Challenges of the Relative Value Unit Experience in Iran: A Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1249-1255
Author(s):  
S. Forootan ◽  
S. Hajebrahimi ◽  
B. Najafi ◽  
A. Janati
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Group Discussions ◽  
Provider Behavior ◽  
Income Disparities ◽  
Relative Value ◽  
Data Content

Background: The Relative Value Unit (RVU) is a value scale and plays a key role in the physician reimbursement system. The health sector has faced challenges such as providers’ dissatisfaction, income disparities, and reduced service quality which is said to be due to improper RVUs. Always there are debates about it. This study aims to identify the challenges of the RVU experience in Iran from the perspective of the service providers, payers and, policymakers. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in 2020. Data were collected from November 2019 to February 2020. Thirty experts participated in the study and were categorized into four groups: insurance organizations’ managers, surgeons, health economists, and health policymakers. Focus Group Discussions and semi-structured interviews were held to collect data. Content analysis was conducted to analyze data. Results: According to the expert, the challenges of RVU in Iran are classified into five scopes. Financial, payment, macro-organization, regulation, and persuasion scope. Each scope’s result was categorized into main themes and relevant sub-themes. Conclusions: The RVU has an important impact on the health system, provider behavior, and even patients. Paying attention to required infrastructures, decision- makers’ conflict of interests, decrease the Ministry of Health and Medical Education’s authority, and expanding the active role of involved organizations to increase their commitment to the successful implantation of RVU is necessary. Keywords: Relative Value Unit, Challenge, Expert opinion, Qualitative study, Iran.

What makes an optimal delivery for PrEP against HIV: A qualitative study in MSM

2022 ◽  
pp. 095646242110608
Author(s):  
Janice Y. C. Lau ◽  
Ngai-Sze Wong ◽  
Krystal C. K. Lee ◽  
Tsz-Ho Kwan ◽  
Grace C. Y. Lui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Service Model ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Ethnic Chinese ◽  
Sex With Men

Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective means of HIV prevention for men who have sex with men (MSM), a key population whose engagement is crucial for achieving effective public health outcomes. An optimal service model would be important in planning the implementation of PrEP in places where such service has not been established. Methods A qualitative study was conducted to delineate the attributes of an optimal PrEP service model for MSM in Hong Kong, a city where no formal PrEP programs existed. Twenty purposively sampled MSM who were enrollees of two pilot PrEP projects participated in the semi-structured interviews promoting story-telling. The coded data were thematically analyzed following Grounded Theory approach, focusing on uncovering a typology of the essential attributes of an optimal PrEP service model, and the reasons for such preferences. Results Participating MSM were all ethnic Chinese and aged 26 to 52 years. All had received PrEP from pilot projects in conjunction with periodic screening of sexually transmitted infections (STI), HIV antibody, and plasma creatinine. Four major themes emerged as regards the attributes of a preferred PrEP service: (i) comprehensiveness of HIV/STI and safety monitoring; (ii) convenient unitary service; (iii) stigma-free PrEP access and protecting confidentiality; and (iv) affordable price. Whereas regular provision of PrEP was acceptable to MSM, unaffordability and related stigma were the anticipated challenges for potential service providers. Conclusions The qualitative assessment of MSM’s preference for PrEP service delivery has yielded important information on the many facets of a desirable service model.

scholarly journals Challenges to effective governance in a low income healthcare system: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions in Malawi

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C Masefield ◽  
Alan Msosa ◽  
Jean Grugel
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Health System ◽  
National Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Health Coverage

Abstract BackgroundAll countries face challenging decisions about healthcare coverage. Malawi has committed to achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) by 2030, the timeframe set out by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As in other low income countries, scarce resources stand in the way of more equitable health access and quality in Malawi. Its health sector is highly dependent on donor contributions, and recent poor governance of government-funded healthcare saw donors withdraw funding, limiting services and resources. The 2017 National Health Plan II and accompanying Health Strategic Plan II identify the importance of improved governance and strategies to achieve more effective cooperation with stakeholders. This study explores health sector stakeholders’ perceptions of the challenges to improving governance in Malawi’s national health system within the post-2017 context of government attempts to articulate a way forward.MethodsA qualitative study design was used. Interviews were conducted with 22 representatives of major international and faith-based non-government organisations, civil society organisations, local government and government-funded organisations, and governance bodies operating in Malawi. Open questions were asked about experiences and perceptions of the functioning of the health system and healthcare decision-making. Content relating to healthcare governance was identified in the transcripts and field notes and analysed using inductive content analysis.ResultsStakeholders view governance challenges as a significant barrier to achieving a more effective and equitable health system. Three categories were identified: accountability (enforceability; answerability; stakeholder-led initiatives); health resource management (healthcare financing; drug supply); influence in decision-making (unequal power; stakeholder engagement).ConclusionsHealth sector stakeholders see serious political, structural, and financial challenges to improving governance in the national health system in Malawi which will impact the government’s goal of achieving UHC by 2030. Stakeholders identify the need for improved oversight, implementation, service delivery and social accountability of government-funded service providers to communities. Eighteen months after the introduction of the policy documents, they see little evidence of improved governance and have little or no confidence in the government’s ability to deliver UHC. The difficulties stakeholders perceive in relation to building equitable and effective healthcare governance in Malawi have relevance for other resource-limited countries which have also committed to the goal of UHC.

