supaya dapat dilaksanakan.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Lutfil Ansori

This articel aim for examine reformation and optimalisation of law enforcement at law enforcerment institution in terms of progresive law perspective. the law face in Indonesia today  is faced a complex problem on law enforcement process. Yet, Reformation on law enforcement is the answer to how the law in Indonesia is actuated within frame work of estabilishment an aspired state of law. Law enforcement reformation ideally must be done through legal system approach, that covered legal substance sub system, legal structure sub system, and legal culture subsystem.  in the context of  law enforcement institution reformation, institution reformation ideally based on three main orientation, which is democration principal, rule of law, and human rights. That institution reformation must be done with changing paradigm from the way of textual legal thinking to progresive legal thinking. It can be formed if reformation of law enforcement institution, consistent in bringing about changing cultural aspect that comes from changing structural aspect and instrumental aspect.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masdar Masdar

Cash waqf in Indonesia has been long enough implemented based on some rules enacted by government and other rules defined by The Waqf Board of Indonesia (BWI). However, the implementation of cash waqf has not reached the level of success. Therefore, this article studies the application of cash waqf law in Indonesia according to Friedman’s legal system theory. The legal system theory of Friedman firstly looks at the substance of the law, which is the rules or regulations; and secondly it examines the structure of the law, encompassing the law enforcement agencies, such as judge, prosecutor, police and legal counselors. And lastly the theory examines the element of legal culture, which is a response from Muslim society. The first two examinations indicate that there is nothing to be a problem. But from the last examination there is a problem regarding the trust from Muslim society. From the legal culture point of view, the implementation of cash waqf by the government, which is performed by BWI, needs attracting society’s credentials in order to improve and maximize the performance of cash waqf in Indonesia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-81
Author(s):  
La Ode Muhammad Jefri Hamzah ◽  
Abdul Agis ◽  
Hamza Baharuddin

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk: (1) Menganalisis efektivitas pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku usaha yang memproduksi dan memperdagangkan kosmetik ilegal berbahaya ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen; dan (2) Menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi efektivitas pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku usaha yang memproduksi dan memperdagangkan kosmetik ilegal berbahaya ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan yuridis-empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: Penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku usaha yang memproduksi dan memperdagangkan kosmetik ilegal yang berbahaya di Wilayah Polres Pelabuhan Makassar terlaksana kurang efektif. Meskipun demikian, proses penegakan hukum yang dilakukan tersebut sudah mengacu pada ketentuan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, seperti tersangka Sdr. ARFANDY alias ARFANDY BIN MUSTAFA yang terbukti melakukan tindak pidana mengedarkan sediaan farmasi/ kosmetika yang tidak memiliki izin edar, sehingga tersangka dijerat dengan Pasal 197 Jo pasal 106 ayat (1) UU R.I. No. 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan, dan juga dijerat dengan Pasal 62 Ayat (1) Jo Pasal 8 ayat (1) UU R.I No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Faktor substansi hukum, struktur hukum, budaha hukum, sarana dan prasarana, dan pengetahuan hukum kurang berpengaruh terhadap penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku usaha kosmetik illegal yang berbahaya di Polres Pelabuhan Makassar. The purpose of this study is to: (1) Analyze the effectiveness of criminal liability against business actors who produce and trade dangerous illegal cosmetics in terms of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection; and (2) Analyzing the factors that influence the effectiveness of criminal liability against business actors producing and trading dangerous illegal cosmetics in terms of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This research is a descriptive study with a juridical-empirical approach. The results of the study show that: Law enforcement against businesses that produce and trade dangerous cosmetics that are dangerous in the Makassar Port Police Area is ineffective. Nevertheless, the law enforcement process carried out has referred to the applicable laws and regulations, such as the suspect Br. ARFANDY alias ARFANDY BIN MUSTAFA who was proven to have committed a crime of distributing pharmaceutical / cosmetic preparations that did not have a marketing authorization, so that the suspect was charged with Article 197 Jo article 106 paragraph (1) of Law R.I. No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, and also snared with Article 62 Paragraph (1) Jo Article 8 Paragraph (1) of Law R.I No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The factors of legal substance, legal structure, legal status, facilities and infrastructure, and legal knowledge have less influence on law enforcement against dangerous cosmetics business operators in Makassar Port Police


Author(s):  
Riska Fauziah Hayati ◽  
Busyro Busyro ◽  
Bustamar Bustamar

<p dir="ltr"><span>The main problem in this paper is how the effectiveness of mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution based on PERMA No. 1 of 2016 at the Bukittinggi Religious Court, and what are the inhibiting factors success of mediation. To answer this question, the author uses an inductive and deductive analysis framework regarding the law effectiveness theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. This paper finds that mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution at the Bukittinggi Religious Court from 2016 to 2019 has not been effective. The ineffectiveness is caused by several factors that influence it: First, in terms of legal substance, PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts still lacks in addressing the problems of the growing community. Second, in terms of legal structure, there are no judges who have mediator certificates. Third, the legal facilities and infrastructure at the Bukittinggi Religious Court have supported mediation. Fourth, in terms of legal culture, there are still many people who are not aware of the law and do not understand mediation well, so they consider mediation to be unimportant.</span> </p><p><em>Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang bagaimana efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah berdasarkan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dan apa saja yang menjadi faktor penghambat keberhasilan mediasi. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penulis menggunakan kerangka analisa induktif dan deduktif dengan mengacu pada teori efektivitas hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. </em><em>Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa m</em><em>ediasi dalam p</em><em>enyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi </em><em>dari tahun 2016 sampai 2019 </em><em>belum efektif</em><em>. Hal ini karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. </em><em> </em><em>Pertama, dari segi substansi hukum, yaitu PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan masih memiliki kekurangan dalam menjawab persoalan masyarakat yang terus berkembang. Kedua, dari segi struktur hukum, belum adanya hakim yang memiliki sertifikat mediator. Ketiga, sarana dan prasarana hukum di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi sudah mendukung mediasi. Keempat, dari segi budaya hukum, masih banyaknya masyarakat yang tidak sadar hukum dan tidak mengerti persoalan mediasi dengan baik, sehingga menganggap mediasi tidak penting.</em><em></em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document