scholarly journals New Biological Treatment Options in CSU

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahava Vadasz ◽  
Elias Toubi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Full Remission ◽  
Met Needs ◽  
The Many ◽  
Short Courses ◽  
Shed Light

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a devastating disease and is associated with many co-morbidities and long-lasting suffering. Therefore, patients always look for a most efficient therapeutic approach to achieve a full remission. In many patients, CSU remain refractory to off-label doses of antihistamines and short courses of steroids, and therefore are treated with omalizumab. However, 15–20% of severe CSU patients will stay unresponsive to omalizumab and are defined as being of un-met needs. In this review we will shed light on the many new drugs which are assessed in ongoing clinical trials.

scholarly journals INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ON DATA OF COVID-19 OFF-LABEL TREATMENT AND DATA OF COMPASSIONATE USE OF MEDICINES AND ACCESS TO TREATMENT IN A PANDEMIC

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Оксана Кашинцева ◽  
Микита Трохименко
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Compassionate Use ◽  
Access To Treatment ◽  
Off Label

The article concerns the issues of legal protection of data obtained as a result of off-label drugs therapy of COVID-19 and of data obtained of the compassionate use of medicines in treatment of COVID-19. The authorsargue that neither data on the use of off-label or on the basis of a compassionate use in the treatment of coronavirus (data obtained in solidarity clinical trials) are not determined as the information that should be protected from unfair commercial use.Regarding to the use of off-label for a new purpose of drag it is not be considered as a «new chemical substance», because the drug is already registered, and therefore known, and in the case of obtaining data in compassionate use, this information is removed from the trade secret regime by the WHO and EMA opinion. Such information is opened to use from the beginning. Therefore, in both of the above cases, it could notbe considered as an «unfair use» in the meaning of Art. 39 TRIPS Agreements.The WHO apply to the world community and informed about the «Solidarity» clinical trial for COVID-19 treatments». Solidified clinical trials of COVID-19 treatment compare four treatment options to evaluate their efficacy in COVID-19 therapy. Solidarity-based clinical trials aim to quickly identify which of the drugs tested slows disease progression or improves survival. New drugs can be added to solidarity studiesbased on new data.On April 3, 2020, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued recommendations for compassionate use for remdesivir as the most promising treatment for COVID-19. The EMA explicitly states that the compassionate use is not part of the clinical trial in its usual meanings.IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) also wrote an open letter to WIPO urging WIPO to use all available flexible intellectual property mechanisms to maximize worldwide access to information (research data) on COVID-19 treatment.Thus, the legal regime of «Solidarity clinical trials and the WHO and EMA declarations lead us to conclude that all data obtained in the Solidarity clinical trials should not be monopolized by intellectual property, either as objects of patenting for a new scope / new purpose of treatment, or like an object of data exclusivity protection.

Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Hematology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (1) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
New Agents ◽  
Ongoing Work ◽  
The Many

Abstract Advances in treatment options for patients with multiple myeloma have made a significant impact on the overall survival of patients and have helped achieve levels of response and duration of remission previously not achievable with standard chemotherapy-based approaches. These improvements are due, in large part, to the development of the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, each of which has substantial single-agent activity. In addition, a large number of second-generation agents are also in clinical development, such that the repertoire of available treatment options continues to expand. To better interpret clinical trials performed in the relapsed setting, it is important that definitions of relapse categories are used to help better pinpoint the specific benefit for a given therapy, especially in the combination therapy setting as it aids in determining if ongoing work should be continued or abandoned for a given new agent. Insights from preclinical modeling and in vitro work have identified several new combinations, new targets and second- or third-generation versions of existing targets that hold great promise in the setting of relapsed myeloma. Combinations of thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide with conventional agents or among each other have resulted in enhanced response rates and efficacy. Clinical trials of agents such as carfilzomib, pomalidomide, vorinostat, panobinostat, and elotuzomab are just a few of the many exciting new compounds that are being tested in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials for relapsed patients. Further clinical and translational testing are critical to better understanding how best to combine these new agents, as well as identifying patient populations that may best benefit from treatment with these developing new agents.

scholarly journals Recent Advances in Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in an Aging Society: 2020 Update

Liver Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 640-662
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Recent Advances

