scholarly journals Little Smoky Woodland Caribou Calf Survival Enhancement Project

Rangifer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirkby G. Smith ◽  
Lois Pittaway
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Landscape Change ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
Pregnant Females ◽  
The Past ◽  
West Central ◽  
Calf Survival ◽  
In Captivity

The Little Smoky woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus) herd is a boreal ecotype located in west central Alberta, Canada. This herd has declined steadily over the past decade and is currently thought to number approximately 80 animals. Factors contributing to the herds' decline appear related to elevated predator-caused mortality rates resulting from industrial caused landscape change. At current rates of decline, the herd is at risk of extirpation. A calf survival enhancement project was initiated in the first half of 2006 as a means of enhancing recruitment while other longer-term approaches were implemented. A total of 10 pregnant females were captured in early March and held in captivity until all calves were at least 3 weeks old. Before release, calves were radiocollared with expandable drop-off collars. Following release, survival of mother and offspring were tracked at intervals until the fall rut. Survival of penned calves was compared to "wild-born" calves at heel of non captive radiocollared females. This approach is compared to other techniques designed to increase recruitment in caribou.

scholarly journals Winter distribution of woodland caribou in relation to clear-cut logging in west-central Alberta

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (8) ◽  
pp. 1433-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirby G Smith ◽  
E Janet Ficht ◽  
David Hobson ◽  
Troy C Sorensen ◽  
David Hervieux
Keyword(s):  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Timber Harvest ◽  
Timber Harvesting ◽  
Home Range Size ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
Daily Movement ◽  
Movement Rates ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Winter Range ◽  
West Central

The responses of a herd of migratory woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) to timber harvesting that fragmented about 11% of their winter range in west-central Alberta were examined in this study. From 1981 to 1996, 45 caribou were radio-collared and monitored during the initiation and completion of first-pass timber harvest (50% removal). Variables examined were home-range size, daily movement rates, and distance to the nearest cut block for radio-collared individuals. Daily movement rates and individual winter range sizes decreased as timber harvesting progressed. Caribou avoided using recently fragmented areas by an average of 1.2 km. If fragmentation of the winter range continues through timber harvesting and other industrial activities, the "spacing out" antipredator strategy used by caribou may be compromised. Based on these findings, timber-harvesting strategies are recommended that (i) ensure an adequate area of usable habitat to support the current population, (ii) minimize the amount of fragmented area, and (iii) in the short term avoid presently defined core use areas.

Population status, distribution, and movements of woodland caribou in west central Alberta

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 817-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Janet Edmonds
Keyword(s):  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Adult Mortality ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Status ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
Winter Range ◽  
West Central ◽  
The Face ◽  
Two Populations ◽  
Maximum Estimate

Twenty-four woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in the mountains and foothills of west central Alberta were radio collared to obtain information on seasonal movements, location and extent of seasonal ranges, rutting and calving areas, and population status. The study was conducted from December 1979 to June 1984 (fall composition surveys continued to 1986). Two populations of woodland caribou resided in the foothills winter range: a migratory mountain variety that moved west to the mountains in spring and returned in fall, and a more sedentary woodland variety that remained year round in the forested foothills. Calving and rutting grounds of the two populations were widely separated (minimum of 60 km). The mountain population ranged over a much larger area (11 000 km2) than the woodland population (4000 km2). Woodland caribou were fewer (maximum estimate 50) than the mountain caribou (maximum estimate 200). Population sex–age structure of the mountain caribou population, based on six surveys during the rut (October), averaged 54 males: 100 females: 27 calves (15% calves). Annual minimum adult mortality was 22% for the mountain and woodland populations, and both populations appeared to be declining. Predation, primarily by wolves, was strongly implicated in adult mortality, but causes of calf mortality were not determined. Human-caused mortality was an additional factor. Intensive management is required to ensure the viability of these caribou populations in the face of increasing industrial and recreational development. A short-term wolf reduction program and long-term public education, law enforcement, and habitat protection programs are recommended.

Dynamics of woodland caribou populations at the southern limit of their range in Saskatchewan

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
W James Rettie ◽  
François Messier
Keyword(s):  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Ursus Americanus ◽  
Road Construction ◽  
Black Bear ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
Southern Limit ◽  
Disjunct Populations ◽  
Calf Survival ◽  
Proximate Causes

Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in central Saskatchewan are aggregated into several spatially disjunct populations. Historical data indicate that some local populations were eliminated and that the regional metapopulation declined during the 1970s. Proximate causes of decline may have included hunting, severe winter weather, and the end of predator control, though the ultimate causes may relate to road construction and logging activity, which expanded after 1966. There has been no sport hunting since 1987, yet the caribou populations in the region appear to be declining. Based on serum progesterone levels, first conception by females occurred at 16 months and the overall pregnancy rate was 94%, and in addition the minimum parturition rate was 86%, all of which indicate adequate nutrition. The annual survival rate of adults was 84%, which is comparatively low, though similar to results from other studies on woodland caribou. We observed a low rate of calf recruitment (28 calves : 100 cows), which we suspect was due to predation. Wolves (Canis lupus) have long been thought to limit woodland caribou populations while subsisting on other ungulate prey, but we speculate that black bear (Ursus americanus) predation may be an important cause of poor calf survival.