scholarly journals Healthcare inequities and barriers to access for homeless individuals: a qualitative study in Barcelona (Spain)

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Cernadas ◽  
Ángela Fernández
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Universal Access ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Medical Professional ◽  
Homeless Population ◽  
Public Health Services ◽  
Structured Interviews

Abstract Background In Spain, homeless individuals have lower perceived quality of health than the rest of the population and their life expectancy is 30 years lower than the national average. While the Spanish health system provides universal access and coverage, homeless individuals do not access or use public care enough to maintain their health. The objective of this study is to determine if homeless individuals can access public health services in conditions of equality with the rest of the population, as established in healthcare legislation, and to better understand the causes of observed inequalities or inequities of access. Methods A detailed qualitative study was carried out in the city of Barcelona (Spain) from October 2019 to February 2020. A total of nine open and in-depth interviews were done with homeless individuals along with seven semi-structured interviews with key informants and two focus groups. One group was composed of eight individuals who were living on the street at the time and the other consisted of eight individuals working in healthcare and social assistance. Results The participants indicated that homeless individuals tend to only access healthcare services when they are seriously ill or have suffered some kind of injury. Once there, they tend to encounter significant barriers that might be 1) administrative; 2) personal, based on belief that that will be poorly attended, discriminated against, or unable to afford treatment; or 3) medical-professional, when health professionals, who understand the lifestyle of this population and their low follow-through with treatments, tend towards minimalist interventions that lack the dedication they would apply to other groups of patients. Conclusions The conclusions derived from this study convey the infrequent use of health services by homeless individuals for reasons attributable to the population itself, to healthcare workers and to the entire healthcare system. Accordingly, to reduce inequities of access to these services, recommendations to healthcare service providers include adapting facilities to provide more adequate care for this population; increasing sensitivity/awareness among healthcare workers; developing in situ care systems in places where the homeless population is most concentrated; and establishing healthcare collaboration agreements with entities that work with this population.

scholarly journals Engagement of Fathers in Parent Group Interventions for Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome: A Qualitative Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (20) ◽  
pp. 3862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey Smythe ◽  
Antony Duttine ◽  
Ana Carolina Dias Vieira ◽  
Barbara da Silveira Madeira de Castro ◽  
Hannah Kuper
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Group Discussions ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Potential Barriers ◽  
Congenital Zika Syndrome ◽  
Program Data

We aimed to explore the engagement of fathers in a community-based group intervention (Juntos) for children with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) and their caregivers in Brazil. Six Juntos groups were facilitated from August 2017 to May 2018. We conducted a qualitative study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for fathers of children with CZS. Methods included participant observation, focus group discussions, and semi-structured interviews of fathers with a child enrolled in the program. Data collected were transcribed, coded and thematically analyzed to explore father preference for, and beliefs about the intervention and to assess potential barriers and enablers to their involvement. Forty-nine families (61 participants) enrolled, of whom 20% (12/61) were fathers. Seven (58%) fathers attended more than 7 out of 10 sessions. The content of Juntos was found to be acceptable to those fathers who attended. Participation in the group offered fathers the opportunity to share experiences of caring for their child and demonstrate their importance as care agents. Work commitments, and the view of mothers as primary caregivers were barriers to engagement of fathers. Facilitators to engagement included a presentation of clear objectives for fathers’ involvement and the opportunity to learn a practical skill related to caring for their child. A better understanding of the perspectives of fathers is crucial to help increase their involvement in parenting interventions.

scholarly journals Cultivating social occupations, spaces, and networks: service providers’ perspectives on enabling immigrants’ social participation

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Huot ◽  
Jaqueline Brower ◽  
Alex Tham ◽  
Atieh Razavi Yekta
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Social Participation ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Canadian Society ◽  
Structured Interviews

