scholarly journals Robot-assisted lobectomy versus completely portal robotic lobectomy: What is the difference?

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 648-655
Author(s):  
Murat Akkuş
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Lung Deflation

Background: This study aims to compare robot-assisted lobectomy versus completely portal robotic lobectomy. Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2019, a total of 41 patients (10 males, 31 females; median age 62 years; range, 50 to 68 years) underwent robotic anatomical pulmonary resection in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were consecutively divided into two groups: the first 20 (48.8%) patients underwent pulmonary resection by robot-assisted lobectomy technique, while the next 21 (51.2%) patients underwent pulmonary resection by completely portal robotic lobectomy with four arms. Data including age, sex, diagnosis, surgery type and duration, rate of conversion to open surgery, and length of stay of the patients were recorded. The operation time, docking time, console time, and closure duration for each patient were also noted. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex, comorbidities, complications, length of hospital stay, adequate lymph node staging, or tumor size and side between the two groups (p>0.05). However, the mean console and operation times were statistically significantly shorter in the patients receiving completely portal robotic lobectomy with four arms (p=0.001). Conclusion: The advantage of completely portal robotic lobectomy with four arms is relative, although it significantly shortens the operation time. Based on our experiences, this technique may be preferred in case of inadequate lung deflation, as carbon dioxide insufflation allows sufficient workspace for robotic lung resection.

scholarly journals Comparison of Inflammatory Reactions Following Two Different Cesarean Section Techniques: The Modified Misgav-Ladach Versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr; A Prospective Randomized Trial

2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Baris Buke ◽  
Hatice Akkaya ◽  
Cigdem Karakukcu
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Inflammatory Reaction ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Inflammatory Reactions ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> There is not yet a consensus on the optimal surgical technique for cesarean section. This is the first study comparing two different (Cesarean Section) with respect to the following inflammatory reaction in means of changes in inflammatory marker levels.<br />To evaluate the differences in inflammatory reactions following two different (Cesarean Section) techniques, the modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique.</p><p><strong>Study Desıgn:</strong> The study population included 88 pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria. These women were randomized into two groups according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines: Group 1 (Misgav-Ladach group) and Group 2 (Pfannenstiel Kerr group). To compare the inflammatory reactions following surgery, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) levels were measured in venous blood samples drawn from the patients just before (0 hour) and 24 hours (24th hour) after the surgery. In 5 women from Group 1 and 2 women from Group 2, the 24th hour blood samples could not be obtained or were lost. Thus, a total of 81 women, 39 women from Group 1 and 42 women from Group 2, comprised the population of study. The differences in inflammatory reactions between the 0 and 24th hours were analyzed by calculating the percent change in IL-6 and TNF-α levels, and these percentages were then compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> There was a statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding the serum IL-6 level change between 0 and 24th hour (530±653% and 196±168%, respectively, p=0.022. The difference in TNF-α was also higher in Group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (229±306% vs. 571±824%, p=0.12). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in Group 1 (9.44 min. vs. 16.86 min, p=0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The results of this study indicate that the modified Misgav-Ladach technique has a weaker inflammatory reaction, which indicates fewer short- and long-term surgical complications.</p>

scholarly journals Nighttime Appendectomy is Safe and has Similar Outcomes as Daytime Appendectomy: A Study of 1198 Appendectomies

2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692093860
Author(s):  
T. Mönttinen ◽  
H. Kangaspunta ◽  
J. Laukkarinen ◽  
M. Ukkonen
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: Although it is controversial whether appendectomy can be safely delayed, it is often unnecessary to postpone operation as a shorter delay may increase patient comfort, enables quicker recovery, and decreases costs. In this study, we sought to study whether the time of day influences the outcomes among patients operated on for acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy at Tampere University Hospital between 1 September 2014 and 30 April 2017 for acute appendicitis were included. Primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and amount of intraoperative bleeding. Appendectomies were divided into daytime and nighttime operations. Results: A total of 1198 patients underwent appendectomy, of which 65% were operated during daytime and 35% during nighttime. Patient and disease-related characteristics were similar in both groups. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 4.8% and 0.2%, respectively. No time categories were associated with risk of complications or complication severity. Neither was there difference in operation time and clinically significant difference in intraoperative bleeding. Patients undergoing surgery during night hours had a shorter hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, only complicated appendicitis was associated with worse outcomes. Discussion: We have shown that nighttime appendectomy is associated with similar outcomes than daytime appendectomy. Subsequently, appendectomy should be planned for the next available slot, minimizing delay whenever possible.

