scholarly journals Concept Cartoons Supported Problem Based Learning Method in Middle School Science Classrooms

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Gunay Balim ◽  
Didem Inel-Ekici ◽  
Erkan Ozcan

<p>Problem based learning, in which events from daily life are presented as interesting scenarios, is one of the active learning approaches that encourages students to self-direct learning. Problem based learning, generally used in higher education, requires students to use high end thinking skills in learning environments. In order to use effectively for secondary students, concept cartoons can be integrated to problem based learning environment. Concept cartoons provide alternative views and help students at problem solving stage. So, in this study the effects of concept cartoons and problem based learning on students’ inquiry learning skill perceptions and levels of relating knowledge with daily life were examined. Two experiment groups and one control group were formed and pre test-post test control group quasi experimental design was used in this research. During four weeks experimental practice, courses were continued with concept cartoon integrated problem based learning in experiment group 1 while only problem based learning was used in experiment group 2 and science program activities was used in control group. 553 sixth grade students (13-14 age group) from 9 different middle schools in Turkey participated in this study. Inquiry learning skills perception scale and knowledge-daily life relating open ended questions were used as data collection tools. In the result of the data anaylsis, it was found that students’ inquiry learning skill perceptions scores differ significantly in favor of experiment groups. However, no significant difference found between groups in terms of knowledge-daily life relation scores.</p>

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 414
Author(s):  
Mufti Arifandi ◽  
Firosalia Kristin

The research aimed to find out the influence of the application of inquiry learning and problem-based learning and model toward students’ critical thinking skills on the content of 5th-grade science lessons in elementary schools. Types of the research are a quasi-experiment with a nonequivalent control group design. The population of this research is the 5th-grade students of SDN 02 Salatiga as the experiment class and the 5th-grade students of SDN Ledok 07 Salatiga as the control class. The instrument used was an observation instrument and an instrument test. Research hypothesis test using independent sample t-test with a significance level of 5% (α - 0,05). The results showed that the observation instrument obtained a significance value of 0,002 which means 0,002 < 0,05 and the instrument test obtained a significance value of 0,000 which means 0,000 < 0,05, then both of these data are Ho=rejected and Ha=accepted. Thus, it can be concluded there is a significant difference between the critical thinking abilities of students who are given Inquiry learning models and students who are given a Problem-Based Learning model.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zetriuslita Zetriuslita ◽  
Wahyudin Wahyudin ◽  
Jarnawi Jarnawi

This research aims to describe and analyze result of applying Problem-Based Learning and Cognitive Conflict Strategy (PBLCCS) in increasing students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking (MCT) ability and Mathematical Curiosity Attitude (MCA). Adopting a quasi-experimental method with pretest-posttest control group design and using mixed method with sequential explanatory strategy, the study involves undergraduate students of Mathematics Education Program at a private university in Riau, Indonesia, academic year 2015/2016 enrolled in Number Theory course. Quantitative data were obtained from essay test and questionnaire whereas qualitative data were from interview and observation. The findings show that; (1) there is a difference between MCT ability taught by PBLCCS and Explicit Direct Instruction (EDI), (2) there is no significant difference between MCA taught by PBLCCS and EDI, (3) students still face obstacles in developing their critical thinking skills when solving matematical problems.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Retno Triningsih ◽  
Mawardi Mawardi

The purpose of conducting this research is to compare the effectiveness of the Problem Based Learning learning model and the Project Based Learning learning model in terms of the critical thinking skills of elementary students. This type of research used in this research is Quasi Experimental with experimental design of Post test-Only Control Group Design. The population in the study were 164 five grade students in Diponegoro Salatiga Cluster, while the sample is 111 students of five grade students in SDN Mangunsari 01, SDN Mangunsari 03, and SDN Mangunsari 05. The results obtained from this study are based on descriptive statistics where the average implementation of the Problem Based Learning learning model is 92.46, while the average implementation of the Project Based Learning learning model is 85.15. the results of critical thinking skills in the Problem Based Learning model are higher than the Project Based Learning learning model reinforced by the T test results obtained by the Sig. (2-tailed) of 0, 047 0.05 thus there is a significant difference between the two groups.


