A Survey of Patient Care Handoff and Sign-Out Practices Among Podiatric Surgical Residency Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Sansosti ◽  
Amanda Crowell ◽  
Whitney Ellis-McConnell ◽  
Andrew J. Meyr
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Personal Communication ◽  
Patient Handoff ◽  
Interprofessional Communication ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Surgical Residency ◽  
Assessment Feedback

Background: A patient “handoff,” or the “sign-out” process, is an episode during which the responsibility of a patient transitions from one health-care provider to another. These are important events that affect patient safety, particularly because a significant proportion of adverse events have been associated with a relative lack of physician communication. The objective of this investigation was to survey podiatric surgical residency programs with respect to patient care handoff and sign-out practices. Methods: A survey was initially developed and subsequently administered to the chief residents of 40 Council on Podiatric Medical Education–approved podiatric surgical residency programs attempting to elucidate patient care handoff protocols and procedures and on-call practices. Results: Although it was most common for patient care handoffs to occur in person (60.0%), programs also reported that handoffs regularly occurred by telephone (52.5%) and with no direct personal communication whatsoever other than the electronic passing of information (50.0%). In fact, 27.5% of programs reported that their most common means of patient care handoff was without direct resident communication and was instead purely electronic. We observed that few residents reported receiving formal education or assessment/feedback (17.5%) regarding their handoff proficiency, and only 5.0% of programs reported that attending physicians regularly took part in the handoff/sign-out process. Although most programs felt that their sign-out practices were safe and effective, 67.5% also believed that their process could be improved. Conclusions: These results provide unique information on a potentially underappreciated aspect of podiatric medical education and might point to some common deficiencies regarding the development of interprofessional communication within our profession during residency training.

Applications of Narrative Medicine to Surgical Education

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110298
Author(s):  
Carol EH Scott-Conner ◽  
Divyansh Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Education ◽  
Surgical Education ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Narrative Medicine ◽  
Medical Schools ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Surgical Residency

Narrative medicine describes the application of story to medical education and practice. Although it has been implemented successfully in many medical schools as a part of undergraduate medical education, applications to the residency environment have been relatively limited. There are virtually no data concerning the adoption of narrative medicine within surgical residencies. This paper provides a brief introduction to the formal discipline of narrative medicine. We further discuss how storytelling is already used in surgical education and summarize the literature on applications of narrative medicine to residents in other specialties. The relevance of narrative medicine to the ACGME core competencies is explored. We conclude with specific suggestions for implementation of narrative medicine within surgical residency programs.

scholarly journals Morning Report: Can an Established Medical Education Tradition Be Validated?

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew McNeill ◽  
Sayed K. Ali ◽  
Daniel E. Banks ◽  
Ishak A. Mansi
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
English Language ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Morning Report ◽  
Residency Programs

Abstract Background Morning report is accepted as an essential component of residency education throughout different parts of the world. Objective To review the evidence of the educational value, purpose, methods, and outcomes of morning report. Methods A literature search of PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library for English-language studies published between January 1, 1966, and October 31, 2011, was performed. We searched for keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms related to medical education, methods, attitudes, and outcomes in regard to “morning report.” Title and abstract review, followed by a full-text review by 3 authors, was performed to identify all pertinent articles. Results We identified 71 citations; 40 articles were original studies and 31 were commentaries, editorials, or review articles; 56 studies (79%) originated from internal medicine residency programs; 6 studies (8%) focused on ambulatory morning report; and 63 (89%) originated from the United States. Identified studies varied in objectives, methods, and outcome measures, and were not suitable for meta-analysis. Main outcome measures were resident satisfaction, faculty satisfaction, preparation for professional examinations, use of evidence-based medicine, clinical effects on patient care, adverse event detection, and utilization of a curriculum in case selection. Conclusions Morning report has heterogeneous purposes, methods, and settings. As an educational tool, morning report is challenging to define, its outcome is difficult to measure, and this precludes firm conclusions about its contribution to resident education or patient care. Residency programs should tailor morning report to meet their own unique educational objectives and needs.

scholarly journals Professional Development Track to Prepare Future Academic Clinicians

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Marie Traylor ◽  
Jorge L. Cervantes ◽  
Cynthia N. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Student Achievement ◽  
Education Research ◽  
Medical Student ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Academic Medicine ◽  
Student Feedback ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
School Of Medicine

Abstract Professional development is instrumental in the success of professionals and trainees in academic medicine. In response to medical student feedback requesting additional professional development opportunities, the Foster School of Medicine developed a distinction program, the Pathway for Preparing Academic Clinicians (PPAC), designed to deliver sought-after skill development and foundational knowledge in the three primary activities of academic medicine: medical education, research, and patient care. This distinction program addresses a curricular gap as identified by students and common to many UME curricula and also provides an opportunity for residency programs to identify student achievement within a pass/fail program.