Abstract Introduction Immigrants may experience many barriers to social participation within host societies. Immigrants’ integration into Canadian society is supported through government-funded services. Objective In the present study, we explored the perspectives of service providers working in community organizations regarding their role in enabling immigrants’ social participation through occupations in British Columbia, Canada. Method Representatives from twenty different organizations providing services to the community participated in a constructivist qualitative study aiming to uncover aspects shaping opportunities for occupational participation provided for immigrants. Results Drawing on semi-structured interviews and using thematic analysis, we identified three main themes relating to cultivating social occupations, spaces, and networks. Findings illustrate that service providers’ cultivation of these opportunities can support immigrants’ desired social roles and social identities, further enabling their participation in receiving societies. Conclusion Emphasis upon supporting socio-economic integration into society appears to limit a client-centred approach to developing opportunities for social participation through occupation. Implications for occupational therapists and scientists are discussed.

scholarly journals A Family-Focused Intervention for Parental Mental Illness: A Practitioner Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mairead Furlong ◽  
Christine Mulligan ◽  
Sharon McGarr ◽  
Siobhan O'Connor ◽  
Sinead McGilloway
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Parental Mental Illness ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Mental Health Settings

Background: Parental mental illness (PMI) is common and can lead to children developing mental disorders. Family Talk (FT) is a well-known and widely implemented intervention designed to reduce the risk of transgenerational psychopathology. However, given the research to practise “gap,” very little qualitative research, to date, has investigated practitioner experiences in implementing FT. This study aimed to explore the practitioner-perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation and sustainability of FT within mainstream mental health settings.Methods: This qualitative study was nested within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Family Talk [N = 86 families (139 parents, 221 children)] within 15 adult (AMHS), child (CAMHS), primary care mental health, and child protection sites in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were undertaken with a purposive sample of clinicians (n = 31) and managers (n = 10), based on their experiences of implementing FT. Interview data were transcribed verbatim, analysed using constructivist grounded theory, and informed by Fixsen's implementation science framework.Results: Service providers highlighted a number of benefits for approximately two thirds of families across different diagnoses and mental health settings (AMHS/CAMHS/primary care). Sites varied in their capacity to embed FT, with key enablers identified as acquiring managerial and organisational support, building clinician skill, and establishing interagency collaboration. Implementation challenges included: recruitment difficulties, stresses in working with multiply-disadvantaged families, disruption in delivery due to the COVID-19 global pandemic, and sustainability concerns (e.g., perceived fit of FT with organisational remit/capacity, systemic and cultural barriers to change).Conclusion: This study is only the second qualitative study ever conducted to explore practitioner experiences in implementing FT, and the first conducted within the context of an RCT and national research programme to introduce family-focused practise (FFP) for families living with PMI. The findings illuminate the successes and complexities of implementing FFP in a country without a “think family” infrastructure, whilst highlighting a number of important generalisable lessons for the implementation of FT, and other similar interventions, elsewhere.

scholarly journals Challenges to effective governance in a low income healthcare system: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions in Malawi

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C Masefield ◽  
Alan Msosa ◽  
Jean Grugel
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Health System ◽  
National Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Health Coverage

Abstract Background: All countries face challenging decisions about healthcare coverage. The scare resources of low income countries prevent improvements in equitable access and quality. Malawi, one of the poorest countries in the world, has committed to achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) by 2030. The health sector is highly dependent on donor contributions, but recent poor governance of government-funded healthcare saw donors withdraw funding, limiting services and resources. The 2017 updated National Health Plan II and accompanying Health Strategic Plan II identify the importance of improved governance and strategies to achieve it, including greater harmonisation with health stakeholders. This study explores health sector stakeholders’ perceptions of challenges to improving governance in the national health system. Methods: A qualitative study design was used. Interviews were conducted with 22 representatives of the major international and faith-based non-government organisations, civil society organisations, local government and government-funded organisations, and governance bodies operating in Malawi. Open questions were asked about experiences and perceptions of the functioning of the health system and healthcare decision-making. The transcripts and field notes were analysed using inductive content analysis.Results: Stakeholders view governance challenges as a barrier to achieving a more effective and equitable health system. Three types of challenges were identified: accountability (enforceability; answerability; stakeholder-led initiatives); health resource management (healthcare financing; drug supply); influence in decision-making (unequal power; stakeholder engagement).Conclusions: Health sector stakeholders see a range of serious challenges to improving governance in the national health system in Malawi which will impact on the government’s goal of achieving UHC by 2030. These can be categorised as political, structural, and financial challenges. Stakeholders identify the need for improved oversight, implementation, service delivery and social accountability of government-funded service providers to communities. Eighteen months after the introduction of the NHP II and HSSP II, they see little evidence of improved governance and have little or no confidence in the government’s ability to deliver UHC in the timeframe set out by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The difficulties stakeholders perceive in relation to building equitable and effective health governance in Malawi have relevance for other resource-limited countries which have also committed to the goal of UHC.

