We Believe

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Bass
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New England ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
World Series ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Fenway Park ◽  
Boston Red Sox

This chapter examines the diasporic quality of Red Sox Nation and the effects of winning two World Series on its (formerly “angst-ridden”) citizenry. For Boston Red Sox fans, the definition of home has always been blurry. Red Sox fans have always been part of a diasporic New England community more imagined than real, but maintaining a strong identity. Even in its most parochial eras, the Red Sox have reached far beyond Fenway Park, rendering “Boston” as home for people in Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, parts of Connecticut, and the rest of Massachusetts. In the 2004 championship season, the Red Sox surpassed the New York Yankees as Major League Baseball's most profitable road attraction. This chapter considers how the creation of Red Sox Nation turned the team into a national phenomenon, “enjoying a community that is rooted to whatever space it occupies at any given moment.”

Emancipation and Free African Americans

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Archer
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
African Americans ◽  
New England ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Jim Crow ◽  
African Descent ◽  
American Population ◽  
African American Population ◽  
Free African Americans

Except in parts of Rhode Island and Connecticut, slavery was a peripheral institution, and throughout New England during and after the Revolution there was widespread support to emancipate slaves. Some of the states enacted emancipation laws that theoretically allowed slavery to continue almost indefinitely, and slavery remained on the books as late as 1857 in New Hampshire. Although the laws gradually abolished slavery and although the pace was painfully slow for those still enslaved, the predominant dynamic for New England society was the sudden emergence of a substantial, free African American population. What developed was an even more virulent racism and a Jim Crow environment. The last part of the chapter is an analysis of where African Americans lived as of 1830 and the connection between racism and concentrations of people of African descent.

Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. [Distribution map].

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
South Dakota ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Diabrotica Virgifera Virgifera ◽  
Diabrotica Virgifera ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
New Distribution ◽  
Distribution In Europe

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae. Hosts: maize (Zea mays). Information is given on the geographical distribution in Europe (Albania, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia-Hercegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Montenegro, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Switzerland, UK (England and Wales), Ukraine, Canada (Ontario, Quebec), Mexico, USA (Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming)), Central America & Caribbean (Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua).

scholarly journals Influence of Origin of Laying Hens on the Quality of Their Carcasses and Meat After the First Laying Period

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 685-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Puchała ◽  
Józefa Krawczyk ◽  
Jolanta Calik
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Resources ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Broiler Chickens ◽  
Laying Hens ◽  
The Other ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Breeding Lines ◽  
Dressing Percentage

AbstractThe aim of the study was to assess the quality of carcasses and meat from selected native breeds and breeding lines of hens after using them for laying eggs in terms of their usefulness as raw material in traditional old polish cuisine. hens included in the programme for the protection of genetic resources were the object of this study. they belonged to the following breeds/breeding lines: greenleg partridge (Z-11), rhode Island red (r-11), new hampshire (n-11) and Barred rock (WJ-44) – 30 hens from each line. the hens were kept in a closed hen house under standard raising conditions. eight hens were selected from 56-week-old hens of each line which were subjected to analysis after being slaughtered. as a result of the research conducted, it was found that:– Among the hens under study, heavier layers, i.e. Barred rock (WJ-44), new hampshire (n-11) and rhode Island red (r-11), which are characterized by good muscling and dressing percentage similar to that of broiler chickens, proved to be most suitable for use as meat.– The meat from WJ-44 hens contained most cholesterol and least protein, and the meat from Z-11 birds had the least fat compared to the other lines.– At the end of the laying period, meat and broth from WJ-44, n-11 and r-11 hens obtained better sensory scores than those from the carcasses of Z-11 hens, which makes them an attractive raw material for traditional polish cuisine.

Diabrotica barberi. [Distribution map].

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
New Brunswick ◽  
South Dakota ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
Diabrotica Barberi ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Diabrotica barberi Smith & Lawrence. Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae Hosts: Maize (Zea mays) and other cereals (Poaceae). Information is given on the geographical distribution in NORTH AMERICA, Canada, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Ontario, Quebec, USA, Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin.

Trichoglossum hirsutum. [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. F. Cannon
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Sierra Leone ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Democratic Republic ◽  
New Caledonia ◽  
Conservation Status ◽  
Rio Grande Do Sul

Abstract A description is provided for Trichoglossum hirsutum. Some information on its associated organisms and substrata, habitats, dispersal and transmission and conservation status is given, along with details of its geographical distribution (Africa (Algeria, Cameroon, Congo Democratic Republic, Ghana, Malawi, Morocco, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Africa and Tanzania), North America (Canada (British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec)), Mexico, USA (California, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin), Central America (Costa Rica and Panama), South America (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (Goias, Parana, Pernambuco and Rio Grande do Sul), Chile, Ecuador and Venezuela), Asia (China (Anhui, Gansu, Guangdong, Hainan, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Hong Kong, Hunan, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Jilin, Sichuan, Yunnan and Zhejiang), Georgia, India (Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Uttarakhand), Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Nepal, Russia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Turkey), Atlantic Ocean (Bermuda, Portugal (Madeira), Spain (Canary Islands)), Australasia (Australia (Victoria) and New Zealand), Caribbean (Cuba, Dominican Republic, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago), Europe (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine and UK), Indian Ocean (Mauritius), and Pacific Ocean (New Caledonia)). No reports of negative economic impacts of this fungus have been found.

Hylobius pales. [Distribution map].

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Prince Edward Island ◽  
District Of Columbia ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
Hylobius Pales ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Hylobius pales (Herbst). Coleoptera: Curculionidae. Hosts: Pinus spp. Information is given on the geographical distribution in North America (Canada, Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, USA, Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin), Central America and Caribbean (Puerto Rico).

Phaeocryptopus gaeumanii. [Distribution map].

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
British Columbia ◽  
New Mexico ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
North America ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Pseudotsuga Menziesii ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Phaeocryptopus gaeumanii (Rohde) Petrak. Hosts: douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Information is given on the geographical distribution in Australasia & Oceania, Australia, Victoria, New Zealand, Europe, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Irish Republic, Italy, Netherlands, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, Yugoslavia, North America, Canada, British Columbia, Ontario, USA, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Maine, Massechusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Minnesota.

scholarly journals Competitive Position of Northeast Agriculture

1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene L. Swackhamer
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New Jersey ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Area ◽  
Specialty Crops ◽  
Competitive Position ◽  
Eleven State ◽  
State Area

The eleven state area of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont comprises the Northeast agricultural area. According to the latest farm number estimates in 1980, there are over 159,000 farms in the Northeast with the largest number of farms concentrated in Pennsylvania, New York and Maryland, respectively. Given the large number of farms and the diverse topography of the region, farmers in the Northeast produce a wide variety of agricultural commodities. In 1980, farm cash receipts in the Northeast were estimated at $8.2 billion with livestock and products accounting for about two thirds of the total and crops (including specialty crops) accounting for the balance. In terms of cash receipts, Pennsylvania is the largest agricultural production state in the Northeast followed by New York and Maryland.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document