Objective: This study aims to determine the effect of preservation /division of ilioinguinal nerve in patients undergoing lichenstein hernioraphy on severity of chronic post operative pain as well well as presence /absence of groin numbness. Method: A randamised control trial was conducted for a period of six months on 60 patient fulfilling inclusion criteria who underwent lichenstein hernioraphy at general surgery department of Liaquat National university hospital Karachi , Pakistan. Result: A total of 60 patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia mesh repair were Included in study and divided in two groups with 30 patients each. Only male patients were included in the study as female gender was one of the exclusion criteria so gender stratification was no considered. Patients between 17 to 77 yrs of age were included in study and randomly divided in two groups. Mean age of population in group A is 42.96 +/- 17.76 an in group B is 54.23 +/- 15.0. The minimum age of the patient in Group A is 17 years and maximum age is 73 years whereas minimum age of the patient in Group B is 20 years and maximum age is 77 years. 45.9% Patients in group A (Nerve preservation group) have right inguinal hernia. 54.0%% Patients in group B (Nerve Division group) have right inguinal hernia. 56.5%% Patients in group A (Nerve Preservation group) have left inguinal hernia. 43.4% Patients in group B (Nerve Division group) have left inguinal hernia. Chronic groin pain while different physical activities and groin numbness in nerve preservation and nerve division group was assessed at three and six months follow ups in all patients of the study population. 3% of the patients from nerve preservation group had mild pain during climbing stairs at three and six months follow up and the P-Value was 0.313 which is statistically not significant. 10% of the patients from nerve division group and 50% patients from nerve preservation group had pain during brisk walking at three months follow up and the P-Value was 0.001 which is statistically significant. 23% of the patients from nerve division group and 60% patients from nerve preservation group had pain during brisk walking at six months follow up and the P-Value was 0.004 which is statistically significant. 13.3% patients from nerve preservation group had moderate pain during brisk walking at three months follow up while none of the patient from nerve division group had pain and P-Value was 0.038 which is statistically significant. 6.6% of the patients from nerve preservation group had moderate pain during brisk walking at six months follow up while none of the patient from nerve division group had pain and p-value was 0.150 which is statistically in significant. 20% of the patients from nerve division group and 30% of the patients from nerve preservation group had mild groin numbness at three months follow up with P-Value of 0.371 which is statistically in significant. 33.3% of the patients from nerve division group and 30% of the patients from nerve preservation group had groin numbness at six months follow up with a p-value of 0.781 which is statistically in significant. Conclusion: Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy during Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair decreases the incidence of exertional chronic post operative pain as compare to the nerve preservation group. However the cutaneous neurosensory disturbance/groin numbness between the two groups has no difference in term of outcome. In order to prepare ourselves from a expected third wave of Covid-19, we should not repeat mistakes that we made during previos waves. We should refrain ourselves from dismantling our enhanced healthcare facilities, there should not be any sorts of shortage of oxygen , hospital beds, and drug that we have already witnessed. We must have an aggressive containment measure comprising of a really strong and pro-active surveillance system. This can be achieved by increasing the capacity of the existing surveillance system by identifying active cases early. We must ensure that we should follow “social vaccine” of proper masking, avoid indoor gatherings, and proper sanitization. Our vaccination programme needs a boost. We should vaccinate a large section of people before any third wave hits us. The more we vaccinate, the better prepared we are. As medical professionals, it must be ensured that proper scientific protocol must be implemented while handling Covid-19 cases. And last but not the least efforts must be made to fill up vacancies seen in our public health system, especially for frontline healthcare workers. As it is anticipated that the young children are more vulnerable to the forthcoming third wave, efforts are to be sought in order to start vaccination of the younger children in our country. Trials for which has already been started in India and across the world. Till the time vaccine is made available, the resources are to be mobilized to build up healthcare facilities catering the vulnerable age group in this third wave such as building up of more paediatric wards, paediatric ICU’s , training of healthcare personals in handling the emergencies for expected third wave .In addition to these efforts , more and more paediatric covid care centers must be set up at various parts of the country. Equally important is making arrangements for rehabilitation centers for the orphans. Countries like US, Singapore and UAE have already started vaccinating the children in age group between 12 to 15 years with Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine. It’s a high time that the government in India must consider for allowing “expedited approval pathway” to the companies like Pfizer for their Covid-19 vaccine for children. All these combined efforts from everyone may ensure that the country and world may remain well equipped against these subsequent waves of this deadly virus and pave the path of the triumph in the near future.
Effect of acupuncture TENS versus conventional TENS on post cesarean section incision pain