scholarly journals The West Central Alberta Woodland Caribou Landscape Plan: Using a Modeling Approach to Develop Alternative Scenarios

Rangifer ◽  
2011 ◽  
pp. 103-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Hubbs ◽  
Piotr Weclaw ◽  
Michael Sullivan ◽  
Nicole McCutchen
Keyword(s):  
Cervus Elaphus ◽  
Habitat Management ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
Fire Control ◽  
The West ◽  
Old Growth ◽  
West Central ◽  
Alternative Scenarios

Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus) are classified as threatened in Alberta. In support of Canada's Species at Risk Act, a Recovery Plan for Woodland Caribou in Alberta was completed in 2004 which required local implementation plans to be completed within 5 areas of the province. The West Central Alberta Caribou Landscape Plan (WCCLP) is the first of these to be initiated and it addresses the recovery strategies for 4 herds. Two aspatial computer models built on the STELLA© modelling platform (ISee Systems, 2007) were used to assist the planning team in evaluating cumulative effects and alternative scenarios for caribou conservation. The ALCES© (Forem Technologies 2008) modelling tool was used to forecast potential changes in the west central Alberta landscape over time. Yearly landscape condition outputs from ALCES© were then exported into a caribou-specific population model, REMUS© (Weclaw, 2004), that was used to project potential population responses by woodland caribou, other primary prey species [moose (Alces alces), elk (Cervus elaphus) and deer (Odocoileus sp.)] and wolves (Canis lupus) (Weclaw & Hudson, 2004). Simulated habitat management strategies that resulted in the highest likelihood of caribou recovery included the maintenance of a high proportion of old forest, the aggregation of industrial footprints and the reclamation of historic seismic lines (although the latter took decades to provide real dividends). Sharing of industrial roads, protection of fragments of old-growth, and expanding an already aggressive fire control strategy in Alberta had little additional effect on caribou recovery. Simulated population management strategies that were successful all involved decades of intensive wolf control, either directly or indirectly through intensive primary prey control (with the exception of woodland caribou) until old-growth forests recovered to densities that provided caribou habitat and decreased alternate prey of wolves. Although this modelling approach makes broad assumptions, it provides simple fundamental relationships that were useful in a multi-stakeholder team setting when evaluating the efficacy of different management strategies for the conservation of woodland caribou.

scholarly journals The diet of woodland caribou populations in west-central Alberta

Rangifer ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Thomas ◽  
E. Janet Edmonds ◽  
W. Kent Brown
Keyword(s):  
Rocky Mountains ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus Caribou ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
West Central ◽  
Conifer Needles ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Conservation And Management ◽  
Salix Spp

The diet of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) populations in the foothills and Rocky Mountains of west-central Alberta was estimated by microhistological analyses of feces collected in winter and summer. In winter, terrestrial lichens averaged 60-83% of fecal fragment densities in both areas. In the mountains, decreasing proportions of terrestrial lichens and increasing proportions of conifer needles and moss indicated decreasing accessibility of forage because of deeper/harder snow. Apparent diets in summer were dominated by Salix spp., sedges, and lichens. However, forb inflorescences and stems were largely undetected by the microhistological technique and results for summer samples must be interpreted accordingly. We conclude that the conservation and management of forest ecotypes of caribou must include options of lichen-rich habitats as a major component of management plans.

scholarly journals The status of Rangifer tarandus caribou in Yukon, Canada

Rangifer ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 131 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Farnell ◽  
R. Florkiewicz ◽  
G. Kuzyk ◽  
K. Egli
Keyword(s):  
Human Activities ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Population Trends ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus Caribou ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
Systematic Monitoring ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Status ◽  
Spread Of Agriculture

This paper summarizes the population trends as well as research and management programs for woodland caribou {Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Yukon. Most herds are stable although not all are counted regularly and systematic monitoring of herds remains an essential need. Over the past decade the Southern Lakes, Aishihik, and Finlayson herds have been well studied and provide valuable models for guiding Yukon management programs. Over harvest and the spread of agriculture, forestry and mining are ongoing human activities are of concern to caribou managers.

