Dental Procedures During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Algorithms and Recommendations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
HIKMAT BAKHISHOV ◽  
Vasif Aliyev ◽  
Merve Benli
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Robson de Lima GOMES ◽  
Marlus da Silva PEDROSA ◽  
Claudio Heliomar Vicente da SILVA

ABSTRACT Since the outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), numerous restrictive measures have been adopted by governments of different countries. The return to elective dental care in Brazil is a reality even during the COVID-19 pandemic. During restorative dental procedures, the dental professional requires close contact with the patient, being exposed to contaminated saliva and fluids. In addition, transmission of COVID-19 by the generation of aerosol produced by dental handipieces may be possible. Thus, the dental staff must know how to act during restorative dental procedures, putting into practice the correct clinical protocols to avoid cross-contamination and COVID-19 spread. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the biosafety practices especially in the context of restorative dental procedures in times of COVID-19.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL1) ◽  
pp. 628-631
Author(s):  
Devangi Agrawal ◽  
Namisha Khara ◽  
Bhushan Mundada ◽  
Nitin Bhola ◽  
Rajiv Borle

In the wake of the current outbreak of novel Covid-19, which is now declared as a 'pandemic' by the WHO, people around the globe have been dealing with a lot of difficulties. This virus had come into light in December 2019 and since then has only grown exponentially. Amongst the most affected are the ones who have been working extremely hard to eradicate it, which includes the hospitals, dental fraternity and the health-care workers. These people are financially burdened due to limited practise. In the case of dentistry, to avoid the spread of the virus, only emergency treatments are being approved, and the rest of the standard procedures have been put on hold. In some cases, as the number of covid cases is rising, many countries are even trying to eliminate the emergency dental procedures to divert the finances towards the treatment of covid suffering patients. What we need to realise is that this is probably not the last time that we are facing such a situation. Instead of going down, we should set up guidelines with appropriate precautionary measures together with the use of standardised PPEs. The government should also establish specific policies to support dental practices and other health-care providers. Together, we can fight this pandemic and come out stronger.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameera Begum ◽  
Riaz Abdulla ◽  
Akhter Hussain

UNSTRUCTURED The menace of COVID 19 pandemic has become a major public health concern all over the world. It is a pandemic outbreak that originated from Wuhan, Hubei province of China in December 2019. All healthcare professionals including dental surgeons are in the front line and a high chance of constantly getting infected. Droplet and aerosol transmissions are the utmost concern in dental clinics and dental college hospitals. Hence, COVID 19 has a high risk of spread through droplets and aerosols generated during dental procedures from infected patients. This review article highlights the dental perspective and discusses the various preventive measures undertaken to control the spread of infection in dental clinics and dental college hospital setups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1914
Author(s):  
Pingping Han ◽  
Honghui Li ◽  
Laurence J. Walsh ◽  
Sašo Ivanovski

Dental aerosol-generating procedures produce a large amount of splatters and aerosols that create a major concern for airborne disease transmission, such as COVID-19. This study established a method to visualise splatter and aerosol contamination by common dental instrumentation, namely ultrasonic scaling, air-water spray, high-speed and low-speed handpieces. Mock dental procedures were performed on a mannequin model, containing teeth in a typodont and a phantom head, using irrigation water containing fluorescein dye as a tracer. Filter papers were placed in 10 different locations to collect splatters and aerosols, at distances ranging from 20 to 120 cm from the source. All four types of dental equipment produced contamination from splatters and aerosols. At 120 cm away from the source, the high-speed handpiece generated the greatest amount and size (656 ± 551 μm) of splatter particles, while the triplex syringe generated the largest amount of aerosols (particle size: 1.73 ± 2.23 μm). Of note, the low-speed handpiece produced the least amount and size (260 ± 142 μm) of splatter particles and the least amount of aerosols (particle size: 4.47 ± 5.92 μm) at 120 cm. All four dental AGPs produce contamination from droplets and aerosols, with different patterns of distribution. This simple model provides a method to test various preventive strategies to reduce risks from splatter and aerosols.


Indoor Air ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Eirini Chatoutsidou ◽  
Aggeliki Saridaki ◽  
Louiza Raisi ◽  
Eleftheria Katsivela ◽  
George Tsiamis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Katarzyna Mocny-Pachońska ◽  
Rafał J. Doniec ◽  
Sylwia Wójcik ◽  
Szymon Sieciński ◽  
Natalia J. Piaseczna ◽  
...  

Background: Dental schools are considered to be a very stressful environment; the stress levels of dental students are higher than those of the general population. The aim of this study was to assess the level of stress among dental students while performing specific dental procedures. Methods: A survey was conducted among 257 participants. We used an original questionnaire, which consisted of 14 questions assigned to three categories: I—Diagnosis, II—Caries Treatment, and III—Endodontic Treatment. Each participant marked their perceived level of stress during the performed dental treatment procedures. The scale included values of 0–6, where 0 indicates no stress, while 6 indicates high stress. Results: Third- (p=0.006) and fourth-year (p=0.009) women were characterized by a higher level of perceived stress during dental procedures related to caries treatment. Caries treatment procedures were the most stressful for 18.3% of third-year students, 4.3% of fourth-year students, and 3.2% of fifth-year students. Furthermore, 63.4% of third-year students, 47.3% of fourth-year students, and 17.2% of fifth-year students indicated that they felt a high level of stress when performing endodontic procedures. Conclusion: Third- and fourth-year female students are characterized by a higher level of stress during caries and endodontic treatment procedures. The most stressful treatments for participants were endodontic treatment procedures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S31-S32
Author(s):  
Daniel Carlsen ◽  
Katie J Suda ◽  
Ursula C Patel ◽  
Gretchen Gibson ◽  
Marianne M Jurasic ◽  
...  

Abstract Background US dentists prescribe 10% of outpatient antibiotics. However, assessing the appropriateness of dental antibiotic prescribing has been challenging due to a lack of guidelines for common infections. In 2019, the American Dental Association proposed clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on the management of common acute oral infections for the first time. Our objective was to describe national baseline antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of irreversible pulpitis, apical periodontitis, and acute apical abscess prior to the release of the proposed CPG. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of national VA data from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. We identified cases of irreversible pulpitis, apical periodontitis, and acute apical abscess using ICD-10-CM codes. Patient demographics, facility location, medical conditions, dental procedure codes (“CDTs”), and diagnostic (ICD-10-CM) codes were extracted from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Antibiotics prescribed by a dentist within 7 days of a visit were included. Multivariable logistic regression identified variables associated with antibiotic prescribing for each infection. Results Of the 470,039 VA dental visits with oral infections coded, 25% of irreversible pulpitis, 41% of apical periodontitis, and 61% of acute apical abscess visits received antibiotics. Amoxicillin was prescribed most frequently. Although the median days’ supply was 7 days, prolonged use of antibiotics was frequent (9.2% of irreversible pulpitis, 17.8% of apical periodontitis, 28.7% of acute apical abscess received antibiotics for ≥8 days). Of the irreversible pulpitis visits with antibiotics prescribed, 20.0% received ≥2 antibiotics. Patients with high-risk cardiac conditions, prosthetic joints, and certain dental procedures were associated with receipt of antibiotics (table). Conclusion Prior to the release of the ADA guidelines, 75.8% and 59.4% of irreversible pulpitis and apical periodontitis were concordant with proposed recommendations. These data identify opportunities to improve prescribing and serve as a benchmark for future outpatient antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Future work should assess definitive dental treatment and populations without access to oral health care. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document