scholarly journals Bones, blood and steel: How bioelectrical impedance analysis is affected by hip fracture and surgical implants

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Martin Steihaug ◽  
Bård Bogen ◽  
Målfrid Holen Kristoffersen ◽  
Anette Hylen Ranhoff
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Metal Implants ◽  
Surgical Implants

Abstract Introduction Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is in widespread use, but there is uncertainty about its validity in patients with metal implants or after acute hip fracture and surgery. We aimed to investigate the use of single frequency tetrapolar BIA in patients with hip fracture by answering the following questions: 1) Are BIA measurements affected by recent hip fracture and surgical repair? 2) Are BIA measurements affected by the presence of metal implants used in hip fracture surgery? Setting Two hospitals in Bergen, Norway. Participants A convenience sample of 203 acute hip fracture patients. Methods Participants had their body composition measured by single frequency, tetrapolar BIA on the fractured and unfractured side of the body in the immediate postoperative period and at follow-up three months after hip fracture. Measurements from fractured and unfractured side and measurements in hospital and at follow-up were compared. BIA readings for hips treated with cannulated screws, compression hip screw and hip arthroplasty were compared. Results Resistance was lower on the side of the fractured hip compared to the unfractured side postoperatively, but not at follow-up. BIA readings did not differ by type of surgical implant. Conclusion Recent fracture and surgery influences single frequency tetrapolar BIA resistance. The presence of surgical implants in the hip do not affect BIA measurements. If BIA is used in acute hip fracture patients, the contralateral side to the fracture should be measured.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis of the body composition of children and adolescents with sickle cell disease

2002 ◽  
Vol 140 (6) ◽  
pp. 681-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy J. VanderJagt ◽  
Paul Harmatz ◽  
Ajovi B. Scott-Emuakpor ◽  
Elliot Vichinsky ◽  
Robert H. Glew
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Cell Disease

scholarly journals Development of bioelectrical impedance analysis-based equations for estimation of body composition in postpartum rural Bangladeshi women

2012 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saijuddin Shaikh ◽  
Kerry J. Schulze ◽  
Anura Kurpad ◽  
Hasmot Ali ◽  
Abu Ahmed Shamim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
South Asia ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Women Of Reproductive Age ◽  
Rural South

Equations for predicting body composition from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters are age-, sex- and population-specific. Currently there are no equations applicable to women of reproductive age in rural South Asia. Hence, we developed equations for estimating total body water (TBW), fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass in rural Bangladeshi women using BIA, with 2H2O dilution as the criterion method. Women of reproductive age, participating in a community-based placebo-controlled trial of vitamin A or β-carotene supplementation, were enrolled at 19·7 (sd 9·3) weeks postpartum in a study to measure body composition by 2H2O dilution and impedance at 50 kHz using multi-frequency BIA (n 147), and resistance at 50 kHz using single-frequency BIA (n 82). TBW (kg) by 2H2O dilution was used to derive prediction equations for body composition from BIA measures. The prediction equation was applied to resistance measures obtained at 13 weeks postpartum in a larger population of postpartum women (n 1020). TBW, FFM and fat were 22·6 (sd 2·7), 30·9 (sd 3·7) and 10·2 (sd 3·8) kg by 2H2O dilution. Height2/impedance or height2/resistance and weight provided the best estimate of TBW, with adjusted R2 0·78 and 0·76, and with paired absolute differences in TBW of 0·02 (sd 1·33) and 0·00 (sd 1·28) kg, respectively, between BIA and 2H2O. In the larger sample, values for TBW, FFM and fat were 23·8, 32·5 and 10·3 kg, respectively. BIA can be an important tool for assessing body composition in women of reproductive age in rural South Asia where poor maternal nutrition is common.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis in the measurement of the body composition of surgical patients

1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 421-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. H. Fearon ◽  
R. A. Richardson ◽  
J. Hannan ◽  
S. Cowan ◽  
W. Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Surgical Patients

scholarly journals Original Paper Relationships Between Indices of Arm Anthropometry, Bioimpedance, and Laboratory in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenn-Yeu Wang ◽  
Shu- Chin Chen ◽  
Betau Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Muscle Area

Abstract Background Maintenance hemodialysis patients often experience protein- calorie malnutrition. Our aim is to evaluate the independent prediction accuracy of bioelectrical impedance analysis derived variables by the measurements of upper arm anthropometry and clinical laboratory indexes for evaluation of nutritional status of hemodialysis patients. Furthermore, the relationship between measurements of upper arm anthropometry and clinical laboratory indexes and cross –sectional evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition with the use of the norms and thresholds were done. Methods In a cross- sectional survey of 32 stable hemodialysis patients (aged 28 to 82 years) in hemodialysis unit of Taipei Municipal Zhongxiao Hospital, we evaluated measurements of upper arm anthropometry with measurements of single frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and clinical laboratory indexes. Results The comparisons between measurements of upper arm anthropometry with measurements of single frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and some of clinical laboratory indexes were statistically significant. This study further found that both mid-arm fat area and triceps skin-fold thickness were independent contributors to percent fat mass after adjustment for body mass index and gender in the multiple regression models. This study also demonstrated that mid-arm muscle circumference, or mid-arm muscle area, or corrected mid-arm muscle area independently predicted height normalized indices of fat-free mass respectively after adjustment for body mass index and gender in the multiple regression models. The prevalence of protein wasting measured by mid-arm muscle circumference (50%) appears to be equivalent to that measured by serum albumin concentration (50%). Conclusions Mid-arm muscle and fat variables by upper arm anthropometry correlated with nutritional variables of single frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and clinical laboratory indexes. Mid-arm muscle and fat variables by upper arm anthropometry were independent predictors of body composition regarding height-normalized indices of fat-free mass and percent fat mass of hemodialysis patients even after adjustment of gender and BMI.

