scholarly journals Dietary risk factors for the development of inflammatory polyarthritis: Evidence for a role of high level of red meat consumption

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 3804-3812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy J. Pattison ◽  
Deborah P. M. Symmons ◽  
Mark Lunt ◽  
Ailsa Welch ◽  
Robert Luben ◽  
...  
1992 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 614-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNE SCHUCHAT ◽  
KATHERINE A. DEAVER ◽  
JAY D. WENGER ◽  
BRIAN D. PLIKAYTIS ◽  
LAURENE MASCOLA ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. T158-T159
Author(s):  
Frederic Calon ◽  
Carl Julien ◽  
Cyntia Tremblay ◽  
Alix Phivilay ◽  
Lyne Berthiaume ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahab Khatibzadeh ◽  
Renata Micha ◽  
Ashkan Afshin ◽  
Mayuree Rao ◽  
Mohammad Y Yakoob ◽  
...  

Background: Diet habits contribute to development of CVD and diabetes. Estimating the impact of diet on these diseases requires identification and quantification of causal effects of dietary factors. Objectives: To assess major dietary risk factors for CVD and diabetes, evaluate current evidence for causal effects, and identify the best unbiased effect estimates on risk. Methods: For multiple dietary risk factors, we evaluated WHO and similar criteria as part of the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) study to assess probable or convincing evidence for causal effects, including consistency, dose-response, plausibility, and temporality. We performed systematic searches of online databases from 2008 to 2011, including hand-searches of references and author contacts, to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of well-designed observational or interventional studies. Meta-analyses were evaluated based on number of studies, design, definition of diet factors and outcomes, sample size, number of events, length of follow-up, statistical methods, evidence of bias, and control for confounders. Meta-analyses with largest numbers of studies and events and least evidence for bias were identified. Effect sizes and uncertainty were quantified per defined units of exposure, including pooling of categorical dose-response estimates using fixed-effects generalized least squares for trend estimation (GLST). Results: We identified 15 dietary risk factors having probable or convincing evidence of causal effects on CVD or diabetes. For 13, data were identified to provide the best pooled unbiased effect size on disease (Table). Conclusions: This systematic evaluation provides the best evidence-based quantitative estimates of the effects of major dietary factors on CVD and diabetes. These findings enable estimation of quantitative impacts on diseases burdens of suboptimal intakes of these factors in specific populations, and also highlight gaps in knowledge related to causality or effect sizes of other dietary factors.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Lewandowska ◽  
Grzegorz Rudzki ◽  
Tomasz Lewandowski ◽  
Aleksandra Stryjkowska-Góra ◽  
Sławomir Rudzki

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC), defined as cancer of the colon or rectum, is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers, and, according to the World Health Organisation database GLOBOCAN, it accounts for about 1.4 million new diagnoses annually worldwide. There is an association between the occurrence of colorectal cancer and non-modifiable risk factors, including age and hereditary factors, as well as with modifiable factors linked to the environment and lifestyle choices.Methods: The study included 800 patients, 400 diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 400 within the control group. The research was based on a clinical, direct, individual, structured, in-depth and focused interview. Assessment of activity and BMI was used according to WHO recommendations, as well as the expert system.Results: The average age of the patients was 64.53 ± 8.86 years, of the control group I - 59.64 ± 9.33 and the control group II - 57.5 (7.83). The association between the incidence of ulcerative colitis and the risk of colorectal cancer was clearly positive (p<0.001). Among obese subjects, the colorectal cancer risk was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.06-1.53) in comparison with non-obese subjects. The relative risk for current smokers was 2.17 (95% CI 1.79-2.66). Higher fat consumption and higher red meat consumption were also associated with the higher risk of colorectal cancer (p=0.01).Conclusions: Obesity, low physical activity, active and passive smoking and high salt and red meat consumption have been linked to a higher risk of colorectal cancer. The results give further evidence of the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document