Explaining the Dimensions of Social Support for Breakfast and Healthy Snacks in Students: A Qualitative Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Bastami ◽  
Arash Ardalan ◽  
Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh ◽  
Firoozeh Mostafavi
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Enrichment Factors ◽  
School Nutrition ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Group Discussions ◽  
Life Patterns ◽  
School Programs ◽  
School Supports

Abstract Background: breakfast elimination as well as consumption of low-value snacks is ever increasing among adolescents. This study sought to explain the dimensions of social support for breakfast and healthy snacks among students. Methods : A qualitative research was conducted in Isfahan, Tehran, and Khorramabad high schools in 2017--18. Data were obtained from five focus group discussions and 35 in-depth interviews as well as semi-structured interviews with students of both sex, parents and school authorities. The data simultaneously analyzed using conventional content analysis in three stages including preparation, organization, and reporting. Prolonged engagement, maximum variation of sampling and member check were the enrichment factors of the research. Results : Three main categories emerged. First, family supports with sub- categories of family in the school programs as well as mother-sponsored support and family life patterns. Second, school supports with sub- categories of instrumental and informational support. And third, support of other community organizations with sub- categories of intra-department coordination and mass media. Conclusion : By providing exciting advocacy opportunities such as holding an exhibition and building families' confidence in the safety of school nutrition, school can attract family partnerships. In addition, promoting healthy eating needs multi-level supports such as mass media, municipalities, police, and the school's renovation office as well as the coordination of these organizations with health sector.

scholarly journals Requirements and Incentives for Implementation of Pharmaceutical Strategic Purchasing in Iranian Health System: A Qualitative Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peivand Bastani ◽  
Leila Doshmangir ◽  
Mahnaz Samadbeik ◽  
Rassoul Dinarvand
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Reimbursement Mechanisms ◽  
Strategic Purchasing ◽  
System A ◽  
Insurance Reimbursement

PURPOSE: According to the importance of strategic purchasing as a prerequisite for overall access and universal health coverage, this study was conducted to explore requirements and incentives for implementation of pharmaceutical strategic purchasing in the Iranian health system.METHODS: This was a qualitative study conducted through content analysis with an inductive approach applying a five-stage framework analysis. Data analysis was started right after transcribing each interview applying MAXQDA10. Data was saturated after 32 semi-structured interviews with experts. These key informants were selected purposefully and through snowball sampling.RESULTS: The findings are categorized under three main themes: “Payment Mechanisms to Service Providers”, “Insurance Reimbursement Mechanisms” and “Rules and Regulations”, and eight related subthemes.CONCLUSIONS: According to the importance of incentive interventions in pharmaceutical strategic purchasing, it is necessary to pay close attention to pharmaceutical price, realistic and fair premiums and appropriate contracts with suppliers, along with estimation a reasonable profit margin for pharmaceutical suppliers and the appropriate reimbursement mechanisms as the most significant incentives for increasing access to pharmaceuticals and implementing strategic purchasing.

scholarly journals Perceived occupational stressors among emergency medical service providers: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Afshari ◽  
Seyed Reza Borzou ◽  
Farshid Shamsaei ◽  
Eesa Mohammadi ◽  
Leili Tapak
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Critical Conditions ◽  
Continuous Exposure ◽  
Occupational Stressors ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Conventional Content Analysis

Abstract Introduction Emergency medical services (EMS) providers are at continuous exposure to occupational stressors which negatively affect their health and professional practice. This study explored perceived occupational stressors among EMS providers. Methods This qualitative study was conducted from December 2019 to April 2020 using conventional content analysis. Sixteen EMS providers were purposively selected from EMS stations in Hamadan, Iran. Semi-structured interviews (with length of 45–60 min) were held for data collection. Data were analyzed through Graneheim and Lundman’s conventional content analysis approach. Findings Data analysis resulted in the development of two themes, namely critical conditions of EMS provision, and personal and professional conflicts. The six categories of these two themes were complexity of patients’ clinical conditions, interruption of EMS provision, health hazards, interpersonal problems, interprofessional interactions, and legal conflicts. Conclusion Besides the stress associated with emergency patient care, EMS providers face many different occupational stressors. EMS managers can use the findings of the present study to develop strategies for reducing occupational stress among EMS providers and thereby, improve their health and care quality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document