Influence of Comorbidity on Outcome after Pulmonary Resection in the Elderly

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris Beshay ◽  
Patrick Dorn ◽  
Hans-Beat Ris ◽  
Ralph A Schmid
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Proper Patient Selection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of comorbidity on outcome after pulmonary resection in patients over 75 years old. Three hundred and thirty-three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer operated on between 1998 and 2002 were divided into 3 age groups: < 60 years (group 1), 60–75 years (group 2), > 75 years (group 3). Overall operative mortality was 0.3%; 30-day mortality was 1%. There were more major complications with re-operation in groups 1 and 2, but minor complications occurred significantly more frequently in group 3 (36% vs 16%). Overall mean hospital stay was 12 days, with no significant difference among groups. Three-year survival rates were: 80%, 70%, and 65% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with no significant difference among groups. Age or the presence of comorbidity should not be considered contraindications for lung resection. With proper patient selection and careful preoperative evaluation, many major complications after pneumonectomy are avoidable.

scholarly journals The Impact of COVID-19 on Hospitalised COPD Exacerbations in Malta

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Yvette Farrugia ◽  
Bernard Paul Spiteri Meilak ◽  
Neil Grech ◽  
Rachelle Asciak ◽  
Liberato Camilleri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Inpatient Mortality ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality ◽  
Copd Exacerbations ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Introduction and Aims. The first COVID-19 case in Malta was confirmed on the 7th of March 2020. This study is aimed at investigating a significant difference between the number of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) admissions and their inpatient outcome at Mater Dei Hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to the same period in 2019. Furthermore, we aim to determine predictors of mortality in AECOPD inpatients. Method. Data was collected retrospectively from electronic hospital records during the periods 1st March until 10th May in 2019 and 2020. Results. There was a marked decrease in AECOPD admissions in 2020, with a 54.2% drop in admissions ( n = 119 in 2020 vs. n = 259 in 2019). There was no significant difference in patient demographics or medical comorbidities. In 2020, there was a significantly lower number of patients with AECOPD who received nebulised medications during admission (60.4% in 2020 vs. 84.9% in 2019; p ≤ 0.001 ). There were also significantly lower numbers of AECOPD patients admitted in 2020 who received controlled oxygen via venturi masks (69.0% in 2020 vs. 84.5% in 2019; p = 0.006 ). There was a significant increase in inpatient mortality in 2020 (19.3% [ n = 23 ] and 8.4% [ n = 22 ] for 2020 and 2019, respectively, p = 0.003 ). Year was found to be the best predictor of mortality outcome ( p = 0.001 ). The lack of use of SABA pre-admission treatment ( p = 0.002 ), active malignancy ( p = 0.003 ), and increased length of hospital stay ( p = 0.046 ) were also found to be predictors of mortality for AECOPD patients; however, these parameters were unchanged between 2019 and 2020 and therefore could not account for the increase in mortality. Conclusions. There was a decrease in the number of admissions with AECOPD in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, when compared to 2019. The year 2020 proved to be a significant predictor for inpatient mortality, with a significant increase in mortality in 2020. The decrease in nebuliser and controlled oxygen treatment noted in the study period did not prove to be a significant predictor of mortality when corrected for other variables. Therefore, the difference in mortality cannot be explained with certainty in this retrospective cohort study.

scholarly journals Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Llumbar Degenerative Diseases, which one is better: A meta-analysis Through a Ggrade Analysis of Evidence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
aixian tian ◽  
xinlong ma ◽  
jianxiong Ma
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract BackgroundTo explore the efficacy and safety between posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.MethodsWe searched the literature in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The index words were posterior lumbar interbody fusion, PLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, TLIF, lumbar interbody fusion, spinal fusion, degenerative disc disease and lumbar degenerative diseases. Primary outcomes were fusion rate and complications. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (ΔVAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ΔODI), total blood loss, operation time and length of hospital stay. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata13.1 was used for the analysis of forest plots, heterogeneity, sensitivity and publication bias.Results17 studies were included (N=1562; PLIF, n=835; TLIF, n=727). The pooled data showed PLIF had a higher complications (P= 0.000), especially in nerve injury (p = 0.003) and dural tear (p = 0.005). PLIF required longer operation time (p = 0.004), more blood loss (p = 0.000) and hospital stays (p = 0.006). Surprisingly subgroup analysis showed there was significant difference in complications in patients under 55 (p = 0.000) and Asian countries (p = 0.000). No statistical difference was found between the two groups with regard to fusion rate (p = 0.593),ΔVAS (p = 0.364) andΔODI (p = 0.237).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis showed there were no significant difference in fusion rate, ΔVAS and ΔODI. However TLIF could reduce complications, especially nerve injury and dural tear. Besides, TLIF was associated with statistically significant less blood loss, shorter operation time and shorter length of hospital stay.