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed markedly since the introduction of the molecular targeted agent sorafenib in 2007. Sorafenib increased the available treatment options for patients with extrahepatic spread and vascular invasion and improved survival in patients with advanced HCC; however, various shortcomings such as low response rates and relatively high toxicity (e.g., hand-foot skin reaction) prompted concerted efforts aimed at developing new molecular targeted agents to provide more treatment options and second-line agents for patients with disease progression or intolerance to sorafenib. Despite many attempts to develop new drugs between 2007 and 2016, all first-line and second-line clinical trials conducted during this period failed. However, between 2017 and 2019, 4 drugs (lenvatinib as a first-line agent and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab as second-line agents) emerged in quick succession from clinical trials and became available for clinical use. In addition, nivolumab and pembrolizumab were approved as second-line agents after sorafenib. A recent phase III trial (IMbrave150) showed that combination immunotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab increases overall survival compared with sorafenib therapy; Food and Drug Agency already approved this combination therapy, and worldwide approval is expected soon. This review describes the recent advances in systemic therapy and the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and cabozantinib), monoclonal antibodies (ramucirumab and bevacizumab), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab) in elderly patients and the similarity of their efficacy and safety profiles to those in the general population.

scholarly journals Neurological commentary addressing the article titled “Guidance for switching from off-label antipsychotics to pimavanserin for Parkinson’s disease psychosis: an expert consensus”

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 352-354
Author(s):  
Neal Hermanowicz
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Efficacy Data ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Frequent Monitoring ◽  
Proven Efficacy ◽  
The Many

Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP) occurs commonly and can comprise the most troubling symptoms among the many that occur with this illness. Prior treatment options for PDP have been limited and unsatisfactory due to uneven efficacy data, burdensome monitoring, and lack of a specific FDA indication coupled with warnings of increased mortality. Pimavanserin, approved for the treatment of PDP by the FDA in 2016, overcomes some of these obstacles, with data proven efficacy and without the frequent monitoring required for clozapine. This presents an opportunity to transition patients with PDP to pimavanserin from older therapies. Black and colleagues provide their thoughtful recommendations on how to achieve this transition to pimavanserin while maintaining symptom control and minimizing disruptions that might occur with a medication change.

scholarly journals Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019: a comprehensive review

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-242
Author(s):  
Damla Sosyal ◽  
Ozge Ozmen ◽  
Muhammed Yunus Bektay ◽  
Fikret Vehbi Izzettin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
World Health ◽  
Comprehensive Review ◽  
New Type ◽  
Governmental Institutions ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Health Organization

The new type of Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is a highly contagious pathogen that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome and can be transmitted from human to human. COVID-19, which has been declared as a pandemic by the world health organization and is infected with more than 50 million people, is also responsible for the death of more than 1 million people. There is no sufficient data from randomized clinical trials that any potential treatment improves outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, antivirals such as favipiravir, lopinavir/ritonavir, immunomodulatory agents tocilizumab, siltuximab, and sarilumab, and anti-inflammatory drugs such as steroids are used for the treatment of COVID-19. Repurposing drugs can provide new treatment options faster than discovering new drugs due to the known safety profiles of existing drugs. On the other hand, there are new drug and vaccine trials for COVID-19. Many researchers, governmental or non-governmental institutions having clinical trials for COVID-19 drugs and vaccines. In this comprehensive review, we investigate the clinical features, management, and treatment of COVID-19 and possible adverse effects and important information related to drugs used for COVID-19. For future preparedness and readiness, new laws and legislations should be constituted. Besides, emergency teams and budgets should be prepared as well. .

scholarly journals Ten-Year Research Update Review: Antiviral Activities from Marine Organisms

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Riccio ◽  
Nadia Ruocco ◽  
Mirko Mutalipassi ◽  
Maria Costantini ◽  
Valerio Zupo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Marine Organisms ◽  
Chemical Diversity ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trials ◽  
Marine Metabolites ◽  
Marine Compound ◽  
Antiviral Activities ◽  
Shed Light

Oceans cover more than 70 percent of the surface of our planet and are characterized by huge taxonomic and chemical diversity of marine organisms. Several studies have shown that marine organisms produce a variety of compounds, derived from primary or secondary metabolism, which may have antiviral activities. In particular, certain marine metabolites are active towards a plethora of viruses. Multiple mechanisms of action have been found, as well as different targets. This review gives an overview of the marine-derived compounds discovered in the last 10 years. Even if marine organisms produce a wide variety of different compounds, there is only one compound available on the market, Ara-A, and only another one is in phase I clinical trials, named Griffithsin. The recent pandemic emergency caused by SARS-CoV-2, also known as COVID-19, highlights the need to further invest in this field, in order to shed light on marine compound potentiality and discover new drugs from the sea.

scholarly journals Therapeutic clinical trials to combat COVID-19 pandemic in India: analysis from trial registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Batta ◽  
Raj Khirasaria ◽  
Vinod Kapoor ◽  
Deepansh Varshney
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Drug Repurposing ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Therapeutic Treatment ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Therapeutic Trials ◽  
Microsoft Office

