scholarly journals EGFR mutation status yield from bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma compared to a venous blood sample and tissue biopsy

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11448
Author(s):  
Nikolay Yanev ◽  
Evgeni Mekov ◽  
Dinko Valev ◽  
Georgi Yankov ◽  
Vladimir Milanov ◽  
...  

Background In recent years, there has been a revolution in the genomic profiling and molecular typing of lung cancer. A key oncogene is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The gold standard for determining EGFR mutation status is tissue biopsy, where a histological specimen is taken by a bronchoscopic or surgical method (transbronchial biopsy, forceps biopsy, etc.). However, in clinical practice the tissue sample is often insufficient for morphological and molecular analysis. Bronchoalveolar lavage is a validated diagnostic method for pathogenic infections in the lower respiratory tract, yet its diagnostic value for oncogenic mutation testing in lung cancer has not been extensively investigated. This study aims to compare the prevalence of EGFR mutation status in bronchoalveolar lavage and peripheral blood referring to the gold standard - tissue biopsy in patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Twenty-six patients with adenocarcinoma were examined for EGFR mutation from tissue biopsy, peripheral blood sample and bronchoalveolar lavage. Results Thirteen patients had wild type EGFR and the other 13 had EGFR mutation. EGFR mutation from a peripheral blood sample was identified in 38.5% (5/13) of patients, whereas EGFR mutation obtained from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was identified in 92.3% (12/13). This study demonstrates that a liquid biopsy sample for EGFR status from BAL has a higher sensitivity compared to a venous blood sample.


2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
T. Aper ◽  
A. Schmidt ◽  
M. Duchrow ◽  
H.-P. Bruch


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 7290.2010.00004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Noor Tantawy ◽  
Todd E. Peterson


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 691-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiamma Buttitta ◽  
Lara Felicioni ◽  
Maela Del Grammastro ◽  
Giampaolo Filice ◽  
Alessia Di Lorito ◽  
...  


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e035632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Hopkins ◽  
Quique Bassat ◽  
Clare IR Chandler ◽  
John A Crump ◽  
Nicholas A Feasey ◽  
...  

IntroductionFever commonly leads to healthcare seeking and hospital admission in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. There is only limited guidance for clinicians managing non-malarial fevers, which often results in inappropriate treatment for patients. Furthermore, there is little evidence for estimates of disease burden, or to guide empirical therapy, control measures, resource allocation, prioritisation of clinical diagnostics or antimicrobial stewardship. The Febrile Illness Evaluation in a Broad Range of Endemicities (FIEBRE) study seeks to address these information gaps.Methods and analysisFIEBRE investigates febrile illness in paediatric and adult outpatients and inpatients using standardised clinical, laboratory and social science protocols over a minimum 12-month period at five sites in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeastern and Southern Asia. Patients presenting with fever are enrolled and provide clinical data, pharyngeal swabs and a venous blood sample; selected participants also provide a urine sample. Laboratory assessments target infections that are treatable and/or preventable. Selected point-of-care tests, as well as blood and urine cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, are performed on site. On day 28, patients provide a second venous blood sample for serology and information on clinical outcome. Further diagnostic assays are performed at international reference laboratories. Blood and pharyngeal samples from matched community controls enable calculation of AFs, and surveys of treatment seeking allow estimation of the incidence of common infections. Additional assays detect markers that may differentiate bacterial from non-bacterial causes of illness and/or prognosticate illness severity. Social science research on antimicrobial use will inform future recommendations for fever case management. Residual samples from participants are stored for future use.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from all relevant institutional and national committees; written informed consent is obtained from all participants or parents/guardians. Final results will be shared with participating communities, and in open-access journals and other scientific fora. Study documents are available online (https://doi.org/10.17037/PUBS.04652739).



2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hao Geng ◽  
Dongdong Tang ◽  
Chuan Xu ◽  
Xiaojin He ◽  
Zhiguo Zhang

Background. Split-hand/foot malformation (SHFM) is a severe congenital disability mainly characterized by the absence or hypoplasia of the central ray of the hand/foot. To date, several candidate genes associated with SHFM have been identified, including TP63, DLX5, DLX6, FGFR1, and WNT10B. Herein, we report a novel variant of TP63 heterozygously present in affected members of a family with SHFM. Methods. This study investigated a Chinese family, in which the proband and his son suffered from SHFM. The peripheral blood sample of the proband was used to perform whole-exome sequencing (WES) to explore the possible genetic causes of this disease. Postsequencing bioinformatic analyses and Sanger sequencing were conducted to verify the identified variants and parental origins on all family members in the pedigree. Results. By postsequencing bioinformatic analyses and Sanger sequencing, we identified a novel missense variant (NM_003722.4:c.948G>A; p.Met316Ile) of TP63 in this family that results in a substitution of methionine with isoleucine, which is probably associated with the occurrence of SHFM. Conclusion. A novel missense variant (NM_003722.4:c.948G>A; p.Met316Ile) of TP63 in SHFM was thus identified, which may enlarge the spectrum of known TP63 variants and also provide new approaches for genetic counselling of families with SHFM.



