Mediation Effectiveness in Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement: Phenomenology in Bukittinggi Religious Court

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Riska Fauziah Hayati ◽  
Busyro Busyro ◽  
Bustamar Bustamar
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Analysis Framework ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
The Law ◽  
Mediation Effectiveness

<p dir="ltr"><span>The main problem in this paper is how the effectiveness of mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution based on PERMA No. 1 of 2016 at the Bukittinggi Religious Court, and what are the inhibiting factors success of mediation. To answer this question, the author uses an inductive and deductive analysis framework regarding the law effectiveness theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. This paper finds that mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution at the Bukittinggi Religious Court from 2016 to 2019 has not been effective. The ineffectiveness is caused by several factors that influence it: First, in terms of legal substance, PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts still lacks in addressing the problems of the growing community. Second, in terms of legal structure, there are no judges who have mediator certificates. Third, the legal facilities and infrastructure at the Bukittinggi Religious Court have supported mediation. Fourth, in terms of legal culture, there are still many people who are not aware of the law and do not understand mediation well, so they consider mediation to be unimportant.</span> </p><p><em>Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang bagaimana efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah berdasarkan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dan apa saja yang menjadi faktor penghambat keberhasilan mediasi. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penulis menggunakan kerangka analisa induktif dan deduktif dengan mengacu pada teori efektivitas hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. </em><em>Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa m</em><em>ediasi dalam p</em><em>enyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi </em><em>dari tahun 2016 sampai 2019 </em><em>belum efektif</em><em>. Hal ini karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. </em><em> </em><em>Pertama, dari segi substansi hukum, yaitu PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan masih memiliki kekurangan dalam menjawab persoalan masyarakat yang terus berkembang. Kedua, dari segi struktur hukum, belum adanya hakim yang memiliki sertifikat mediator. Ketiga, sarana dan prasarana hukum di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi sudah mendukung mediasi. Keempat, dari segi budaya hukum, masih banyaknya masyarakat yang tidak sadar hukum dan tidak mengerti persoalan mediasi dengan baik, sehingga menganggap mediasi tidak penting.</em><em></em></p>

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM MENANGANI SENGKETA ANTARA PT. SINAR MENARA DELI DENGAN SARI ALAMSYAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.

scholarly journals The Paradoxical Success of UNCLOS Part XV: A Half-hearted Reply to Rosemary Rayfuse

2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Serdy
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
The Future ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Law

In his reply to Rosemary Rayfuse's article, "The Future of Compulsory Dispute Settlement under the Law of the Sea Convention", Andrew Serdy addresses some of the criticisms that have been levelled at the Part XV dispute resolution provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). He concludes that despite being little used, the Part XV provisions remain pivotal to UNCLOS and its related treaties, and if anything are becoming more so

scholarly journals Pembatalan Perkawinan dan Akibat Hukumnya: Studi Putusan Nomor 1384/Pdt.G/2013/PA Mks

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-161
Author(s):  
Husaima Husaima ◽  
Ma’ruf Hafidz ◽  
Hasbuddin Khalid
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen terhadap perusahaan leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Serta menganalisis faktor-faktor efektivitas yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum bagi perlindungan konsumen terhadap perusahaan leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Hasil yang diperoleh penulis dalam melakukan penelitian ini adalah Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap perusahaan Leasing yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum terbagi menjadi dua yakni bentuk preventif dan represif. Penegakan hukum sengketa konsumen tidak lepas dari tiga faktor yaitu Substansi Hukum, Struktur Hukum dan Kultur Hukumnya yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan prosesnya. Adapun diantaranya ialah ketentuan yang kontradiktif dan rumusannya tidak jelas serta tegas, terlalu banyak peranan lemabaga yang terlibat dalam penegakan hukum UUPK,  tidak adanya pedoman operasioanl, dan pelaku usaha tidak melaksanakan putusan BPSK dengan sukarela. This study aims to determine and analyze the form of legal protection for consumers against companies leasing that commit acts against the law. As well as analyzing the factors that influence law enforcement for consumer protection agains tcompanies leasing that commit acts against the law. The results obtained by the author in conducting this research are consumer protection against companies leasing that commit acts against the law is divided into two, namely preventive and repressive forms. Law enforcement of consumer disputes cannot be separated from three factors, namely Legal Substance, Legal Structure and Legal Culture which affect the success of the process. Among them are contradictory provisions and the formulation is not clear and firm, there are too many roles of institutions involved in UUPK law enforcement, there are no operational guidelines, and business actors do not voluntarily implement BPSK decisions.

scholarly journals KENDALA DALAM PELAKSANAAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PRAKTIK PARANORMAL SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1908
Author(s):  
Yusi Permatasi ◽  
Yuwono Prianto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law