scholarly journals Comparison of short-term outcomes between Chinese surgical robot “Micro Hand S” assisted and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanlei Wang ◽  
Guohui Wang ◽  
Zheng Li ◽  
Ling Hao ◽  
Bo Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Total Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Surgical Robot ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background As the first domestically produced Chinese surgical robot for clinical use, the Micro Hand S robot has been applied to total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer in our center since 2017. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Micro Hand S robot-assisted TME (R-TME) in comparison with laparoscopic TME (L-TME).Methods Between May 2017 and February 2018, patients who underwent R-TME and L-TME in the Third Xiangya Hospital were prospectively included in this study. The data including intraoperative outcomes, postoperative outcomes, pathological outcomes, and functional outcomes were analyzed and compared.Results Totally, 30 patients underwent L-TME and 21 patients underwent R-TME. The patient characteristics of the two groups were similar. Regarding intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, the R-TME group had significantly less blood loss (95.2 vs. 130.0 ml, p = 0.022), shorter time to first flatus (2.1 vs. 2.9 d, p = 0.017) and first liquid intake (2.8 vs. 3.7 d, p = 0.027) than the L-TME group. There were no significant difference in the operative time, conversion, protective ileostomy, length of hospital stay, pain score, complications, and 30-day mortality between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the pathological and functional outcomes also did not differ significantly.Conclusion The Micro Hand S robot-assisted total mesorectal excision is safe and feasible for rectal cancer. However, prospective and large sample size trials are needed to further confirm this conclusion.Trial registration:Clinicaltrial.gov, NCT02752698, Registered on 27 April 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02752698?term=Micro+hand&cntry=CN&draw=2&rank=1

scholarly journals Day of surgery: the impact on patient length of stay in a tertiary vascular unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
NC Holford ◽  
C Ní Ghuidhir ◽  
L Hands
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
The Impact

Background Our hypothesis was that patients undergoing surgery earlier in the week would have better access to physiotherapy and other discharge services after surgery and, as a result, would have a shorter length of hospital stay compared with patients undergoing surgery later in the week. This study aimed to assess whether there is a significant difference in postoperative length of hospital stay between the groups with secondary assessment by operation subtype. Methods We identified all patients admitted for vascular surgery in 2015 from a prospectively collected database and divided the week into Monday to Wednesday and Thursday to Friday. Endovascular cases were included but day cases were excluded. Further analysis was performed with a breakdown in both groups by operation type. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0. Results We identified 652 patients who met our criteria. Within the elective patient group, there was a significantly longer length of stay of three days for the late-week group compared with two days for the early-week group (P = 0.016). Femoral artery procedures had a median length of stay of two days for those operated on early in the week compared with four days later in the week (P < 0.005). Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair showed a trend to longer length of stay in the late-week group (P = 0.06). Conclusion Day of surgery appears to impact on patients’ length of stay following vascular procedures, with the greatest impact on medium-sized procedures. This difference could be explained by the difference in weekend support services, but further evaluation is required following introduction of weekend support services to assess this.

A Study of Applying RFID for Heat Block Management in IC Packaging Factory

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Ling Wang ◽  
Shu-Jen Wang ◽  
Chiao-Tzu Huang
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Wire Bond ◽  
Ic Packaging ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Test Of Hypothesis ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Die Bonding