AbstractObjectivesWith the emergence of Novel corona virus, hunt for finding a preventive and therapeutic treatment options has already begun at a rapid pace with faster clinical development programs. The present study was carried out to give an insight of therapeutic interventional trials registered under clinical trial registry of India (CTRI) for COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsAll trials registered under CTRI were evaluated using keyword “COVID” from its inception till 9th June 2020. Out of which, therapeutic interventional studies were chosen for further analysis. Following information was collected for each trial: type of therapeutic intervention (preventive/therapeutic), treatment given, no. of centers (single center/multicentric), type of institution (government/private), study design (randomized/single-blinded/double-blinded) and sponsors (Government/private). Microsoft Office Excel 2007 was used for tabulation and analysis.ResultsThe search yielded total of 205 trials, out of which, 127 (62%) trials were interventional trials. Out of these, 71 (56%) were AYUSH interventions, 36 (28.3%) tested drugs, 9 (7%) tested a nondrug intervention, rest were nutraceuticals and vaccines. About 66 (56%) were therapeutic trials. Majority were single-centered trials, i.e. 87 (73.7%). Trials were government funded in 57 (48.3%) studies. Majority were randomized controlled trials, i.e. 67 (56.8%). AYUSH preparations included AYUSH-64, Arsenic Album, SamshamaniVati etc.ConclusionsThe number of therapeutic interventional clinical trials was fair in India. A clear-cut need exists for an increase in both quantity and quality of clinical trials for COVID-19. Drug repurposing approach in all systems of medicine can facilitate prompt clinical decisions at lower costs than de novo drug development.

scholarly journals Variation in treatment preferences of pulmonary exacerbations among Australian and New Zealand cystic fibrosis physicians

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000956
Author(s):  
Grace Currie ◽  
Anna Tai ◽  
Tom Snelling ◽  
André Schultz
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Early Response ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Dornase Alfa ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Professional Opinion ◽  
Pulmonary Exacerbations

BackgroundDespite advances in cystic fibrosis (CF) management and survival, the optimal treatment of pulmonary exacerbations remains unclear. Understanding the variability in treatment approaches among physicians might help prioritise clinical uncertainties to address through clinical trials.MethodsPhysicians from Australia and New Zealand who care for people with CF were invited to participate in a web survey of treatment preferences for CF pulmonary exacerbations. Six typical clinical scenarios were presented; three to paediatric and another three to adult physicians. For each scenario, physicians were asked to choose treatment options and provide reasons for their choices.ResultsForty-nine CF physicians (31 paediatric and 18 adult medicine) participated; more than half reported 10+ years of experience. There was considerable variation in primary antibiotic selection; none was preferred by more than half of respondents in any scenario. For secondary antibiotic therapy, respondents consistently preferred intravenous tobramycin and a third antibiotic was rarely prescribed, except in one scenario describing an adult patient. Hypertonic saline nebulisation and twice daily chest physiotherapy was preferred in most scenarios while dornase alfa use was more variable. Most CF physicians (>80%) preferred to change therapy if there was no early response. Professional opinion was the most common reason for antibiotic choice.ConclusionsVariation exists among CF physicians in their preferred choice of primary antibiotic and use of dornase alfa. These preferences are driven by professional opinion, possibly reflecting a lack of evidence to base policy recommendations. Evidence from high-quality clinical trials is needed to inform physician decision making.

scholarly journals Patient Derived Xenografts for Genome-Driven Therapy of Osteosarcoma

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 416
Author(s):  
Lorena Landuzzi ◽  
Maria Cristina Manara ◽  
Pier-Luigi Lollini ◽  
Katia Scotlandi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Tumor Heterogeneity ◽  
Functional Studies ◽  
Ngs Data Analysis ◽  
The Many ◽  
Orthotopic Xenografts ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Ngs Data ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Somatic Copy Number Alterations

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a rare malignant primary tumor of mesenchymal origin affecting bone. It is characterized by a complex genotype, mainly due to the high frequency of chromothripsis, which leads to multiple somatic copy number alterations and structural rearrangements. Any effort to design genome-driven therapies must therefore consider such high inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Therefore, many laboratories and international networks are developing and sharing OS patient-derived xenografts (OS PDX) to broaden the availability of models that reproduce OS complex clinical heterogeneity. OS PDXs, and new cell lines derived from PDXs, faithfully preserve tumor heterogeneity, genetic, and epigenetic features and are thus valuable tools for predicting drug responses. Here, we review recent achievements concerning OS PDXs, summarizing the methods used to obtain ectopic and orthotopic xenografts and to fully characterize these models. The availability of OS PDXs across the many international PDX platforms and their possible use in PDX clinical trials are also described. We recommend the coupling of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data analysis with functional studies in OS PDXs, as well as the setup of OS PDX clinical trials and co-clinical trials, to enhance the predictive power of experimental evidence and to accelerate the clinical translation of effective genome-guided therapies for this aggressive disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document