Abwicklung von Banken

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Blaß
Keyword(s):  
Financial Distress ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
The Other ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
Single Resolution Mechanism ◽  
European Banking ◽  
Public Money ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Insolvency Proceedings

In this book, the author concerns himself with the EU’s banking union, whose establishment aims to further integrate the European banking sector and strengthen confidence in its stability. He focuses on the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), which was established as the second pillar of the banking union. With the help of the SRM, it should be possible in the future for even large banks to be in financial distress without endangering the stability of the entire financial system. The bank will be liquidated in accordance with the rules of the SRM if traditional insolvency proceedings are not feasible due to the caesura effect associated with them. In addition, as little public money as possible—at best no public funds at all—is to be spent on the resolution. The main purpose of this study is to ascertain whether the SRM can achieve this objective and how the SRM and the other pillars of the banking union interact with each other.

scholarly journals Multilevel cooperation in the EU resolution of cross-border bank groups: lessons from the non-euro area Member States joining the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Smoleńska
Keyword(s):  
Euro Area ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Member States ◽  
Essential Condition ◽  
European Banking Union ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Single Resolution Mechanism ◽  
European Banking ◽  
Administrative Oversight ◽  
The Eu

AbstractCross-border banking presents a unique set of challenges in the EU from the perspective of arranging administrative oversight structures. Structuring cooperation between different EU and national authorities in a way which is conducive to trust-building and mutual engagement is an essential condition for overcoming disintegrative tendencies in the internal market. To assess how the existing EU arrangements fare in this regard in the context of EU resolution law, this article comparatively analyses the different models of multilevel administrative cooperation in the post-crisis EU framework. These are specifically the centralised model of the European Banking Union (Single Resolution Mechanism) and the relatively looser networked model of the resolution colleges. The multilevel cooperation under both models is nuanced given the distinct roles of the national resolution authorities, EU agencies and the differentiated status of non-euro area Member States in the EBU (Croatia, Bulgaria). The article’s findings allow to identify specific problems of constitutional nature pertaining to the accountability of administrative cooperation, equality of Member States and the implications of Meroni doctrine’s distortive effects.

Financial Market Integration and EMU

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kern Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Market Integration ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Financial Integration ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Shadow Banking ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Financial Market Integration ◽  
Banking Market ◽  
Capital Markets Union ◽  
European Banking

This chapter discusses the evolution of the market structure in European banking and the level of financial integration in the Eurozone and the interaction with financial regulatory developments. The chapter will address how the creation of the Banking Union’s Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) has affected banking market integration in the Eurozone. The chapter also raises related issues concerning monetary policy and banking supervision and some of the challenges in discharging these responsibilities within the Banking Union. This chapter also analyses the Capital Markets Union (CMU) proposal in respect of its important objective to increase the supply of credit from non-bank financial intermediaries to the economy of the European Union (EU) while also raising important prudential regulatory concerns concerning the risks raised by the shadow banking sector.

scholarly journals The European Banking Union: will it be Sufficient to Avert Another Debt Crisis in Europe?

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Alexander Spence
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crises ◽  
Debt Crisis ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Member States ◽  
Single Supervisory Mechanism ◽  
European Banking Union ◽  
The Past ◽  
Single Resolution Mechanism ◽  
European Banking ◽  
Single Rulebook

<p>The rationales for the creation of the European Banking Union (“EBU”), what its objectives are and the main pillars of support for such a scheme, are worthy of investigation.  This article means to critically discuss the various elements of the EBU and determine whether the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism, the main pillars underpinning the structure, are robust enough to avert another debt crisis in Europe. At the EBU’s heart lies the Single Rulebook (“SR”), which aims to counter the risk of fragmentation and nationalist tendencies. This inward looking trend became apparent in the recent financial crises, and contributed greatly to them. In an effort to avoid repeating the divisive and disjointed mistakes of the past, the SR is instead looking to provide unity and harmonisation across all participating member states. </p>

scholarly journals Quo Vadis Banking Union? Discussions over the Resolution of Banks

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (333) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaudia Alicja Zielińska
Keyword(s):  
Banking Sector ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
International Level ◽  
Final Structure ◽  
The Core ◽  
Single Resolution Mechanism ◽  
Review Procedure ◽  
Quo Vadis ◽  
The Right ◽  
Core Issues

Transferring the right to make the decision concerning a bank’s resolution onto the international level has long been the bone of contention between the European Union’s Member States. The aim of this article is to provide a review of the discussions on this topic, while attempting to evaluate whether the consensus reached allows the achievement of goals set for the resolution mechanism. The article is composed of five parts. The first part introduces the concept of single supervision over the banking sector and explains the importance of having harmonised resolution rules. The second part discusses the process of reaching a consensus towards the establishment of the Single Resolution Mechanism. That part is followed by a description of the final structure agreed for the mechanism back in 2014. The fourth part outlines the review procedure of the established regulations currently under way. The final part of the article summarises the contents and attempts to identify the core issues that still need to be resolved in order to guarantee reliability of the second pillar of the banking union.

15 The Operation of the Single Resolution Mechanism in the Context of the EU State Aid Regime

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kokkoris Ioannis ◽  
Olivares-Caminal Rodrigo
Keyword(s):  
Crisis Management ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
State Aid ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Single Resolution Mechanism ◽  
The Eu

This chapter addresses the initiatives of the European Commission to maintain the financial stability of the banking sector. It analyses the regulatory reforms on bank recovery and resolution introduced by the EU aimed at creating a Banking Union, and provides an overview of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) by taking into account the crisis management tool innovations. It also offers a critical appraisal of the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM). The initiatives examined here are envisaged in a two-pronged approach: through the uniform rules of the Banking Union and in a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) and a Single Resolution Fund (SRF) on one hand, and its interrelation with the state aid rules of the Treaty for the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the other.

Conclusion

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Epstein
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Major Powers ◽  
European Banking Union ◽  
Catching Up ◽  
European Banking ◽  
Domestic Banks

The study’s findings from Europe have implications for other major powers, including that: (1) banking sector protectionism became increasingly costly given other liberalizing trends; (2) foreign-owned bank subsidiaries can provide more stable funding in crises than alternative foreign or even domestic bank activity; (3) foreign domination in finance limited catching up in the global economy, but in fact few states showed the capacity to exploit domestic banks for national goals; and (4) centralized bank governance through European Banking Union weakened bank–state ties in Europe, and elevated the role of markets there. This chapter analyzes the relevance of the findings for the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). China is perhaps the clearest case of a country struggling to both liberalize and retain the economic policy autonomy associated with a largely state-controlled financial system. The conclusion specifies the broader transformation in bank–state ties, but also its limits.

Justice system and corruption dog Bulgaria’s euro bid

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Banking System ◽  
Political Support ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Waiting Room ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
European Banking Union ◽  
Finance Minister ◽  
European Banking ◽  
The Stability

Significance Bulgaria must also join the European Banking Union (EBU) as part of its Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) II bid, in order to alleviate concerns over institutional governance, economic convergence and the stability of its banking system. ERM II accession -- the ‘waiting room to the euro’ -- would bolster Bulgaria’s financial and monetary stability, and help serve as a policy anchor; Bulgaria had hoped to join this month, but Finance Minister Vladislav Goranov said in June he now hoped for entry by year-end if not before. Impacts Timing will depend on Bulgaria’s meeting the new requirement to join both ERM II and the EBU at the same time. Political support from other euro-area states could also affect the ultimate timeline. That Croatia has just applied for ERM II shows adopting the euro is still a goal, particularly for smaller EU member states.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document