scholarly journals Prevalence of ENDS and JUUL Use, by Smoking Status, in National Samples of Young Adults and Older Adults in the U.S.

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-418
Author(s):  
Shivaani Prakash ◽  
Cameron Hatcher ◽  
Saul Shiffman
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Us ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
National Probability Sample

Objectives: In this paper, we estimate the prevalence of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and JUUL brand ENDS use among adults in the US, overall and by smoking history. Methods: We obtained 2019 cross-sectional online surveys assessing smoking, use of any ENDS, and JUUL specifically, in a national probability sample of 11,833 US adults. Data were analyzed for young adults (YA; aged 18-24) and older adults (OA; aged 25+). Results: Past 30-day ENDS prevalence was 8.0% in YA and 4.7% in OA; equivalent JUUL figures were 3.1% and 1.2%. ENDS/JUUL use was more prevalent among current and former smokers than never smokers, where prevalence was ≤ 2% (YA: 2.0%/0.9%; OA: 0.9%/0.1%). JUUL use was higher among recent (< 1 year) quitters than among long-term (≥ 1 year) quitters. Among those who had ever used both ENDS and other tobacco, strong majorities reported using other tobacco first. Among JUUL users who also had used other tobacco ≥ 95% had used other tobacco first. Conclusions: Past-30-day ENDS use (including JUUL) was ≤ 8% among young adults and ≤ 5% in older adults. Most (> 98%) ENDS and JUUL users were current or former smokers, which is relevant to assessment of the population impact of these products.

Role of flavours in vaping uptake and cessation among New Zealand smokers and non-smokers: a cross-sectional study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Gendall ◽  
Janet Hoek
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cigarette Smokers ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers

BackgroundConcerns about the effects of vaping have prompted calls to restrict e-cigarette flavours. Vaping proponents have criticised these proposals, which they argue may discourage smokers from taking up vaping or trigger relapse to smoking. We explored the role flavours play in vaping uptake and cessation among New Zealand cigarette smokers and vaping-susceptible never smokers (VSNS), and examined current vapers’ preferred flavours.MethodsWe conducted an online survey of 1005 New Zealanders aged 18–70 years that included 324 current vapers (vaped in the last 30 days) and 302 ‘past’ vapers (reported past vaping, but not within the last month). We asked respondents their reasons for vaping and explored current vapers’ preferred e-cigarette flavours; we analysed the data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.ResultsIrrespective of smoking status, flavour was one of the main reasons respondents gave for vaping (smokers 83%; former smokers 77%; VSNS 80%). Flavour was less important to former vapers; 47% of smokers, 57% of former smokers and 64% of VSNS cited flavour as a reason for originally taking up vaping. Fruit flavours were most popular among all three groups; smokers also favoured tobacco flavour, while former smokers also favoured mint or menthol, and never smokers also favoured confectionery/sweets/lolly flavours.ConclusionsFlavours play a major role in vaping initiation for current smokers, former smokers and vaping-susceptible non-smokers, and remain important to those who continue vaping. Our findings highlight the need for regulation that allows some flavour diversity without the extravagant marketing currently used to promote vaping and e-liquids.

scholarly journals Unraveling the Relationship between Smoking and Weight: The Role of Sedentary Behavior

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Kaufman ◽  
Erik M. Augustson ◽  
Heather Patrick
Keyword(s):  
Sedentary Behavior ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Anthropometric Measures ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Health And Nutrition ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Relationship

Research has shown that current smokers have a lower mean body mass index (BMI) than never and former smokers, with former smokers having the highest mean BMI. A number of physiological mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain this pattern, but few studies have explored the possible role of behavioral factors. Using data from the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2006, this descriptive study explored the associations among smoking status, sedentary behavior, and two anthropometric measures (BMI and waist circumference (WC)). Sedentary behavior was significantly higher among current smokers compared to never and former smokers; former smokers had higher levels of sedentary behavior compared to never smokers. The association between smoking status and anthropometric outcomes was moderated by sedentary behavior, with current smokers evidencing higher BMI and WC at higher levels of sedentary behavior compared to lower levels of sedentary behavior. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for interventions, particularly with respect to postcessation weight gain.

