aluminum specimen
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

53
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Clement A. Idiapho ◽  
Sani I. Awwal ◽  
Udosoh N. Emmaunel

This research was undertaken to determine the effects of corrosion on material performance using mild steel and Aluminum as selected material in seawater media. The result from the experiment showed higher corrosion rate in uncoated mild steel coupon as higher corrosion rate ranges from 0.0494 mmpy, 0.0565 mmpy, and 0.0656 mmpy was evident, while a reduction in corrosion rate from 0.0369mmpy, 0.0432 mmpy and 0.0452mmpy was observed in the fourth week, fifth week and sixth week. Corrosion rate for coated mild steel ranges from 0.0396 mmpy in the first week and reduces to 0.0333 mmpy and continually reduces to 0.0206 mmpy in the sixth week. From the hardness testing device using MITECH 320, uncoated Mild steel metal specimen gave an average Brinell hardness reading of 112 before immersion and 105 after immersion to seawater. Also, the tensile strength of the uncoated mild steel specimen deteriorated from 414 Mpa before immersion to 403Mpa after immersion to seawater media. Also, uncoated Aluminum specimen gave a brinell average reading of 163 before immersion and 152 after immersion to the seawater media. Likewise, the tensile strength result of the aluminum specimen gave 776M pa before immersion and 744 Mpa after immersion to the seawater media. The overall result from weight loss technique and metal hardness using MITECH 320 showed aluminum metal is more resistive to corrosion attack.


Author(s):  
Wisdom Opare ◽  
Can Kang ◽  
Xiao Wei ◽  
Haixia Liu ◽  
Hualu Wang

To investigate the response of material to cavitation erosion, a comparative work was carried out on three materials, aluminum, copper alloy and titanium. Ultrasonic cavitation erosion was produced as the specimen was submerged in the deionized water. Within a cavitation erosion period of 120 min, the cumulative mass loss was measured at certain time intervals. Surface structure and cavitation damage patterns were observed for the three materials. Microhardness was measured and compared. The results indicate that the cumulative mass loss of aluminum is the highest among the three materials, while the slightest material removal is associated with titanium, which is still in the initial stage of cavitation erosion after 120 min of cavitation erosion. The surface of the aluminum specimen is eroded rapidly after the cavitation erosion commences. Large erosion pits dominate the eroded surface as the cavitation erosion progresses. The surface of the titanium specimen manifests needle-like erosion pits and cleavage cracks. Even at the later stage of the cavitation erosion, non-eroded surface elements are identifiable. The cavitation erosion pattern on the copper alloy specimen surface is related to the twin-phase crystal structure and large erosion pits are produced at the later stage of cavitation erosion. The highest resistance to the cavitation erosion of titanium is related to the close-packed hexagonal structure and the weak slip effect associated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 11008
Author(s):  
Carl H. Wolf ◽  
Andreas Burgold ◽  
Sebastian Henkel ◽  
Meinhard Kuna ◽  
Horst Biermann

The aim of this study is to propose a simplified calculation of the Mode I stress intensity factor K for the cruciform specimen design proposed by Brown and Miller. To calculate K, both cracks have to grow with a similar crack growth rate and the crack paths of the two single cracks with the length a should also be similar. The calculations are carried out on an aluminum specimen and a steel specimen. For all load cases and materials, the stresses resulting from the forces are first considered. It was found that the elastic constants E and ν have only a small influence of less than 3 %. In addition, the coupling between the forces of the load axes, which should be minimized by the slotted arms, is considered. Furthermore K-factors are calculated by FE for different crack lengths. These K-values together with the transmission factor allow to find a K-factor formula for cruciform specimens, which is based on the prescribed forces. Finally, the results of the FE calculation of the exact straight crack paths were compared to experimentally determined crack paths.


Author(s):  
M. Ruiz-Andrés ◽  
A. Conde ◽  
J. de Damborenea ◽  
I. García

The investigated slow sliding speeds presented in this work enable the understanding of the wear behavior on aluminum alloys and could possibly facilitate the completion of the previously proposed wear mechanism map for aluminum at this slow sliding speed range. Dry sliding block-on-ring wear tests were carried out on aluminum alloys, AA5754 (Al-Mg), AA6082 (Al-Mg-Si), and AA7075 (Al-Zn-Cu), at a very slow sliding speed range (<0.01 m/s). A bearing steel ring of AISI 52100 was used as the counterbody. Tests were performed at varying contact pressures, 20, 100, and 140 MPa, and sliding speeds ranging from 0.001 to 1.5 m/s. The wear tracks and debris collected were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD), with the aim of analyzing their morphology and composition. At relatively slow sliding speeds (>0.01 m/s), the specimens exhibited a wear process placed at the mild wear regime, characterized by oxidation and delamination mechanisms of both the aluminum specimen and the steel ring. However, at very slow speed range (<0.01 m/s), an increase in the wear rate and the friction coefficient is observed for all of the aluminum alloys, thus suggesting that an alternative wear mechanism could be taking place.


Metals ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester D’Accardi ◽  
Davide Palumbo ◽  
Rosanna Tamborrino ◽  
Umberto Galietti

Pulsed thermography is commonly used as a non-destructive technique for evaluating defects within materials and components. In the last few years, many algorithms have been developed with the aim to detect defects and different methods have been used for detecting their size and depth. However, only few works in the literature reported a comparison among the different algorithms in terms of the number of detected defects, the time spent in testing and analysis, and the quantitative evaluation of size and depth. In this work, starting from a pulsed thermographic test carried out on an aluminum specimen with twenty flat bottom holes of known nominal size and depth, different algorithms have been used with the aim to obtain a comparison among them in terms of signal to background contrast (SBC) and number of detected defects by analyzing different time intervals. Moreover, the correlation between SBC and the aspect ratio of the defects has been investigated. The algorithms used have been: Pulsed Phase Thermography (PPT), Slope, Correlation Coefficient (R2), Thermal Signal Reconstruction (TSR) and Principal Component Thermography (PCT). The results showed the advantages, disadvantages, and sensitivity of the various thermographic algorithms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 913 ◽  
pp. 636-641
Author(s):  
Rong Guang Jia ◽  
Chong Hong Zhang ◽  
Xin Fu ◽  
Tong Da Ma

CBED and EELS are most common methods to determine the thickness of the TEM specimen. In this work, specimen thickness of He-ion irradiated Al is measured respectively by CBED and EELS under 200kV. The helium concentration and the atomic displacement damage level are 2000appm and 0.2dpa, respectively. The CBED results show that the measurements of extinction distance match the calculations of effective extinction distance considering the deviation vector of the crystal. Moreover, it is proven by modeling analysis that He-ion irradiation does not affect the thickness measurements of extinction distance. Compared with CBED, the specimen thickness, measured by EELS, is larger, and may be attributed to the decrease of the zero-loss peak due to a part of elastic scattering electronsloss and the larger inelastic scattering mean free path selected. The EELS measurement error is less than 20%,consistent with the accuracy (about 20%) byK. Iakoubovskiiet al.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (0) ◽  
pp. OS0725
Author(s):  
Kohei FUKUCHI ◽  
Ken-ichi OHGUCHI ◽  
Takayuki OHMORI ◽  
Kengo KUROSAWA ◽  
Yorimasa THUBOTA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document