scholarly journals Cohesion is established during DNA replication utilising chromosome associated cohesin rings as well as those loaded de novo onto nascent DNAs

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhusudhan Srinivasan ◽  
Marco Fumasoni ◽  
Naomi J Petela ◽  
Andrew Murray ◽  
Kim A Nasmyth
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
De Novo ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Associated Proteins

Sister chromatid cohesion essential for mitotic chromosome segregation is thought to involve the co-entrapment of sister DNAs within cohesin rings. Although cohesin can load onto chromosomes throughout the cell cycle, it only builds cohesion during S phase. A key question is whether cohesion is generated by conversion of cohesin complexes associated with un-replicated DNAs ahead of replication forks into cohesive structures behind them, or from nucleoplasmic cohesin that is loaded de novo onto nascent DNAs associated with forks, a process that would be dependent on cohesin’s Scc2 subunit. We show here that in S. cerevisiae, both mechanisms exist and that each requires a different set of replisome-associated proteins. Cohesion produced by cohesin conversion requires Tof1/Csm3, Ctf4 and Chl1 but not Scc2 while that created by Scc2-dependent de novo loading at replication forks requires the Ctf18-RFC complex. The association of specific replisome proteins with different types of cohesion establishment opens the way to a mechanistic understanding of an aspect of DNA replication unique to eukaryotic cells.

scholarly journals The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bachant ◽  
Shannon R. Jessen ◽  
Sarah E. Kavanaugh ◽  
Candida S. Fielding
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Origin Of Replication ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore–spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.

scholarly journals DNA replication and spindle checkpoints cooperate during S phase to delay mitosis and preserve genome integrity

2014 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M. Magiera ◽  
Elisabeth Gueydon ◽  
Etienne Schwob
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Transient Activation ◽  
Spindle Checkpoints ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoints

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication and chromosome segregation must occur in ordered sequence to maintain genome integrity during cell proliferation. Checkpoint mechanisms delay mitosis when DNA is damaged or upon replication stress, but little is known on the coupling of S and M phases in unperturbed conditions. To address this issue, we postponed replication onset in budding yeast so that DNA synthesis is still underway when cells should enter mitosis. This delayed mitotic entry and progression by transient activation of the S phase, G2/M, and spindle assembly checkpoints. Disabling both Mec1/ATR- and Mad2-dependent controls caused lethality in cells with deferred S phase, accompanied by Rad52 foci and chromosome missegregation. Thus, in contrast to acute replication stress that triggers a sustained Mec1/ATR response, multiple pathways cooperate to restrain mitosis transiently when replication forks progress unhindered. We suggest that these surveillance mechanisms arose when both S and M phases were coincidently set into motion by a unique ancestral cyclin–Cdk1 complex.

scholarly journals Set1-dependent H3K4 methylation becomes critical for DNA replication fork progression in response to changes in S phase dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe de La Roche Saint-André ◽  
Vincent Géli
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
H3k4 Methylation ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Phase Dynamics

AbstractDNA replication is a highly regulated process that occurs in the context of chromatin structure and is sensitive to several histone post-translational modifications. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone methylase Set1 is responsible for the transcription-dependent deposition of H3K4 methylation (H3K4me) throughout the genome. Here we show that a combination of a hypomorphic replication mutation (orc5-1) with the absence of Set1 (set1Δ) compromises the progression through S phase, and this is associated with a large increase in DNA damage. The ensuing DNA damage checkpoint activation, in addition to that of the spindle assembly checkpoint, restricts the growth of orc5-1 set1Δ. Interestingly, orc5-1 set1Δ is sensitive to the lack of RNase H activity while a reduction of histone levels is able to counterbalance the loss of Set1. We propose that the recently described Set1-dependent mitigation of transcription-replication conflicts becomes critical for growth when the replication forks accelerate due to decreased origin firing in the orc5-1 background. Furthermore, we show that an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, likely a consequence of the elevated DNA damage, is partly responsible for the lethality in orc5-1 set1Δ.Author summaryDNA replication, that ensures the duplication of the genetic material, starts at discrete sites, termed origins, before proceeding at replication forks whose progression is carefully controlled in order to avoid conflicts with the transcription of genes. In eukaryotes, DNA replication occurs in the context of chromatin, a structure in which DNA is wrapped around proteins, called histones, that are subjected to various chemical modifications. Among them, the methylation of the lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4) is carried out by Set1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, specifically at transcribed genes. We report that, when the replication fork accelerates in response to a reduction of active origins, the absence of Set1 leads to accumulation of DNA damage. Because H3K4 methylation was recently shown to slow down replication at transcribed genes, we propose that the Set1-dependent becomes crucial to limit the occurrence of conflicts between replication and transcription caused by replication fork acceleration. In agreement with this model, stabilization of transcription-dependent structures or reduction histone levels, to limit replication fork velocity, respectively exacerbates or moderates the effect of Set1 loss. Last, but not least, we show that the oxidative stress associated to DNA damage is partly responsible for cell lethality.

