clinical reason
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

15
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Sara Fonseca ◽  

Abnormal red blood cell indices are frequently missed among newborns that perform blood tests for any clinical reason.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-197
Author(s):  
Sergiu Vacaras ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

The present study investigated the capacity of Suprathel® (a copolymer membrane, so far validated for skin regeneration) to also regenerate oral tissue – mucosa and bone, by comparing this biomaterial, in a split-mouth rabbit model, to Mucoderm®, a xenogeneic collagen matrix certified for keratinized oral mucosa healing. The clinical reason behind this experimental animal model was to determine whether the benefits of this advanced skin regeneration product (Suprathel®) could be conveyed for future evaluation in clinical trials of oral tissue regeneration in humans. The outcomes of this study validated the use of Suprathel®, a terpolymer of polylactide with trimethylene carbonate and ε-caprolactone, for stimulation of oral epithelium and alveolar bone regeneration in rabbits. Both Suprathel® and Mucoderm® exhibited comparable results and the null hypothesis stating a comparable regenerating effect of these two materials could not be rejected.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob N. Blackwell ◽  
Jessica Keim-Malpass ◽  
Matthew T. Clark ◽  
Rebecca L. Kowalski ◽  
Salim N. Najjar ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesEarly detection of subacute potentially catastrophic illnesses using available data is a clinical imperative, and scores that report risk of imminent events in real time abound. Patients deteriorate for a variety of reasons, and it is unlikely that a single predictor such as an abnormal National Early Warning Score (NEWS) will detect all of them equally well. The objective of this study was to test the idea that the diversity of reasons for clinical deterioration leading to ICU transfer mandates multiple targeted predictive models.DesignIndividual chart review to determine the clinical reason for ICU transfer; determination of relative risks of individual vital signs, lab tests and cardiorespiratory monitoring measures for prediction of each clinical reason for ICU transfer; logistic regression modeling for the outcome of ICU transfer for a specific clinical reason.SettingCardiac medical-surgical ward; tertiary care academic hospital.Patients8111 adult patients, 457 of whom were transferred to an ICU for clinical deterioration.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsWe calculated the contributing relative risks of individual vital signs, lab tests and cardiorespiratory monitoring measures for prediction of each clinical reason for ICU transfer, and used logistic regression modeling to calculate ROC areas and relative risks for the outcome of ICU transfer for a specific clinical reason. The reasons for clinical deterioration leading to ICU transfer were varied, as were their predictors. For example, the three most common reasons – respiratory instability, infection and suspected sepsis, and heart failure requiring escalated therapy – had distinct signatures of illness. Statistical models trained to target specific reasons for ICU transfer performed better than one model targeting combined events, and both performed better than the untrained NEWS score.Conclusions and relevanceA single predictive model for clinical deterioration does not perform as well as having multiple models trained for the individual specific clinical events leading to ICU transfer.


BMJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. l729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Mariathas ◽  
Rick Allan ◽  
Sanjay Ramamoorthy ◽  
Bartosz Olechowski ◽  
Jonathan Hinton ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the distribution, and specifically the true 99th centile, of high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) for a whole hospital population by applying the hs-cTnI assay currently used routinely at a large teaching hospital.DesignProspective, observational cohort study.SettingUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom, between 29 June 2017 and 24 August 2017.Participants20 000 consecutive inpatients and outpatients undergoing blood tests for any clinical reason. Hs-cTnI concentrations were measured in all study participants and nested for analysis except when the supervising doctor had requested hs-cTnI for clinical reasons.Main outcome measuresDistribution of hs-cTnI concentrations of all study participants and specifically the 99th centile.ResultsThe 99th centile of hs-cTnI for the whole population was 296 ng/L compared with the manufacturer’s quoted level of 40 ng/L (currently used clinically as the upper limit of normal; ULN). Hs-cTnI concentrations were greater than 40 ng/L in one in 20 (5.4%, n=1080) of the total population. After excluding participants diagnosed as having acute myocardial infarction (n=122) and those in whom hs-cTnI was requested for clinical reasons (n=1707), the 99th centile was 189 ng/L for the remainder (n=18 171). The 99th centile was 563 ng/L for inpatients (n=4759) and 65 ng/L for outpatients (n=9280). Patients from the emergency department (n=3706) had a 99th centile of 215 ng/L, with 6.07% (n=225) greater than the recommended ULN. 39.02% (n=48) of all patients from the critical care units (n=123) and 14.16% (n=67) of all medical inpatients had an hs-cTnI concentration greater than the recommended ULN.ConclusionsOf 20 000 consecutive patients undergoing a blood test for any clinical reason at our hospital, one in 20 had an hs-cTnI greater than the recommended ULN. These data highlight the need for clinical staff to interpret hs-cTnI concentrations carefully, particularly when applying the recommended ULN to diagnose acute myocardial infarction, in order to avoid misdiagnosis in the absence of an appropriate clinical presentation.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.govNCT03047785.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 402-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Black ◽  
Henry Nasrallah ◽  
Stuart Isaacson ◽  
Mark Stacy ◽  
Rajesh Pahwa ◽  
...  