Evaluation of biomarkers of exposure and potential harm in smokers, former smokers and never-smokers

2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frazer J. Lowe ◽  
Evan O. Gregg ◽  
Michael McEwan
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Status ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Potential Harm ◽  
Biomarkers Of Exposure ◽  
Prostaglandin F ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract: The objective of this study was to obtain baseline data on biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) in smokers, former smokers and never-smokers.: This was a cross-sectional study of 80 healthy male and female volunteers over 21 years old, self-selected for smoking status. Subjects were pre-screened by medical staff at an independent clinical research unit, within 1 week prior to a single overnight residential visit and sample collection.: All BoE were able to differentiate between the two smoking groups and smokers from all non-smokers. There was a strong correlation between cigarettes smoked per day and total urinary nicotine equivalents (TNE; r=0.85). TNE correlated better with 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol levels than cigarettes smoked per day (r=0.75 and r=0.56, respectively). Of the BoPH included in this study, seven (11-dehydro-thromboxane B2, 2, 3-dinorthromboxane B2, 8-epi prostaglandin F: While BoE clearly differentiate between groups based on self-declared smoking status, most BoPH examined could not do so in a consistent manner. The dynamics of BoPH levels are not well understood. Future studies of BoPH should eliminate potential confounding factors and increase the number of subjects to allow the investigation of genetic polymorphism in metabolic pathways.Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:311–20.

scholarly journals Relationship with Grandparents and Young Adults’ Attitudes About Aging and Future-Oriented Tendencies

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 883-883
Author(s):  
Tianyuan Li ◽  
Pok Man Siu
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Healthy Lifestyle ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Sustainable Development ◽  
Consideration Of Future Consequences ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Future Consequences

Abstract It is important but always challenging to restrain from immediate temptations and behave conscientiously for long-term goals. Constructive interactions with older adults may promote young adults’ positive attitudes about aging. With a brighter later adulthood in mind, young adults may then demonstrate a higher level of future-oriented tendency in their behaviors. The current study recruited 371 college students (Mage = 22.43, SDage = 2.88; 203 females) from Hong Kong. They completed an online survey about their interaction with the closest grandparent, attitudes about aging, and measures related to future-oriented tendencies (i.e., consideration of future consequences, healthy lifestyle, and impulsiveness). Parental intimacy and demographic information were assessed as potential covariates. Supporting the hypotheses, more interaction with grandparents was related to more positive attitudes about aging, β = .40, SE = .11, p &lt; .001. More positive attitudes about aging was then related to more consideration of future consequences, β = .14, SE = .07, p = .03, healthier lifestyle, β = .16, SE = .06, p = .005, and less impulsivity, β = -.10, SE = .03, p &lt; .001. Bootstrapping tests for the indirect effects from interaction with grandparents to the future-oriented outcomes through positive attitudes about aging were all significant as well. Although the current cross-sectional data could not confirm the causal links among the variables, the results provide some initial insight on how older adults can foster a long-term orientation in younger generations and contribute to the sustainable development of our societies through constructive intergenerational interactions.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Characteristics of Ever Regular Use of Non-combustible Nicotine for One-year or More: A Population Survey in England

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Cox ◽  
Jamie Brown ◽  
Loren Kock ◽  
Lion Shahab
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Status ◽  
Tobacco Product ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Hazardous Alcohol Use ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Product Use ◽  
Hazardous Alcohol ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
One Year

Abstract Introduction: Up-to-date monitoring of non-combustible nicotine products (NNP) is important to assess their impact. To date, there is little evidence on the association between long-term regular use (defined here as one-year or more) of NNP and current smoking status. Aims/methods: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence, and sociodemographic, alcohol and smoking status correlates, of ever regular use of NNP in England in 2020.A cross sectional survey of adults in England between February and June 2020. Results: 8,486 adults were surveyed, 94.9% (8,055) were complete cases. The weighted prevalence of ever regular NNP use was 5.4% (n=436; 95%CI 5.0-6.0), of which 82% (n=360; 95%CI 78.7-85.8) was single, and 18% (n=79; 95%CI 14.8-22) multiple product use. Amongst ever regular NNP users, the prevalence of ever regular nicotine replacement therapies (NRT), e-cigarette and heated tobacco product use was 64.7% (95% CI 60.1-69), 43.4% (95%CI 38.8-48) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.4-4.5), respectively. In regression analysis, ever regular NNP use was independently associated with smoking status, being significantly higher among current (22.3%; Adjusted OR (aOR) 34.9, 95%CI 24.0-50.8) and ex-smokers (12.7%, aOR 19.8, 95%CI 11.1-14.4) than among never smokers (0.6%). More advantaged occupational grade (aOR, 1.27 95% CI 1.02-1.57) and at least hazardous alcohol use (aOR, 1.38 95%CI 1.06-1.78) were independently associated with greater prevalence of ever regular NNP use.Conclusions: Ever regularly using NNP was highest among smokers and ex-smokers and rare among never smokers. Among people who have ever regularly used NNP, NRT is the most popular.