scholarly journals A Coordinated Temporal Interplay of Nucleosome Reorganization Factor, Sister Chromatin Cohesion Factor, and DNA Polymerase α Facilitates DNA Replication

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 9568-9579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjiao Zhou ◽  
Teresa S.-F. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Replication Complex ◽  
Dna Polymerase Α ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Phase Progression

ABSTRACT DNA replication depends critically upon chromatin structure. Little is known about how the replication complex overcomes the nucleosome packages in chromatin during DNA replication. To address this question, we investigate factors that interact in vivo with the principal initiation DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase α (Polα). The catalytic subunit of budding yeast Polα (Pol1p) has been shown to associate in vitro with the Spt16p-Pob3p complex, a component of the nucleosome reorganization system required for both replication and transcription, and with a sister chromatid cohesion factor, Ctf4p. Here, we show that an N-terminal region of Polα (Pol1p) that is evolutionarily conserved among different species interacts with Spt16p-Pob3p and Ctf4p in vivo. A mutation in a glycine residue in this N-terminal region of POL1 compromises the ability of Pol1p to associate with Spt16p and alters the temporal ordered association of Ctf4p with Pol1p. The compromised association between the chromatin-reorganizing factor Spt16p and the initiating DNA polymerase Pol1p delays the Pol1p assembling onto and disassembling from the late-replicating origins and causes a slowdown of S-phase progression. Our results thus suggest that a coordinated temporal and spatial interplay between the conserved N-terminal region of the Polα protein and factors that are involved in reorganization of nucleosomes and promoting establishment of sister chromatin cohesion is required to facilitate S-phase progression.

scholarly journals Under-Replicated DNA: The Byproduct of Large Genomes?

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2764
Author(s):  
Agustina P. Bertolin ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann ◽  
Vanesa Gottifredi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Nuclear Bodies ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Higher Eukaryotes ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
Large Genomes

In this review, we provide an overview of how proliferating eukaryotic cells overcome one of the main threats to genome stability: incomplete genomic DNA replication during S phase. We discuss why it is currently accepted that double fork stalling (DFS) events are unavoidable events in higher eukaryotes with large genomes and which responses have evolved to cope with its main consequence: the presence of under-replicated DNA (UR-DNA) outside S phase. Particular emphasis is placed on the processes that constrain the detrimental effects of UR-DNA. We discuss how mitotic DNA synthesis (MiDAS), mitotic end joining events and 53BP1 nuclear bodies (53BP1-NBs) deal with such specific S phase DNA replication remnants during the subsequent phases of the cell cycle.

Organization of Chromosomal DNA by SMC Complexes

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 445-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislau Yatskevich ◽  
James Rhodes ◽  
Kim Nasmyth
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Chromosome Architecture ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Dna Translocases ◽  
Structural Maintenance Of Chromosomes

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes are key organizers of chromosome architecture in all kingdoms of life. Despite seemingly divergent functions, such as chromosome segregation, chromosome maintenance, sister chromatid cohesion, and mitotic chromosome compaction, it appears that these complexes function via highly conserved mechanisms and that they represent a novel class of DNA translocases.

scholarly journals Quantitative Cytogenetics Reveals Molecular Stoichiometry and Longitudinal Organization of Meiotic Chromosome Axes and Loops

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Woglar ◽  
Kei Yamaya ◽  
Baptiste Roelens ◽  
Alistair Boettiger ◽  
Simone Köhler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
S Phase ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Molecular Bases ◽  
Chromosome Axis ◽  
Specialized Organization