In the integrated circuit (IC) packaging process, including operations of die sawing, die bonding, wire bonding, molding, plating, marking, trim/form, and inspection. Purposes of packaging include protecting ICs, making ICs easier to handle, and connecting ICs to the circuit outside. The wire bond stations are the bottleneck in the packaging and assemble process where the heat block is the key auxiliary parts in the stations. This research proposes a RFID-enabled Heat Block Management System (RHMS) to accurately control the progress of the IC packaging production line to meet the customer requirements. Our research analyzed all the flows of heat block management operations during before and after introducing RHMS. Hypothesis testing can verify significant difference between two sample sizes. Based on the statistics test of hypothesis, we compared the difference for before and after introducing RHMS. The results show that the RHMS can bring advantage for heat block management in wire bond stations. Moreover, it has clear improvement of saving counting and revising operation time. The contributions of this research are not only a case study but also a direction for applying RFID technology on IC packaging industry.

scholarly journals Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Weifen Lu ◽  
Qianli Pan ◽  
Yinxin Zhou ◽  
Wenyu Chen ◽  
Hongyan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Exposure Time ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Needle Stick ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
New Type ◽  
Needle Stick Injuries ◽  
The Difference

Objective. To develop a new type infusion set and apply it to the clinic, as well as explore its effectiveness in the prevention from needle stick injuries. Methods. A total of 200 inpatients who were in need of intravenous infusion with a disposable infusion needle were included and randomly divided into two groups: intervention group and control group. Disposable infusion needles with a separation-free safety tube were used in the intervention group, whereas conventional ones were used in the control group. Then, effects of the two types of infusion sets were observed and compared. Results. As for the operation time for infusion, it was (82.19±1.80) seconds in the intervention group and (83.02±1.83) seconds in the control group, with the difference statistically significant (P<0.05). Besides, the exposure time of the needles after infusion in the intervention group was (3.36±0.17) seconds while (18.85±1.18) seconds in the control group; the difference between which was statistically significant (P<0.05). In terms of the time for needle disposal, (18.60±0.84) seconds was required in the intervention group, while for the control group, it took (18.85±1.18) seconds, and the difference between two groups was of statistical significance as well (P<0.05). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the accidental slip rate of the needles as that turned out 0% in both groups (P>0.05). It was worth noting that the block rate of the disposed needles in the intervention group was 100%. Conclusion. The separation-free safety tube on the disposable infusion needle could instantly block the sharp needle after infusion, which reduces the needle exposure time and lowers the risk of needle stick injuries. In the meantime, the safety tube is convenient to use, and its application can shorten the time for infusion and needle disposal, consequently improving the working efficiency of nurses. As the new type safety tube has above advantages and would not raise the risk of needle slippage, it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Experimental Evaluation of the Optimal Suture Pattern With a Flexible Endoscopic Suturing System

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Halvax ◽  
Michele Diana ◽  
Yoshihiro Nagao ◽  
Jacques Marescaux ◽  
Lee Swanström
Keyword(s):  
Suture Material ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Anterior Wall ◽  
Bursting Pressure ◽  
Endoscopic Suturing ◽  
Endoluminal Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Suturing Technique ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Current Systems

Background. The ability to perform reliable, secure endoluminal closure of the gastrointestinal tract wall, is a prerequisite to support the progress of the emerging field of endoluminal surgery. Along with advanced clipping systems, flexible endoscopic suturing devices are commercially available. Current systems can replicate traditional surgical suturing patterns in the endoluminal environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal endoluminal suturing technique using a flexible endoscopic suturing device. Materials and Methods. Procedures were performed on bench-top simulators containing 20 explanted porcine stomachs. A standardized 3-cm full-thickness incision was created on the anterior wall of each stomach using monopolar cautery. The gastrotomy was closed endoscopically using an over-the-scope suturing device (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery; Austin, TX). Three different techniques were used: single stitches, figure-of-8 pattern, and running suture. Material consumption and operation time were recorded and bursting pressure measurement of the closure was performed. Results. No statistically significant differences were identified in suturing time. Suturing time (minutes) was slightly shorter with the figure-of-8 technique (41.14 ± 4.6) versus interrupted (45.75 ± 1.1) versus continuous (51.44 ± 10.0), but the difference was not statistically significant. The number of sutures required was greater in the interrupted group. No significant difference was found in the burst pressure (mm Hg): figure-of-8 (45.85 ± 26.2) versus interrupted (30.5 ± 22.89) versus continuous (32.0 ± 26.5). In the figure-of-8 group, 85.5% of cases were leakproof above 30 mm Hg, while in the other groups only 50% of cases were so. Conclusion. A figure-of-8 suturing pattern seems to be the preferable suturing technique with the endoscopic suturing device.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document