Patients with Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP) are often treated with an atypical antipsychotic, especially quetiapine or clozapine, but side effects, lack of sufficient efficacy, or both may motivate a switch to pimavanserin, the first medication approved for management of PDP. How best to implement a switch to pimavanserin has not been clear, as there are no controlled trials or case series in the literature to provide guidance. An abrupt switch may interrupt partially effective treatment or potentially trigger rebound effects from antipsychotic withdrawal, whereas cross-taper involves potential drug interactions. A panel of experts drew from published data, their experience treating PDP, lessons from switching antipsychotic drugs in other populations, and the pharmacology of the relevant drugs, to establish consensus recommendations. The panel concluded that patients with PDP can be safely and effectively switched from atypical antipsychotics used off label in PDP to the recently approved pimavanserin by considering each agent’s pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, receptor interactions, and the clinical reason for switching (efficacy or adverse events). Final recommendations are that such a switch should aim to maintain adequate 5-HT2A antagonism during the switch, thus providing a stable transition so that efficacy is maintained. Specifically, the consensus recommendation is to add pimavanserin at the full recommended daily dose (34 mg) for 2–6 weeks in most patients before beginning to taper and discontinue quetiapine or clozapine over several days to weeks. Further details are provided for this recommendation, as well as for special clinical circumstances where switching may need to proceed more rapidly.


CJEM ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 206-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan L. Jensen ◽  
Andrew H. Travers ◽  
Darrell J. Bardua ◽  
Thomas Dobson ◽  
Bruce Cox ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: Long-term care (LTC) patients are often sent to emergency departments (EDs) by ambulance. In this novel extended care paramedic (ECP) program, specially trained paramedics manage LTC patients on site. The objective of this pilot study was to describe the dispatch and disposition of LTC patients treated by ECPs and emergency paramedics. Methods: Data were collected from consecutive calls to 15 participating LTC facilities for 3 months. Dispatch determinants, transport rates, and relapse rates were described for LTC patients attended by ECPs or emergency paramedics. ECP involvement in end-of-life care was identified. Results: Of 238 eligible calls, 140 (59%) were attended by an ECP and 98 (41%) by emergency paramedics. Although the top three determinants were the same in each group, the overall distribution of dispatch determinants and acuity differed. In the ECP cohort, 98 of 140 (70%) were treated and released, 33 of 140 (24%) had “facilitated transfer” arranged by an ECP, and 9 of 140 (6%) were immediately transported to the ED by ambulance. In the emergency paramedic cohort, 77 of 98 (79%) were immediately transported to the ED and 21 of 98 (21%) were not transported. In the ECP group, 6 of 98 (6%) patients not transported triggered a 911 call within 48 hours for a related clinical reason, although none of the patients not transported by emergency paramedics relapsed. Conclusion: ECP involvement in LTC calls was found to reduce transports to the ED with a low rate of relapse. These pilot data generated hypotheses for future study, including determination of appropriate populations for ECP care and analysis of appropriate and safe nontransport.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
Richard J. Parkinson ◽  
T.J. Walton ◽  
R.J. Lemberger

Testicular ultrasound is a non-invasive and accurate investigation for testicular abnormalities. However, the majority of testicular problems are amenable to diagnosis by clinical examination alone. Testicular USS requests and reports generated over an 18-month period (03/2006 to 09/2007) at Nottingham City Hospital were examined to determine the indication for the test and the ultrasound findings. 2475 scans were performed: 576 were requested by urologists; 1899 by GPs and other hospital specialists. The most common findings were a completely normal scan (825) and epididymal cyst (637). In the majority of cases, the ultrasound scan was not necessary to make a diagnosis and added nothing to the findings at clinical examination. Correlations of ultrasound findings with the clinical reason for the test are presented in order to suggest suitable indications for this investigation. The total cost of testicular scans performed was around £200,000. It is estimated that at least £130,000 per year could be saved in a single hospital by avoiding unnecessary testicular scans. However, where the clinical findings are equivocal, ultrasound remains an excellent diagnostic tool.


2007 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Absalom D. Hepner ◽  
Mastaneh Ahmadi-Kashani ◽  
Mohammad-Reza Movahed

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamta Agarwal ◽  
Patricia Clinard ◽  
John M. Burkart

Objective To determine the clinical experience of using combined-modality [simultaneous hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD)] treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease. Design We reviewed data on 4 patients from our center that were treated with “combined-mode therapy.” We then conducted a retrospective survey by sending questionnaires to nephrologists in the US and Canada by mail and by posting the survey on the Internet. Data queried included number of patients on combined modality, solute clearances, albumin levels pre and post combined therapy, reasons for using combined therapy, duration and success of combined therapy, and reimbursement issues. Setting and Participants Ours is a tertiary-care center. Patients that were not doing well on PD alone were put on combined modality of treatment between 1992 and 1998. Main Outcome Measures Clinical improvement in the indication for which the participant was started on combined modality. Results In response to the survey, data on 27 patients were collected. These data were combined with data on 4 patients from our unit that had previously been treated with combined HD and PD. Most patients were reported to have more than one clinical reason for changing from PD to combined therapy. The main clinical reason for offering combined treatments was inadequate solute clearance (34%), followed by ultrafiltration problems (16%) and neuropathy (11%). Mean duration of time followed on combined treatment was 8.5 ± 0.12 months. Most patients tolerated combined treatment well and were reported to show improvement in the clinical reasons for which they needed the combined modality. Dual access and reimbursement issues were not a problem. There was no single method used for calculating total (HD, PD, and residual renal) solute clearance. No universal total solute clearance goal was reported. Conclusion Hemodialysis and PD are not mutually exclusive. They can be used in combination to achieve targeted solute clearances, to improve certain clinical conditions, and to control volume and blood pressure in a subset of patients. Further evaluation is needed to better establish the long-term outcomes of using combined modality. Total solute clearance goals and methods for determining total solute clearance need to be standardized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document