Problem Behaviors of Children from Multicultural and Mono-cultural Families in Korea: Differences in Behavior Evaluations between Parents and Teachers

In recent years, multicultural families are increasing in Korea. In such multicultural families, there may be language and interpersonal difficulties that affect the children. Given the possibility of real problems affecting academics and the potential for bias, the perceptions of parents and teachers is of vital importance. In this study, parents' and teachers’evaluations of problem behaviors of 405 elementary school students were collected on the Korean Child Behavior Checklist and the Korean Teacher's Report Form. Studies have shown that parents in multicultural families tend to rate their children's problems more seriously than in mono cultural families in the areas of Withdrawal/Depressed, Attention Problems, and Rule-Breaking Behaviors.Teachers rated boys from multicultural families as more problematic with Withdrawal/Depressed, Attention Problems, Rule-Breaking Behaviors, and overall scores than boys from monocultural families. Parents tended to take their child's problematic behaviors more seriously than teachers.In general, younger students were found to be more vulnerable to behavioral problems. This may indicate that an intervention is needed to help the children acculturate.

Structural validation of the “Teacher’s report form” attention problems scale in a Brazilian sample

Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is one of the most common childhood neurodevelopmental syndromes. Although clinical evaluation is considered the gold standard in diagnosing psychiatric disorders, in epidemiological studies, this evaluation is rarely used for practical and financial reasons. Instead, psychometric instruments are used to screen for the disorders. In this case, it is essential to investigate whether these instruments are suitable for measuring the proposed problem. This study aims to verify the structural validation of the Attention Problems Scale of the Teacher’s Report Form (TRF). Methods A random sample of 445 TRF filled out by the teacher of children from São Gonçalo/RJ was selected. The confirmatory factor analysis was applied to validate some factor structures that have been raised in the literature. A second aspect analyzed was the use of structural equation models to verify the validated factorial structure’s relationship with some comorbidities. Results The bifactor model was the most suitable to explain the TRF child’s Attention Problems Scale’s factor structure. It presented the best-fit quality scores for confirmatory factor analysis than other tested structures. Although it presented good indicators for structural validity, some symptoms could be reassessed to have a more consistent instrument. The bifactor model as an explanatory structure in SEM was able to predict important mental health outcomes. These results are an additional validation to the bifactor model. Conclusions The results suggest the validity of the TRF’s Attention Problems Scale. The instrument’s factor structure was also appropriate because it corroborated most of the association’s assumptions between subtypes of attention problems and other aspects of mental health. The existence of screening scales adapted to Brazilian Portuguese can substantially impact many children who have difficulty learning. Also, the screening scales can be a useful tool for the health sector to facilitate referral to the professional to make the diagnosis.

ROC Analyses of Relevant Conners 3–Short Forms, CBCL, and TRF Scales for Screening ADHD and ODD

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to examine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Conners 3–Parent Short Form (C 3-P(S)), and the Conners 3–Teacher Short Form (C 3-T(S)) inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity scales, and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Teacher’s Report Form (TRF) attention problems scales, to distinguish those with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It also examined and compared the diagnostic accuracy of the C 3-P(S) and C 3-T(S) Aggression (AG) scales, and the CBCL and TRF Aggressive Behavior (AB) scales, to distinguish those with and without oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). The study used archival data ( N = 150-261) involving a large group of clinic-referred children aged between 6 and 11 years who had been interviewed for clinical diagnosis of ADHD and ODD using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADISC-IV) as the reference standard, and then administered one or more of the screening measures. The findings provided empirical support for the use of the C 3-P(S) and CBCL for identifying ADHD and ODD, with the CBCL aggressive behavior scale having better ability to detect ODD. The implications of the findings for using the screening scales for diagnoses of ADHD and ODD are discussed.

Low levels of morning salivary α-amylase activity predict higher number of depressive symptoms in a community sample of children

<p>Models of the etiology of depressive disorders suggest that the onset of a depressive episode is the result of a complex phenomenon based on the interaction between genetic background, critical environmental factors such as life stressors and traumatic events, and the effects of neuroendocrine changes associated with the stress response. Numerous studies have highlighted the usefulness of morning cortisol (C) as a potential predictor of depressive episodes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of C, salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) activity/output, and the sAA/C ratio in predicting depressive symptoms in a community sample of 99 children aged 8-11 years old. Two saliva samples were obtained in the morning on two different school days. Teachers described their pupils' behavior by using the internalizing problems scales of the <em>Teacher’s Report Form</em> (TRF) questionnaire. Our results indicate that, regardless of gender, the best predictor of depressive/withdrawal scores and overall internalizing scores on the TRF was lower mean morning levels of sAA activity. Hence, sAA could be proposed as a biological marker for the risk of developing a first episode of depressive illness in child samples. </p>