scholarly journals Educational Experiences Residents Perceive As Most Helpful for the Acquisition of the ACGME Competencies

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lourdes R. Guerrero ◽  
Susan Baillie ◽  
Paul Wimmers ◽  
Neil Parker
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Graduate Medical

Abstract Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires physicians in training to be educated in 6 competencies considered important for independent medical practice. There is little information about the experiences that residents feel contribute most to the acquisition of the competencies. Objective To understand how residents perceive their learning of the ACGME competencies and to determine which educational activities were most helpful in acquiring these competencies. Method A web-based survey created by the graduate medical education office for institutional program monitoring and evaluation was sent to all residents in ACGME-accredited programs at the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, from 2007 to 2010. Residents responded to questions about the adequacy of their learning for each of the 6 competencies and which learning activities were most helpful in competency acquisition. Results We analyzed 1378 responses collected from postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) to PGY-3 residents in 12 different residency programs, surveyed between 2007 and 2010. The overall response rate varied by year (66%–82%). Most residents (80%–97%) stated that their learning of the 6 ACGME competencies was “adequate.” Patient care activities and observation of attending physicians and peers were listed as the 2 most helpful learning activities for acquiring the 6 competencies. Conclusion Our findings reinforce the importance of learning from role models during patient care activities and the heterogeneity of learning activities needed for acquiring all 6 competencies.

Equivalency? An Analysis of the AACS General Cosmetic Surgery Fellowship Through the Lens of the ACGME 6 Core Competencies

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-182
Author(s):  
Angel M. Morales ◽  
Jeffrey B. Marvel
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Interpersonal Communication ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Fellowship Program ◽  
Residency Programs

The American Academy of Cosmetic Surgeons (AACS) and American Board of Cosmetic Surgery (ABCS) have developed a 1-year fellowship program in cosmetic surgery with a pathway for board certification. However, attempts by ABCS physicians to advertise as “board certified cosmetic surgeons” have been met with resistance in some states, claiming that this training is not equivalent in scope, content, and duration to training accredited by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). This has led us to examine the AACS Cosmetic Surgery Fellowship through the lens of the ACGME 6 core competencies and milestones. We conclude that the AACS General Cosmetic Surgery Fellowship meets the ACGME core competencies. Medical knowledge and patient care are the competencies in which it is easiest to demonstrate equivalency to training accredited by the ACGME. Professionalism, systems-based practice, interpersonal communication skills, and practice-based learning are met, although they are more challenging to document. This problem is no different from that faced by ACGME-accredited residency programs and fellowships, who have also found it difficult to measure the competencies independently of one another in a meaningful way.

scholarly journals Empathy Can Be Taught, and Patients Teach it Best

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 238212052110003
Author(s):  
Sudhagar Thangarasu ◽  
Gowri Renganathan ◽  
Piruthiviraj Natarajan
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Role Modeling ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Mixed Messages ◽  
Attending Physicians ◽  
Medical Education Curriculum

Empathy toward patients is an essential skill for a physician to deliver the best care for any patient. Empathy also protects the physician from moral injury and decreases the chances for malpractice litigations. The current graduate medical education curriculum allows trainees to graduate without getting focused training to develop empathy as a core competency domain. The tools to measure empathy inherently lack validity. The accurate measure of the provider’s empathy comes from the patient’s perspectives of their experience and their feedback, which is rarely reaching the trainee. The hidden curriculum in residency programs gives mixed messages to trainees due to inadequate role modeling by attending physicians. This narrative style manuscript portrays a teachable moment at the bedside vividly. The teaching team together reflected upon the lack of empathy, took steps to resolve the issue. The attending demonstrated role modeling as an authentic and impactful technique to teach empathy. The conclusion includes a proposal to include the patient’s real-time feedback to trainees as an essential domain under Graduate Medical Education core competencies of professionalism and patient care.

scholarly journals Osteopathic students and graduates matching into pathology residency, 2011–2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
Ryan Philip Jajosky ◽  
Hannah C. Coulson ◽  
Abric J. Rosengrant ◽  
Audrey N. Jajosky ◽  
Philip G. Jajosky
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Accreditation System ◽  
Senior Year ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Past ◽  
Residency Match