ABSTRACTDuring meiosis, chromosomes adopt a specialized organization involving assembly of a cohesin-based axis along their lengths, with DNA loops emanating from this axis. We applied novel, quantitative and widely applicable cytogenetic strategies to elucidate the molecular bases of this organization using C. elegans. Analyses of WT chromosomes and de novo circular mini-chromosomes revealed that meiosis-specific HORMA-domain proteins assemble into cohorts in defined numbers and co-organize the axis together with two functionally-distinct cohesin complexes (REC-8 and COH-3/4) in defined stoichiometry. We further found that REC-8 cohesins, which load during S phase and mediate sister chromatid cohesion, usually occur as individual complexes, supporting a model wherein sister cohesion is mediated locally by a single cohesin ring. REC-8 complexes are interspersed in an alternating pattern with cohorts of axis-organizing COH-3/4 complexes (averaging three per cohort), which are insufficient to confer cohesion but can bind to individual chromatids, suggesting a mechanism to enable formation of asymmetric sister chromatid loops. Indeed, immuno-FISH assays demonstrate frequent asymmetry in genomic content between the loops formed on sister chromatids. We discuss how features of chromosome axis/loop architecture inferred from our data can help to explain enigmatic, yet essential, aspects of the meiotic program.

scholarly journals Scc2-mediated loading of cohesin onto chromosomes in G1 yeast cells is insufficient to build cohesion during S phase

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim A Nasmyth
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
De Novo ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Previous Conclusion ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cohesin Subunit

SummarySister chromatids are held together from their replication until mitosis. Sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by the ring-shaped cohesin complex and it is thought that cohesin holds sister chromatids together by entrapping sister DNAs within the cohesin ring (Haering et al., 2008). However, how this occurs is not well understood. Because cohesin binds to DNA prior to replication it is possible that the replication fork passes through the lumen of the ring thereby placing replicated sisters inside cohesin rings. If this is the case, loading of cohesin in the G1 phase may be sufficient to build cohesion.We show here that Scc2, a cohesin subunit required for loading cohesin onto chromosomes de novo, is necessary for establishment of cohesion even after Scc2-mediated loading has already taken place during late G1 or early S phase. Our results challenge a previous conclusion based on related experiments whereby Scc2 was found not to be required for cohesion establishment during S phase (Lengronne et al., 2006).

scholarly journals Assembly and regulation of γ-tubulin complexes

Open Biology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 170266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorian Farache ◽  
Laurent Emorine ◽  
Laurence Haren ◽  
Andreas Merdes
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Intracellular Transport ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Cellular Structures ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Multiprotein Complexes ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Centres ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Ring Complexes

Microtubules are major constituents of the cytoskeleton in all eukaryotic cells. They are essential for chromosome segregation during cell division, for directional intracellular transport and for building specialized cellular structures such as cilia or flagella. Their assembly has to be controlled spatially and temporally. For this, the cell uses multiprotein complexes containing γ-tubulin. γ-Tubulin has been found in two different types of complexes, γ-tubulin small complexes and γ-tubulin ring complexes. Binding to adaptors and activator proteins transforms these complexes into structural templates that drive the nucleation of new microtubules in a highly controlled manner. This review discusses recent advances on the mechanisms of assembly, recruitment and activation of γ-tubulin complexes at microtubule-organizing centres.

scholarly journals Mitotic replisome disassembly in vertebrates

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Priego Moreno ◽  
Rebecca M. Jones ◽  
Divyasree Poovathumkadavil ◽  
Agnieszka Gambus
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Replicative Helicase ◽  
Egg Extract ◽  
Eukaryotic Dna ◽  
Higher Eukaryotes

ABSTRACTRecent years have brought a breakthrough in our understanding of the process of eukaryotic DNA replication termination. We have shown that the process of replication machinery (replisome) disassembly at the termination of DNA replication forks in S-phase of the cell cycle is driven through polyubiquitylation of one of the replicative helicase subunits Mcm7. Our previous work in C.elegans embryos suggested also an existence of a back-up pathway of replisome disassembly in mitosis. Here we show, that in Xenopus laevis egg extract, any replisome retained on chromatin after S-phase is indeed removed from chromatin in mitosis. This mitotic disassembly pathway depends on formation of K6 and K63 ubiquitin chains on Mcm7 by TRAIP ubiquitin ligase and activity of p97/VCP protein segregase. The mitotic replisome pathway is therefore conserved through evolution in higher eukaryotes. However, unlike in lower eukaryotes it does not require SUMO modifications. This process can also remove any helicases from chromatin, including “active” stalled ones, indicating a much wider application of this pathway than just a “back-up” for terminated helicases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document