scholarly journals Investigation of Body Development in Growing Holstein Heifers With Special Emphasis on Body Fat Development Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Heine ◽  
Viktoria Kichmann ◽  
Miriam K. von Kuhlberg ◽  
Ingrid Vervuert ◽  
Lisa Bachmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Skeletal Development ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Skeletal Growth ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Fat Tissue

This study analyzed skeletal development, body condition, and total body fat development of growing heifers. A total of 144 female primiparous Holstein cattle from four commercial dairy farms with different degrees of stillbirth rates were examined during the rearing period. This included measurements in body condition, fat tissue, metabolic, and endocrine factors. Pelvic measurements and the sacrum height were analyzed to assess skeletal development. The body condition was classified via body condition scoring, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), back fat thickness measurements, and the body mass. For the first time, BIA was used as an appropriate method to evaluate the fat tissue content of cattle throughout the rearing period. This analysis technique can be performed on heifers aged 8–15 months. Throughout that period, the fat content decreased while the skeletal development increased. In addition, high free fatty acid concentrations in serum of the animals with high frame development were found, supporting our hypothesis that stored energy of body fat deposits is used for skeletal growth. Furthermore, we were able to demonstrate complex endocrine relationships between fat metabolism and skeletal growth by using specific markers, such as leptin, insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and estradiol (E2). Food analysis showed high crude protein (CP) levels in the total mixed ration above recommendation for daily protein intake of all farms. However, there was a positive correlation between CP and the body frame measurements in our study. In summary, we established a novel regression formula for BIA analysis (“BIA-Heine”) in heifers to evaluate the body composition throughout different ages and physiological stages in the development of heifers. This special formula allows the evaluation of fat tissue without a whole-body analysis and therefore provides an innovative technique for animal welfare support.

scholarly journals No differences in the body fat after violating core bioelectrical impedance measurement assumptions

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arshdeep K. Randhawa ◽  
Veronica Jamnik ◽  
Michael D. T. Fung ◽  
Adam S. Fogel ◽  
Jennifer L. Kuk
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Impedance Measurement ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
The Body ◽  
The Other ◽  
Weight Loss Intervention ◽  
Preliminary Measurement

Abstract Objective It is unclear to what degree acutely violating bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurement assumptions will alter the predicted percent fat mass (%FM) and whether this differs by sex or body mass index (BMI). Methods %FM was assessed under control, dehydration, exercise, water, food intake and non-voided bladder conditions with three BIA devices (Tanita: BC-418, TBF-314, & Omron HBF-306CN) for men (n = 23, age: 24.0 ± 5.2 years old) and women (n = 17, age: 22.5 ± 3.4 years old) separately. Results For all BIA devices, there were no differences in the %FM values between the control and the other conditions in men or women (− 1.9 to 0.4%, p > 0.05). Across the three devices and five conditions, 97% of %FM tests returned values within 5% of control (2 tests), and 86% of tests were within 2% of control despite violating an assumption. The errors were greatest with dehydration and women were more likely to have a %FM difference greater than 2% than men with dehydration using the hand-to-foot device (Tanita TBF-314: 59% versus 9%). There were no differences in %FM between control and the conditions when examined by BMI (overweight/obesity: − 2.8 to 0.1% and normal weight: − 1.7 to 0.5%; BMI*trial, p = 0.99). Conclusion %FM estimates were similar despite acutely violating the preliminary measurement BIA assumptions across a range of different BMIs. The minor variations in %FM are smaller than what would be expected with day-to-day variability or weight loss intervention but may be larger in women than men.

scholarly journals The Scope of Body Mass Index (BMI) and other body component measurements

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Németh
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Electrical Impedance ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
The Body ◽  
Methods And Techniques ◽  
Body Component

This paper presents and compare the scopes of the body component measurement methods and techniques currently in use. Next to the best known and widespread Adolphe Quetelet's Body Mass Index, ‘New Body Mass Index’ created by Prof. Trfethen. Moreover, it presents and compares the bioelectrical impedance analysis and the Electrical Impedance Myographs methods, too. This article aims to go through one by one the body component measurement methods, and to compare the most important feature of them, for a better understanding of their usability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document