Abstract P132: Time Since Smoking Cessation and Pulse Wave Velocity: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky L Camplain ◽  
Michelle L Snyder ◽  
Priya Palta ◽  
Hanyu Ni ◽  
Kenneth R Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Arterial Stiffness ◽  
Pulse Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
Aric Study

Cigarette smoking is a preventable cause of cardiovascular disease and is associated with arterial stiffening among young adults. While smoking cessation lowers the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, evidence for a relationship between time since smoking cessation and arterial stiffness is limited in older adults. We assessed the association of smoking status and time since smoking cessation with arterial stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral (cfPWV) and brachial-ankle (baPWV) pulse wave velocity, conditional on intensity and duration of exposure to smoking (pack-years). Analyses included 1,996 men and 2,767 women aged 67 to 90 years examined in the ARIC study in 2011-2013. Smoking status was ascertained at all five ARIC examinations and during annual telephone interviews. Information on age at initiation of smoking, smoking intensity and duration were also collected. Pack-years were calculated as the product of the average number of cigarettes smoked per day and years smoked divided by 20. Two measures of baPWV and cfPWV were obtained then averaged. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate the association between smoking status and time since smoking cessation with PWV by gender, adjusted for age, hypertension, body mass index (BMI), and heart rate. Estimates of the association between smoking cessation and PWV were further adjusted for pack-years. Among women, former smokers and current smokers had a lower baPWV when compared to never smokers [β = -40.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): -64.2, -17.6) and β = -119.7 (95%CI: -168.7, -70.7), respectively]. Similar patterns were observed for cfPWV; however, the relationship was only significant among former smokers [β = -25.3 (95%CI: -48.0, -2.5)]. Association of smoking status and PWV was not significant in men. Among men who were former smokers there was a negative and significant association between smoking cessation and cfPWV [β = -1.4 (-2.7, -0.4)]; however, this same relationship was not observed for baPWV. BMI modified the association between smoking cessation and PWV in women. Time since smoking cessation was positively associated with PWV in women with a BMI <25 kg/m 2 [baPWV: β = 3.8 (95%CI: 1.2, 6.5); cfPWV: β = 2.5 (0.3, 4.7)], but not in women with a BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 . In these cross-sectional analyses, ever smokers had lower PWV compared to never smokers among older women, but not among older men. Greater time since smoking cessation was positively associated with arterial stiffness among normal or underweight women, but not among women who were overweight or obese, or among men. Accounting for cumulative exposure to smoking over the life course, gender-specific and arterial segment-specific patterns were observed in the association between time since smoking cessation and arterial stiffness measured in community-dwelling older adults, as well as a modification of these associations by excess weight among women.

Smoking history and adherence to cancer-related recommendations in a primary care setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger J Zoorob ◽  
Maria C Mejia ◽  
Jennifer Matas ◽  
Haijun Wang ◽  
Jason L Salemi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
The United States ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Abstract Public health prevention efforts have led to overall reductions in mortality from screening-preventable cancers. We explored cancer screening behaviors of smokers, former smokers, and nonsmokers among patients of large primary care practices to discover the relationship between smoking status and previous adherence to the United States Preventive Services Task Force breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Our descriptive study of electronic medical record data included 6,029 established primary care patients. Multi-predictor log-binomial regression models yielded prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine associations between smoking status and the likelihood of nonadherence. All models were adjusted for race/ethnicity, age, insurance, primary care specialty, number of comorbidities, and sex. Smoking history was obtained from all participants in January 2020. Current smokers accounted for 4.8%, while 22.7% were former smokers, and 72.5% were never smokers. Current smokers (compared to never smokers) were 63% more likely to be mammogram nonadherent (PR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.02), 26% more likely to be Pap smear nonadherent (PR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.53), and 39% more likely to be colonoscopy nonadherent (PR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.66). Current smokers and former Powered by Editorial Manager and ProduXion Manager from Aries Systems Corporation smokers had on average 2.9 comorbidities while never smokers had on average 2.1 comorbidities. Our findings showed that current smokers experienced significantly lower rates of cancer screening compared to never smokers. Further research is needed to investigate and identify best practices for increasing cancer screening uptake in this population.