2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 665-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Mollaoglu ◽  
Eleftherios Vairaktaris ◽  
Emeka Nkenke ◽  
Friedrich W. Neukam ◽  
Jutta Ries


Author(s):  
Swathy Srinivasan ◽  
Rani P. Reddi

GDM is defined as any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. The prevalence of GDM varies, widely based on the diagnostic criteria used and the ethnic group studied. It is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcome. Incidence of GDM in India is 1-14%. There are several screening and diagnostic tests for GDM. It is important to diagnose early and treat to prevent these complications. The present study was done to compare Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) with International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for diagnosis of GDM and to assess the validity of these methods.Methods: It was a cross sectional study done in 144 pregnant women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They underwent non - fasting OGTT with 75 grams glucose which was given irrespective of the last meal. A venous blood sample was drawn two hours after glucose administration. They were advised to come two to three days later and repeated with 75 grams OGTT after an overnight fast of atleast 8 hours. Venous blood sample was drawn at fasting, one hour and two hours after load with 75 grams of glucose. Plasma glucose was measured by using an autoanalyzer by glucose - oxidase peroxidase (GOD - POD) technique.Results: The epidemiological parameters like Age, BMI, Parity and Gestational age did not have any difference between two groups. 17.4% was diagnosed by DIPSI criteria and 15.3% was diagnosed by IADPSG criteria and 6.9% was diagnosed by both. Sensitivity and specificity of DIPSI was 45% and87% and sensitivity and specificity of IADPSG was 40% and89% respectively. According to kappa statistics, the p-value is 0.000.Conclusions: In present study it was concluded that screening is very essential in all pregnant women due to high prevalence of GDM in India. By comparing these two criteria, sensitivity of DIPSI was found better than IADPSG criteria in diagnosing GDM. Though IADPSG is universally accepted for diagnosis, DIPSI has still got a place in low resource countries as it is easy, cost effective and non fasting test.





Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5208-5208
Author(s):  
Tatiana Tvrdik ◽  
Kristian T. Schafernak ◽  
Jeffrey R Jacobsen ◽  
Reha Toydemir ◽  
Alexandra M Walsh ◽  
...  

Constitutional ring chromosome 21, r(21)c, is a rare chromosome abnormality associated with variable clinical features that range from mild dysmorphism to severe congenital anomalies and intellectual disability. Recently, r(21)c has been reported to predispose to B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21), a distinct subgroup of high-risk pediatric B-ALL. Only a few iAMP21-B-ALL cases with r(21)c have been reported to date. The mechanism of leukemogenesis of r(21)c has not been entirely elucidated. Here we report an 11-year-old boy with iAMP21-B-ALL carrying an atypical r(21)c. The patient has a history of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, sensorineural hearing loss s/p cochlear implant, intellectual disability and scoliosis. Three months before admission he developed a soft tissue nodule on the occipital scalp deemed to possibly represent an enlarged lymph node. Subsequently, he presented with spontaneous bruising followed by severe epistaxis. The initial CBC showed a white blood cell count of 4.3K/uL with circulating blasts, absolute neutropenia, profound normocytic normochromic anemia (hemoglobin of 5.2 g/dL), and marked thrombocytopenia (platelets, 12K/uL ). Peripheral blood flow cytometry showed 17.9% phenotypically abnormal B lymphoblasts which were negative for CD45, and positive for CD34, nuclear TdT, CD19, CD22, CD79a, CD10, HLA-DR , as well as CD20 (21% positive). The bone marrow aspirate contained 98% blasts. CNS status was 2a (RBC 0, WBC 0, 8% blasts) and clear after the second lumbar puncture. Fine-needle aspiration of the scalp mass demonstrated B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. The patient was treated per COG protocol AALL1131 and was assigned to the very high-risk arm when bone marrow interphase FISH showed iAMP21. The chromosome analysis failed to yield metaphase cells on the diagnostic bone marrow sample. A concurrent genomic microarray showed chromothripsis with multiple non-contiguous losses and high copy gains on 21q involving the RUNX1 gene, as well as mosaic deletions within 7q22.3q36.3, 9p24.3p24.1 (including JAK2), 12q12 (several exons of ARID2), 13q14.2q21.2 (RB1, DLEU1/2/7, miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster), 14q32.33 (IGH locus), 19p13.2 (several exons of the SMARCA4), and mosaic gains within 3q22.3q29 and Xp22.33p11.3. Day 29 end of induction bone marrow examination was positive for minimal residual disease (MRD) at 0.13% of nucleated mononuclear cells, but FISH was negative for iAMP21. On day 57 of consolidation, the bone marrow was negative for both MRD and iAMP21. However, chromosome analysis on both of these follow-up studies showed an abnormal chromosome 21. Chromosome analysis on peripheral blood lymphocytes confirmed the presence of a constitutional r(21). A subsequent genomic microarray analysis on peripheral blood sample did not show chromothripsis observed in the diagnostic bone marrow sample, but showed a 4.7 Mb terminal deletion and two interstitial deletions (3.0 Mb and 5.5 Mb) on the long arm of chromosome 21. These findings are consistent with a r(21) with interstitial deletions, which is likely responsible for the congenital anomalies reported in this patient. iAMP21 is associated with a poor outcome in B-ALL. Accurate detection of iAMP21 is critical for risk stratification and treatment in B-ALL. The strong association between iAMP21 and r(21)c has been proposed based on previous studies on r(21)c carriers with iAMP21-ALL. Our data further support an increased risk of developing iAMP21-ALL in carriers of constitutional r(21) and demonstrate the value of intensive treatment on iAMP21-B-ALL. The r(21) observed in this patient contains a relatively larger (4.7 Mb) terminal deletion along with two additional interstitial deletions. Due to the scarcity of r(21)c, the pathogenetic mechanisms of this leukemic process is not fully understood, and the clinical significance of loss of additional genetic content is unknown. More case reports are needed to generate more comprehensive clinical and genetic profile for this high risk ALL. Figure 1. Genomic microarray findings on diagnostic bone marrow sample (top) and the follow up peripheral blood sample (bottom). Chromothripsis and amplification were observed only in the diagnostic bone marrow specimen, whereas the peripheral blood sample in remission showed two interstitial and a terminal deletion. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document