Post-glacial recolonization of insular Newfoundland across the Strait of Belle Isle gave rise to an endemic subspecies of woodland caribou, Rangifer tarandus terranovae (Bangs, 1896): evidence from mtDNA haplotypes

Genome ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 575-585
Author(s):  
Corinne D. Wilkerson ◽  
Shane P. Mahoney ◽  
Steven M. Carr
Keyword(s):  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Early 20Th Century ◽  
Founder Effects ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
Mitochondrial Dna Control Region ◽  
The Past ◽  
Basal Clade ◽  
Hierarchical Amova ◽  
Mtdna Diversity ◽  
Avalon Peninsula

Post-glacial origins of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus subsp.) on the island of Newfoundland and their relationship to mainland populations have been uncertain. Sequence analysis of 2223 bp of the mitochondrial DNA control region and cytochrome b gene from 233 Newfoundland caribou identified 32 haplotypes in four major clades. Comparison with other Nearctic caribou confirms a closer affinity of the basal Clade A with animals from the mainland, and as an outgroup to Clades B, C, and D that are endemic to the island. This indicates re-entry of caribou to post-glacial Newfoundland across the Strait of Belle Isle from Labrador, rather than from southern coastal refugia. Newfoundland caribou are a distinct subspecies, Rangifer tarandus terranovae (Bangs, 1896). Hierarchical AMOVA shows significant clinal differentiation of the major clades from northwest to southeast across the island. The isolated Avalon Peninsula population in the extreme southeast is genetically depauperate. Founder effects are evident in herds introduced to previously unoccupied areas by wildlife managers over the past 40–50 years. Reindeer introduced in the early 20th century have not contributed to mtDNA diversity in Newfoundland caribou.

scholarly journals Woodland caribou population decline in Alberta: fact or fiction?

Rangifer ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J.A. Bradshaw ◽  
Daryll M. Hebert
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Management ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Population Decline ◽  
Population Fluctuations ◽  
Woodland Caribou ◽  
Subsistence Hunting ◽  
The Past ◽  
Adequate Information ◽  
Aboriginal Subsistence

We re-assessed the view of a major woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) population decline in Alberta. Several historical publications and provincial documents refer to this drastic decline as the major premise for the designation of Alberta's woodland caribou an endangered species. In the past, wildlife management and inventory techniques were speculative and limited by a lack of technology, access and funding. The accepted trend of the decline is based on many speculations, opinions and misinterpretation of data and is unsubstantiated. Many aerial surveys failed to reduce variance and did not estimate sightability. Most surveys have underestimated numbers and contributed unreliable data to support a decline. Through forest fire protection and the presence of extensive wetlands, the majority of potential caribou habitat still exists. Recreational and aboriginal subsistence hunting does not appear to have contributed greatly to mortality, although data are insufficient for reliable conclusions. Wolf (Canis lupus), population fluctuations are inconclusive and do not provide adequate information on which to base prey population trends. The incidence of documented infection by parasites in Alberta is low and likely unimportant as a cause of the proposed decline.

Track 2.b Introduction: Design & Democracy

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Virginia TASSINARI ◽  
Ezio MANZINI ◽  
Maurizio TELI ◽  
Liesbeth HUYBRECHTS
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Core Theme ◽  
The Past ◽  
Noam Chomsky ◽  
Local Contexts ◽  
Democratic Discourse ◽  
Different Parts

The issue of design and democracy is an urgent and rather controversial one. Democracy has always been a core theme in design research, but in the past years it has shifted in meaning. The current discourse in design research that has been working in a participatory way on common issues in given local contexts, has developed an enhanced focus on rethinking democracy. This is the topic of some recent design conferences, such PDC2018, Nordes2017 and DRS2018, and of the DESIS Philosophy Talk #6 “Regenerating Democracy?” (www.desis-philosophytalks.org), from which this track originates. To reflect on the role and responsibility of designers in a time where democracy in its various forms is often put at risk seems an urgent matter to us. The concern for the ways in which the democratic discourse is put at risk in many different parts of the word is registered outside the design community (for instance by philosophers such as Noam Chomsky), as well as within (see for instance Manzini’s and Margolin’s call Design Stand Up (http://www.democracy-design.org). Therefore, the need to articulate a discussion on this difficult matter, and to find a common vocabulary we can share to talk about it. One of the difficulties encountered for instance when discussing this issue, is that the word “democracy” is understood in different ways, in relation to the traditions and contexts in which it is framed. Philosophically speaking, there are diverse discourses on democracy that currently inspire design researchers and theorists, such as Arendt, Dewey, Negri and Hardt, Schmitt, Mouffe, Rancière, Agamben, Rawls, Habermas, Latour, Gramsci, whose positions on this topic are very diverse. How can these authors guide us to further articulate this discussion? In which ways can these philosophers support and enrich design’s innovation discourses on design and democracy, and guide our thinking in addressing sensitive and yet timely questions, such as what design can do in what seems to be dark times for democracy, and whether design can possibly contribute to enrich the current democratic ecosystems, making them more strong and resilient?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document