Family History of Crohn’s Disease (CD) May Be a Risk Factor for Developing de novo CD following Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) for Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S150-S150
Author(s):  
H Li ◽  
M Arslan ◽  
Z Fu ◽  
H Lee ◽  
M Mikula
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Current Smoking Status ◽  
Current Smoking ◽  
History Of ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract Introduction/Objective A subset of patients with an established diagnosis of UC develops signs of CD (de novo CD) following IPAA. While the etiology and risk factors of de novo CD remain largely unknown, preliminary studies have shown controversial results regarding family history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and smoking history. Methods Patients that underwent IPAA for UC, with at least 1 year of follow-up, were identified (n=161; 1996 to 2018). We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records. Patients that were diagnosed with de novo CD during the follow-up period were further identified. Smoking history and family history of IBD were evaluated. Chi square test was performed to compare the frequencies. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression model. P&lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results 29 de novo CD were identified. At the time of proctocolectomy, the family history of IBD and smoking history was documented in 152 UC patients including 27 that subsequently developed de novo CD. 23 of 152 had a family history of IBD (12 UC, 9 CD and 2 IBD, NOS). 19/129 (14.7%) UC patients without a family history of any type of IBD, 4/9 (44.4%) with a family history of CD, and 4/12 (33.3%) with a family history of UC developed de novo CD. Patients with a family history of CD were more likely to develop de novo CD post IPAA than those without a family history of any type of IBD (OR 4.63, 95% CI 1.14-18.82, p=0.03). Family history of UC did not correlate with development of de novo CD (OR 2.90; 95% CI 0.79-10.57, p=0.108). At the time of proctocoletomy, 11 were current smokers, 25 were former smokers, and 116 never smoked. In de novo CD group, there were 4/27 (14.8 %) former smokers and 23/27 (85.2 %) never smokers. No de novo CD patient was current smoker. In the UC group that remained as UC following IPAA, 11/125 (8.8%) were current smokers, 21/125 (16.8 %) former smokers, and 93/125 (74.4 %) were never smokers. Current smoking status was not associated with development of de novo CD (p = 0.214). Conclusion Family history of CD may be a risk factor for developing de novo CD following IPAA for UC. Current smoking status was not associated with development of de novo CD following IPAA for UC.

scholarly journals Effect of Smoking Cessation On Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Silveira Souto ◽  
Emanuel Silva Rovai ◽  
Cristina Cunha Villar ◽  
Mariana Minatel Braga ◽  
Claudio Mendes Pannuti
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Tooth Loss ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract Background: Smoking is a major risk factor for periodontitis and tooth loss. Smoking cessation has a positive impact in periodontal treatment. However, so far, no systematic reviewhas evaluatedthe effect of smoking cessation on tooth loss. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate if smoking cessation reduces the risk of tooth loss. Methods: Observational (cross-sectional and longitudinal) studiesthat investigated the association between smoking cessation and tooth loss were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS databases were searched for articles published up to November 2018. Pooled results for subgroups of current and former smokers were compared in meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to test the influence of smoking status on estimates and explore the heterogeneity. Results: Of 230 potentially relevant publications, 21 studies were included in the qualitative review and 12 in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies did not show any differences between former and current smokers in the chance of losing 1 or more teeth (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.24, I 2 = 80%), losing more than 8 teeth (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.32, I 2 = 0%) or being edentulous (OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.99, I 2 = 98%). Meta-analysis from longitudinal studies showed that, when compared to never smokers, former smokers presented no increased risk of tooth loss (RR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.35, I 2 = 76%), while current smokers presented an increased risk of tooth loss (RR = 2.60; 95% CI = 2.29 to 2.96, I 2 = 61%). Meta-regression showed that, among former smokers, the time of cessation was the variable that better explained heterogeneity (approximately 60%). Conclusions: Risk for tooth loss in former smokers is comparable to that of never smokers. Moreover, former smokers have a reduced risk of tooth loss, when compared to current smokers.

scholarly journals Association between Cigarette Smoking Status and Composition of Gut Microbiota: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Hwan Lee ◽  
Yeojun Yun ◽  
Soo Jung Kim ◽  
Eun-Ju Lee ◽  
Yoosoo Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Former Smokers ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Gut Microbiota Composition

There have been few large-scale studies on the relationship between smoking and gut microbiota. We investigated the relationship between smoking status and the composition of gut microbiota. This was a population-based cross-sectional study using Healthcare Screening Center cohort data. A total of 758 men were selected and divided into three groups: never (n = 288), former (n = 267), and current smokers (n = 203). Among the three groups, there was no difference in alpha diversity, however, Jaccard-based beta diversity showed significant difference (p = 0.015). Pairwise permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) tests between never and former smokers did not show a difference; however, there was significant difference between never and current smokers (p = 0.017) and between former and current smokers (p = 0.011). Weighted UniFrac-based beta diversity also showed significant difference among the three groups (p = 0.038), and pairwise PERMANOVA analysis of never and current smokers showed significant difference (p = 0.01). In the analysis of bacterial composition, current smokers had an increased proportion of the phylum Bacteroidetes with decreased Firmicutes and Proteobacteria compared with never smokers, whereas there were no differences between former and never smokers. In conclusion, gut microbiota composition of current smokers was significantly different from that of never smokers. Additionally, there was no difference in gut microbiota composition between never and former smokers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document