Abstract Context In the past decade, two changes have affected the pathology residency match. First, the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) Match, which did not offer pathology residency, became accredited under a single graduate medical education (GME) system with the Main Residency Match (MRM), which offers pathology residency. Second, substantially fewer United States senior-year allopathic medical students (US MD seniors) matched into pathology residency. Objective To determine whether there were major changes in the number and percentage of osteopathic students and physicians (DOs) matching into pathology residency programs over the past decade. Methods Pathology match outcomes for DOs from 2011 to 2020 were obtained by reviewing AOA Match data from the National Matching Services and MRM data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). The number of DOs that filled pathology positions in the MRM was divided by the total number of pathology positions filled in the MRM to calculate the percentage of pathology positions taken by DOs. Results Over the past decade, there was a 109% increase in the total number of DOs matching into pathology residency (34 in 2011 vs. 71 in 2020). During this time, there was a 23.3% increase in the total number of pathology positions filled in the MRM (476 in 2011 vs. 587 in 2020). Thus, the percentage of pathology residency positions filled by DOs increased from 7.1% in 2011 to 12.1% in 2020. The substantial increase of DOs in pathology occurred simultaneously with a 94.2% increase in the total number of DOs filling AOA/MRM “postgraduate year 1” (PGY-1) positions (3201 in 2011 vs. 6215 in 2020). Thus, the percentage of DOs choosing pathology residency has remained steady (1.06% in 2011 and 1.14% in 2020). In 2020, pathology had the third lowest percentage of filled PGY-1 residency positions taken by DOs, out of 15 major medical specialties. Conclusion The proportion of DOs choosing pathology residency was stable from 2011 to 2020 despite the move to a single GME accreditation system and the stark decline in US MD seniors choosing pathology. In 2020, a slightly higher percentage of DOs (1.14%) chose pathology residency than US MD seniors (1.13%). Overall, DOs more often choose other medical specialties, including primary care. Additional studies are needed to determine why fewer US MD seniors, but not fewer DOs, are choosing pathology residency.

Current Models for Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultation in U.S. Residency Programs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. e171-e174
Author(s):  
Donna H. Kim ◽  
Dongseok Choi ◽  
Thomas S. Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Direct Supervision ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Residency Program Directors ◽  
Competency Assessments

Abstract Objective This article examines models of patient care and supervision for hospital-based ophthalmology consultation in teaching institutions. Design This is a cross-sectional survey. Methods An anonymous survey was distributed to residency program directors at 119 Accreditation Council for Graduated Medical Education accredited U.S. ophthalmology programs in the spring of 2018. Survey questions covered consult volume, rotational schedules of staffing providers, methods of supervision (direct vs. indirect), and utilization of consult-dedicated didactics and resident competency assessments. Results Of the 119 program directors, 48 (41%) completed the survey. Programs most frequently reported receiving 4 to 6 consults per day from the emergency department (27, 55.1%) and 4 to 6 consults per day from inpatient services (26, 53.1%). Forty-seven percent of programs reported that postgraduate year one (PGY-1) or PGY-2 residents on a dedicated consult rotation initially evaluate patients. Supervising faculty backgrounds included neuro-ophthalmology, cornea, comprehensive, or a designated chief of service. Staffing responsibility is typically shared by multiple faculty on a daily or weekly rotation. Direct supervision was provided for fewer of emergency room consults (1–30%) than for inpatient consults (71–99%). The majority of programs reported no dedicated didactics for consultation activities (27, 55.1%) or formal assessment for proficiency (33, 67.4%) prior to the initiation of call-related activities without direct supervision. Billing submission for consults was inconsistent and many consults may go financially uncompensated (18, 36.7%). Conclusion The majority of hospital-based ophthalmic consultation at academic centers is provided by a rotating pool of physicians supervising a lower level resident. Few programs validate increased levels of graduated independence using specific assessments.

scholarly journals A Descriptive Analysis of the Use of Twitter by Emergency Medicine Residency Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Diller ◽  
Lalena M. Yarris
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Instructional Tool ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
The Public ◽  
Twitter Account ◽  
E Mail

ABSTRACT Background  Twitter is increasingly recognized as an instructional tool by the emergency medicine (EM) community. In 2012, the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD) recommended that EM residency programs' Twitter accounts be managed solely by faculty. To date, little has been published regarding the patterns of Twitter use by EM residency programs. Objective  We analyzed current patterns in Twitter use among EM residency programs with accounts and assessed conformance with CORD recommendations. Methods  In this mixed methods study, a 6-question, anonymous survey was distributed via e-mail using SurveyMonkey. In addition, a Twitter-based search was conducted, and the public profiles of EM residency programs' Twitter accounts were analyzed. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed a qualitative analysis on the data. Results  Of 168 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited EM programs, 88 programs (52%) responded. Of those programs, 58% (51 of 88) reported having a program-level Twitter account. Residents served as content managers for those accounts in the majority of survey respondents (61%, 28 of 46). Most programs did not publicly disclose the identity or position of their Twitter content manager. We found a wide variety of applications for Twitter, with EM programs most frequently using Twitter for educational and promotional purposes. There is significant variability in the numbers of followers for EM programs' Twitter accounts. Conclusions  Applications and usage among EM residency programs are varied, and are frequently not consistent with current CORD recommendations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document