Relation between Early Over- and Undertreatment and Behavioural Problems in Preadolescent Children with Congenital Hypothyroidism

Objective: Congenital hypothyroidism (CH) per se, when not treated or undertreated, may lead to severe behavioural problems (cretinism), whereas overtreatment of CH seems associated with attention problems. Design and Methods: For 55 CH patients, prospectively followed from birth until 11 years, parents rated the Child Behaviour Checklist and teachers the Teacher’s Report Form at children’s ages 6 and 11 years. We related scores regarding Attention, Delinquency, and Aggression (ADA scores, indicative for attention deficit hyperactivity syndrome, ADHD), and scores regarding Withdrawn, Anxious, Social, and Thought problems (WAST scores, indicative for autism) to the occurrence of over- and undertreatment in five age periods. Over- and undertreatment were defined as free thyroxine (fT4) concentrations above/below the range of the patient’s individual fT4 steady state concentration. Results: ADA scores at 6 and 11 years for patients overtreated in the period 1–3 months postnatally were higher than those for patients who were not overtreated. Patients with severe CH undertreated in the period 3–6 months postnatally had higher WAST scores at 6 and 11 years than all other patients. Conclusions: This is the first study suggesting that permanent ADHD as well as autism in CH patients at ages 6 and 11 years are the result of early overtreatment and undertreatment, respectively.

Association between child maltreatment indicators and developmental problems in early childhood education

Introdução: a experiência de maus tratos constitui-se em um importante fator de risco ao desenvolvimento humano, a curto e longo prazo. Objetivo: caracterizar uma amostra de crianças em início de escolarização quanto à presença de indicadores de maus tratos infantis e à de problemas emocionais e comportamentais e verificar a associação entre essas variáveis. Métodos: a amostra (n = 40) foi composta por todas as crianças do 1º ano de uma escola municipal cujos pais/responsáveis autorizaram, e seus respectivos professores (n = 6). Para a coleta de dados empregou-se o Inventário de Frases no Diagnóstico de Violência Doméstica contra Crianças e Adolescentes (IFVD) e o Teacher’s Report Form (TRF). Procedeu-se a análises descritivas e inferenciais. Resultados: a pontuação média no IFVD foi de 17,82, fora da faixa de risco, segundo as normas do instrumento. Porém, 30% da amostra obtiveram escore superior a 23, o preconizado para suspeitar de maus tratos. Com isso, estabeleceu-se 2 grupos para a comparação no TRF (crianças suspeitas de serem maltratadas/ crianças sem suspeita). Verificou-se diferenças significativas em Total de Problemas e em Problemas Internalizantes, ainda que em termos médios os dois grupos tenham apresentado performances em níveis normais, em todos os subitens. Conclusão: crianças apresentando indicadores de maus tratos apresentaram também indicadores de depressão e ansiedade, ainda que em níveis não clínicos, corroborando outros estudos. Deve-se, entretanto, considerar que a amostra formada por conveniência pode ter introduzido um viés no tocante à severidade/gravidade dos maus tratos abarcados no estudo. Outros estudos, com amostras maiores e mais diversificadas, devem ser realizados.

Die Effektivität des Trainings mit aggressiven Kindern im Rahmen einer Hochschulambulanz

Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Wirksamkeit des „Trainings mit aggressiven Kindern” im Rahmen einer psychotherapeutischen Hochschulambulanz zu untersuchen. 22 aggressive Kinder (19 Jungen, 3 Mädchen) zwischen sechs und zwölf Jahren (M 9;8 Jahre, SD 1.85), die die Diagnosekriterien der Störungen des Sozialverhaltens nach ICD-10 erfüllten, wurden von ihren Eltern und Lehrern vor Beginn und nach Abschluss des Trainings eingeschätzt. Im Prätest-Posttest-Vergleich ließen sich deutliche Besserungen in den externalisierenden Störungen mit der Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) belegen. Anhand des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) wurde eine Verringerung in den Verhaltensauffälligkeiten, der Gesamtproblembelastung und auch in der hyperaktiven Symptomatik nachgewiesen. Die Lehrereinschätzungen, die sich auf eine reduzierte Stichprobe von 16 Kindern bezogen, bestätigten nur in der Teacher‘s Report Form (TRF) eine Abnahme von aggressivem Verhalten. Weder Eltern noch Lehrkräfte gaben eine Verbesserung des prosozialen Verhaltens an. Insgesamt bestätigen die Ergebnisse die Wirksamkeit des Trainings primär in der Verminderung aggressiven Verhaltens.