Vidya Karya ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Tyass Bella Pratiwi ◽  
Abdul Hakim ◽  
Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen

Abstract. This research was conducted to improve critical thinking skills students through the application of the Project Based Learning (PBL) model on the material of simple harmonic motion. The research design was a quasi-experimental study with a control group pretest posttest design. The research was conducted at a high school in Samarinda with the number of research subjects consisting of 34 students. The instruments of the research were in the form of an integrated test description with skills critical thinking and a questionnaire of the student responses to the application of the PBL model. The result of the research showed that the of the PBL model (experimental class) improved students' critical thinking skills with N-Gain means of 0.61, while the conventional model (control class) improved students' critical thinking skills with N-Gain means of 0.38. There is a significant difference in critical thinking skills between classes using the PBL model compared to those applying the conventional model on the topic of simple harmonic motion.Keywords: problem based learning, critical thinking, simple harmonic motion.Abstrak. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa melalui penerapan model Project Based Learning (PBL) pada materi gerak harmonik sederhana. Desain penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan control group pretest posttest design. Penelitian dilakukan pada salah satu SMA di Samarinda dengan jumlah subjek penelitian terdiri dari 34 siswa orang siswa. Instrumen penelitian berupa tes uraian yang terintegrasi dengan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan angket tanggapan siswa terhadap penerapan model PBL. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan model PBL (kelas eksperimen) meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa dengan rerata N-Gain sebesar 0,61, sedangkan untuk model konvensional (kelas control) meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa dengan rerata N-Gain sebesar 0,38. Terdapat perbedaan kterampilan berpikir kritis yang signifikan antara kelas dengan menerapkan model PBL dibandingkan dengan yang menerapkan model konvensional pada topik gerak harmonik sederhana.Kata kunci: problem based learning, berpikir kritis, gerak harmonik sederhana.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
Nurlaili Nurlaili ◽  
Ruqiah Ganda Putri Panjaitan ◽  
Laili Fitri Yeni

This research is aimed to determine the students’ achievement and critical thinking on the digestion system topic. This study was conducted using a quasi-experiment with a control group pre-test and post-test design. Furthermore, the samples were chosen using the purposive sampling technique. The instrument consisted of 20 multiple-choice tests. Findings indicate that the average student achievement is 16.71 in the experiment and 12.92 in the control class. The t-test also can be known as t-count t-table (1.71 1.68), which means a significant difference between experiment average and control average. Based on the test result in the experiment class, it can be assumed that there is an enhancement of the average percentage of students' critical thinking from 63% to 84%. Thus, it can be concluded that inquiry learning model can increase the students’ achievement and critical thinking.


Alotrop ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-116
Author(s):  
Ida Nurjelita Sani ◽  
Amrul Bahar ◽  
Elvinawati Elvinawati

The aim of this study to determine the comparison of Problem Solving (PS) and Problem Based Learning (PBL) models to critical thinking skills of student on buffer solution material. This type of research is quasi experimental research with posttest only control group design research design. The population of this study is all class XI IPA of MAN 2 Bengkulu City academic year 2018/2019 as many 133 students. The analysis of the data was used the normality test,  homogeneity test, and hypothesis test.  The research sample was taken by purposive sampling technique. Data on the results of students' critical thinking skills are obtained from the value of the posttest or final test. Posttest is done by using test instruments in the form of descriptive tests as many as 6 items, each of which has a different critical thinking indicator. Previous test instruments were tested and analyzed to see the level of validity, reliability, differentiation and the level of difficulty of the questions. The results of the study showed that the average value of students' critical thinking ability achievement in the experimental class 1 was higher than that of the experimental class 2 students which were 74.09 and 70.22. Based on these results, the experimental class 1 which applied the problem solving learning model was better at improving students' thinking skills than the experimental class 2 which applied a problem-based learning model. Hypothesis testing with the T-test at the 0.05 significance level yields a sig value. (2-tailed)> level of signicant which is 0.147> 0.05 so that Ho is accepted. Thus, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between the critical thinking skills of the experimental class 1 students who apply PS models and experimental class 2 students who apply the PBL model.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Sani Abdurrahman ◽  
Abdullah Abdul Halim ◽  
Osman Sharifah