In Society, Paranormal practices is considered as common things. Paranormal Practices is used for any good and also for crime, so to cope with the activities, government had regulated the act to control the crime by using paranormal background. The paranormal practices have been included as criminal acts. It has regulated in article 545 and article 546 of the criminal law act and set on as supernatural powers activity. As time passes, there are constraint in the alleviation law it’s law enforcement. This research was done with empirical or law sociological point of view, where Lawrence M. Friedman state that the elements of the legal system consist of Legal Structure, Legal Substance, and Legal Culture. The result of this research is the paranormal practices are differentiate by it used which is good or bad. The bad paranormal practices cause loss for society. This gave rise to uncertainty of law enforcement on the paranormal practices, therefore it need a deep research which is not only from the law enforcement point of view, but also the religious and cultural represented by figure.

scholarly journals AKTUALISASI PANCASILA SEBAGAI LANDASAN POLITIK HUKUM INDONESIA

2015 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derita Prapti Rahayu ,
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
The Other ◽  
National Integration ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Legislation

<h4>Abstract</h4> <p><strong><em> </em></strong></p> <p><em>Pancasila is a major cornerstone in the making of law (law and Legislation) with a new or replacement of laws (political law), so that the values of the Deity, Humanity and Society (nationalistic; democratic; social justice) must be actualized into the substance of the law, the legal structure and legal culture to be built, is expected to strengthen national integration, democratization of law, achieve prosperity and social justice by putting Pancasila, ranging from values, goals until the actualization of the various fields of existing law, whether criminal, civil, administrative and the other, as well as the internalization of the structures of law and legal culture of Pancasila.</em><em> </em></p> <p><strong>Keyword</strong><em>s : Actualization, Pancasila, Politics of Law</em><em> </em></p> <p><em> </em></p> <h3>Abstrak</h3> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p>Pancasila merupakan landasan utama dalam pembuatan hukum (Peraturan Perundang-Undangang) baru maupun dengan penggantian hukum lama (politik hukum), sehingga nilai-nilai Ketuhanan, Kemanusiaan dan Kemasyarakatan (nasionalistik; demokratik; berkeadilan sosial) harus teraktualisasi kedalam substansi hukum, struktur hukum maupun kultur hukum yang akan dibangun, diharapkan dapat menguatkan integrasi bangsa, demokratisasi hukum, tercapainya kesejahteraan dan keadilan sosial dengan menempatkan Pancasila, mulai dari nilai, tujuan sampai dengan aktualisasi kepada berbagai bidang hukum yang ada, baik hukum pidana, perdata, tata usaha negara dan lain-lain, serta internalisasi pada struktur hukum dan budaya hukum Pancasila.</p> <p><strong>Kata Kunci : </strong>aktualisasi, Pancasila, Politik Hukum</p>

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CABOTAGE PRINCIPLE ON GOOD GOVERNANCE AS THE WORLD MARITIME AXIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Sudirman Sudirman
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Social Engineering ◽  
Research Problem ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Is Implementation ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The World ◽  
World Maritime

<p>The research problem of this study is implementation of the Cabotage Principle in Indonesia in accordance with Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping has implications for Indonesia's positive law. The implementation of the Cabotage Principle is an integral part of the Archipelago Insight and is the basis for realizing Good Governance as the World Maritime Axis and will have positive implications if the Cabotage Principle is based on the Good Governance principles as the World Maritime Axis. The ideal implementation of the Cabotage Principle for the interests of Indonesia as the World Maritime Axis is determined by the synergy of three element of the legal system, namely the legal structure (structure of law), legal substance (substance of the law) and legal culture (legal culture). So that the Cabotage Principle as a Grundnorm can function properly, namely as social control, dispute settlement, and a tool of social engineering</p>

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Klausul Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Akad Perbankan Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri KCP Indramayu

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Mahpudin Mahpudin ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism

ABSTRAKPutusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Tanggal 29 Agustus 2013 telah membatalkan Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah adalah soal kepastian hukum. Hal ini dikarenakan dalam Penjelasan pasal 55 ayat (2) menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum antara pilihan hukum dalam lingkup peradilan umum dengan pilihan hukum dalam lingkup peradilan agama. Kepastian hukum secara normatif adalah ketika suatu peraturan dibuat dan diundangkan secara pasti karena dapat memberikan pengaturan secara jelas dan logis. Jelas dalam arti tidak menimbulkan keragu-raguan atau multi tafsir, dan logis dalam arti hukum tersebut menjadi suatu sistem norma dengan norma lain sehingga tidak berbenturan atau menimbulkan konflik norma ataupun adanya kekaburan dan kekosongan norma. Asas ini dapat dipergunakan untuk dapat mengatasi persoalan dalam hal konsep mekanisme dan pilihan hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah;Pilihan forum penyelesaian sengketa Perbankan Syariah berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Tanggal 29 Agustus 2013 yang membatalkan Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah harus dinyatakan secara tegas menyatakan dan menyepakati apakah memilih forum Arbitrase Syariah atau menentukan pilihan forum Pengadilan Agama dalam rumusan klausula Penyelesaian Perselisihan atau Sengketa dalam Akad Perbankan Syariahnya. Artinya memilih atau menentukan salah satu forum mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa syariah yaitu forum BASYARNAS atau Pengadilan Agama, bukan menggabungkan keduanya dalam satu rangkaian rumusan klausula penyelesaian sengketa.Kata kunci : klausul penyelesaian sengketa, akad perbankan syariah, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi ABSTRACTDecision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 dated August 29, 2013 has annulled the Elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 Year 2008 concerning Sharia Banking is a matter of legal certainty. This is because in the Elucidation of article 55 paragraph (2) raises legal uncertainty between the choice of law within the scope of general justice with the choice of law within the scope of religious court. Normative legal certainty is when a rule is created and enacted as it can provide clear and logical arrangements. Clearly in the sense that there is no doubt or multi-interpretation, and logical in the sense that the law becomes a system of norms with other norms so as not to clash or cause conflict of norms or the existence of vagueness and void norms. This principle can be used to solve the problem in terms of the concept of mechanism and choice of law in solving the dispute of sharia banking;The choice of dispute resolution forum of Sharia Banking pursuant to Decision of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 dated August 29, 2013 which annul the Elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law of Republic of Indonesia Number 21 Year 2008 concerning Sharia Banking must be stated expressly declare and agree on whether to vote for a Shari'ah Arbitration Forum or to determine the choice of Religious Court forums in the formulation of a Clause or Dispute Settlement clause in its Sharia Banking Agreement. It means choosing or determining one of the forums of dispute resolution mechanism of sharia namely BASYARNAS or Religious Court, not merging the two in a series of dispute settlement clause formulas.Keywords: clause of dispute settlement, syariah banking contract, Constitutional Court decision

scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi dalam Meminimalisir Kejahatan Anak Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

FENOMENA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abnan Pancasilawati ◽  
Muhamad Noor
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Integration ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law

The implementation of legislation either nationally or internationally linked to the implementation of restorative justice as one of the alterntif in the process of implementation of conviction against children in conflict with the law had been applied, but the case has not yet been thoroughly and still limited at the law enforcement officers and observers who are committed and integrity as well as having the attention to this problems. The implementation of restorative justice which is applied at each level of the process of criminal justice in the form of taking back the children to their parents, versioned by handing the children to Panti Sosial Marsudi Putra (PSMP), and the implementation of social integration through giving CB, CMB, and PB for children who are already serving imprisonment. Some obstacle factors the implementation of restorative justice as one of the alternatives in the implementation of conviction against children in conflict with the law, including physical building facilities and non-physical facilities and legal substance. It is because restorative justice has not been expressly regulated, even though in the law nomer 11, 2012 concerning about the Child Criminal System has been regulated but until now it has not been declared valid. The other factors are legal structure and legal culture.

scholarly journals The Dispute Settlement Model of Regional Head Election Perspective Theory of Legal System in Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dedi Mulyadi ◽  
Tanti Kirana Utami
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Law System ◽  
Perspective Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Electoral Law

The effectiveness of law enforcement depends on three law aspects; those are the structure of law, the substance of the law, and legal culture. Law structure is about the law enforcers, law substance is about the legislative means, and law culture is about a living law adopted by society. This study defines the background of simultaneous regional head elections in Indonesia, the problems of the simultaneous regional head elections in Indonesia, and the implementation of legal system theory to solve the simultaneous regional head election problems in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with the specification of descriptive analysis research. The result of the research is needed permanent law structures that cover (Election Police, Election Prosecutor, Election lawyer, and Election Jury), the law substance through the issuing of general regulations (lex general) which can integrate the Laws of Legislative, Presidential, and Regional Head Elections (lex specialist) and the legal culture of society as human behavior (including the legal culture of law enforcement officers) on the electoral law and law system that are in force at the moment.

scholarly journals Consumer Legal Protection Reviewed from Consumer Protection Law in Consumer Dispute Settlement through Litigation

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-166
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jarnawansyah ◽  
Reza Muhammad Rizqi
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Other ◽  
Business People ◽  
Business Goals ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Law

There is a law called Law Number 8 of 1999 that deals with consumer protection. It says that disputes between consumers and business people can be settled through both litigation and non-litigation channels and that both types of channels can be used to do this. Using the courts to settle consumer disputes is a way to do this. This type of dispute resolution refers to the rules for general courts. So that consumers need to get help from the law to get their rights as consumers. Consumer protection is becoming more and more important as science and technology move faster and faster. This is because the speed of science and technology is what drives the productivity and efficiency of producers for the goods or services they make in order to reach their business goals. As a result of this, either directly or indirectly, the Consumers are the ones who feel the effects of these two things the most. In this case, the consumer protection law says that businesses must give legal protection to their customers, so this shows that businesses must do this. And legal remedies for resolving disputes between customers and business people in the event of a dispute can be used both in court and out of court. In order for a dispute to be resolved through litigation, one party has filed a lawsuit against the other party. However, non-litigation dispute resolution can be done in a number of ways, such as through negotiation, consolidation, mediation, arbitration, and so on. Keywords: Legal Protection, Consumers, Consumer Disputes, Litigation, Laws.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document