<span>Mathematics is one of the most emphasized subjects and has grown immensely to provide a strong base for programs in science, engineering and technology. Training students in this field will give them the opportunity to improve their high order thinking skills (HOTS). But the students’ HOTS level is at low stage due to the learning approaches employed in classrooms. As a result, the study aimed at looking into the effect of inquiry-based learning (IBL) in improving polytechnic students’ level of HOTS. Quasi-experimental design was used in this study involving two sampled National Diploma II classes. There were 73 students participated in this study (36 students for experimental group and 37 students for control group). HOTS questions and worksheets based on IBL are the instruments used for this study. At the α=0.05 (p=0.000) level of significance, the results of the independent-sample t-test revealed a significant difference between the mean post-test scores of the experimental group and the control group. Moreover, the students’ overall HOTS level was discovered to be (applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating) improving through this approach. In conclusion, IBL can have a positive effect on the HOTS of polytechnic students in mathematics classroom.</span>


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Peter Ogweno ◽  
Nephat Kathuri ◽  
Agnes Nkurumwa

Purpose: The study sought to compare the effects of Problem Based Learning (PBL) method and Demonstration Teaching Method (DTM) on achievement of students in agriculture subject. Methodology: The study used Quasi-Experimental Design which followed a Non-equivalent Control Group Pre-test-Post-test Design, while a Constructivist learning theory guided the study. PBL was the treatment while Demonstration teaching method was used as control. The target population were 7124 students taking agriculture and 52 teachers of agriculture. Accessible population were Form Two Students and 12 schools. Both stratified random sampling and purposive sampling methods were used to obtain a sample size of 575 students and 12 teachers of agriculture. Six schools used Problem Based Learning as treatment, while the other six schools were taught through Demonstration teaching method. Pre-test was administered to PBL and DTM groups before teaching the students and a post-test was also administered to both groups at the end of six weeks of study. Data was collected using Agriculture Achievement Test (AAT) to measure students’ achievement. Data was analysed using ANCOVA and descriptive statistics. Findings:  Post-test results established that teaching through PBL resulted in higher students’ achievement in agriculture with a mean score of 57.47 compared to DTM mean score of 48.4. There were statistically significant difference in post-intervention scores between the interventions, F (1, 278) = 1170.43, p < .001, partial η2= .800 leading to rejection of null hypothesis. Therefore, PBL teaching method was found to be more effective in teaching agriculture as compared to Demonstration teaching method. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommended that teachers of agriculture should embrace and use PBL as a method of instruction in agriculture subject. Likewise, Tertiary institutions and Universities in Kenya should implement the use of PBL method in their training programmes in training students.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Ms Jumariati ◽  
◽  
Rizky Amelia ◽  
Eka Puteri Elyani ◽  
Tofan Mahendra ◽  
...  

Having the ability to think critically is prominent to aid students in dealing with academic life, filtering any information, and solving problems. This study investigates the effects of Problem-Based Learning on students’ ability in writing expository essays. It employed a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design by utilizing intact classes of advanced writing. The study utilized a writing test and a scoring rubric as the instruments to collect the data. The experimental group was taught by using PBL with group works whereas the control group was taught by using individual guided problem-solving. The findings on the t-test conveyed that the null hypothesis is rejected. Hence, there is a significant difference in the mean score of the students in the experimental group and those in the control group. Moreover, the analysis of each component of writing revealed that the implementation of PBL gives a significant effect on the components of content and organization. Hence, small group discussion for problem-solving tasks is recommended to develop students’ critical thinking skills, social skills, and writing skills particularly in writing expository essays of problem-solution.


Author(s):  
Wadha H. Al-Otaibi

The study aimed at identifying the effectivness of a suggested model for learning through projects based on shared learning in developing critical thinking skills and self-efficiency in Princess Nourah bint Abdularhman University (PNU). The study included a sample of 76 students from the specialization of primary level teachers in PNU randomly chosen, in which 39 students represented the experimental group. This group was taught the course of learning through projects using a suggested model. The other 37 students formed the control group and were taught the course in the conventional teaching manner. The critical thinking test and the self-efficiency scale were both administered before and after the experiment. The study revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the means between the experimental and control groups in the critical thinking skills test and the self-efficiency sclae in favor of the experimental group. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document